Preparation and evaluation of thiol-functionalized activated alumina for arsenite removal from water
Introduction
Arsenic (As) is one of the most toxic contaminants found in the environment. Arsenic contamination has been receiving increased attention and emerged as a major concern on a global scale in recent years [1], [2]. Chronic intake of arsenic has been associated with increased risk of cancers, diabetes, developmental and reproductive problems, and cardiovascular disease [2], [3], [4], [5]. To minimize these risks, the World Health Organization (WHO) has set a provisional guideline limit of 0.01 mg L−1 for arsenic as the drinking water standard [6]. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced its ruling in 2001 to lower the maximum contaminant level (MCL) from 50 to 10 ppb, and this new regulation has become effective from January 2006 [7], [8].
The more stringent drinking water standard has a significant impact on the management of arsenic contaminated sites and has motivated researchers and water treatment industries to develop innovative arsenic removal technologies. The current water treatment technologies, such as coagulation/precipitation, ion exchange, lime softening, and metal oxide adsorption, are effective for removing arsenate [As(V)], but much less for arsenite [As(III)] [9], [10], [11], [12] mainly because As(III) is a hydrophilic, neutral species below pH 9 and is not accessible to the major removal mechanisms of anion sorption and anion exchange [11]. Compared with As(V), As(III), which is present predominantly in anoxic groundwater, is more toxic and more mobile [13], [14], [15], [16]. To enhance As(III) removal, a pre-oxidization of As(III) to As(V) is usually involved using oxidizing agents or photocatalytic oxidation on TiO2 [9], [11], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. However, the application of a pre-oxidation step causes operational complexity, increases cost of water treatment, and especially diminishes the overall viability of the fixed-bed process [23]. These problems have highlighted the urgent necessity for the development of direct and cost-effective As(III) remediation technologies without the need for additional pre-oxidization.
It is well known that As(III) has an especially high affinity for tissue proteins by strongly binding to mercaptan (thiol) groups existing in biomolecules such as amino acids, peptides and proteins (including some enzymes), which explains the higher toxicity of this species and the metabolism of arsenic in mammals [5], [24], [25], [26]. Based on the above understanding, some thiol-based adsorbents including polymer resins and silica gels have been developed for As(III) removal [27], [28], [29], [30], and some of them exhibited the selective removal of As(III) and had a high adsorption capacity. Recently, McKimmy et al. [31] synthesized thiol-functionalized mesostructured silica using direct assembly methods for As(III) trapping, and the As(III) concentration was reduced by up to 98% under batch equilibrium conditions. More interestingly, a biomass (treated waste chicken feathers) with a cysteine-rich protein has been used for selective As(III) adsorption up to 270 μmol g−1 of biomass [26]. These results suggested that materials bearing thiol functional groups as As(III) adsorbents are very promising, and prompted us to develop new thiol-functionalized adsorbents for As(III).
Activated alumina (AA), as a low-cost material, has a high surface area and a distribution of both macro- and micropores, and has been extensively studied and used as arsenic adsorbent [2], [32], [33]. The AA adsorption has been classified among the best available technologies (BAT) for arsenic removal from water [34]. However, the conventional commercially available AA has ill-defined pore structures, low adsorption capacities and exhibits slow kinetics [35]. Moreover, the uptake of As(III) by AA is much less than that of As(V) in most pH conditions [32]. To improve its performance, some modified types of AA such as Fe(OH)3-coated AA, iron oxide-impregnated AA, manganese-amended AA and biopolymer chitosan-coated AA, have been developed and proved to be more effective for As(III) and As(V) removal than virgin AA [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. However, to our knowledge, there is no report on the use of thiol-functionalized AA for arsenic removal up to present although thiol-modified alumina materials have been used to adsorb certain heavy metals like Hg, Pb, Cd, etc. [42], [43]. The thiol-functionalized AA is expected to take advantage of the strength of the two materials.
In this study, various novel hybrid adsorbents bearing thiol groups were prepared by introducing mercaptopropyl-functionalized silica onto the surface of the AA under different conditions. The hybrid adsorbents were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectroscopy and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis. Their adsorption properties for As(III) were investigated and the effects of the various factors on As(III) removal are discussed. It is also expected that the hybrid adsorbents will still be effective for As(V) removal due to the presence of aluminol active sites remaining uncovered. The broad objective of this investigation was to develop a cost-effective and environmentally friendly hybrid adsorbent for remedying groundwater and drinking water contaminated by As(III), or both As(III) and As(V), which is also viable for a fixed-bed process without pre-oxidation of As(III).
Section snippets
Materials and characterization
(3-Mercaptopropyl)triethoxysilicane (MPTS, 80%, technical) and sodium arsenite (NaAsO2, Certified) were purchased from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA), respectively. All other chemicals were analytical grade and purchased from Aldrich or Fisher Scientific and used as received. The activated alumina (AA-400G-48 MESH) was obtained from Alcan Specialty Aluminas (Brockville, ON, Canada), and sieved with 70 mesh sieve to removal fine particles. As(III) and
Preparation of the hybrid adsorbents
The modification of solid surfaces by organosilanol chemistry or sol–gel process is routinely used for material functionalizations affording new physico-chemical surface properties and enabling diverse applications. Various functionalized adsorbents for heavy metal adsorption have been developed by modifying porous substrates or filtration membranes with organosilane reagents containing certain target functional groups such as mercapto, amino, and carboxyl groups [45], [46], [47], [48]. Here,
Conclusions
Thiol-functionalized organic–inorganic hybrid adsorbents for direct removal of As(III) from water have been prepared by means of introducing the reactive ingredients onto AA as substrate. The hybrid adsorbents were characterized by SEM, Raman spectroscopy and BET surface area analysis. Based on the evaluation of the different preparation methods and conditions, a cost-effective and environmentally benign approach has been developed to obtain the optimum hybrid adsorbent with the best balance of
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Su and Dr. Chou in CES for their technical support in the facilities, and the Ph.D. students Zhonghou Xu and Shiyou Xu for their help with BET and SEM measurements.
References (50)
- et al.
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a critical review
J. Hazard. Mater.
(2007) - et al.
Determination of configuration of arsenite–glutathione complexes using ECSTM
Toxicol. Lett.
(2007) - et al.
Arsenic remobilization in water treatment adsorbents under reducing conditions. Part I. Incubation study
Sci. Total Environ.
(2008) - et al.
A review of the arsenic cycle in nature waters
Water Res.
(1972) - et al.
A review of the source, behavior, and distribution of arsenic in natural waters
Appl. Geochem.
(2002) - et al.
Oxidation of arsenite in groundwater using ozone and oxygen
Sci. Total Environ.
(2000) - et al.
Arsenic removal from water employing heterogeneous photocatalysis with TiO2 immobilized in PET bottles
Chemosphere
(2008) - et al.
Adsorption of As(V) and As(III) by nanocrystalline titanium dioxide
Water Res.
(2005) - et al.
Combined use of photocatalyst and adsorbent for the removal of inorganic arsenic(III) and organoarsenic compounds from aqueous media
J. Hazard. Mater. B
(2005) - et al.
Arsenic removal using a polymeric/inorganic hybrid sorbent
Water Res.
(2003)
Equilibrium characterization of the As(III)–cysteine and the As(III)–glutathione systems in aqueous solution
J. Inorg. Biochem.
Sorption of arsenic anions onto poly(ethylene mercaptoacetimide)
React. Funct. Polym.
Design of polyvinyl alcohol mercaptyl fibers for arsenite chelation
React. Funct. Polym.
Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: equilibrium and kinetics
Water Res.
Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As(III) on activated alumina
Sep. Purif. Technol.
Laboratory based approaches for arsenic remediation from contaminated water: recent developments
J. Hazard. Mater. B
Application of new adsorbents for removal of arsenic from drinking water
Stud. Environ. Sci.
Determination of surface properties of iron hydroxide-coated alumina adsorbent prepared for removal of arsenic from drinking water
J. Colloid Interf. Sci.
Removal of arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) from aqueous medium using chitosan-coated biosorbent
Water Res.
Polythiol-functionalized alumina membranes for mercury capture
J. Membrane Sci.
Functionalized sol–gel material for extraction of mercury (II)
React. Funct. Polym.
Acid catalyzed synthesis of ordered bifunctionalized mesoporous organosilicas with large pore
Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
India's spreading health crisis draws global arsenic experts
Science
Dose-response relation between arsenic concentration in well water and mortality from cancers and vascular diseases
Am. J. Epidemiol.
Arsenic Environmental Health Criteria. 18
Cited by (45)
Evaluation of sol-gel-modified activated alumina adsorbent for arsenic removal from drinking water
2023, Handbook of Arsenic ToxicologyA combination approach using two functionalized magnetic nanoparticles for speciation analysis of inorganic arsenic
2022, TalantaCitation Excerpt :Long term consumption of drinking water contaminated with arsenic can be associated with increased risk of cancers, diabetes, developmental and reproductive problems and cardiovascular disease. Hereby, to minimize these risks, in 2001 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and World Health Organization (WHO) have modified the permissible contamination level in drinking water from 50 to 10 μg L−1 [6,7]. The inorganic species of arsenic are more toxic than common organic forms like monomethyl arsenic and dimethyl arsenic.
Graphene oxide-MnO<inf>2</inf>-goethite microsphere impregnated alginate: A novel hybrid nanosorbent for As (III) and As (V) removal from groundwater
2021, Journal of Water Process EngineeringSimultaneous removal of arsenic and antimony from mining wastewater
2020, Journal of Environmental Sciences (China)Metal ion and contaminant sorption onto aluminium oxide-based materials: A review and future research
2018, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Exposure to arsenic-containing water can cause serious skin cancer, loss of appetite and other health complications. Several research groups have explored the capability of NAOs as sorbents to sorb arsenic species from water [91–93]. The ability of alumina in chitosan-graft-polyacrylamide (CTS-G-PA) for effective As(V) removal was tested by Saha et al. [94].