Handling financial resource mobilisation in technological innovation systems - The case of chinese wind power
Introduction
To curb climate change a radical transformation of energy systems is required within a few decades, involving a rapid and large-scale growth of industries based on sustainable innovations (IPCC, 2014). The development of wind power in China is an exceptional example of a fast and large-scale development of a novel industry, which can provide vital knowledge of how to stimulate and maintain transformation of energy systems.
The development of wind power in China has taken place in an environment of extraordinary economic expansion as the gross domestic product has increased by about 10% per year for three decades in a row. Only Taiwan and South Korea have previously shown similar growth rates (Eklund, 2012).1 In parallel, annual primary energy use increased from about 2000 TWh in 1970 to more than 30 000 TWh in 2012. Coal dominates energy supply, covering almost 70% (BP, 2013).2 However in the last decade, China has also shown an impressive development of renewable energy. Investment in these technologies increased from 32 billion CNY in 2005 to 410 billion CNY in 2012 and is taking the lead globally (PEW, 2013).3
Wind power production in China increased from negligible levels in the beginning of the 1990s to 100 TWh in 2012, corresponding to almost 20% of the global wind electricity output (BP, 2013). Supportive government policies and the opportunity to transfer technology from abroad are often pointed to as reasons for the success of wind power development in China (see, for example, Liu and Kokko, 2010, Kang et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012, Lewis, 2013 and Zhang et al. (2013)). However, while still generating only about 1% of electricity supply (BP, 2013), the pace of development showed signs of slowdown around 2010–2012. One reason for this slowdown was financial constraints experienced by turbine manufacturers and utilities that develop wind power projects (Qiao, 2012, GWEC, 2013, Ming et al., 2014).4
The aim of this article is to describe the dynamics of the Chinese wind power industry focusing particularly on financial resource mobilisation and the reasons behind the financial constraints turbine manufacturers and utilities met around 2012. The technological innovation systems (TIS) framework is used as theoretical frame. Despite its importance for industrial growth processes, research on resource mobilisation within the TIS framework is still limited (Farla et al., 2012, Karltorp, 2016, Musiolik et al., 2012, Polzin et al., 2016, Surana and Anadon, 2015). Thereby, the article makes a contribution to the literature by discussing the evolution of an innovation system paying particular attention to the role of the resource mobilisation function.
Section snippets
Conceptual framework
The development and diffusion of emerging technologies is a process characterised by complexity and systemic interaction. Hence, analyses of such processes can fruitfully apply a systems perspective (Foxon and Pearson, 2008). The TIS framework is a systems approach that highlights that innovation is a socio-technical process where heterogeneous elements interact and agglomerate, including actors and networks of actors, institutions and technology (Bergek et al., 2008a, Bergek et al., 2008b,
Method
For this article data was collected from scientific articles, reports and governmental documents and in 16 semi-structured interviews, most of which were made face to face in China in September 2013. Interviews are seen as a valuable source of data as it provides up to date views on the development of the wind power industry. In addition, since some interviewees had been working in the industry for long time they could also recount the history and reflect upon key factors and events of the
Three decades of wind power diffusion: from early experimentation to growing pains
In the 1970s, wind power development in China was confined to small off-grid applications in remote areas (Liu et al., 2002). The deployment of grid-connected wind power in China started in 1986 when four 55 kW Vestas turbines were imported (Zhang et al., 2013). Subsequently, there has been an impressive but uneven development of wind power, supported by varying funding sources and institutional arrangements in different periods. Inspired by Lema and Ruby 2007, four periods of wind power
Concluding discussion
A successful deployment of renewable energy in China over the next decades will remain crucial to environmental and economic development in China and globally. After a slow start, China's track record of wind power deployment shows both speed and scale. This article describes the dynamics that first lead to rapid growth and then to a slowdown of Chinese wind power industry and financial constraints for turbine manufacturers and utilities around 2012.
It is shown that one reason for weak
Acknowledgement
Financial support from the Swedish Energy Agency, the Energy Area of Advance at Chalmers, Adlerbertska Research Foundation and a scholarship for travel from Chalmers Vänner foundation is gratefully acknowledged. Constructive comments have been received from Staffan Jacobsson, Jorrit Gosens, Friedemann Polzin, members of the Energy System Research programme's Industry consortium, at the ETH PhD Academy 2014 and two anonymous reviewers.
References (95)
- et al.
Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis
Res. Policy
(2008) - et al.
Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics
Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.
(2015) - et al.
Why space matters in technological innovation systems - mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology
Res. Policy
(2014) - et al.
Green investment: trends and determinants
Energy Policy
(2013) Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(2012)- et al.
From lagging to leading? Technological innovation systems in emerging economies and the case of Chinese wind power
Energy Policy
(2013) - et al.
Prospects for global market expansion of China's wind turbine manufacturing industry
Energy Policy
(2014) - et al.
The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech
J. Clean. Prod.
(2015) - et al.
Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(2007) - et al.
Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research
Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.
(2011)
Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system - challenges for policy intervention
Energy Policy
The length of the infant industry period: evidence from the engineering industry in South Korea
World Dev.
Review on wind power development and relevant policies in China during the 11th Five-Year-Plan period
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Challenges in mobilising financial resources for renewable energy - the cases of biomass gasification and offshore wind power
Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.
Constructing China's wind energy innovation system
Energy Policy
Between fragmented authoritarianism and policy coordination: creating a Chinese market for wind energy
Energy Policy
The evolving role of carbon finance in promoting renewable energy development in China
Energy Policy
Wind power in China: policy and development challenges
Energy Policy
Cost-competitive incentives for wind energy development in China: institutional dynamics and policy changes
Energy Policy
Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework
Res. Policy
Review of renewable energy investment and financing in China: status, mode, issues and countermeasures
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany
Energy Policy
Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: towards a conceptual framework for system building
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Addressing barriers to eco-innovation: exploring the finance mobilisation functions of institutional innovation intermediaries
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden
Res. Policy
Evidence of the clean development mechanism impact on the chinese electric power system's low-carbon transition
Energy Policy
Public policy and financial resource mobilization for wind energy in developing countries: a comparison of approaches and outcomes in China and India
Glob. Environ. Change
Financing large scale wind and solar projects—A review of emerging experiences in the Indian context
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
China's wind power industry: policy support, technological achievements, and emerging challenges
Energy Policy
Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies
Energy Policy
Context matters: how existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the Swiss Bio-SNG innovation system
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Industry looks to Policy Support in Slump Period
Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and opportunities for further research
Energy Policy
Wind farm investment risks under uncertain CDM benefit in China
Energy Policy
Political and institutional analysis of the successes and failures of China's wind power policy
Energy Policy
Windfarm Database - Donghai Bridge
China's financial system: past, present, and future
'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities': two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems
Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag.
Technological dynamics and policy: how to derive policy prescriptions
Corporate Finance
Crossing the Valley of Death—solutions to the Next Generation Clean Energy Project Financing Gap
BNEF Database, Disclosed Transaction Values in Wind Power Development in China
Statistical Review of World Energy 2013
World Market Update 2008-Forecast 2009–2013
China Wind Power Industry Map
Cited by (36)
Ten financial actors can accelerate a transition away from fossil fuels
2022, Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsConnected knowledge spillovers, technological cluster innovation and efficient industrial structure
2022, Journal of Innovation and KnowledgeCitation Excerpt :Moretti & Biancardi (2020) focused on the effect of open innovation on firm performance. Previous research on technological innovation and industrial structure optimization and upgrade primarily focused on aspects such as the internal mechanism of technological innovation (Zhou & Li, 2012), the effect of technological innovation (Karltorp et al., 2017), the factors influencing the optimization and upgrade of industrial structure (Li & Lin, 2017), and the relationship between industrial structure transformation and economic growth (Dong et al., 2020). Romer (1986) and Lucas (1988) endogenized technological progress in the theory of endogenous economic growth, thus proposing that technological progress could promote the adjustment of industrial structure.
Mobilising mainstream finance for a future clean energy transition: The case of Finland
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Electrification develops unevenly – some technologies have passed the second valley of death (e.g. heat pumps), some are still mainly funded by venture capital (e.g. deep heat), but power-to-X still requires public RDI funding. Our research provides a novel contribution to the relatively limited literature of TIS analyses on the development of the market motor and passing the second valley of death of financing (e.g. Karltorp, 2016; Karltorp et al., 2017; Quitzow, 2015). At this development stage of the TIS, different technologies compete for finance and most users consider various technological options and even invest in a number of technologies simultaneously.
Energy innovation and the sustainability transition
2021, Handbook of Energy Economics and Policy: Fundamentals and Applications for Engineers and Energy PlannersA mechanism-based explanation for blocking mechanisms in technological innovation systems
2020, Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsCitation Excerpt :They also aim at understanding the interconnection of meso and micro conditions. For instance, Dewald and Truffer (2011) focus on explaining how different activities and actors create a market for solar PV TIS; Konrad et al. (2012) investigate how expectations influence activities that fulfil system functions for fuel cell technology; Binz et al. (2016a) and Wirth et al. (2013) examine the institutional dynamics of technologies’ legitimacy for water reuse and biogas technologies; Karltorp (2016) and Karltorp et al. (2017) study how different actors behave and influence activities of financial resource mobilisation for biomass gasification and wind power technologies; and Yap and Truffer (2018) analyse strategic actions that fulfil guidance of the search for water technologies in China. These empirical studies evidence the effort to understand the causes, mechanisms and pathways to system functioning.