Elsevier

Journal of Environmental Management

Volume 182, 1 November 2016, Pages 620-640
Journal of Environmental Management

Review
Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.049Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The removal of PPCPs from wastewater was reviewed.

  • Analytical methods for 87 commonly used PPCPs were summarized.

  • Tables summarizing the biological and chemical processes were provided.

  • Suggestions were made for further study.

Abstract

The pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) are emerging pollutants which might pose potential hazards to environment and health. These pollutants are becoming ubiquitous in the environments because they cannot be effectively removed by the conventional wastewater treatment plants due to their toxic and recalcitrant performance. The presence of PPCPs has received increasing attention in recent years, resulting in great concern on their occurrence, transformation, fate and risk in the environments. A variety of technologies, including physical, biological and chemical processes have been extensively investigated for the removal of PPCPs from wastewater. In this paper, the classes, functions and the representatives of the frequently detected PPCPs in aquatic environments were summarized. The analytic methods for PPCPs were briefly introduced. The removal efficiency of PPCPs by wastewater treatment plants was analyzed and discussed. The removal of PPCPs from wastewater by physical, chemical and biological processes was analyzed, compared and summarized. Finally, suggestions are made for future study of PPCPs. This review can provide an overview for the removal of PPCPs from wastewater.

Introduction

Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) have been widely used in many fields such as medicine, industry, livestock farming, aquaculture and people's daily life. They are becoming ubiquitous in the environments due to their extensive applications and poor removal by the conventional biological wastewater treatment plants. They can be classified into several classes based on their various purposes (Daughton and Ternes, 1999). The specific classes, corresponding purposes and main properties of PPCPs were listed in Table 1. PPCPs have been received increasing attention since 2000s. The worldwide production of PPCPs was over 1 × 106 tons in 1993 (Daughton and Ternes, 1999). In 2003, the annual production of penicillin was 28,000 tons amounting 60% of the world total consumption of antibiotics (Richardson et al., 2005). Antibiotics contain more than 50 products (Mompelat et al., 2009), and penicillin is just one of the antibiotics. Although their assumption is not accurate, PPCPs have many classes, and each class includes many products. The annual production of PPCPs can be higher than 2 × 107 tons. Moreover, this production still increases due to the high demands of PPCPs in preventing or curing disease and sustaining the development of economic such as aquaculture and livestock farming. Consequently, environmental pollution caused by extensive application of PPCPs is becoming more and more serious.

Nowadays, the rising attention from the world has been paid to the fate of PPCPs in the environment, which can be attributed to the two reasons. One reason is the ubiquity of PPCPs in the environment resulting from their widespread use; the other reason is the progress in analytical technology, which enables people to detect PPCPs in trace level.

The PPCPs can be introduced into the environment by direct and indirect pathways. The way of PPCPs entering to the environment was reviewed by Mompelat et al. (2009). Briefly, PPCPs can enter the surface water via directly discharging into the surface water by industries, hospitals, households and wastewater treatment plants and through land runoff in case of biosolids spread on agricultural land, which can reach the groundwater by leaching or bank filtration. Within the surface water compartment, sediment can adsorb the PPCPs because it has a variety of binding sites (Kästner et al., 2014). Soil can be also one of the sink for PPCPs. PPCPs can pass into the soil by the irrigation with the treated or untreated wastewater containing PPCPs. In addition, for some PPCPs, they can transfer to soil by atmospheric wet deposition (Kallenborn et al., 2004).

Many studies have shown that PPCPs occurred in the surface water with the concentration ranging from ng/l to μg/l (Calamari et al., 2003, Moldovan, 2006, Kasprzyk-Hordern et al., 2008, Huerta-Fontela et al., 2011, Wu et al., 2015, Roberts et al., 2016), in the ground water at concentration level of ng/l to mg/l (Cabeza et al., 2012, López-Serna et al., 2013), in sediment with the concentration reaching μg/kg (Richardson et al., 2005) and in soil achieving μg/kg (Karnjanapiboonwong et al., 2011, Gottschall et al., 2012).

The advance in the development of analytical technology enables people to detect PPCPs in trace level. Improvement of extraction method combining with advanced analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), significantly increases the ability to detect the distribution of PPCPs in the environment.

PPCPs are recognized as pseudo persistent organic pollutants in the environment, which may display the same risk to the environment as the truly persistent organic pollutants due to their continuous introduction into the environment by means of different ways such as sewage treatment plants. Although the concentrations of PPCPs in the environment are very low as aforementioned, they still can affect water quality and ecosystem balance, and even impact drinking water resources. Studies have been conducted to investigate the environmental risk of PPCPs by comparing the difference between predicted concentration and measured concentration or predicting the adverse effect concentration with regard to specific organisms (Hernando et al., 2006, Verlicchi et al., 2014), which provided theoretical basis for determining the environmental risk of PPCPs. In addition to the comparison between the predicted and measured concentration or the effect on the specific organisms, the environmental risk of PPCPs was also characterized in terms of bioaccumulation, toxicity and persistence (Mendoza et al., 2015). In order to eliminate the potential risk of the PPCPs, it is necessary to get rid of the PPCPs from wastewater. As a result, many methods including physical, chemical and biological methods have been developed to remove the PPCPs during the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).

The objective of this paper is to review the current knowledge on the removal of PPCPs from the wastewater, as well as the analytical techniques used to determine the PPCPs in the environment.

Section snippets

Analytical methods of PPCPs

Analytical method is the prerequisite for investigating the fate of PPCPs in the environment. The analysis of targeted compounds usually includes three steps. The first step is to select the proper analytical instrument. Gas chromatography (GC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are two most widely used instruments. The requirement of sample preparation is easier for HPLC than that for GC. Water sample after filtration (usually 0.45 μm filter) can be directly injected into the

Removal efficiency of PPCPs by WWTPs

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are considered as the main unit to remove or degrade the pollutants from wastewater. The conventional biological treatment process adopted in the WWTPs is activated sludge system. It has the capacity to remove the PPCPs from the wastewater, but the removal efficiency of PPCPs changed greatly, and varied with the physiochemical properties of compounds as well as environmental conditions such as the biological reactor configuration and operational parameters

Removal of PPCPs

Although the concentrations of PPCPs in the environment are low, continuous exposure to these compounds is a critical concern with unknown long-term impacts. As a consequence, the removal of PPCPs gained much attention. Generally, removal methods of PPCPs fall into three categories: physical, biological and chemical methods. Among chemical methods, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been widely investigated. Thus, the review will be stated with the following order: physical, biological,

Concluding remarks and perspectives

The conventional wastewater treatment process, especially activated sludge system, cannot effectively remove the PPCPs, which are frequently detected in the effluents. Moreover, the removal of PPCPs during the activated sludge system can be affected by many factors, such as the composition of PPCPs, pre-treatment system, microbial community existing in the activated sludge system and the environmental conditions as well as operational conditions. Thus, activated sludge system as the most widely

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51338005) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT-13026).

References (233)

  • I.R. Bautitz et al.

    Photodegradation of lincomycin and diazepam in sewage treatment plant effluent by photo-Fenton process

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • F.J. Beltrán et al.

    Diclofenac removal from water with ozone and activated carbon

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • B. Blair et al.

    Evaluating the degradation, sorption, and negative mass balances of pharmaceuticals and personal care products during wastewater treatment

    Chemosphere

    (2015)
  • D. BŁędzka et al.

    Degradation of n-butylparaben and 4-tert-octylphenol in H2O2/UV system

    Radiat. Phys. Chem.

    (2010)
  • A.D. Bokare et al.

    Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2014)
  • Y. Cabeza et al.

    Monitoring the occurrence of emerging contaminants in treated wastewater and groundwater between 2008 and 2010. The Baix Llobregat (Barcelona, Spain)

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2012)
  • J.B. Carbajo et al.

    Continuous ozonation treatment of ofloxacin: transformation products, water matrix effect and aquatic toxicity

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2015)
  • M. Carballa et al.

    Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant

    Water Res.

    (2004)
  • L.B. Chu et al.

    Degradation of sulfamethazine in sewage sludge mixture by gamma irradiation

    Radiat. Phys. Chem.

    (2015)
  • L.B. Chu et al.

    Degradation of 3-chloro-4-hydroxybenzoic acid in biological treated effluent by gamma irradiation

    Radiat. Phys. Chem.

    (2016)
  • B. De Gusseme et al.

    Degradation of acetaminophen by Delftia tsuruhatensis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a membrane bioreactor

    Water Res.

    (2011)
  • N. De la Cruz et al.

    Degradation of 32 emergent contaminants by UV and neutral photo-fenton in domestic wastewater effluent previously treated by activated sludge

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • B. De Witte et al.

    Ozonation and advanced oxidation by the peroxone process of ciprofloxacin in water

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • J. Deng et al.

    Degradation of the antiepileptic drug carbamazepine upon different UV-based advanced oxidation processes in water

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • I.N. Dias et al.

    Enhancement of the photo-Fenton reaction at near neutral pH through the use of ferrioxalate complexes: a case study on trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole antibiotics removal from aqueous solutions

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • E.V. Efremov et al.

    Achievements in resonance Raman spectroscopy: review of a technique with a distinct analytical chemistry potential

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2008)
  • S. Esplugas et al.

    Ozonation and advanced oxidation technologies to remove endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in water effluents

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2007)
  • L. Feng et al.

    Removal of residual anti-inflammatory and analgesic pharmaceuticals from aqueous systems by electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. A review

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2013)
  • X. Feng et al.

    Degradation of estrone in aqueous solution by photo-Fenton system

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2005)
  • C. Gómez-Pacheco et al.

    Tetracycline removal from waters by integrated technologies based on ozonation and biodegradation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • S. Gao et al.

    Oxidation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) by chlorine, ozone and permanganate—a comparative study

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2014)
  • A. Garcia-Ac et al.

    Oxidation kinetics of cyclophosphamide and methotrexate by ozone in drinking water

    Chemosphere

    (2010)
  • T. Garoma et al.

    Removal of sulfadiazine, sulfamethizole, sulfamethoxazole, and sulfathiazole from aqueous solution by ozonation

    Chemosphere

    (2010)
  • H. Gauthier et al.

    Biodegradation of pharmaceuticals by Rhodococcus rhodochrous and Aspergillus niger by co-metabolism

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • A. Ghauch et al.

    Antibiotic removal from water: elimination of amoxicillin and ampicillin by microscale and nanoscale iron particles

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2009)
  • A. Goi et al.

    Degradation of salicylic acid by Fenton and modified Fenton treatment

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2008)
  • N. Gottschall et al.

    Pharmaceutical and personal care products in groundwater, subsurface drainage, soil, and wheat grain, following a high single application of municipal biosolids to a field

    Chemosphere

    (2012)
  • S.J. He et al.

    Removal of diclofenac from surface water by electron beam irradiation combined with a biological aerated filter

    Radiat. Phys. Chem.

    (2014)
  • M.D. Hernando et al.

    Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater effluents, surface waters and sediments

    Talanta

    (2006)
  • J. Hu et al.

    Degradation of chlorophenols in aqueous solution by gamma-radiation

    Radiat. Phys. Chem.

    (2007)
  • M. Huerta-Fontela et al.

    Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and hormones through drinking water treatment

    Water Res.

    (2011)
  • E. Illés et al.

    Ketoprofen removal by O3 and O3/UV processes: kinetics, transformation products and ecotoxicity

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • N. Janzen et al.

    Transformation products and reaction kinetics of fragrances in advanced wastewater treatment with ozone

    Chemosphere

    (2011)
  • C. Jung et al.

    Removal of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products in water using carbon nanotubes: a review

    J. Indus. Eng. Chem.

    (2015)
  • M. Kaczmarek et al.

    Chemiluminescence determination of tetracyclines using Fenton system in the presence europium (III) ions

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2009)
  • B. Kasprzyk-Hordern et al.

    The occurrence of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs in surface water in South Wales, UK

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • B. Kasprzyk-Hordern et al.

    The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • M.H. Khan et al.

    Tetracycline degradation by ozonation in the aqueous phase: proposed degradation intermediates and pathway

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2010)
  • I. Kim et al.

    Performance of UV and UV/H2O2 processes for the removal of pharmaceuticals detected in secondary effluent of a sewage treatment plant in Japan

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • N. Klamerth et al.

    Degradation of fifteen emerging contaminants at μgL−1 initial concentrations by mild solar photo-Fenton in MWTP effluents

    Water Res.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (1118)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text