The compatibility of a nucleopolyhedrosis virus control with resistance management for Bacillus thuringiensis: Co-infection and cross-resistance studies with the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2006.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of genetically modified crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins can lead to the reduction in application of broad-spectrum pesticides and an increased opportunity for supplementary biological control. Bt microbial sprays are also used by organic growers or as part of integrated pest management programs that rely on the use of natural enemies. In both applications the evolution of resistance to Bt toxins is a potential problem. Natural enemies (pathogens or insects) acting in combination with toxins can accelerate or decelerate the evolution of resistance to Bt. In the present study we investigated whether the use of a nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) could potentially affect the evolution of resistance to the Bt toxin Cry1Ac in Plutella xylostella. At low toxin doses there was evidence for antagonistic interactions between AcMNPV and Cry1Ac resistant and susceptible insects. However, this antagonism was much stronger and more widespread for susceptible larvae; interactions were generally not distinguishable from additive for resistant larvae. Selection for resistance to Cry1Ac in two populations of P. xylostella with differing resistance mechanisms did not produce any correlated changes in resistance to AcMNPV. Stronger antagonistic interactions between Bt and AcMNPV on susceptible rather than resistant larvae can decrease the relative fitness between Bt-resistant and susceptible larvae. These interactions and the lack of cross-resistance between virus and toxin suggest that the use of NPV is compatible with resistance management to Bt products.

Introduction

The demand for environmentally friendly control methods and an increasing problem of resistance to synthetic insecticides has led to the increased use of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) microbial sprays. While the percentage share of the insecticide market accounted for by Bt microbial sprays is small this type of biological control is a key product in forestry, in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and for organic growers (Lacey et al., 2001). Bt has also been successfully exploited for its production of insect-specific Cry toxins. Genes encoding these toxins have been incorporated into genetically modified (GM) crops such as cotton and maize (Shelton et al., 2002). The consequences of the application of insect resistant GM crops are several; one notable advantage has been the reduction in use of broad-spectrum insecticides (Pyke and Fitt, 1998, Pray et al., 2002, Carpenter et al., 2004, Hails and Raymond, 2004), a pattern accompanied by some evidence for increasing reliance on natural enemies and biological control (EPA, 2001).

A reduction in the application of broad-spectrum pesticides increases the potential for IPM (van Lenteren, 2000) and can allow the build-up of natural enemies. In this context, the use of narrow-spectrum microbial products that do not interfere with a conserved natural enemy complex can be of added value in pest management. Nucleopolyhedroviruses (NPVs) are one such microbial insecticide. NPV products are commercially available for heliothine pests in the US and Australia and have been successfully used globally in various agricultural and horticultural settings (Hunter-Fujita et al., 1998) and in the development of IPM in cotton (Mensah, 2002). While NPVs have limitations as insecticides, especially in their cost of production, they can, through the build-up of infectious particles and secondary cycles of infection in pest populations, be an effective means of long-term population control (Reed and Springett, 1971, Entwistle et al., 1983, Dwyer and Elkinton, 1993, Fuxa and Richter, 1994, Young, 1998, Bonsall, 2004). This, in turn can lead to increased spray intervals and reduced costs for growers (Moscardi, 1999).

However, concerns have been expressed about the compatibility of microbial and natural enemy control with Bt resistance management. In particular, parasitoid attack and the action of a fungal pathogen were predicted to increase the rate of adaptation of Heliothis virescens to GM tobacco (Johnson and Gould, 1992, Johnson et al., 1997a, Johnson et al., 1997b, Gould, 1998). Nevertheless, parasitoid attack on Bt-resistant Plutella xylostella was not predicted to affect the relative fitness or evolution of resistance on GM oil seed rape (Schuler et al., 1999, Schuler et al., 2004). Given the importance of resistance management for the sustainability of Bt products and the potential of many target insects to evolve resistance to Bt toxins (Ferré and Van Rie, 2002, Janmaat and Myers, 2003) it would be valuable to know whether other invertebrate pathogens might have similarly deleterious consequences for the evolution of resistance to Bt. In this study we investigated how the combined use of a nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) and a Bt toxin, Cry1Ac, might affect the evolution of resistance to Bt. More specifically, we tested how co-exposure to NPV and toxin would interact and whether these interactions would vary between Cry1Ac resistant and susceptible insects. Secondly, we tested whether selection for resistance to a Bt toxin would produce correlated changes in susceptibility to an NPV.

Section snippets

General methods

Two populations of P. xylostella from Malaysia, Serd4 and Karak, derived from field populations with high levels of field-evolved resistance to B. t. kurstaki (Btk) and Cry1Ac, its most important constituent toxin, were used in this study (Sayyed and Wright, 2001, Sayyed et al., 2004). These populations have distinct and independently evolved mechanisms of resistance to Cry1Ac (Sayyed et al., 2001, Sayyed and Wright, 2001). Insects were fed on Chinese cabbage, Brassica pekinensis var. “One Kilo

Co-infection with AcMNPV and Cry1Ac

Comparison of toxin-only LC50s from resistant and susceptible Karak strains indicates that relative resistance to Cry1Ac was 23-fold at the time of this experiment (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). This is compatible with estimates of relative resistance (20 to 30-fold) from bio-assays immediately prior and after this experiment (data not shown). For Cry1Ac resistant insects the analysis of covariance found no evidence for interactions between toxin and virus (Table 1a, Fig. 3). While there was evidence of

Discussion

There was no clearly no impact of selection for Bt resistance on susceptibility to AcMNPV in two independent populations of P. xylostella. Thus, neither the loss of binding resistance mechanisms in the Serd4 and Karak population, nor the reduced toxin activation and an un-described third Bt resistance mechanism in Serd4 (Sayyed et al., 2001, Sayyed et al., 2004, Sayyed and Wright, 2001) appear to have any effects on the susceptibility of larvae to NPV infection. Although there are few other

Acknowledgments

We thank the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Grant D15960) for funding this study. Dr. Rosie Hails assisted in the development of this project. We also thank Dan Rose and Angeliki Martinou for technical assistance.

References (48)

  • M.B. Bonsall

    The impact of diseases and pathogens on insect population dynamics

    Physiol. Entomol.

    (2004)
  • Carpenter, J.E., Sankula, S., Silvers, C.S., Gianessi, L.P., 2004. Insecticidal Bacillus thurgingiensis plants versus...
  • D. Collett

    Modelling Binary Data

    (1991)
  • M.J. Crawley

    Statistical Computing, an Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus

    (2002)
  • G. Dwyer et al.

    Using simple models to predict virus epizootics in gypsy moth populations

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (1993)
  • P.F. Entwistle et al.

    Epizootiology of nuclear polyhedrosis virus (Baculoviridae) in European spruce sawfly (Gilpinia hercyniae)—spread of disease from small epicentres in comparison with spread of disease in other hosts

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (1983)
  • Environmental Protection Agency, 2001. Bt-plant incorporated protectants October 15 2001; Biopesticides Registration...
  • R.R. Farrar et al.

    Activity of the nucleopolyhedrovirus of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) on foliage of transgenic sweet corn expressing a CryIA (b) toxin

    Environ. Entomol.

    (2004)
  • J. Ferré et al.

    Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis

    Annu. Rev. Entomol.

    (2002)
  • J.R. Fuxa et al.

    Persistence and distribution of wild-type and recombinant nucleopolyhedroviruses in soil

    Microb. Ecol.

    (2001)
  • J.R. Fuxa et al.

    Distance and rate of spread of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) nuclear polyhedrosis-virus released into soybean

    Environ. Entomol.

    (1994)
  • T.R. Glare et al.

    Bacillus thuringiensis: Biology, Ecology and Safety

    (2000)
  • F. Gould

    Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology

    Annu. Rev. Entomol.

    (1998)
  • R.S. Hails et al.

    Insect resistant transgenic plants and their environmental impact

  • Cited by (31)

    • HearNPV susceptibility in Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa punctigera strains resistant to Bt toxins Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, and Vip3Aa

      2021, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The focus of this work was to explore patterns of relative efficacy of HearNPV across strains within each Helicoverpa species to inform future laboratory and field experiments and stimulate thinking about a potential IRM fit for this product. The lack of any cross-resistance between HearNPV and other insecticides is consistent with previous studies in other insect species (Ignoffo and Roush, 1986; Fuxa and Richter, 1990; Raymond et al., 2006; Bentivenha et al., 2018). Bentivenha et al. (2018) showed that Spodoptera frugiperda larvae resistant to Bt or 5 additional insecticides were equally sensitive to SfMNPV relative to an insecticide-susceptible strain.

    • ABCC2 participates in the resistance of Plutella xylostella to chemical insecticides

      2020, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, the fufenozide-resistant strain showed high resistance to dibenzoylhydrazines and benzoylphenylureas, and low cross-resistance to avermectin (Sun et al., 2012); the indoxacarb-resistant strain showed cross-resistance to metaflumizone, beta-cypermethrin, and chlorfenapyr (Zhang et al., 2017), and the field-evolved pyridalyl-resistant strain showed high resistance to all insecticides tested (including avermectin, emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole, fipronil, and chlorfenapyr) (Yin et al., 2019). Interestingly, although a great deal of cross-resistance between different Bt toxins had been previously reported (e.g. Cry1C-resistant P. xylostella strains are cross-resistant to Cry1A, Cry1F, and other toxins) (Liu et al., 2001; Sayyed and Wright, 2001; Zhao et al., 2001; Sayyed et al., 2008), few reports have shown that Bt-resistant strains can exert cross-resistance with chemical insecticides and there is no cross-resistance between Bt toxins and the bioinsecticide AcMNPV (Raymond et al., 2006). According to this study, ABCC2 expression in P. xylostella is closely related to its metabolic resistance.

    • Microbial biopesticides for invertebrate pests and their markets in the United States

      2019, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Primary targets include the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni, corn earworm, Heliothis zea, and beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua. These products are highly specific and can be compatible with parasitoids and other biological control methods (Raymond et al., 2006). Another product (AcNPV) for cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni, is pending (Silvana Niedermann, pers.

    • Biocontrol of Insect Pests

      2016, Ecofriendly Pest Management for Food Security
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text