Finite element analysis of springback in L-bending of sheet metal
Introduction
Sheet metal stamping plays a major role in many industries today. As part components get smaller and tolerances get tighter, the dimensional accuracy of a stamped part becomes a crucial factor in determining the overall quality of the part. In most, if not all, sheet metal forming processes, springback is the major problem faced. Springback often complicates the design of forming dies, and final die designs may only be accomplished after fabrication and testing of multiple prototypes. This poses significant problems to designers, who must accurately assess the amount of springback which occurs during a forming process so that a final desired part shape can be obtained. In this paper, L-bending with a step in the die is analyzed with finite element methods, and the amount of springback reduction that can be achieved with variations in die clearance, die radii, step height and step distance (Fig. 1) is studied. Recommendations on how these parameters can be used in combination to give the most springback reduction are also made.
Section snippets
Background
As early as 1958, Gardiner [1] derived a generalized mathematical analysis for springback corrections in the pure bending of metals such as aluminum, nickel, titanium, and ferrous alloys. In 1981, Johnson and Yu [2], [3] followed the work of Gardiner to give a theoretical analysis of springback in the bi-axial, elastic–plastic pure bending of a rectangular plate. Ayres [4] proposed a process called “shape-set” to reduce side-wall curl springback in high-strength steel rails. Wang et al. [5]
Finite element model
In the finite element model, the workpiece, the male die steel, the punch and the pressure pad form the main components. In the model definition in ABAQUS/standard, the die, punch, and pressure pad are defined by rigid surfaces, The workpiece is represented by a deformable mesh. The simulation begins with the pressure pad in contact with the workpiece. The die then moves up to contact the workpiece, followed by the lowering of the punch to bend the workpiece. After the bending operation, the
Simulation details
The simulations are carried out in five batches. In the first batch of simulations, the die step height and step distance set to zero so as to study the effects of changes in die clearances and die radii. Die clearances used are 0.75t, 0.80t, 0.85t, 0.90t, 0.95t, 0.98t, 1.00t, 1.03t, 1.05t and 1.10t. Die radii used are 0.5t, 1.0t, 2.0t, 3.0t and 4.5t. With 10 die clearance values and 5 die radii values, a total of 50 simulations are conducted in the first batch.
The second batch consists of
Effects of die clearance
Due to the large amount of data from the simulations, only selected results will be shown. The variation of springback with changes in die clearance is summarized in Fig. 3. It is noted that for simulations with die radii of 0.5t to 3.0t, the change in springback angle follows a similar trend. As the die clearance increases from 0.75t to 0.95t, the springback increases to a maximum in a non-linear manner. Between die clearances of 0.98t and 1t, there is a sudden drop in springback. As the die
Effects of die radius
The effect of die radius on springback is commonly expressed using the springback factor K:where A = bend angle of part after springback (°), A1 = bend angle of part during bending (°), R = part radius, R1 = die radius, and t = metal thickness.
Using the results from the first batch of simulations, another graph of springback factor against die radius is plotted, as shown in Fig. 7. Generally, for all die clearances, the springback factor decreases as die radius increase. It is also
Effects of step height and step distance
With the presence of a step, it is observed that the effects of changes in die clearance on springback still follow the trends shown in Fig. 3. The springback increases non-linearly to a maximum from clearance 0.75t to 0.95t, followed by a sudden decrease to clearance 1.00t, after which it increases again to clearance 1.10t. This trend is consistently seen in all simulations of die radii 2.0t and 3.0t. For die radius of 4.5t, the trend is also similar except for the absence of a decrease in
Die design recommendations
The results and observations made thus far clearly show that die radius, clearance, step height and step distance can be used to reduce springback. Of the four parameters, die radius and clearance have the more significant effects on springback compared to step height and step distance. If the die design allows for small radius, the recommendation is to use as small a die radius as possible to reduce springback. However, care must be taken to avoid using a die radius smaller than the minimum
Conclusion
The variation in springback with different die parameters for L-bending has been analyzed using finite element methods. From the results of numerous FE simulations, trends of how springback changes with die clearance, die radius, step height and step distance are studied, and die design recommendations are made on the use of these parameters to reduce springback.
The simulations were conducted only for one material type: AL2024-T4. There is a need to conduct the simulation for other material
References (20)
- et al.
Springback after the biaxial elastic-plastic pure bending of a rectangular plate – I
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
(1981) - et al.
On the range of applicability of results for the springback of an elastic/perfectly plastic rectangular plate after subjecting it to biaxial pure bending – II
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
(1981) - et al.
Mathematical modeling of plane-strain bending of sheet and plate
J. Mater. Proc. Tech.
(1993) - et al.
Mathematical model for bend allowance calculation in automated sheet-metal bending
J. Mater. Proc. Tech.
(1993) A simplified approach for evaluating bendability and springback in plastic bending of anisotropic sheet metals
J. Mater. Proc. Tech.
(1997)- et al.
Tooling design in sheet metal forming using springback calculations
J. Mech. Sci.
(1992) - et al.
Tooling and binder design for sheet metal forming processes compensating springback error
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
(1996) - et al.
Finite element analysis and optimization on springback reduction
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
(1999) Experimental and numerical prediction of springback and side wall curl in U-bending of anisotropic sheet metals
J. Mater. Proc. Tech
(2000)The spring back of metals
Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech.
(1957)
Cited by (73)
Effect of presence of holes locations and size on spring back in U bent components
2023, Materials Today: ProceedingsPrediction algorithm for springback of frame-rib parts in rubber forming process by incorporating Sobol within improved grey relation analysis
2021, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :The second type of influencing factors are related to the process, such as forming pressure, keep time, rubber hardness, coefficient of friction or lubrication condition, die parameters and so on. Ling et al. [4] analyzed the influence on sprinback of die parameters including step height, step distance, die radius and die clearance in the L-bending process. Lee and Kim [5] focused on the impact of some process factors on springback in the sheet metal flange drawing process, such as the supporting force, the blank holding force, the lubrication and so on.
Review on current research of materials, fabrication and application for bipolar plate in proton exchange membrane fuel cell
2020, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyNumerical prediction of springback and ductile damage in rubber-pad forming process of aluminum sheet metal
2016, International Journal of Mechanical SciencesDevelopment of anew spring-back factor for a wiping die bending process
2016, Materials and DesignCitation Excerpt :Research has assessed the precise prediction of spring-back in various bending process parameters and materials. The effects of the die radius and die clearance on the spring-back characteristics were investigated with various difficult-to-bend materials, such as aluminum alloy sheets [1,2], high strength low alloy (HSLA) sheets [3–5] stainless steel sheets [6] and magnesium alloy sheets [7,8]. Spring-back decreases as the die radius increases and as the die clearance decreases.