Elsevier

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume 142, Part 4, 20 January 2017, Pages 3872-3882
Journal of Cleaner Production

Handling financial resource mobilisation in technological innovation systems - The case of chinese wind power

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.075Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Chinese wind power has a track record of rapid and large-scale deployment.

  • However, around 2012 the Chinese wind power industry faced a slowdown.

  • The article analyse how system dynamics affect mobilisation of financial resources.

  • Innovation system external trends also affect mobilisation of financial resources.

Abstract

To mitigate climate change, a rapid and large-scale expansion of sustainable innovations such as renewable energy technologies is crucial. China's track record of wind power development shows both speed and scale that can provide valuable knowledge of how to stimulate and maintain transformation of energy systems. The growth was made possible partly by ample access to financial capital. However, the rapid growth also led to growing pains and made the industry face increasing financial constraints. While these constraints partly relate to structures and trends that are external to the wind power innovation system, they were also a consequence of the particular path taken in Chinese wind power development. The case demonstrates that if a full-fledged industry is to be developed and sustained, a balanced growth is required and all innovation system functions need due attention, sooner or later. Conceptually, the article contributes by further exploring how mobilisation of financial resources affect and is affected by overall system dynamics.

Introduction

To curb climate change a radical transformation of energy systems is required within a few decades, involving a rapid and large-scale growth of industries based on sustainable innovations (IPCC, 2014). The development of wind power in China is an exceptional example of a fast and large-scale development of a novel industry, which can provide vital knowledge of how to stimulate and maintain transformation of energy systems.

The development of wind power in China has taken place in an environment of extraordinary economic expansion as the gross domestic product has increased by about 10% per year for three decades in a row. Only Taiwan and South Korea have previously shown similar growth rates (Eklund, 2012).1 In parallel, annual primary energy use increased from about 2000 TWh in 1970 to more than 30 000 TWh in 2012. Coal dominates energy supply, covering almost 70% (BP, 2013).2 However in the last decade, China has also shown an impressive development of renewable energy. Investment in these technologies increased from 32 billion CNY in 2005 to 410 billion CNY in 2012 and is taking the lead globally (PEW, 2013).3

Wind power production in China increased from negligible levels in the beginning of the 1990s to 100 TWh in 2012, corresponding to almost 20% of the global wind electricity output (BP, 2013). Supportive government policies and the opportunity to transfer technology from abroad are often pointed to as reasons for the success of wind power development in China (see, for example, Liu and Kokko, 2010, Kang et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012, Lewis, 2013 and Zhang et al. (2013)). However, while still generating only about 1% of electricity supply (BP, 2013), the pace of development showed signs of slowdown around 2010–2012. One reason for this slowdown was financial constraints experienced by turbine manufacturers and utilities that develop wind power projects (Qiao, 2012, GWEC, 2013, Ming et al., 2014).4

The aim of this article is to describe the dynamics of the Chinese wind power industry focusing particularly on financial resource mobilisation and the reasons behind the financial constraints turbine manufacturers and utilities met around 2012. The technological innovation systems (TIS) framework is used as theoretical frame. Despite its importance for industrial growth processes, research on resource mobilisation within the TIS framework is still limited (Farla et al., 2012, Karltorp, 2016, Musiolik et al., 2012, Polzin et al., 2016, Surana and Anadon, 2015). Thereby, the article makes a contribution to the literature by discussing the evolution of an innovation system paying particular attention to the role of the resource mobilisation function.

Section snippets

Conceptual framework

The development and diffusion of emerging technologies is a process characterised by complexity and systemic interaction. Hence, analyses of such processes can fruitfully apply a systems perspective (Foxon and Pearson, 2008). The TIS framework is a systems approach that highlights that innovation is a socio-technical process where heterogeneous elements interact and agglomerate, including actors and networks of actors, institutions and technology (Bergek et al., 2008a, Bergek et al., 2008b,

Method

For this article data was collected from scientific articles, reports and governmental documents and in 16 semi-structured interviews, most of which were made face to face in China in September 2013. Interviews are seen as a valuable source of data as it provides up to date views on the development of the wind power industry. In addition, since some interviewees had been working in the industry for long time they could also recount the history and reflect upon key factors and events of the

Three decades of wind power diffusion: from early experimentation to growing pains

In the 1970s, wind power development in China was confined to small off-grid applications in remote areas (Liu et al., 2002). The deployment of grid-connected wind power in China started in 1986 when four 55 kW Vestas turbines were imported (Zhang et al., 2013). Subsequently, there has been an impressive but uneven development of wind power, supported by varying funding sources and institutional arrangements in different periods. Inspired by Lema and Ruby 2007, four periods of wind power

Concluding discussion

A successful deployment of renewable energy in China over the next decades will remain crucial to environmental and economic development in China and globally. After a slow start, China's track record of wind power deployment shows both speed and scale. This article describes the dynamics that first lead to rapid growth and then to a slowdown of Chinese wind power industry and financial constraints for turbine manufacturers and utilities around 2012.

It is shown that one reason for weak

Acknowledgement

Financial support from the Swedish Energy Agency, the Energy Area of Advance at Chalmers, Adlerbertska Research Foundation and a scholarship for travel from Chalmers Vänner foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Constructive comments have been received from Staffan Jacobsson, Jorrit Gosens, Friedemann Polzin, members of the Energy System Research programme's Industry consortium, at the ETH PhD Academy 2014 and two anonymous reviewers.

References (95)

  • S. Jacobsson et al.

    Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system - challenges for policy intervention

    Energy Policy

    (2013)
  • S. Jacobsson

    The length of the infant industry period: evidence from the engineering industry in South Korea

    World Dev.

    (1993)
  • J. Kang et al.

    Review on wind power development and relevant policies in China during the 11th Five-Year-Plan period

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2012)
  • K. Karltorp

    Challenges in mobilising financial resources for renewable energy - the cases of biomass gasification and offshore wind power

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2016)
  • B. Klagge et al.

    Constructing China's wind energy innovation system

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • A. Lema et al.

    Between fragmented authoritarianism and policy coordination: creating a Chinese market for wind energy

    Energy Policy

    (2007)
  • J.I. Lewis

    The evolving role of carbon finance in promoting renewable energy development in China

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Wind power in China: policy and development challenges

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • W.Q. Liu et al.

    Cost-competitive incentives for wind energy development in China: institutional dynamics and policy changes

    Energy Policy

    (2002)
  • J. Markard et al.

    Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework

    Res. Policy

    (2008)
  • Z. Ming et al.

    Review of renewable energy investment and financing in China: status, mode, issues and countermeasures

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2014)
  • C. Mitchell et al.

    Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany

    Energy Policy

    (2006)
  • J. Musiolik et al.

    Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: towards a conceptual framework for system building

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2012)
  • F. Polzin et al.

    Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2016)
  • B.A. Sandén et al.

    A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden

    Res. Policy

    (2011)
  • M. Stua

    Evidence of the clean development mechanism impact on the chinese electric power system's low-carbon transition

    Energy Policy

    (2013)
  • K. Surana et al.

    Public policy and financial resource mobilization for wind energy in developing countries: a comparison of approaches and outcomes in China and India

    Glob. Environ. Change

    (2015)
  • S. Umamaheswaran et al.

    Financing large scale wind and solar projects—A review of emerging experiences in the Indian context

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    China's wind power industry: policy support, technological achievements, and emerging challenges

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • C. Wilson

    Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • S. Wirth et al.

    Context matters: how existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the Swiss Bio-SNG innovation system

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2011)
  • Q. Wu

    Industry looks to Policy Support in Slump Period

    (2013)
  • R. Wüstenhagen et al.

    Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and opportunities for further research

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • M. Yang et al.

    Wind farm investment risks under uncertain CDM benefit in China

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • S. Zhang et al.

    Political and institutional analysis of the successes and failures of China's wind power policy

    Energy Policy

    (2013)
  • 4C Offshore

    Windfarm Database - Donghai Bridge

    (2014)
  • F. Allen et al.

    China's financial system: past, present, and future

  • A. Bergek et al.

    'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities': two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems

    Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag.

    (2008)
  • A. Bergek

    Technological dynamics and policy: how to derive policy prescriptions

  • J. Berk et al.

    Corporate Finance

    (2007)
  • BNEF

    Crossing the Valley of Death—solutions to the Next Generation Clean Energy Project Financing Gap

    (2010)
  • BNEF
  • BNEF

    BNEF Database, Disclosed Transaction Values in Wind Power Development in China

    (2013)
  • BP

    Statistical Review of World Energy 2013

    (2013)
  • BTM Consults ApS

    World Market Update 2008-Forecast 2009–2013

    (2009)
  • X. Chen
  • CWEA

    China Wind Power Industry Map

    (2013)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Ten financial actors can accelerate a transition away from fossil fuels

      2022, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
    • Connected knowledge spillovers, technological cluster innovation and efficient industrial structure

      2022, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moretti & Biancardi (2020) focused on the effect of open innovation on firm performance. Previous research on technological innovation and industrial structure optimization and upgrade primarily focused on aspects such as the internal mechanism of technological innovation (Zhou & Li, 2012), the effect of technological innovation (Karltorp et al., 2017), the factors influencing the optimization and upgrade of industrial structure (Li & Lin, 2017), and the relationship between industrial structure transformation and economic growth (Dong et al., 2020). Romer (1986) and Lucas (1988) endogenized technological progress in the theory of endogenous economic growth, thus proposing that technological progress could promote the adjustment of industrial structure.

    • Mobilising mainstream finance for a future clean energy transition: The case of Finland

      2021, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Electrification develops unevenly – some technologies have passed the second valley of death (e.g. heat pumps), some are still mainly funded by venture capital (e.g. deep heat), but power-to-X still requires public RDI funding. Our research provides a novel contribution to the relatively limited literature of TIS analyses on the development of the market motor and passing the second valley of death of financing (e.g. Karltorp, 2016; Karltorp et al., 2017; Quitzow, 2015). At this development stage of the TIS, different technologies compete for finance and most users consider various technological options and even invest in a number of technologies simultaneously.

    • Energy innovation and the sustainability transition

      2021, Handbook of Energy Economics and Policy: Fundamentals and Applications for Engineers and Energy Planners
    • A mechanism-based explanation for blocking mechanisms in technological innovation systems

      2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
      Citation Excerpt :

      They also aim at understanding the interconnection of meso and micro conditions. For instance, Dewald and Truffer (2011) focus on explaining how different activities and actors create a market for solar PV TIS; Konrad et al. (2012) investigate how expectations influence activities that fulfil system functions for fuel cell technology; Binz et al. (2016a) and Wirth et al. (2013) examine the institutional dynamics of technologies’ legitimacy for water reuse and biogas technologies; Karltorp (2016) and Karltorp et al. (2017) study how different actors behave and influence activities of financial resource mobilisation for biomass gasification and wind power technologies; and Yap and Truffer (2018) analyse strategic actions that fulfil guidance of the search for water technologies in China. These empirical studies evidence the effort to understand the causes, mechanisms and pathways to system functioning.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text