Unpacking the misery multiplier: How employability modifies the impacts of unemployment and job insecurity on life satisfaction and mental health
Introduction
Luiz Felipe Scolari has shrugged off the pressure mounting on him at Chelsea and declared that another managerial position would always be around the corner for him. “If I lose my job, I have another job …… Maybe tomorrow, maybe after one year or two years. I have worked for 25 years.” (Guardian, 14 January, 2009).
It has been firmly established, in a wide range of empirical studies at individual and country levels, that unemployment is detrimental for health and well-being, both in itself and because it entails a loss of income. At the same time, a large number of psychological studies and a few in economics have found that job insecurity itself also generates substantial losses in well-being. Within both literatures, some studies have uncovered heterogeneous effects associated with scarring and social norms, or across different socio-economic groups. The issue which I address in this paper is that an important reason for heterogeneity in the effects of unemployment and job insecurity is rarely recognised in theory or empirically investigated: namely, that employability matters. The Guardian quotation illustrates one instance of this proposition: Chelsea coach Scolari was reported to be unconcerned by his job being at risk because he felt he was very employable. More generally, the effects on well-being of being unemployed or of the fear of job loss are each potentially mitigated if there are good prospects of finding another job: the question is, how much?
The broad term “employability” refers to the ability of an individual to find and sustain employment. A characteristic of the individual in context, employability is indicated by the probability of obtaining employment, though often proxied by measures of its determinants (skills, adaptability and so on). In this paper I develop a simple conceptualisation of the roles of employment insecurity and employability, with two central features. First, it allows for the uncertainty surrounding unemployment and employment to affect well-being both directly and indirectly through its impact on expected income. The direct effects are justified in psychological and social theory, while the indirect effects are economic. Second, the framework allows for the interaction between unemployment and employability, and between job insecurity and the employability of the employed. To empirically implement this framework, the three key variables – employability of the unemployed, job loss risk, and the employability of the employed – are directly measured by the subjective expectations of the probabilities of future employment transitions.
An understanding of the role of employability in modifying the detrimental impacts of unemployment and job insecurity is greatly relevant to the formation of unemployment and employment policies. European debate, for example, in recent years has focused on “flexicurity”, a strategy to devise employment and welfare legislation that will optimise the ability of employers to redeploy labour (thereby, other things equal, raising job insecurity) while at the same time providing generous support and training for the unemployed (European Commission, 2007). “Flexicurity” policies are argued, not only to be efficient, but also to provide a political compromise by protecting the welfare of the unemployed. There is, however, no empirical evidence through which the impacts of job insecurity and of employability could be compared, and any trade-off evaluated from the perspective of the well-being of workers.
My findings provide new estimates of the impact of unemployment and of job insecurity, in the context of a model that takes account of the effects of the interacting transition risks. These findings are gleaned using fixed effects estimation on panel data, and are therefore more confidently interpreted as causal than in the many cross-section studies in the literature. I examine how the magnitude of the effects of insecurity among employees compares with the effects of being unemployed.
It turns out that, as predicted, unemployed people with little hope of finding a job enjoy the least well-being by a considerable margin, while employed people who are both highly employable and in a secure job enjoy the most. In between there is substantial differentiation according to employability, job insecurity and their interaction. The estimates imply that there are considerable gains from raising the employability of an unemployed person. Meanwhile, high job insecurity substantially lowers subjective well-being, but less so if the employee is more employable. Relative to a secure job the deleterious effects of a high level of job insecurity are comparable in magnitude with the effects of unemployment. I compute crude estimates of the “misery multiplier” ranging between 3.2 and 3.5 – this being the ratio of the total impact of a rise in unemployment on well-being to the impact on just those made unemployed. It is this broader impact of unemployment, deriving from its extended impact on job insecurity and employability, that accounts for the society-wide impact of recessions. The estimates also allow the trade-off between greater job insecurity and improved employability to be computed, thus providing a first step for a potential evaluation of “flexicurity” policy.
The paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 overviews the two literatures on unemployment and job insecurity, and sets up the simple framework and specification that takes account of the interactions among the uncertainties. Section 3 describes the data and Section 4 my findings, and I conclude in Section 5 with the policy implications.
Section snippets
Theory and literature
Whether or not they have a job workers face uncertainty: in any given period employees might lose their jobs, while the unemployed might find one. This uncertainty affects well-being both directly, in that it is uncertain whether they will experience the well-being associated with having a job per se, and indirectly through its impact on expected income. The aim of this section is to develop a simple framework that allows the separate and interactive effects on well-being of the different
Data
Eq. (3) was estimated using panel data from the first seven annual waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (HILDA).5
Core findings
Estimations of life satisfaction depend on whether it is treated as an ordinally comparable variable or as a cardinal variable. There is a trade-off between the possible disadvantage of making the stronger assumption that it is cardinal, and the benefits of being able to allow for unobserved fixed factors that may be correlated with outcomes of interest. Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Frijters (2004) show that it makes little difference in practice whether one assumes cardinal or ordinal responses to
Conclusions and implications
Football management is a precarious job, but this did not seem to concern Scolari, even though he may have been feeling quite insecure while his team's performances were below expectations.18
References (48)
- et al.
Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?
Social Science & Medicine
(2008) - et al.
Boon or bane? Others’ unemployment, well-being and job insecurity
Labour Economics
(2010) - et al.
Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being
Journal of Economic Psychology
(2008) The effects of low-pay and unemployment on psychological well-being: a logistic regression approach
Journal of Health Economics
(1998)- et al.
The relationship between perceived employability and subsequent health
Work and Stress
(2007) Full Employment in a Free Society
(1944)- et al.
Unemployment and mental health: evidence from research in the Nordic countries
Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare
(1998) The effects of labour market position, job insecurity and unemployment on psychological health
- et al.
The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities
BMC Public Health
(2004) - et al.
Job Insecurity and Wages
Economic Journal
(2007)
Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review
Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale
Unemployment as a social norm: psychological evidence from panel data
Journal of Labor Economics
Unhappiness and unemployment
Economic Journal
Scarring: the psychological impact of past unemployment
Economica
Job security and job protection
Oxford Economic Papers-New Series
Unemployed, uneducated and sick: the effects of socio-economic status on health duration in the European Union
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series a-Statistics in Society
Job insecurity in temporary versus permanent workers: associations with attitudes, well-being, and behaviour
Work and Stress
Employability and employees’ well-being: Mediation by job insecurity
Applied Psychology an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale
Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness
American Economic Review
The macroeconomics of happiness
Review of Economics and Statistics
Toward Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and better jobs through flexibility and security
How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?
Economic Journal
Demanding Work. The Paradox of Job Quality in the Affluent Economy
Cited by (218)
Does employability help to cope with job insecurity? An analysis of workers' well-being with Swiss panel data
2024, Research in Social Stratification and MobilityWhat happens to restaurant employees during times of distress? A focus on separation strategies, emotional outcomes, and drinking behaviors
2024, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementToo stressed to sleep? Downsizing, job insecurity and sleep behavior
2023, Economics and Human BiologyGeneral and COVID19-specific emotional stress: Religious practice as a potential coping strategy
2023, Economics and Human BiologyEconomic conditions and health: Local effects, national effect and local area heterogeneity
2023, Journal of Economic Behavior and OrganizationShocks and mental health: Panel data evidence from South Africa
2023, World Development