Business models as drivers of the low carbon power system transition: a multi-level perspective
Introduction
The electrical power system holds a central role in meeting emission targets for climate change mitigation. In order to keep global mean temperature rise within 1.5–2 °C relative to pre-industrial levels, as recommended by the IPCC and restated in the 2015 UNFCCC Paris Agreement (IPCC, 2013, UNFCCC, 2015), feasible energy transformation pathways – developed with Integrative Assessment Models – require significant reduction in energy intensity (i.e. efficiency), a radical electrification of the energy system, and a fast decarbonisation of the electricity sector (Kriegler et al., 2014, Rogelj et al., 2015). But considering that electricity corresponds to just 18% of total energy consumption, and 67% of its primary source is fossil based (IEA, 2014), this scenario requires a challenging technological and systemic revolution in this sector. This shift is not occurring at the speed required: wide scale renewable energy technologies and carbon-saving innovations have faced significant resistance when attempting system-wide diffusion (Bumpus et al., 2014, Geels, 2014). Resistance comes from a complex structure of actors mostly centered around fossil fuel incumbent firms that have been locked into sustaining carbon intensive business models (BMs) (Dangerman and Schellnhuber, 2013, Unruh, 2000).
Recent increases in electricity prices, reduction in renewable technology manufacturing costs, and government clean energy incentives, are, however, producing opportunities for cleantech entrepreneurs and new BMs (Frankel et al., 2014, Huijben and Verbong, 2013). The result is yielding increased incorporation of distributed energy resources (DER) such as photovoltaics, smart meters, stationary batteries and electric vehicles. DERs are helping change the essential paradigm in the electricity sector of industrialized nations, evolving from a traditional value chain to a more complex participatory network (Klose et al., 2010). This tendency is expected to further accelerate in coming years (Frei, 2008, Schleicher-Tappeser, 2012). Furthermore, since conventional utility BMs were not designed to tap the most value from distributed renewable generation, they are a current locus of destabilization and thus experimentation, innovation and emerging opportunities (eLAB, 2013, Richter, 2012, Schoettl and Lehmann-Ortega, 2011b).
The dynamics in the transition between old and new power system BMs involves tensions between incumbent and new business actors, a centralized versus a distributed technological paradigm, and a societal shift from a passive to an active user role in its value chain. Some industrialized nations with an ongoing energy transition are showing early signs worth noting. Large incumbent utilities are forced to reconfigure their BM (Jeevan Vasagar, 2015, Richter, 2013a) whilst new distributed energy corporations are achieving financial scale with competitive BMs (Biello, 2014, Hess, 2013). In parallel, modern markets are hosting BMs with increased customer participation, both through collective value creation through peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms (Andersson, 2013, Belk, 2014), and through socially active initiatives such as grassroots innovations and for-benefit firms (Hess, 2013, Seyfang et al., 2014). Collectively, these dynamics may present windows of opportunities to destabilize the rigid foundations of the current carbon lock-in and accelerate the inertia towards a low carbon power system. This paper discusses the relevance of these systemic signals by considering BMs as a critical unit of analysis, and provides specific illustrative examples for a qualitative characterization of these emerging tendencies.
This article adopts a sociotechnical framework for its analysis. It recognizes the transformation required in the power sector does not only involve a change in technology, but also a system level shift in elements such as user practices, regulations, industrial networks, markets and infrastructure (Geels, 2002, Verbong and Geels, 2010). Specifically, the multi-level perspective (MLP) on sociotechnical transitions has been a useful approach to understand the changes and tensions at different societal levels, including those between new and incumbent actors and innovations, which give rise to new technological systems (Grin et al., 2010). However, the specific role BMs have on these interactions has largely been left out of the literature (Geels, 2011). This is surprising given BMs are ‘value creation engines’ (Zott et al., 2011), devices for competitive advantage, both for incumbents ensuring their locked-in trajectory, and for new actors commercializing new technologies in novel ways. We highlight here how BMs, rather than commercialized technology per se, can become disruptive niche innovations.
We perform an analysis combining BM theory and the MLP to better understand critical business dynamics in the current landscape of modern power systems. We illustrate our observations by focusing on BM dynamics in illustrative examples of niche and regime business actors. With this work, we seek to address whether BM tensions and innovative BM initiatives are acting as disruptive forces on the barriers of the low carbon transition. We also intend to contribute to an emerging literature linking BM and sociotechnical transitions (Bidmon and Knab, 2014, Huijben and Verbong, 2013, Loorbach and Wijsman, 2013, Tongur and Engwall, 2014). The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides the background literature, theoretical framework and relevance, Section 3 presents a characterization of tendencies in the power system transition using the BM and MLP framework, Section 4 provides the illustrative examples to further elaborate on these tendencies, and Section 5 concludes and discusses further research.
Section snippets
Methodological approach
We undertake a qualitative analysis to answer our research questions. Firstly we review the literature to bring business model theory and the multilevel perspective together (Boons and Lüdeke-Freund, 2013, Geels, 2011). Then we undertake a qualitative analysis of three examples of how this theoretical development is played out in reality. Given the complexity of energy systems and the emerging nature of DERs, these are not representative case studies, but rather illustrative examples to
The ongoing power system transition
This section provides a background analysis on the systemic changes occurring in the power sector, and then uses the framework established in the previous section to characterize the role BM dynamics are having in this ongoing process.
Power system business models and the multilevel perspective: illustrative examples
This section presents and discusses three illustrative examples of transition-relevant BM using the MLP and the 9-point BM decomposition. The main BM-elements are summarized in Table 1.
Conclusions
International negotiations to establish stricter climate targets and foster national energy transition projects may foster new investments and reductions in technology costs. However, our analysis suggests that BMs need to be considered as a critical aspect in the acceleration of this process and should be attended to accordingly. A positive feedback can be traced between disruptive BM innovation and the disrupted incumbent BM; a dynamic that can drive sociotechnical transitions.
We have shown
References (165)
- et al.
Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: a review
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2013) - et al.
Business models as models
Long Range Plan.
(2010) - et al.
Some things old, some things new: the spatial representations and politics of change of the peak oil relocalisation movement
Geoforum
(2010) You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online
J. Bus. Res.
(2014)- et al.
A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes
J. Clean. Prod.
(2014) - et al.
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
J. Clean. Prod.
(2013) - et al.
Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview
J. Clean. Prod.
(2013) Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-Service systems: insights from innovation studies and companies' experiences
J. Clean. Prod.
(2013)Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers
Long Range Plan.
(2010)- et al.
The merit order effect of wind and photovoltaic electricity generation in Germany 2008–2016 estimation and distributional implications
Energy Econ.
(2014)
What if…? Utility vision 2020
Energy Policy
Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services
Energy Policy
Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study
Res. Policy
From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems
Res. Policy
The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms
Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit.
A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies
J. Transp. Geogr.
Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management
Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks
J. Business Res
A novel business model for aggregating the values of electricity storage
Energy Policy
Industrial fields and countervailing power: the transformation of distributed solar energy in the United States
Glob. Environ. Change Hum. Policy Dimens.
The market value of variable renewables: the effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price
Energy Econ.
Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in the Netherlands
Energy Policy
Innovation process of new ventures driven by sustainability
J. Clean. Prod.
Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions
J. Clean. Prod.
The rise of community wind power in Japan: enhanced acceptance through social innovation
Energy Policy
Retrospective modeling of the merit-order effect on wholesale electricity prices from distributed photovoltaic generation in the Australian National electricity market
Energy Policy
Collaborative entrepreneurship:: a business model for continuous innovation
Organ. Dyn.
The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective
J. Bus. Res.
Development of Renewable Energy Sources in Germany 2014, Charts and Figures Based on Statistical Data from the Working Group on Renewable Energy-statistics (AGEE-stat), as at February 2015
AGL Annual Report 2015
Value creation in e-business
Strateg. Manag. J.
Peer-to-peer service sharing platforms: driving dhare and dhare alike on a mass-scale
P2P and human evolution: peer to peer as the premise of a new mode of civilization
. Ensaio, rascunho
The political economy of peer production
CTheory
Class and capital in peer production
Cap. Cl.
The Pathway to New Market Structures for the Success of the Energy Transition (Energiewende)
The three roles of business models for socio-technical transitions
Fight over Rooftop Solar Forecasts a Bright Future for Cleaner Energy
Community Wind Power Ownership Schemes in Europe and Their Relevance to the United States
What's Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live
Carbon Governance, Climate Change and Business Transformation
Your Digital Afterlife: when Facebook, Flickr and Twitter Are Your Estate, What's Your Legacy?
Responses to disruptive strategic innovation
MIT Sloan Manag. Rev.
Want to invest a few hundred bucks in a solar project? Mosaic opens crowdfunding platform
Wall Str. J. WSJ
Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore
Strategy Leadersh.
Cited by (124)
From kilowatts to cents: Financial inclusion of citizens through Dutch community energy business model configurations
2023, Energy Research and Social ScienceThe electricity market in Brazil: A multilevel perspective of sector agents for liberalization to residential consumers
2023, Energy for Sustainable DevelopmentValuing carbon quota assets of power generation companies based on Lasso-Back propagation neural network
2023, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewDegrowth-oriented organisational value creation: A systematic literature review of case studies
2023, Ecological Economics