Maximization of hydropower generation through the application of a linear programming model
Introduction
Due to an increase in energy demand, fossil fuel resources required for the generation of energy are becoming increasingly scarce. Furthermore, the development of atomic power has been regulated because of safety concerns. Consequently, there has been renewed interest in hydropower as an energy source. In comparison to other energy sources, hydropower is clean. It also requires no fossil fuel, thereby offering economic advantages even though the cost of development is higher than thermal power. Hydropower is also appealing because of its fast start-up time and peak load characteristics. For these reasons, hydropower plants are constructed by remote development in multipurpose dam development projects in South Korea and operated as storage plants.
Supplying water is the primary role of multipurpose dams in South Korea, and their hydroelectric power plants are mostly managed alongside the water supply systems. Performance criteria can be established for the operation and optimal stabilization of hydropower systems. The performance criteria generally include installed capacity, firm power and annual energy production (Kwon, 1994). The objective function for the performance is nonlinear because the products of power generation release, storage level and reservoir operation are of a sequential decision-making nature. Dynamic programming has commonly been used as a method to solve the problem (Yakowitz, 1982, Pereira and Pinto, 1985, Hiew, 1987, McLaughlin and Velasco, 1990, Paudyal et al., 1990, Ko et al., 1992, Kim and Palmer, 1997, Tilmant et al., 2002).
Research has been conducted on the application of successive linear programming (SLP) for the implementation of approximate linearization of the nonlinear function, and has been employed as a method for overcoming the nonlinearity of such objective functions (Grygier and Stedinger, 1985, Tao and Lennox, 1991, Ko et al., 1992, Reznicek and Simonovic, 1992, Barros et al., 2003).
This research applies a linear programming method similar to an SLP model. However, this study differs from the SLP model in that a new linear hydropower objective function is formulated and optimized in the model without the iterative algorithm.
Section snippets
Research model and approach
The objective function for maximizing hydropower energy can be expressed as a product form of the release and the head for hydropower generation. Therefore, nonlinear programming may be thought for maximization of energy production. However, this research takes a different approach by applying linear programming to the linear operation model.
Inflow
The inflow data used for the model is monthly inflow with a reliability of 50% calculated based on Yongdam dam inflow data for 38 years from 1963 to 2000, where the reliability is the exceedance probability obtained after the statistical analysis of 38 monthly inflow data in each seasonal month (Kim et al., 2002). In this study only a series of monthly data in a year with a reliability of 50% are used because of focusing on the results by this proposing methodology but it is not analyzed with a
Sensitivity analysis
The results of the optimal system operation with various parameter values of w1 and w2 in the linear model are shown in Table 4. As shown in Table 4 and Fig. 3, hydropower energy is convergent at the maximum value when the coefficient (w2) of discharge flow is more than 25 times greater than the coefficient (w1) of storage. In this convergent state, hydropower generation releases R and RR are maximized and the annual average storage level of the dam is indicated to be slightly down and could be
Summary and conclusion
In this study, the linear objective function model for maximizing hydropower generation is suggested as an alternative to the nonlinear model, and the optimality of the linear objective function model was examined and applied to the optimal operation of Yongdam Dam in South Korea. It can be summarized as follows:
- (1)
The linear objective function was examined as an alternative to a theoretical and graphical solution of the nonlinear objective function in order to maximize the energy generated by
References (21)
- et al.
Optimization of large-scale hydropower system operations
Water Resour. Plann. Manage.
(2003) - et al.
Algorithms for optimizing hydropower system operation
Water Resour. Res.
(1985) - Hiew, K.L., 1987. Optimization Algorithms for Large-Scale Multireservoir Hydropower Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation,...
- et al.
Value of seasonal flow forecasts in Bayesian Stochastic Programming
J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.
(1997) - Kim, Ju-Cheol, Yoo, Ju-Hwan, Kim, Jae Han, Jung, Kwansue, 2002. Analysis of the reliabilities of reservoir inflows into...
- et al.
Multiobjective optimization of reservoir systems operation
Water Resour. Bull.
(1992) - Korea Institute of Construction and Technology, 1996. Water Resources Long-Term Mater Planning (1997–2001). Appendix...
- Korea Water Resources Corporation, 1990. Yondam Multipurpose Dam Feasibility Study Report, Ministry of Construction,...
- Korea Water Resources Corporation, 1991. Yondam Multipurpose Dam Construction Project Specification Report, Republic of...
Water Resources Engineering
(1994)