Storage-based approaches to build floodplain inundation modelling capability in river system models for water resources planning and accounting
Introduction
Floodplains and wetlands are a critical part of natural environment and they play important ecological and hydrological roles in river basins. The role of floodplains and wetlands to provide for stable water supplies, improved water quality and a range of ecological benefits has been demonstrated in a number of recent studies (Richardson et al., 2012, Borin et al., 2001, Moore et al., 2002, Mitchell et al., 2002, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan et al., 2007). For example, the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) in Australia has over 30,000 wetlands (MDBA, 2011). Many wetlands located across the MDB are of national and international significance and listed in the Ramsar Convention as the wetlands of international importance and provide a range of ecological benefits (EA, 2001). The Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has recently developed a basin plan with the aim to return MDB to a healthy, working condition so as to have a sustainable and productive economic future (MDBA, 2012). One of the main objectives of the basin plan is to make sure that the key environmental assets (including wetlands and floodplains) are protected and progressively improved, and there is adequate water to sustain their ecological resilience during periods of drought. Floodplain wetlands rely on inflow from catchments to maintain the flooding and drying cycles critical to their ecological integrity (Powell et al., 2008) and a key determinant for habitat quality and the ecological integrity of floodplain wetlands is how the wetland is hydrologically connected to the main river channel over time (Junk et al., 1989, Paterson and Whitfield, 2000, Tockner et al., 2000, Bunn and Arthington, 2002, Frazier and Page, 2006). The environmental benefits of water flowing into wetlands and over floodplains depend on the extent, depth, duration and frequency of the inundation. Water management authorities and river managers need to predict the dynamics of wetting when they plan environmental flows so that they can optimise the environmental benefits to the riparian ecosystem. Thus, development of a detailed understanding of wetland hydrology and inundation characteristics is imperative for effective environmental management.
In-situ measurements of flood extent and depths, while very useful, are generally difficult to obtain for large floodplain problems that are of practical interest for environmental management. For most rivers in MDB sufficient observations of flood inundation extent are not available to determine such areas. Several research projects were undertaken in the past several years to develop detailed understanding of wetland inundation characteristics in different parts of MDB using mainly two approaches: satellite imagery based approach and hydrodynamic modelling.
Satellite and airborne platforms provide useful flood inundation maps that can act as validation data sets for hydraulic flood inundation models. Monitoring and mapping of wetlands using satellite imagery has been undertaken over a range of temporal and spatial scales (Shaikh et al., 2001, Kingsford and Thomas, 2002, Overton et al., 2006, Powell et al., 2008, Colloff et al., 2010). Bates et al., 1997, Smith, 1997 present a good review of the active and passive remote sensing studies of flood inundation. Shaikh et al. (2001) classified wetlands of the Lower Darling River in southeastern Australia based on broad commence-to-flow discharges and the inundation effects at different discharge magnitudes. To date, remote sensing of floodplain inundation from satellite platforms has not offered solution to the dynamic flood inundation processes because multiple images at fine resolution are generally not available (e.g. 35 days for ERS1 and ERS2 satellites, 16 days for Landsat, 7 to 10 days for RADARSAT). The satellite imagery based approach has several limitations including the inability to develop detailed understanding of floodplain hydrology (such as water balance) and hydraulics (e.g., changing floodplain dynamics). Nevertheless, these techniques indeed provide very useful direct observations that can be used for during or post event mapping (Brakenridge and Anderson, 2006; Pulvirenti et al., 2011) and calibration data sets for the flood inundation hydraulic models that can simulate a variety of historical and likely future conditions.
Both one and two dimensional hydrodynamic model are used for simulation of floodplain inundation (Horritt and Bates, 2002, Bales et al., 2007). The representative hydrodynamic models include MIKE21 (DHI, 2012), HEC-RAS (Horritt and Bates, 2002, Pappenberger et al., 2005) and LISFLOOD-FP (Bates et al., 2010). These models require an accurate high resolution DEM, cross-sections of channels and cross-sections of floodplains. The strength of these models includes use of water equilibrium equations, such as St. Venant’s equations, to model water movement in river channel and floodplain and to estimate inundation extent, velocity, duration, depth and frequency of wetting. They can also be used for analyzing impacts of modification of control structure such as levee banks. But, they are computationally expensive and need detailed parameter information (for each grid cell) for model calibration. Within MDB, several previous studies on modelling river flow and inundation have been undertaken for wetlands on the Lachlan Valley and Darling River in New South Wales (Shaikh et al., 1998, Shaikh et al., 2001), Murrumbidgee River (Frazier et al., 2003), Koondrook Perricoota (Tuteja, 2007), Edwaard-Wakool floodplain (SKM, 2011), Macquarie Valley (MacDonald et al., 2011a), Gwydir Valley (MacDonald et al., 2011b). Whilst hydrodynamic modelling is suitable for floodplain inundation simulation at high spatio-temporal resolutions, the approach is costly and not time effective (Dutta et al., 2000; Dutta et al., 2007, Dutta, 2012). In recent years, new approaches have been incorporated in floodplain hydrodynamic modelling for large floodplains with reduced computational time (Neal et al., 2012). There is scope for further research before such models can be integrated with river-system models for applications in very large river basins.
The coupling of the previous approaches with water resources planning models remains challenging for multiple reasons: the runtime of hydrodynamic models prevent a coupled model to be run for long period of time (e.g. 100 years) and multiple climate scenarios to explore water resources availability. In Australia, several planning models have been used by water managers such as IQQM (Simons et al., 1996, Vaze et al., 2011), REALM (Perera et al., 2005) and BIGMOD-MSM (Close, 1996a, Close, 1996b). Recently, eWater CRC has developed a new river system model, “eWater Source” (Dutta et al., 2012a, Welsh et al., 2013, Dutta et al., 2013a), which is expected to replace the old river system models. None of these river system models including Source are capable of explicitly modelling flood inundation. Instead, conceptual relationships, developed based on local knowledge and historical records and/or simulated outputs from hydrodynamic (HD) models, are used to define losses from river to floodplains (Macdonald et al., 2011a, Macdonald et al., 2011b). In recent years, several attempts have been made to incorporate flood modelling capabilities within hydrological modelling framework (e.g.,Yamazaki et al., 2011, Sayama et al., 2012). These models are not designed for regulated river system and their spatial resolution and computational time are not suitable for estimating floodplain fluxes and stores at a river reach scale in regulated river systems.
The main aim of this research was to develop a simplified methodology for flood inundation simulation within river system modelling framework to enhance the flood inundation modelling capability of river system models and to produce floodplain fluxes and stores. Two conceptual storage-based approaches have been designed and integrated with two river system models developed for MDB. Approach 1 is a simple method suitable for data limited environment. Approach 2 is more comprehensive and suitable for areas with high resolution data such as LiDAR topography data. The computational time of the two approaches are relatively very small compared to any floodplain hydrodynamic models and thus, the river model with these two inundation modelling approaches can be implemented in a large river basin (e.g., MBD) for long-term simulation. This paper introduces the two approaches and presents the results of their applications in MDB. The results are compared with the observed data and the results from a 2D hydrodynamic model and flood maps derived from Landsat TM imagery for some of the recent flood events.
Section snippets
Methodology
The two approaches have been designed for two river system models developed by CSIRO, namely, the simplified MDB River Model (SMDBRM) and AWRA river model (AWRA-R). SMBDRM is a daily river system model of the entire MDB being developed by CSIRO and it incorporates various physical and management characteristics for water resources planning (Dutta et al., 2012b). AWRA-R is the river system component of the Australian Water Resources Assessment (AWRA) system developed jointly by CSIRO and the
Study area and data
Approach 1 was implemented in the entire floodplains of the Murray Darling Basin (MDB). The MDB is one of the largest Australian river basins covering an area of approximately 1 million km2. The transboundary river basin, shared by four states and one territory, is Australia’s most important agriculture region producing one third of Australia’s food supply (CSIRO, 2008). For the purpose of AWRA-R modelling, the entire MDB was divided into 18 contiguous regions based on the regional boundaries
Results of Approach 1
Approach 1 flood inundation modelling in AWRA-R was implemented in 216 reaches of the MDB. The modelling parameters were calibrated as part of the joint calibration of AWRA-R model for all components including the parameters of flow routing and groundwater Monod function for the period of 1975–1999. The Monod function is a simple two-parameter function used to estimate flux from river to groundwater (Lerat et al., 2013). The model was validated using more recent data for 2000–2012. The flood
Conclusions
This paper describes the development and implementation of the flood inundation component of AWRA-R modelling system. Two flood inundation modelling approaches were successfully developed for AWRA-R model and tested in the Murray-Darling Basin. The first approach is a single storage approach, where river flow is partitioned into in-stream and overbank flow based on the in-stream flow capacity in a floodplain river reach. This approach was implemented in all floodplain reaches of MDB. The second
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support received from Water for a Healthy Country Flagship of CSIRO and WIRADA project for this research and the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Government of NSW for the LiDAR data. The authors acknowledge the contribution of Catherine Ticehurst of CSIRO Land and Water in processing Landsat TM imagery for the project. The two internal reviewers of CSIRO are acknowledged for their valuable review comments.
References (71)
- et al.
Simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling
Journal of Hydrology
(2010) - et al.
A new modelling system for river operations with a case study from the Goulburn River, Australia
Journal of Environmental Management
(2013) NDWI a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space
Remote Sensing of Environment
(1996)- et al.
Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation
Journal of Hydrology
(2002) - et al.
Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations
Journal of Hydrology
(2005) - et al.
Do shallow-water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes?
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
(2000) - et al.
Computer software tool REALM for sustainable water allocation and management
Journal of Environmental Management
(2005) - et al.
Modelling floodplain inundation for environmental flows: Gwydir wetlands
Australia, Ecological Modelling
(2008) - et al.
lood monitoring using multi-temporal COSMO-SkyMed data: Image segmentation and signature interpretation
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2011) - et al.
IQQM e a hydrologic modelling tool for water resource and salinity management
Environmental Software
(1996)
Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices
Environmental Modelling & Software
An integrated modelling framework for regulated river systems
Environmental Modelling and Software
A design system for two-dimensional nearly-horizontal flows
Journal of Hydraulic Research
Integrating remote sensing observations of flood hydrology and hydraulic modelling
Hydrological Processes
Controlled drainage and wetlands to reduce agricultural pollution – a lysimetric study
Journal of Environmental Quality
MODIS-based flood detection, mapping, and measurement: the potential for operational hydrological applications
Basic principles and consequences of altered hydrological regimes for aquatic biodiversity
Environmental Management
Improving Environmental Water Planning and Policy Outcomes: Ecological Responses to Flow Regimes in the Murray–Darling Basin
Effects of spatial grid resolution on river flow and surface inundation simulation by physically based distributed modeling approach
Hydrological Processes
Flood inundation simulation in a river basin using a physically based distributed hydrologic model
Hydrological Processes
A two dimensional hydrodynamic model for flood inundation simulation: a case study in the Lower Mekong River basin
Hydrological Processes
A comparative evaluation of short-term streamflow forecasting using time series analysis and rainfall-runoff models in eWater Source
Water Resources Management
The effect of river regulation on floodplain wetland inundation, Murrumbidgee River, Australia
Marine and Freshwater Research
Relating wetland inundation to river flow using Landsat TM data
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Cited by (28)
Merging Landsat and airborne LiDAR observations for continuous monitoring of floodplain water extent, depth and volume
2022, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :Floodplain wetlands with intermittently connection to main river channels are a common feature of Australia’s dryland river systems (Brennan et al., 2002; Hou et al., 2019). They play essential hydrological and ecological roles: maintaining the biodiversity and productivity of the river ecosystem; cycling nitrogen, carbon and sediment; providing stable water supplies, replenishing soil moisture and groundwater; and improving water quality (Dutta et al., 2013; Heimhuber et al., 2016; Kazezyılmaz-Alhan et al., 2007). The Murray-Darling Basin in Australia is one of the driest and most dynamic river basins worldwide.
From global circulation to local flood loss: Coupling models across the scales
2018, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :This part of the model chain couples the mesoscale (1000 to 100 km) to the micro-scale (1 km to 10 m). Such coupled models have been assessed by Brandimarte and Di Baldassarre (2012), Cook and Merwade (2009), Lerat et al. (2012), and Kim et al. (2012), among others and have been extensively applied in studies that estimate flood wave propagation (e.g. Laganier et al., 2014), retention effects (e.g. Felder et al., 2017; Skublics et al., 2014; Vorogushyn et al., 2012), and flood probabilities (Altarejos-García et al., 2012; Dutta et al., 2013; Felder and Weingartner, 2017). Finally, hydrodynamic models have been coupled to loss models to estimate flood losses.
Accounting public and individual flood protection measures in damage assessment: A novel approach for quantitative assessment of vulnerability and flood risk associated with local engineering adaptation options
2018, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :Backwater effects are not considered in the methodology, assuming that the length of the embankment is far greater than the overflow head (Hamill, 2011). Studies that have included the backwater effect consider critical depths on the crest level for the effects to take place (e.g. Dutta et al., 2013; Arrighi et al., 2013) To simulate a resulting inundation level in the protected vicinity caused by the overflow volume, the methodology further adopts the so-called semi-dynamic approach.
Spatiotemporal floodplain mapping and prediction using HEC-RAS - GIS tools: Case of the Mejerda river, Tunisia
2018, Journal of African Earth SciencesThe effect of coupling hydrologic and hydrodynamic models on probable maximum flood estimation
2017, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :The application of a hydrodynamic model allows for the consideration of the effects of retention areas, dykes, bridge piers and other physical obstacles. Numerous studies show that hydrodynamic models are particularly useful for considering retention effects due to floodplain inundation (Dutta et al., 2013; Meire et al., 2010; Skublics et al., 2014) and dyke breaches (Apel et al., 2009; Vorogushyn et al., 2010). Therefore the application of a hydrodynamic model potentially increases the plausibility of extreme flood estimations.