Partially reflecting and non-reflecting boundary conditions for simulation of compressible viscous flow

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.016Get rights and content

Abstract

For numerical simulation of compressible viscous flow, the characteristics-based NSCBC boundary conditions proposed by Poinsot and Lele [T. Poinsot, S.K. Lele, Boundary conditions for direct simulation of compressible viscous flows, J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1992) 104–129] are frequently employed. This formulation is analyzed analytically and it is found that the linear relaxation term proposed by Rudy and Strikwerda [D.H. Rudy, J.C. Strikwerda, A nonreflecting outflow boundary condition for subsonic Navier–Stokes calculations, J. Comput. Phys. 36 (1) (1980) 55–70] to suppress slow “drift” of flow variables results in a non-zero reflection coefficient for acoustic waves. Indeed, although the NSCBC formulation of boundary conditions is often called “non-reflecting”, the magnitude of the reflection coefficient approaches unity for low frequencies. A modification of the NSCBC boundary conditions and in particular the linear relaxation term is proposed, which should appear fully non-reflecting to plane acoustic waves with normal incidence on the boundaries for all frequencies. The new formulation is implemented and successfully validated in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flow.

Introduction

Acoustically non-reflecting boundary conditions for compressible (turbulent) flow simulation are a prerequisite for the successful application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to flow-acoustics problems, e.g., the numerical simulation of combustion instabilities. For linear problems, or for problems where linearization near the boundary is permissible, a variety of techniques have been developed, see the recent review of Colonius [1]. On the other hand, situations with nonlinear effects near the boundary – the prime example being the turbulent outflow problem – still pose significant problems. The Navier–Stokes characteristics boundary condition (NSCBC) developed for multi-dimensional viscous flow by Thompson, and Poinsot and Lele with the linear relaxation term proposed by Rudy and Strikwerda [2], [3], [4] has been applied successfully to many problems. However, there is evidence that this formulation, although frequently termed “non-reflecting”, is indeed partly reflecting [5], [6].

In this paper, the NSCBC boundary conditions are analyzed, and an analytical expression for the reflection coefficient of this formulation is derived. Then, a modification is proposed, which should allow the implementation of fully non-reflecting boundary conditions – at least for plane waves with normal incidence on the boundary. The proposed formulation is computationally very efficient and the restriction to plane waves is not a significant drawback for many applications in duct acoustics or combustion dynamics.

Both the original and the modified formulation for NSCBCs are tested in a large eddy simulation (LES) of compressible turbulent channel flow at low Mach number with external excitation. The numerical results agree with expectations except for very high frequencies (above the so-called cut-off frequency of the duct, i.e., the frequency of the fundamental non-plane travelling or standing acoustic mode in the duct).

In Section 2, some notation is established before characteristics based boundary conditions are reviewed briefly in Section 3. A more comprehensive discussion of the NSCBCs may be found in the original literature [2], [3], [4], [7] and in textbooks [8], [9]. Recent developments of the approach with extensions to real gases or mixtures thereof are discussed, for example in [10], [11]. The new, non-reflecting formulation is introduced and discussed in Section 4. Results of a validation study based on large eddy simulation (LES) of compressible channel flow are shown in the last section.

Section snippets

Turbulent and acoustic fluctuations, characteristic wave amplitudes

When dealing with problems of compressible turbulent flow, it is often advantageous to distinguish conceptually between turbulent (“′”) and acoustic (“∼”) fluctuations of the flow variables, e.g.,p(x,t)=p¯(x)+p˜(x,t)+p(x,t),u(x,t)=u¯(x)+u˜(x,t)+u(x,t)for the pressure and the x-component of velocity, respectively. The overbar denotes mean values. In this paper, we are concerned primarily with plane acoustic waves. Without essential loss of generality, it is assumed that the waves

Boundary conditions in compressible viscous flow

Consider a (computational) domain as shown in Fig. 1, with acoustic signals f, g travelling back and forth. At the domain boundaries, acoustic waves are partly reflected (outgoing and reflected components are indicated in the figure). Furthermore, there may be external acoustic excitation signals fx or gx at the inflow and outflow boundary, respectively.

Boundary conditions in compressible viscous flow simulation must fulfill several requirements:

  • (1)

    a target velocity uT at the inlet as well as a

Non-reflecting boundary conditions with plane-wave “masking”

It is possible to construct characteristics-based boundary conditions, which – at least for plane acoustic waves with normal incidence – should be nearly non-reflecting even for low frequencies ωτ  0. The idea is to identify outgoing plane waves at the boundary, and then explicitly eliminate outgoing wave contributions from the linear relaxation term.

For example, at an outflow boundary the pressure coupling (17) would be modified as follows:L1=σc¯L(p-ρ¯c¯f-p).In this way the contribution of the

Simulation results

Large eddy simulation of a channel flow configuration at a Reynolds number based on channel height, H, and bulk velocity, Ub, of 25,000 and a Mach number based on bulk velocity of 3.3 × 10−2 has been performed to validate the non-reflective character of the new boundary conditions. The length, L, of the computational domain was twenty channel heights H, and the width, W, was three channel heights. No slip conditions were applied at the top and bottom walls of the channel, and periodic boundary

Summary and outlook

The characteristics-based NSCBC formulation of boundary conditions for simulation of turbulent compressible flows was originally proposed as a “non-reflecting” boundary condition [3]. However, in the present work it was shown that the standard formulation with a linear relaxation term is in general partially reflecting and indeed strongly reflecting for large coupling coefficients or low frequencies.

For plane acoustic waves with normal incidence on the boundary, it is possible to quantify

Acknowledgments

The ideas presented in this work were developed during the 2002 Summer Program of the Center for Turbulence Research (CTR) at NASA Ames Research Ctr./Stanford University [13]. Discussions with Summer Program participants and CTR staff, in particularAndre Kaufmann, Thierry Poinsot, Laurent Selle and Sanjiva Lele are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Andreas Huber for proof-reading and helpful suggestions. Financial support was provided by Alstom Power and Siemens Power Generation in the

References (23)

  • L. Selle et al.

    Actual impedance of nonreflecting boundary conditions: implications for computation of resonators

    AIAA J.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    Expanded version of a contribution to the 11th Conference on Sound and Vibration (St. Petersburg, July 2004).

    View full text