Rural industries and water pollution in China
Introduction
Water supply and quality are fundamental issues in China. A few years ago, the debate about who will feed China emphasised scarcity of farmland and the food crisis (Brown, 1995). Yet the most critical resource in China is not land or food, but water (as Brown later (2001) came to recognise). Not only are per capita water resources limited (Niu and Harris, 1996) and the spatial distribution of water resources extremely uneven, there is also significant waste of water. This waste is related to inefficient irrigation practices, leaking water pipes, and water pollution. Growing municipal and industrial waste discharges, coupled with limited wastewater treatment capacity, are the principal drivers of water pollution. About two-thirds of the total waste discharge into rivers, lakes and the sea derives from industry, and about 80% of that is untreated. Most of the untreated discharge comes from rural industries.
Rural industries stand out as one of the most spectacular respondents to China's 1978 economic reform. They represent a middle ground between private and state ownership and have not developed in any other country on such a large scale and at such a rapid rate. They have become the driving force behind China's economic growth and a significant engine of China's transition, with double-digit growth rates since the late 1970s. To a large degree, this growth of rural industry was neither planned nor anticipated (Bruton et al., 2000).
However, the environmental cost of China's rural industrialisation is enormous. Rural industry consumes massive quantities of water and pollutes a large proportion of rural water bodies (Anid and Tschirley, 1998; Wheeler et al., 2000). While a few large rural enterprises have advanced technology and sophisticated wastewater treatment facilities, rural enterprises are characterised by their small scale, outmoded technology, obsolete equipment, poor management and heavy consumption of water resources (Qu and Li, 1994). As a result, water pollution is a serious problem wherever there are rural industries. Over 80% of China's rivers have some degree of contamination (Qi et al., 1999). China's 2002 State of the Environment Report shows that 70% of the 741 river sections monitored were unfit for human contact (pollutions levels at or above Grade IV standard) (SEPA, 2002). The most polluted was the Hai River, where 86% of monitored sections were unfit for human contact.
China's environmental policy is widely considered as a comparatively success in urban areas, with marked declines in urban pollution (Florig et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1997; Abigail, 1997). However, these efforts rarely reach the rural areas, where environmental policy is not effective (Florig et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1997; Abigail, 1997). One of the names for this phenomenon is a policy ‘implementation gap’ (Chan et al., 1995). It is the aim of this paper to understand the reasons for this implementation gap. Previous studies have attributed it to a combination of factors, including legislative shortcomings, poorly designed policy instruments, an unsupportive work environment for environmental regulators, and a pro-growth political and social environment (Chan et al., 1995; Wong and Hon, 1994; Ross, 1992). These are important; however, we argue that the most fundamental factors causing rural water pollution are the very same factors that have underpinned the economic success of rural industry. The problem of water pollution, we argue, is therefore unlikely to be remedied by discrete institutional changes, and instead requires a transformation of the models associated with rural development.
We present this argument in the following sections. We begin by explaining the characteristics of rural industry and the reasons for its success. This will be followed by a summary of the water crisis as it relates to rural industry. In 4 The characteristics of rural industry, 5 Institutional framework, 6 Administrative transition, we explain our interpretation of the reasons for water pollution problems in rural China. Section 4 is focussed on how the characteristics of rural industry contribute to rural water pollution; in Section 5, we review the institutional arrangements that make it difficult to control water pollution by rural industry; and in Section 6, we emphasise how the on-going transition has made water pollution control more difficult. The conclusion integrates this evidence and explains our interpretation of it.
Section snippets
Rural industrialisation
The rise of rural industry is one of the outcomes of China's transition. The rural household responsibility system introduced in the late 1970s released hundreds of millions of peasants from the farming sector. To accommodate increasing under- and unemployment in China's countryside, the central government allowed industrial development in rural areas (Lin, 1997; Oi, 1995; Lieberthal, 1995). Peasants were encouraged “to leave the land but not the village” (litu bu lixiang in Chinese) (Tan, 1993
Rural industry and the water crisis
Rural industries have been widely criticised for their waste of natural resources, including water resources, due to substandard equipment and basic technology (Shen et al., 2005; Edmonds, 1994; Wong, 1999). Most rural industries have no wastewater or hazardous waste treatment facilities. Almost all wastewater is directly discharged into local river systems. According to the State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA, 2002), the total discharge of sewage and wastewater in China was 62 billion
Small is not beautiful
One of the common characteristics of rural industry is small enterprises. The mushrooming Chinese economy allows a few small rural enterprises to become large and some successful rural enterprises have grown to employ well over 1000 workers. Likewise, those rural enterprises registered as foreign or Hong Kong/Macau/Taiwan owned employed on average over 130 workers (Table 1). Nevertheless, the average size of all rural enterprises was only six employees in 2003. In fact, more than 93% of all the
Institutional framework
The factors identified in the previous section only partially explain the problem of environmental enforcement. The national environmental protection system is also a significant factor. When the reform program was introduced in 1978, the central Chinese government also introduced a legal framework for environmental protection and, as mentioned above, tough punishments are stipulated in the laws for violating environmental regulations. Since 1978, many water pollution laws have been issued
Administrative transition
We have already claimed that the factors that underpin water pollution among TVEs are also the factors that have helped TVEs become so important: in that respect, water pollution is integral to the model of TVE growth. But Section 5 demonstrated some institutional weaknesses that prevent the complete regulation of rural industry by the state's environmental protection system. To a large degree, these weaknesses reflect the character of the transition in China.
In a political sense, transition in
Conclusion
Rural industrial growth in China has occurred almost outside central environmental management systems. Despite a variety of new laws, regulations and guidelines, implementation gaps still exist. The current water pollution control system relies on a top-down approach to monitoring, control and supervision. While this may work in cities where industries are spatially concentrated and pollution-monitoring systems are well developed, it does not work in the rural areas where water polluting
References (86)
- et al.
The nature of the township–village enterprise
Journal of Comparative Economics
(1994) - et al.
Explaining regional economic policies in China: interest groups, institutions, and identities
Communist and Post-Communist Studies
(2002) - et al.
China: the forecast of its environmental situation in the 21st Century
Journal of Environmental Management
(1996) - et al.
Status and fuzzy comprehensive assessment of combined heavy metal and organo-chlorine pesticide pollution in the Taihu Lake region of China
Journal of Environmental Management
(2005) - et al.
Environmental performance rating and disclosure: China's GreenWatch program
Journal of Environmental Management
(2004) - et al.
Chinese township–village enterprises as vaguely defined cooperatives
Journal of Comparative Economics
(1994) - et al.
Environmental regionalization for the management of township and village enterprises in China
Journal of Environmental Management
(2001) - et al.
Impact of reform and economic restructuring on rural systems in China: a case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang
Journal of Rural Studies
(2002) - et al.
The sustainability dilemma of China's township and village enterprises: an analysis from spatial and functional perspectives
Journal of Rural Studies
(2002) The contradictory impact of reform on environmental protection in China
China Quarterly
(1997)
Population, public health and the environment in China
The China Quarterly
Who Will Feed China? Wake-up Call for a Small Planet
How water scarcity will shape the new century
Water Science and Technology
China's township and village enterprises: Kelon's competitive edge/executive commentary
The Executive—ADA Then Briefcliff
Rural industrialization and ownership in China
Comparative Economic Studies
The implementation gap in environmental management in China: the case of Guangzhou, Zhengzhou, and Nanjing
Public Administration Review
Insecure property rights and government ownership of firms
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Evolution of organizational governance and human resource management in China's township and village enterprises
International Journal of Human Resource Management
Patterns of China's Lost Harmony: A Survey of the Country's Environmental Degradation and Protection
Zhongguo nongcun qiye zuzhi de bianhua ji qi lilun qishi—you guan “Hengdian moshi” de yixie chubu sikao [Changes in the Organization of Chinese TVEs and Their Theoretical Implications—First Thoughts on the “Hengdian Model”]
Jingji Yanjiu (Economic Research)
China strives to make the polluter pay
Environmental Science and Technology
Rural industrialization trends and causes
Industry's view of rural area
Institutional challenges for EIA implementation in China: a case study of development versus environmental protection
Environmental Management
Western influence on environmental management in China: dreams of markets and democracy
Sinosphere
The contradictory impact of reform on environmental protection in China
The China Quarterly
The organisation of environmental protection in China
The China Quarterly
The puzzle of China's township–village enterprises: the paradox of local corporatism in a dual-track economic transition
Management and Organization Review
Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform
Transformation of a rural economy in the Zhujiang delta
The China Quarterly
Reform from below: the private economy and local politics in the rural industrialization of Wenzhou
The China Quarterly
Cited by (235)
Sediment records of black carbon variations over the last two centuries in North China
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentAssessing the dynamic land utilization efficiency and relevant driving mechanism in in-situ urbanized rural areas: A case study of 1979 administrative villages in Hangzhou
2023, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewDoes the low-carbon city pilot policy work in China? A company-level analysis based on the PSM-DID model
2023, Journal of Environmental Management