Assessment of operation management for beer packaging line based on field failure data: A case study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.12.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Reliability analysis for packaging of beer production over a period of 9-month was carried out. The most important failure modes were identified and the descriptive statistics at failure and machine level were calculated. Several theoretical distributions were applied and best fit of failure data was identified. The reliability and hazard rate models of the failure data were determined to provide an estimate of the current operation management (i.e. maintenance policy, training, spare parts) and improve the line efficiency. It was found out that (a) the availability of the beer filling/capping machine is 94.80%, (b) the failures due to mechanical and pneumatic causes amount to 57.1% of all the failures of the machine, (c) the time-between-failure (TBF) was drastically decreased thereby suggesting that the probability to fail increased and the current maintenance policy should be revised, and (d) the failure times follow the normal distribution whereas the times-to-repair (TTR) a failure comply with the logistic distribution.

Introduction

Modern industrial systems apply advanced technology and automation for produced goods with required quality and quantity. Based on market requirements there is a strong relationship between manufacturers and customers that demand the products to be delivered on time with the proper quality. Reliability analysis techniques play an important role to optimize the operational management of the production process. The inconvenience of a failure includes high maintenance cost, loss of production, quality deterioration and delay in the delivery of the products to customers. In some cases the presence of failure may be disastrous for the environment and operators as well. Consequently, the managers/engineers may find a way to reduce the probability of failures and their undesirable consequences on the production process. Blischke and Murthy (2003) pointed out that since failures cannot be prevented entirely, it is important at least to minimize both their probability of occurrence and their impact when they do occur.

Ho (1989) and Mula et al. (2006) reported that the occurring uncertainties can be categorized into two types: (i) environmental uncertainty, such as supply and demand uncertainty, and (ii) system uncertainty, which is related to uncertainties within the production process, e.g. operation yield uncertainty, production lead time uncertainty, quality uncertainty, failure of production system and changes in product structure.

According to Mobley (2002), the maintenance costs are a major part of the total operating costs of all manufacturing or production plants, and depending on the specific industry, maintenance costs can represent between 15% and 60% of the cost of the goods produced. Lewis and Steinberg (2001) reported that for instance maintenance-related costs account for approximately 30–50% of direct mining costs. Hauge (2002) reported that the two requirements to be met for the preventive maintenance of a component to be appropriate are: first, preventive maintenance when the component deteriorates with time and the second requirement is the cost of preventive maintenance that must be less than the cost of corrective maintenance. Preventive maintenance is widely considered an effective strategy for reducing the number of system failures, thus lowering the overall maintenance cost (Okogbaa and Peng, 1996). Francois and Noyes (2003) displayed a methodology for the evaluation of maintenance strategies by taking into consideration the effect of certain variables on the dynamic of maintenance, its structure and its context of evolution.

In the literature, the availability of field data collected from the production lines is quite limited. Bendell (1988) identified a number of issues relevant to the collection, analysis and reliability of data. Kumar and Klefsjo (1992) investigated the reliability characteristics of a fleet of load-haul-dump machines deployed at Kiruna mine and showed that the engine and the hydraulics are the two most critical subsystems. Furthermore, maintenance data for 2 years for these machines are analyzed. Barabady and Kumar (2008) published a case study describing reliability and availability analysis of the crushing plant 3 at Jajarm Bauxite Mine in Iran; the reliability analysis was shown to be very effective for deciding maintenance intervals. Bendell and Walls (1985) outlined some of the data analysis procedures that should be carried out in the initial consideration of any reliability time-between-failure and repair time data. Information gathered with such an approach may prove invaluable in providing an insight into equipment behaviour and highlighting problems which might otherwise remain unnoticed. Jones and Hayes (1997) reported a methodology to collect field reliability data and analysis for identifying problems in manufacturing, design and screening.

Only a very limited number of publications related to food industry are available in this field. Liberopoulos and Tsarouhas (2002) reported a case study of speeding up a croissant production line, based on actual data collected over 10 months, by inserting an in-process buffer in the middle of the line to absorb some of the downtime, based on the simplifying assumption that the failure and repair times of the workstations of the lines have exponential distributions. Furthermore, Liberopoulos and Tsarouhas (2005) displayed a statistical analysis of failure data of an automated pizza production line. The analysis included identification of failures, computation of statistics of the failure data, and parameters of the theoretical distributions that best fit the data, and investigation of the existence of autocorrelations and cross correlations in the failure. Tsarouhas et al., 2009 developed a reliability and maintainability analysis of strudel production line, and descriptive statistics of the failure and repair data was carried out and the best fitness index parameters were determined. Moreover, Tsarouhas et al. (in press) investigated reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) analysis of the cheese production line over a period of 17 months, and the best fit of the failure and repair data between the common theoretical distributions was found and the respective parameters were computed.

In this study reliability analysis for beer packaging line over a period of 9-months was carried out. The most important failure modes were identified and the descriptive statistics at failure and machine level were elaborated. The best fit of failure data for several theoretical distributions was determined and the respective parameters were computed. The reliability and hazard rate models of the failure data were determined in order to assess the current operation management (i.e. maintenance policy, training, spare parts) and improve the production line efficiency. The aim of this paper is to provide a valid reliability and maintainability model for food product machinery manufacturers, who target to optimize the design and operation of their packaging production lines.

Section snippets

Beer main production stages

The beer production line consists of several machines in series the design of which is based on advanced technology with assemblies adopting highly precision manufacture and control system. Its operation is stable, safe, highly effective and characterized by law consumption of resources. The main stages for beer production are shown schematically in Fig. 1. The beer production consists of the following stages;

  • Raw materials receipt: The main raw materials used in beer production are the

Beer bottle packing station

The packaging is a subsystem of the beer production line that contains four-machines, filling/capping machine, conveyor belt, packing machine and palletizer. The rotary filling/capping machine is fully automatic and the transmission system is driven by motors, by means of a synchronization encoding control. The machine has high microbiological safety due to fully automatic cleaning in place (CIP) cleaning and external washing and low oxygen content due to the vacuum system. The beer filling

Field failure data for beer filling/capping machine

Failure and repair data of the filling/capping machine were collected from the files of the technical department by the end of each shift. They had been recorded in print by the technicians in charge (mechanical and electrical).

The availability of the beer filling/capping machine is defined asAm=meanTBFmeanTBF+meanTTR=(1/n)i=1nTBFi(1/n)i=1nTBFi+(1/n)i=1nTTRi=5688.55688.5+311.5=0.948where n is the total number of failures studied within the frame of this investigation.

The records included the

Statistical analysis of field failure data

In order to obtain qualitative and quantitative analysis of the failure data for the beer filling/capping machine, the descriptive statistics of the basic features of the failure and repair data for TBF, and TTR are presented in Table 2. Thus, it is possible to extract the minimum and the maximum value of the sample, mean, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), skewness and kurtosis of the failure data at failure modes, and the machine level. The SD of the random variable is

Reliability and maintainability analysis

Reliability is the probability that a system (machine or component) will perform a required function, under stated operating conditions, for a given period of time t. T defines the TBF of the system. If T  0, then the reliability can be expressed as (Ebeling, 1997), R(t)=P(Tt). The un-reliability function is defined as, Q(t), which is the probability of failure in t, Q(t)=1-R(t)=P(Tt). In reliability theory, the hazard or failure rate function is denoted as, λ(t)=f(t)/R(t) where f(t) is the

Determination of reliability and hazard rate models for the beer filling/capping machine

The beer filling/capping machine consists of several components in series with a common transfer mechanism and fully automated control system. The machine will function if and only if all its components are properly functioning. Should a component of the machine fail then the machine stops, and as a result the production line stops too.

The machine, as mentioned above, is following the normal failure low, and it is fair to indicate T as the continuous random variable representing the time

Conclusions

The main research findings can be summarized as follows:

  • (a)

    The availability of the beer filling/capping machine is 94.80%, and should be optimized with an adequate operation management. The mean TBF is 73.8766 h whereas the mean TTR is about 4 h.

  • (b)

    To improve the reliability of the machine efforts, attention should be firstly focused on Fm.1 (mechanical), and secondly on Fm.2 (pneumatic) that have the major number of failures. Furthermore, they comprise the 57.1% of all the failures of the machine.

  • (c)

    The

References (27)

  • C.E. Ebeling

    An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering

    (1997)
  • N.M. Eskin

    Biochemistry of Foods

    (1990)
  • P. Francois et al.

    Evaluation of a maintenance strategy by the analysis of the rate of repair

    Quality and Reliability Engineering International

    (2003)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Annual production budget in the beverage industry

      2012, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the second stage, different sized cans, glass bottles (disposable and reusable), kegs and plastic (PET) bottles (less common in the beer case) are filled with beer and soft drinks. A filling line consists on a series of conveyor belts and machines that wash, fill, seal, label and pack the bottles, cans or kegs (Cooke et al., 2005; Tsarouhas and Arvanitoyannis, 2010). The first step involves washing and disinfection of containers, which afterwards pass through an inspection to guarantee the absence of potential hazards.

    • Alleviating bottlenecks in a microbiology laboratory

      2011, Journal of Food Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sampling plans for food quality control are standardized for international trade by ICMSF (1986), and for food manufacturers, with knowledge of material sources, food processes, etc., and hence for food testing laboratories like PAS, by IFST (UK) (1999). The effectiveness of reliability analysis is demonstrated for a beer packaging line and a cake and cheese production line, by Tsarouhas and Arvanitoyannis (2010) and Tsarouhas et al. (2009a,b). They show how machine maintenance can alleviate the adverse impact of machine breakdown on the efficiency of the entire manufacturing operation.

    • Statistical Analysis of Stoppages of A Metal Stamping Line: A Case Study

      2023, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management
    • Smart Technologies in Food Manufacturing

      2022, Smart and Sustainable Food Technologies
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text