Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society
Introduction
In this paper we pose several questions about the determinants of subjective well-being. We do so for South Africa, a country that, because of its unusually divided society, provides a good case study of the effects of community and comparisons on subjective well-being. Each of these questions is new for South Africa. More broadly, the major contribution of the paper to the economic literature on subjective well-being concerns the role of comparisons made with others in the community. What are the reference groups against which people compare themselves, and do their comparisons give rise to fellow feeling or to feelings of relative deprivation? We highlight the roles that space and race can play. Spatially defined reference groups are shown to have a positive effect on subjective well-being, suggesting that neighbors may be ‘positives’ and not ‘negatives’. By contrast, racially defined reference groups are shown to have a negative effect, implying that relative deprivation may be experienced in relation to others of one's own race rather than to neighbors or to the larger society. There are interesting implications for welfare economics and for policy.
In Section 2, we provide a framework of concepts and literature about the effects of comparisons on subjective well-being. Section 3 describes the South African context and the data, and outlines the method: the estimation of subjective well-being functions that include explanatory variables representing relevant comparisons. The empirical Section 4 presents the results, question by question. In particular, we test whether and how spatial and racial comparisons affect subjective well-being. Section 5 concludes and draws out the implications of the analysis.
Section snippets
Concepts and literature
The idea that relative position matters to individual utility has substantial support and acceptance in the social science literature, particularly in sociology (for instance, Runciman, 1966) and psychology (for instance, Diener and Biswas-Diener, 2000). By contrast, mainstream microeconomic theory generally treats utility as a function of own absolute income. However, some economists have advocated models in which the income of others enters the individual's utility function (prominent among
Context, data and method
In South Africa race was the defining feature of society until the end of apartheid, with most aspects of life being governed by racial segregation. For instance, different education departments catered for the education of the four races (African, Coloured, Indian, and White), and there was a marked racial hierarchy in resource allocations to schools. There were restrictions on the movement and migration of non-Whites, and they had been debarred from entering certain higher positions of
Empirical results
Table 1 sets out the notation, definitions, means and standard deviations of the variables used in the analysis. Column (a) of Table 2 presents a general specification of the ordered probit equation of subjective well-being, together with the marginal effects of the variables on the probability of being ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with life. Column (b) provides an OLS equation of the same specification. Province dummies are included but not reported. In this table and subsequent tables, the
Robustness checks
Various tests of the robustness of the income results are reported in Table 7; these tests involve price deflation of income, collinearity of income with other variables, endogeneity of income, and errors in income measurement. Although spatially disaggregated consumer price levels are not available, it is possible to adjust income for differences in cluster food price indices, weighted for the importance of food in household expenditure. Column (a) shows an ordered probit with deflated income
Conclusion
The first question that we posed was to what extent is it absolute income and to what extent relative income that determines happiness. We found a good deal of evidence that both the income of the household and the income of other households influence subjective well-being. Some of our estimates suggest that the latter relative to the former is more important than the former on its own. Second, insofar as relative concepts matter, is it only relative income that counts or are comparisons made
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Marcel Fafchamps, John Helliwell, Karla Hoff, Carol Graham, Alan Krueger, Valerie Møller, Frances Stewart, and two anonymous referees for perceptive comments. We are also grateful to participants at the CSAE Conference (Oxford), the NEUDC Conference (Montreal) and the DPRU Conference (Cape Town) for useful feedback. Any errors are ours.
References (59)
- et al.
Persistent parochialism: trust and exclusion in ethnic networks
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
(2004) - et al.
Relative payoffs and happiness: an experimental study
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
(2001) - et al.
Social distance and reciprocity: an internet experiment
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
(2007) - et al.
Satisfaction and comparison income
Journal of Public Economics
(1996) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence
Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
(1995)Household consumption smoothing through ethnic ties: evidence from Cote d’Ivoire
Journal of Development Economics
(1997)Social distance and social decisions
Econometrica
(1997)- et al.
Economics and identity
Quarterly Journal of Economics
(2000) - et al.
The fair wage–effort hypothesis and unemployment
Quarterly Journal of Economics
(1990)
What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Understanding social preferences with simple tests
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Unemployment as a social norm: psychological evidence from panel data
Journal of Labor Economics
On the nature of reciprocal motives
Economic Enquiry
Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness
American Economic Review
New directions in subjective well-being research: the cutting edge
Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology
Income, Savings and the Theory of Consumer Behavior
Choosing the joneses: endogenous goals and reference standards
Scandinavian Journal of Economics
How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?
The Economic Journal
A theory of social comparison processes
Human Relations
Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behaviour and the Quest for Status
Cost-benefit analysis and relative position
University of Chicago Law Review
Interpreting and inventing social reality. Attributional and constructive elements in social comparison
Frustrated achievers: winners, losers and subjective well-being in new market economies
Journal of Development Studies
Overpayment and earnings satisfaction: an application of an ordered response Tobit model
Applied Economics Letters
Social capital, the economy and well-being
How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being
Economic Modelling
Cited by (195)
Risk preference and relative poverty: An analysis based on the data of China Family Panel Studies
2024, Economic Analysis and PolicySocioeconomic determinants of happiness: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries
2024, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental EconomicsLocal happiness and corporate financial misconduct: Does happiness reduce organizational opportunistic behavior?
2023, Journal of Accounting and Public PolicyThe importance of positional mobility for regional comparisons
2023, Research in EconomicsEstimating social preferences using stated satisfaction: Novel support for inequity aversion
2023, European Economic ReviewAnalyzing the relationship between income and life satisfaction of Forest farm households - a behavioral economics approach
2023, Forest Policy and Economics