Characterization of different starch types for their application in ceramic processing
Introduction
Starch is one of the frequently used pore-forming agents in ceramic technology.1, 2 Due to its chemical composition (a polysaccharide consisting essentially of C, H and O only) this natural biopolymer is easily burnt out during firing without residues in the final ceramic body. In a recently developed process, called starch consolidation casting (SCC), starch can additionally take the role of a body-forming agent.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 This process exploits the ability of starch granules to swell in aqueous media at elevated temperature and enables ceramic green bodies to be formed from starch-containing aqueous ceramic suspensions by casting into non-porous molds (e.g. polymer or metal molds). Principles, processing details and modeling issues concerning the SCC process as well as microstructure–property characterization of final ceramics prepared by SCC can be found in Refs. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. Of course, also the SCC process results in porous ceramics with a microstructure determined by the type of starch used. However, optimization of the SCC process is a highly complex task, which is complicated by the intricate time–temperature behavior of starch in aqueous media and the non-equilibrium nature of phase transitions (e.g. gelatinization and retrogradation).16, 17 Although starch granules can generally change their size (and volume) and possibly shape during swelling, the initial size and shape will determine the characteristics of the pore space of the final ceramics to a large degree.
In any case, as a first step towards efficient microstructural control by the SCC process, it is necessary to know the initial size, shape and size distribution of the starch type used. In particular, concerning size distribution, it is desirable to dispose of a characterization in terms of laser diffraction (LD) data and in terms of microscopic image analysis (MIA) data. The former (LD) is a convenient modern standard method that can be routinely applied in process optimization and production control, while the latter (MIA) is a method that can be conveniently applied for the characterization of fired ceramic bodies. In other words, only by MIA it is possible to relate the particle size distribution of the pore-forming agent directly to the pore size distribution in the fired ceramics. In spite of the immense literature on starch science and technology, it seems that a systematic comparison between LD data and MIA data from the viewpoint of particle statistics is not available. The purpose of this paper to provide such a comparison and to present the individual characteristics for five native starch types which are commercially available in the world market: potato, wheat, tapioca, corn and rice.
The size and shape information provided in this paper should be helpful to realistically delimit the potential microstructural goals that can be attacked with starch as a pore-forming agent (in conventional ceramic shaping technologies or in the SCC process) and may serve as a guideline in selecting the appropriate starch type for a concrete application in mind. The comparison between LD and MIA results is a necessary precondition for future process optimization and improved microstructural control.
Section snippets
Starch types
Starches are complex biopolymers of natural origin, occurring in the form of granules in plant tissue. Chemically, they consist essentially of two types of polysaccharides (glucose polymers), amylose and amylopectin, cf. Table 1. For a detailed characterization of composition, structure and properties of starch, including the time–temperature behavior in aqueous media (with or without additional solutes), the reader can refer to several excellent reviews.18, 19, 20 What is of primary interest
Measurement details and evaluation procedure
All five starch types (potato, tapioca, wheat, corn, and rice) have been characterized by LD and MIA. The reader can refer to standard monographs21, 22 for measurement principles of these methods. Laser diffraction was carried out in a standard way23, 24 on the particle sizer Analysette 22 (Fritsch Laborgeratebau GmbH, Germany) using a He–Ne laser (wavelength approximately 0.6 μm) and performing a model-independent evaluation via Fraunhofer theory. No sample preparation was necessary prior to
Results and discussion
Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 7 show micrographs of potato, wheat, tapioca, corn and rice starch, respectively. It is evident that potato starch exhibits the largest and most anisometric granules (Fig. 3). The deviation from sphericity is clearly towards prolate shapes. Polydispersity is a common feature of all starch types, but wheat starch shows a large amount of small grains beside many large grains, while intermediate sizes are apparently missing (Fig. 4). Most wheat starch granules
Summary and conclusions
Five starch types, all commercially available on the world market, have been characterized with respect to size and shape. Size distributions have been measured by LD and MIA. The latter, although much more operator-intensive and time-consuming, was necessary in order to verify the possibility to replace MIA by LD in routine measurements and to justify the future use of LD (and not MIA) results for a direct comparison with resulting pore-size distributions measured by MIA. In particular, good
Acknowledgement
This work was part of the project “Preparation and properties of advanced materials—modelling, characterization, technology”, supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (Grant No. MSM 223100002). The support is gratefully acknowledged.
References (33)
- et al.
Characterization of porous silicon nitride materials produced with starch
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(2004) - et al.
Mechanical properties and mechanical behaviour of SiC dense-porous laminates
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(2005) - et al.
Processing of porous ceramics by “starch consolidation”
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(1998) - et al.
Processing of porous cordierite bodies by starch consolidation
Mater. Res. Bull.
(1998) - et al.
Porous bioactive calcium carbonate implants processed by starch consolidation
Mater. Sci. Eng.
(2000) - et al.
Size and shape characterization of polydisperse short fiber systems
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(2006) - et al.
A note on particle size analyses of kaolins and clays
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(2000) Novel water-based shaping of ceramic components
Br. Ceram. Proc.
(1999)- et al.
Porous ceramics formed using starch consolidation
Key Eng. Mater.
(2002) - Týnová, E., Alumina Ceramics Prepared by Casting with Organic Additives. MSc thesis, ICT Prague, Prague, 2000 (in...
New trends in shaping of ceramics (in Czech)
Sklář a keramik
Gelatin casting and starch consolidation of alumina ceramics
Starch consolidation casting of alumina ceramics—body formation and microstructural characterization
Key Eng. Mater.
A model for the body formation in starch consolidation casting
J. Mater. Sci. Lett.
Zirconia and alumina-zirconia composites ceramics prepared by starch consolidation
Influence of the starch type on microstructure and properties of oxide ceramics prepared by starch consolidation (in Czech)
Cited by (125)
Preparation of foam concrete from solid wastes: Physical properties and foam stability
2023, Construction and Building MaterialsProcess of making rice paper from mango purée
2023, Materials Today: ProceedingsEthanol pretreatment increases the efficiency of maltogenic α-amylase and branching enzyme to modify the structure of granular native maize starch
2022, Food HydrocolloidsCitation Excerpt :However, it is unknown how MA and BE alter the molecular structure of granular starch upon ethanol treatment. The starch source strongly influences the structure and properties of starch granules (Gregorová, Pabst, & Bohačenko, 2006; N. Singh, Singh, Kaur, Singh Sodhi, & Singh Gill, 2003; Srichuwong, Sunarti, Mishima, Isono, & Hisamatsu, 2005). For instance, when compared with rice starch, maize starch has a lower crystallinity (Huang et al., 2015; Srichuwong et al., 2005), larger granule size (Singh et al., 2003; Srichuwong et al., 2005), lower peak viscosity (Huang et al., 2015; Srichuwong et al., 2005), and a higher retrogradation rate (Jacobson, Obanni, & Bemiller, 1997).
Biochar based nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of emerging organic pollutants from water and wastewater
2021, Materials Research Bulletin