The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.04.020Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate two agroindustrial productive processes in their entirety (one organic and one semi-industrial), focusing on the comparison of impacts derived from the inputs and outputs of the system (life cycle assessment, LCA), integrated with a physical evaluation of the resources and natural services, on a common basis (emergy).

Methods based on the joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation are useful, as they measure the contribution of environmental services and products to the productive process thus focusing primarily on the environmental impact of emissions and non-renewable energy inputs.

The complementarity of the methods used in this paper contributes important elements and information useful for the comprehension of the organization of agriculture within Siena's territory.

The results show important elements and useful information: (1) for the comprehension of the two agroecosystems’ organization; (2) for the use of the energy flows that determine their development. Moreover, the combined use of emergy and LCA gives a comparative thermodynamic performance evaluation between organic and semi-industrial farming.

Introduction

In an age in which agriculture has assisted in the decline of energy sources, and in the pollution of soils and water tables, it has become urgent to manage natural resources in an effective and efficient way in order to sustain agricultural activity (Kang and Park, 2002). In general, agricultural economies represent a meeting point between human essential needs and nature's primary production. Since environmental issues affect so many disciplines, cross-disciplinary interaction is essential for the development of “eco-centric” methods (Bakshi and Fiksel, 2003).

Methods based on the laws of thermodynamics are useful, because they measure the contribution of environmental services and products to the productive process. Therefore their use, and the fact that they allow for a representation of all the energetic flows that feed a system, makes possible an evaluation of the sustainability of agricultural productive processes.

Life cycle assessment (LCA) in agriculture focuses primarily on the environmental impact of emissions and non-renewable energy inputs. In other words, it considers the impact of all agricultural processes in a product's life cycle, from the extraction of the natural resource to the use and disposal of the product. LCA ignores ecosystem services and products, and the final results of this analysis depend on subjective evaluation (Ulgiati et al., 2005). For this reason, it has become necessary to promote integration among methods that may be potentially complementary. Therefore, the usefulness of the emergy methodology for the ecological and economic analysis of agricultural systems and natural resources will be emphasized (Odum, 1996). In the past, emergy was already applied to several agricultural systems, both for comparative evaluations and simple agricultural systems (see for example Cavalett et al., 2005; Lefroy and Rydberg, 2003; Liu and Chen, 2005), and in particular to grape or wine productions together with exergy (Bastianoni et al., 2003).

Emergy evaluation is a method that is able to evaluate environmental and economic products and services on a common basis, that of the equivalent solar energy, called “solar emergy”, or “solar memory energy” (Scienceman, 1987). All systems and their inputs and outputs are organized hierarchically, considering their importance within a web of relationships, introducing the concept of “energy quality”. Emergy evaluation is a powerful tool, for it is one of the very few methods that accounts for the contribution of ecological products and services. The main potential of this method is normalizing forcing factors, state variables, and other system attributes to one metric unit, namely solar emergy (Tilley and Swank, 2003).

The importance of this paper derives from the combined use of emergy and the LCA for the comparative thermodynamic evaluation of two wine producing farms—one using organic and one conventional farming methods—both situated in the Province of Siena, Italy. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the agroindustrial productive processes as a whole, focusing on the comparison of impacts derived from the inputs and outputs of the system (LCA), integrated with a physical evaluation of the resources and natural services, on a common basis (emergy). The complementarity of the methods used in this paper contributes important elements and information useful for the comprehension of the organization of the two agroecosystems and the use of the energy flows that determine their development, in relation to the importance that agriculture holds for the territory of Siena.

Section snippets

LCA

LCA's main objective is to assess needs and emissions of a production process. The data are classified in specific impact categories representing known environmental effects. The LCA procedure is an iterative methodology; every successive phase of the study focuses on aspects to be investigated in more detail: the old data will be replaced with new ones leading to a more realistic evaluation. Sometimes the complete analysis of the product life cycle from “cradle to grave” can be replaced by a

The systems

The systems under study are two farms located in Tuscany (Italy): an organic farm in the Chianti area (Tuscany) and a semi-industrial farm in the Montepulciano area. Both produce wine and belong to the Province of Siena, but apply two very different production systems. The first produces wine utilizing an organic farming method, the other does it in a semi-industrial manner.

The organic farm, of approximately 63 ha, reserves 10 ha for the production of organic wine; the rest is divided among olive

LCA

In Fig. 1a and b, the productive cycles of the semi-industrial and organic farms are illustrated. A basic common model has been devised for both productive processes that consists of five phases: the planting phase, the production phase, the wine cellar phase, the wine bottling phase and the glass recycling phase.

The planting phase is the first to be executed. In this phase, the uncultivated land is prepared for the undertaking of the vineyard. Work includes improvements to the structure and

Conclusions

It is very important to evaluate agroalimentary productive systems from the point of view of environmental sustainability, as these systems represent the base of our sustenance, and the human population, already oversized, is destined to grow even further in the future, producing even greater environmental impacts. Over the past years different methods have been developed for the analysis of various productive systems, but the majority have been specifically devised for the study of systems

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the owners of the organic farm Pacina (Siena, Tuscany, Italy) for providing us with all the necessary information regarding their productive activities, which made this study possible. The authors wish also to thank the Province of Siena Administration and the Monte dei Paschi Foundation for financially supporting this work.

References (23)

  • M.T. Brown et al.

    Transformities. Working paper, Center for Wetlands

    (1991)
  • Cited by (136)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text