Elsevier

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume 172, 20 January 2018, Pages 3791-3805
Journal of Cleaner Production

Sustainability experiences in the wine sector: toward the development of an international indicators system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.129Get rights and content

Abstract

Increasing awareness for sustainability has led to the proliferation of initiatives in the wine industry. These initiatives mainly aim at managing the environmental aspects of wine production. In this context, the identification of suitable indicators is crucial to evaluate the industry's progress toward sustainability. Firstly, in the present study, the main environmental impacts of wine production are reviewed, with specific reference to LCA studies. On this baseline, the main programs from the New World, Europe and Italy that address sustainability in the wine sector are examined. Results show that each program has its strengths and weaknesses, but there is still a large margin to merge the best of these programs in one unique protocol internationally recognized. Therefore, the authors have compared the set of indicators employed by two specific wine industries initiatives (the Italian VIVA and Californian CSWA) and the indicators implemented by the wine Italian companies certified with the Environmental Management System (EMS), defined by the European Regulation EMAS. A specific evaluation framework has been developed to assess the comprehensiveness of these indicators in terms of their capacity to address the triple bottom line of sustainability. Findings reveal that while VIVA consider environmental, economic and social aspects, CSWA and EMAS focus mainly on environmental impacts of wine production. Additionally, only EMAS has an approach to the evaluation of raw materials efficiency and waste management. The outcome of the study integrates existing literature on sustainable wine production, expanding the scope of previous analysis and introducing an evaluation framework that stakeholders of the industry may apply to introduce new indicators sets to assess sustainability performances of wine producers.

Introduction

Sustainability is one of the main goals of the European Union (EU) and other international organizations' development policy. This is also confirmed by the Europe 2020 Strategy, which aims to promote a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Sustainability is progressively gaining importance also in the wine industry (Borsellino et al., 2016, Chiusano et al., 2015, Corbo et al., 2014, Santiago-Brown et al., 2015, Stoughton et al., 2013). For wine production, however, environmental issues have been largely unexplored (Marshall et al., 2005), because it has been traditionally seen as an environmentally friendly process (Barber et al., 2009). Instead the industry is far from being eco-friendly (Gabzdylova et al., 2009): it benefits from public goods such as natural resources, ecosystems, clean water, but it also brings costs and negative externalities transferred to society and the surrounding environment (Christ and Burritt, 2013, Penco, 2012). Understanding the nature and the extent of these externalities could help to prepare firms to deal with the potential impact of externalities regulation, to promote responsibility toward consumers and to identify opportunities for innovation and resources savings. In recent years, this awareness has led the “World of Wine” to show wide attention to the environment, identifying it as an element of the wine quality itself (Bruwer and Alant, 2009). The concept of sustainability in this area, however, has many definitions that often seem to be surrounded by a shadow of ambiguity (Warner, 2007). Sustainable vitiviniculture is defined by the OIV (International Organization of Vine and Wine) as a “global strategy on the scale of the grape production and processing systems, incorporating at the same time the economic sustainability of structures and territories, producing quality products, considering requirements of precision in sustainable viticulture, risks to the environment, products safety and consumer health and valuing of heritage, historical, cultural, ecological and landscape aspects” (International Organization of Vine and Wine, 2011). From this definition, it is clear that sustainability in the wine sector is more than just organic, biodynamic or integrated production (Bordiga, 2016, Gemmrich and Arnold, 2007). It incorporates the culture, the landscape, the history and all the intangible aspects that characterize wine as a product of excellence. The Italian wine sector, being one of the country's agricultural sectors able to produce quality products and to generate excellent results on the market, has the opportunity to open up to new proposals to reduce environmental impact and enhance sustainable agricultural techniques. The industry has the opportunity to strategically position itself in a constantly evolving market, increasingly oriented toward sustainability and composed by conscious consumers who already buy sustainable products (organic, Fairtrade, etc.) and are becoming more aware of wine production dynamics (Christ and Burritt, 2013).

In recent years, an increased awareness by companies, consumers and institutions on wine sustainability issues has led to a proliferation of projects, protocols and tools for the promotion of sustainability in the industry (Giacomarra et al., 2016, Gilinsky et al., 2016, Hughey et al., 2005, Pullman et al., 2010). Although the approach to sustainable development is based on the triple bottom line concept (environment-economy-society), most of the programs and objectives of these initiatives are based on the environmental pillar of sustainability, which is also the most debated issue in the scientific community (Christ and Burritt, 2013, Mozell and Thach, 2014, Vecchio, 2014).

Section snippets

Aim and scope

This research aims to understand how the wine sector approaches sustainability issues and to assess how sustainable practices are implemented. It explores the tools created by private and public institutions, in order to measure the path toward sustainability, with a specific focus on performance indicators. In addition, the authors have created an evaluation framework to test these indicators, to provide a tool which can assist firms and decision makers in the selection of more suitable

Materials and methods

The analysis employed different typologies of materials for data collection, such as scholars' literature, reports and protocols. The aim of this section is to clarify the methodological approach of the research. Initially, to identify the current state of academic insight about wine sustainability, a review of the existing literature was carried out. Sections 3.1 The environmental impact of wine production, 3.2 A common framework for environmental indicators in the wine industry, 3.3 Wine

Cross-national comparison of sustainability initiatives: “New world” and “Old world” projects for a sustainable wine sector

So far, we have discussed the environmental impacts of wine industry and consumers' perceptions toward sustainable initiatives, but it is crucial to understand how all this turns into concrete actions. In practical terms, what does sustainability mean in the wine sector? To answer this question, we analyzed international and national initiatives undertaken in the wine industry.

The pioneers of sustainability in the vineyard and winery are certainly countries of the New World (Santiago-Brown

Conclusion

Starting with the identification of the main environmental issues related to wine production, this study provides a critical review of sustainability programs and initiatives in the wine industry in the New World, Europe and Italy. Specifically, it focuses on the evaluation of the wine indicators sets proposed by three sustainability programs.

The analysis showed that each examined program has its strengths and weaknesses. It is not possible to affirm that a program is better than another and,

References (121)

  • S.L. Forbes et al.

    Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2009)
  • A. Fusi et al.

    Delving into the environmental aspect of a Sardinian white wine: from partial to total life cycle assessment

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • B. Gabzdylova et al.

    Sustainability in the New Zealand wine industry: drivers, stakeholders and practices

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2009)
  • M. Giacomarra et al.

    The integration of quality and safety concerns in the wine industry: the role of third-party voluntary certifications

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • A. Gilinsky et al.

    Sustainability in the global wine industry: concepts and cases

    Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia

    (2016)
  • K.F.D. Hughey et al.

    Qualitative evaluation of three “environmental management systems” in the New Zealand wine industry

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2005)
  • R. Iannone et al.

    Improving environmental performances in wine production by a life cycle assessment analysis

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • L. Lamastra et al.

    A new approach to assessing the water footprint of wine: an Italian case study

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • M. Loureiro

    Rethinking new wines: implications of local and environmentally friendly labels

    Food Policy

    (2003)
  • M. Meneses et al.

    Sensitivity analysis in a life cycle assessment of an aged red wine production from Catalonia, Spain

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • M.R. Mozell et al.

    The impact of climate change on the global wine industry: challenges & solutions

    Wine Econ. Policy

    (2014)
  • V. Niccolucci et al.

    Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Ecological Footprint analysis applied to the production of two Italian wines

    (2008)
  • B. Notarnicola et al.

    LCA of wine production

  • A.C.I. Pizzigallo et al.

    The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2008)
  • E. Point et al.

    Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2012)
  • E. Pomarici et al.

    Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • P. Quinteiro et al.

    Addressing the freshwater use of a Portuguese wine (“vinho verde” ) using different LCA methods

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • D. Rigby et al.

    Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2001)
  • J. Rinne et al.

    From sustainability to well-being: lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2013)
  • B. Rugani et al.

    A comprehensive review of carbon footprint analysis as an extended environmental indicator in the wine sector

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2013)
  • A. Scipioni et al.

    Monitoring the carbon footprint of products: a methodological proposal

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2012)
  • M. Smyth et al.

    Energy and English wine production: a review of energy use and benchmarking

    Energy Sustain. Dev.

    (2014)
  • E. Aguilera et al.

    The potential of organic fertilizers and water management to reduce N2O emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems. A review

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2013)
  • M. Alberti et al.

    The Sustainable City: Analysis, Scenarios and Proposals for Urban Ecology in Europe

    (1994)
  • G. Arcese et al.

    Analysis of sustainability based on Life Cycle Assessment: an empirical study of wine production

    J. Environ. Sci. Eng

    (2012)
  • Associazione Vino Libero

    Technical specification for evolved integrated wine production

  • Austrian Winegrowers Association

    Certified Sustainable Austria

    (2016)
  • N. Barber et al.

    Wine consumers' environmental knowledge and attitudes: influence on willingness to purchase

    Int. J. Wine Res.

    (2009)
  • P. Bazoche et al.

    An experimental study of wine consumers' willingness to pay for environmental characteristics

  • N. Berghoef et al.

    Potential for sustainability eco-labeling in Ontario's wine industry

    J. Wine Bus. Res.

    (2011)
  • C. Binder et al.

    Normative, systemic and procedural aspects: a review of indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture

    Methods Proced. Build. Sustain.

    (2013)
  • C. Bockstaller et al.

    Use of agro-ecological indicators on the evaluation of farming systems

  • M. Bordiga

    Valorization of Wine Making By-products

    (2016)
  • J.C. Broome et al.

    Agro-environmental partnerships facilitate sustainable wine-grape production and assessment

    Calif. Agric.

    (2008)
  • J. Bruwer et al.

    The hedonic nature of wine tourism consumption: an experiential view

    Int. J. Wine Bus. Res.

    (2009)
  • California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance

    California Wine's Carbon Footprint: Study Objectives, Results and Recommendations for Continuous Improvement

    (2011)
  • California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance

    California Wine Community Sustainability Report

    (2015)
  • E. Carlisle et al.

    California vineyard greenhouse gas emissions: an assessment of the available literature and determination of research needs

    Agriculture

    (2009)
  • Certified Sustainable Wine of Chile

    What Is the Sustainability Code?

    (2016)
  • C. Corbo et al.

    From environmental to sustainability programs: a review of sustainability initiatives in the Italian wine sector

    Sustainability

    (2014)
  • Cited by (95)

    • A common framework for sustainability indicators in the wine sector: Dream or reality?

      2023, Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      They appear useful and reliable communication tools to transfer sustainability information between producers and consumers. However, by examining the several existing protocols and the increasing body of literature, it appears that a scattered set of certification programs including a variety of tools and indicators have been proposed which have unnecessarily generated obstacles to the willingness-to-adoption, both for companies and consumers [15]. Based on previous literature reviews and syntheses [15,23], twenty programs (indicators frameworks, tools, certification schemes, etc.) have been chosen to reflect the state-of-the-art on the most recent developments of sustainability initiatives in the wine industry.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text