Regional groundwater model of north-east Belgium
Introduction
In 1975, SCK·CEN (the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre) started investigations on the possibility to dispose of high-level radioactive waste in the Boom Clay layer in north-east Belgium. Since 1982, ONDRAF/NIRAS (the Belgian Agency for Radioactive Waste and Enriched Fissile Materials) is responsible for the long-term management of all radioactive waste in Belgium. In this framework, ONDRAF/NIRAS and SCK·CEN are currently evaluating the feasibility and safety of a possible deep repository for high-level and medium-level radioactive waste in the Boom Clay (ONDRAF/NIRAS, 2001). Favourable properties of the Boom Clay are its low hydraulic conductivity (10−7 m/d), its thickness (about 100 m at the Mol site) and lateral homogeneity, its high sorption capacity, favourable geochemical (reducing) conditions and its high plasticity, which strongly contributes to its self-sealing capacity.
The regional groundwater model (Fig. 1) simulates the water flow in the groundwater system (Fig. 2) consisting of the host formation and the main surrounding aquifers. It covers almost 7000 km2 and includes the most important regional natural boundary conditions (rivers, regional divides and the sea) that influence the regional groundwater system. The main applications of the regional groundwater model are as follows: understanding the hydrogeology of the delineated research area, providing boundary conditions for the local flow and transport models (Meyus et al., 1998) that are used in the performance assessments (Marivoet et al., 2002), and simulating the hydrogeological system behaviour for changing boundary conditions, e.g. due to climatic changes.
This paper presents the most recent update of the regional groundwater model incorporating the results of the data acquisition campaign started in 1996 (ONDRAF/NIRAS, 2001).
Section snippets
Regional groundwater system
The hydrogeological system of north-east Belgium (Fig. 1) consists of tertiary sedimentary layers that deepen towards the north-east and outcrop in the south. The layers form a series of outcrops that represents the main recharge zones of the aquifers both above and below the Boom Clay (Fig. 2).
The major aquitard in the studied area is the approximately 100 m thick (at the Mol site) Boom Clay separating the Neogene and Quaternary group of aquifers (upper aquifer) from the Lower Rupelian aquifer.
Problem description
The regional groundwater model runs in present-day conditions until a steady state is reached. The steady-state solution represents the system response to a specific set of boundary conditions and sources and sinks. Hence, changes in the system and especially the long term changes can be evaluated by adapting the boundary conditions of the regional model to specific evolution scenarios.
The preceding versions of the regional model were not able to simulate the observed groundwater levels below
Regional hydrogeological model update
The updated regional hydrogeological model, designated NEB-2002, and released in 2002, brought several improvements into the concept and parameters of the regional model. The main features are discussed below.
The boundary conditions for the upper aquifer are the net infiltration, the rivers and zero flow boundary conditions assigned to the groundwater catchment boundaries. The main boundary condition for the Lower Rupelian and Lede-Brussel aquifers is the infiltration in the outcrop area. At
Transient groundwater flow model of the deep aquifers
In order to fit the calculated levels in the aquifers located below the Boom Clay to the observed values we built a specific transient model. This model includes only the confined parts of the deep aquifers (deep groundwater circulation domain – Fig. 5). The unconfined areas of the deep aquifers are represented by fixed head boundary conditions. These boundaries represent the interfaces between the two groundwater circulation domains correctly because the regional groundwater model gives
Conclusions
The goal of the regional groundwater modelling for the performance assessment of the deep geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste was to improve the understanding of the regional groundwater system including the host formation. Ultimately, the regional groundwater model is also used to simulate effects of changing boundary conditions on the groundwater system and to provide the boundary conditions for smaller-scale models used for flow and transport calculations.
The recent update of
Acknowledgements
This update of the regional hydrogeological model forms part of the programme on geological disposal of high-level and long-lived radioactive waste that is carried out by ONDRAF/NIRAS, the Belgian Agency for Radioactive Waste and Fissile Materials. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily correspond to those of ONDRAF/NIRAS.
References (12)
- et al.
Spatial variability of transport parameters in the Boom Clay
Applied Clay Science
(2004) - Anderman, E.R., Hill, M.C., 2003. MODFLOW-2000, The US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model – Three Additions...
- Bernier, F., Bastiaens, W., 2004. Fracturation and self-healing processes in clays - the SELFRAC project. In: Davies,...
- De Cannière, P., Put, M., Neerdael, B., 1995. Hydraulic characterisation of the boom clay formation from the HADES...
The post-paleozoic geological history of north-eastern Belgium
Mededeling van de Koninglijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van Belgie
(1989)- Marivoet, J., Sillen, X., Mallants, D., De Preter, P., 2002. Performance assessment of geological disposal of...
Cited by (32)
Regional groundwater flow in hard rocks
2015, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :With the rapid increase of computer power and the advent of Geographic Information System (GIS), the partial approaches to regional flow modeling, including the assessment of leakage structures and preferential flow paths, could be integrated into complex algorithms, being MODFLOW (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) and the associated graphic user interfaces (e.g., Visual MODFLOW; Waterloo Hydrogeological, 2001) the most widely used packages, because of their flexible modular structure, complete coverage of hydrogeological processes and public domain free availability. Among the studies employing MODFLOW in the analysis of regional groundwater flow, one can refer the ones by Dufresne and Drake (1999), Gedeon et al. (2007) and Scanlon et al. (2003). The data required to operate these models are immense, and for that reason their applicability may be hampered when these data are lacking or fragmented.
Groundwater resources management through the applications of simulation modeling: A review
2014, Science of the Total EnvironmentCalibration of spatial aquitard distribution using hydraulic head changes and regularisation
2011, Journal of HydrologyCombined use of groundwater modeling and potential zone analysis for management of groundwater
2011, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationCitation Excerpt :MODFLOW developed by USGS (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) is the widely used software in the community of groundwater modelers. Several case studies were carried out through MODFLOW to understand and predict the groundwater behavior (Palma and Bentel, 2007; Gedeon et al., 2006; Idrysy et al., 2006; Kumar, 2001). As per the literature review, several studies have been performed to find out the groundwater potential zones using different methods, but the real impact/influence of these potential zones on aquifer has not been examined with the help of available technique i.e. groundwater modeling.
Comparative reflections on the use of modelling tools in conflictive water management settings: The Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain
2010, Environmental Modelling and SoftwareCitation Excerpt :Resolution varies as a function of the available data. Model development follows a standard implementation methodology (Anderson and Woessner, 1992; Refsgaard et al., 2007) and is based on a finite-difference numerical code (Harbaugh and McDonald, 1996; Chiang and Kinzelbach, 2001; Chiang, 2005) whose reliability and robustness have been tested extensively (Prommer et al., 2002; Bradley, 2002; Lin and Medina, 2003; Martinez-Santos et al., 2004; Martinez-Cortina and Cruces, 2005; Scibek and Allen, 2006; Gedeon et al., 2007). Aquifer geometry is defined throughout by the interpretation of over 400 borehole logs.