Fish stranding in freshwater systems: Sources, consequences, and mitigation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Fish can become stranded when water levels decrease, often rapidly, as a result of anthropogenic (e.g., canal drawdown, hydropeaking, vessel wakes) and natural (e.g., floods, drought, winter ice dynamics) events. We summarize existing research on stranding of fish in freshwater, discuss the sources, consequences, and mitigation options for stranding, and report current knowledge gaps. Our literature review revealed that ∼65.5% of relevant peer-reviewed articles were found to focus on stranding associated with hydropower operations and irrigation projects. In fact, anthropogenic sources of fish stranding represented 81.8% of available literature compared to only 19.9% attributed to natural fish stranding events. While fish mortality as a result of stranding is well documented, our analysis revealed that little is known about the sublethal and long-term consequences of stranding on growth and population dynamics. Furthermore, the contribution of stranding to annual mortality rates is poorly understood as are the potential ecosystem-scale impacts. Mitigation strategies available to deal with stranding include fish salvage, ramping rate limitations, and physical habitat works (e.g., to contour substrate to minimize stranding). However, a greater knowledge of the factors that cause fish stranding would promote the development and refinement of mitigation strategies that are economically and ecologically sustainable.

Highlights

► When water levels decrease in freshwater ecosystems, fish can become stranded. ► It is unknown whether fish stranding contributes significantly to mortality rates. ► We summarize the sources, consequences, and mitigation options for fish stranding. ► Generalized statements can be made about the factors associated with stranding. ► It is difficult to assess effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

Introduction

Fish stranding is any event in which fish are restricted to poor habitat as a consequence of physical separation from a main body of water. This phenomenon can occur in both lentic and lotic environments and is caused by natural and anthropogenic processes that generally result in rapidly falling water levels. Arguably, the majority of stranding research to date has emanated from hydropower studies that have typically focused on quantifying and reducing mortality of salmonids during hydropeaking operations (Cushman, 1985; Fig. 1). Comparatively little is known about non-salmonid species or in other contexts, and in general little is known about the factors that are associated with stranding, making it difficult to develop mitigation strategies. Nonetheless, there are other examples of stranding studies in the literature from freshwater systems around the globe (e.g., billabongs in Australia [Ward, 1998], ship wakes in navigation canals in Europe [Wolter et al., 2004]).

With increasing levels of aquatic habitat alteration (Richter et al., 1997) and increased management of flows and water levels in freshwater systems (e.g., hydropower development [Bunn and Arthington, 2002, Nilsson et al., 2005], irrigation [Haag et al., 2010]), there is a need to understand the extent of stranding, the factors that contribute to stranding, and the consequences of stranding at various biological levels. Because fish stranding is a natural phenomenon in some systems (e.g., flood pulse concept; Junk et al., 1989), it may also play an important role in structuring aquatic systems (Junk et al., 1989) or even provide important sources of fish protein in developing countries (Martin et al., 2011). Despite the fact that fish stranding may be a significant issue, there is currently no synthesis of knowledge related to stranding in freshwater systems which makes it difficult to assess its relative threat to biodiversity or determine the need for mitigation strategies.

The objective of this paper is to generate a synthesis of knowledge related to the topic of fish stranding with a focus on freshwater systems. Specifically, we will: 1) characterize the literature on fish stranding using a quantitative literature review; 2) describe potential and documented sources of stranding; 3) summarize the factors affecting stranding rates; 4) discuss possible effects of stranding at organismal, population, community and ecosystem (including socio-economics) levels; 5) consider mitigation strategies that have been proposed and tested, and (6) identify knowledge gaps and suggest possible future research directions.

Section snippets

Overview of fish stranding literature

To search for documented cases of anthropogenic and naturally caused fish stranding we used various combinations of the following search terms in both Web of Science and Google Scholar: fish, strand*, flood*, oxbow, drawdown, desiccation, ice dams, freshet, dewater*, fish kill, eggs, juvenile, alevin, redd, drought, irrigation, hydropeaking, floodway, vessel drawdown, and ship wake. In the existing technical and peer-reviewed literature we identified a number of documented sources of

Sources of fish stranding

As noted above, our literature review revealed that the majority of fish stranding research is attributed to anthropogenic alteration of natural flow regimes. More specifically, rapid flow fluctuations downstream of hydropower facilities (e.g., hydropeaking and plant shutdowns; see Fig. 2a,b) were identified as being a common source of stranding (Cushman, 1985). Hydropeaking can drastically change river depths and available habitat, resulting in a flow regime that is significantly different

Factors influencing fish stranding

Understanding the factors that influence fish stranding may help managers assess the potential for fish stranding in a given water body and/or strategies for mitigation. Abiotic factors that can influence fish stranding include water flow rate, water temperature, water quality, wetted history, seasonality, light conditions, time of day, bathymetric morphology, and substrate characteristics (Table 2; Saltveit et al., 2001, Halleraker et al., 2003, Irvine et al., 2009). In general, there appears

Consequences of fish stranding

The biological outcomes of fish stranding on individual fish described in the literature range from negligible sub-lethal impacts to direct mortality. However, the consequences of stranding (presumably via mortality of individuals) at the population-, community- and ecosystem-level have not been studied. Although a stranding event that leads to mortality of a fish is not of benefit to that individual, the fish may be a key food source for some shoreline dwelling animals (e.g., birds of prey,

Mitigation strategies

One of the most common mitigation methods for fish stranding are manual salvage efforts (Fig. 5), typically associated with planned anthropogenic water-level lowering events (e.g., canal drainings, hydropower plant shutdowns). Such efforts are labour intensive, expensive, and not sustainable in the long-term, particularly for more regular water level fluctuations such as downstream from peaking hydropower facilities. Higgins and Bradford (1996) reported on the effectiveness of fish salvage to

Knowledge gaps and future research directions

To date, research on hydropeaking systems has served as the basis for the majority of the knowledge on fish stranding. However, many questions remain and today, particularly in the context of hydropower, regulators and utilities continue to struggle with identifying the magnitude and consequences of stranding as well as identifying potential mitigation strategies (Table 3). One of the more fundamental questions that still exists is whether the extent of fish stranding has whole-population

Synthesis and conclusion

Our review identified that stranding occurs as a result of both natural and anthropogenic causes although it is difficult to use primary literature to understand and quantify the relative frequency of stranding events and their causes as most accounts of stranding do not find their way into journals. The factors associated with stranding are diverse and in general poorly understood. Indeed, it is most likely that when stranding occurs in a given system, the extent of stranding is dictated by

Acknowledgements

Our team is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, Parks Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Center of Expertise on Hydropower Impacts on Fish), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through the HydroNet Strategic Network Project. We thank Karen Smokorowski and Brent Mossop for assisting with finding appropriate photos.

References (67)

  • K.R. Dabrowski et al.

    How efficiently do fish larvae and juveniles swim?

    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A

    (1986)
  • S. Martin et al.

    Impacts of fishing by dewatering on fish assemblages of tropical floodplain wetlands: a matter of frequency and context

    Biological Conservation

    (2011)
  • J.V. Ward

    Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation

    Biological Conservation

    (1998)
  • S.R. Adams et al.

    Stranding potential of young fishes subjected to simulated vessel-induced drawdown

    Transactions of American Fisheries Society

    (1999)
  • A.A. Agostinho et al.

    The dependence of fish community structure and dynamics on floodplain and riparian ecotone zone in Parana River, Brazil

    Hydrobiologia

    (1995)
  • A.H. Arthington et al.

    The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems

    Ecological Applications

    (2006)
  • L.N. Baumgartner et al.

    The Effects of Selected Irrigation Practices on Fish of the Murray–Darling Basin

    (2007)
  • C.D. Becker et al.

    Survival data for dewatered rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Rich.) eggs and alevins

    Journal of Applied Ichthyology

    (1986)
  • C.D. Becker et al.

    Effects of dewatering on Chinook salmon redds: tolerance of four development phases to one-time dewatering

    North American Journal of Fisheries Management

    (1983)
  • A.T. Bednarek et al.

    Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation

    Ecological Applications

    (2005)
  • E. Bell et al.

    Fidelity and survival of juvenile coho salmon in response to a flood

    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

    (2001)
  • E. Bell et al.

    Salmonid fry stranding mortality associated with daily water level fluctuations in Trail Bridge reservoir, Oregon

    North American Journal of Fisheries Management

    (2008)
  • M.J. Bradford

    An experimental study of stranding of juvenile salmonids on gravel bars and inside channels during flow decreases

    Regulated Rivers: Research and Management

    (1997)
  • M.J. Bradford et al.

    An experimental study of the stranding of juvenile coho salmon and rainbow trout during rapid flow decreases under winter conditions

    North American Journal of Fisheries Management

    (1995)
  • R.S. Brown et al.

    Winter movements and habitat use of riverine brown trout, white sucker and common carp in relation to flooding and ice break-up

    Journal of Fish Biology

    (2001)
  • S.E. Bunn et al.

    Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity

    Environmental Management

    (2002)
  • L.J. Chapman et al.

    The consequence of flooding for the dispersal and fate of poeciliid fish in an intermittent tropical stream

    Oecologia

    (1991)
  • A.G. Coche

    Fish culture in rice fields a world-wide synthesis

    Hydrobiologia

    (1967)
  • R.M. Cushman

    Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream from hydroelectric facilities

    North American Journal of Fisheries Management

    (1985)
  • A.J.H. Davey et al.

    Fish community responses to drying disturbances in an intermittent stream: a landscape perspective

    Freshwater Biology

    (2007)
  • M.R. Donaldson et al.

    Cold shock and fish

    Journal of Fish Biology

    (2008)
  • D. Evans

    Effects of hypoxia on scope for activity and power capacity lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush)

    Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

    (2007)
  • C.H. Fernando

    Rice field ecology and fish culture – an overview

    Hydrobiologia

    (1993)
  • L.E.W. Flodmark et al.

    Performance of juvenile brown trout exposed to fluctuating water level and temperature

    Journal of Fish Biology

    (2004)
  • T.B. Grabowski et al.

    Effects of flow fluctuations on the spawning habitat of a riverine fish

    Southeastern Naturalist

    (2007)
  • J.J. Haag et al.

    2009 Fish Survey in Recently Dewatered Western Irrigation District Canals

    (February 2010)
  • J. Halleraker et al.

    Factors influencing stranding of wild juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid and frequent flow decreases in artificial stream

    River Research and Application

    (2003)
  • J. Heggenes et al.

    Seasonal and spatial micrpohabitat selection and segregation in young Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and brown trout (S. trutta L.) in a Norwegian river

    Journal of Fish Biology

    (1990)
  • J. Heggenes

    Habitat selection of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and young Atlantic salmon (S. salar) in streams: static and dynamic hydraulic modeling

    Regulated Rivers: Research and Management

    (1996)
  • M.L. Heman et al.

    Manipulation of fish populations through reservoir drawdown

    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

    (1969)
  • P.S. Higgins et al.

    Evaluation of a large-scale fish salvage to reduce the impacts of controlled flow reduction in a regulated river

    North American Journal of Fisheries Management

    (1996)
  • L.E. Holland

    Effect of brief navigation related dewatering on fish eggs and larvae

    North American Journal of Fisheries Management

    (1987)
  • Hunter, M.A., 1992. Hydropower flow fluctuations and salmonids: a review of the biological effects, mechanical causes...
  • Cited by (127)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text