Characterization and modeling of the magnetic field-induced strain and work output in magnetic shape memory alloys
Introduction
As a new class of active materials, magnetic shape memory alloys (MSMA) have recently drawn considerable research interest due to their ability to produce magnetic field-induced strains (MFIS) at least one order of magnitude higher than those of ordinary magnetostrictive or piezomagnetic materials [1], [2], [3]. MSMA have exhibited a greater actuation bandwidth than conventional shape memory alloys (SMA), since their actuation frequency is not limited by heat transfer [3], [4]. The MFIS response is nonlinear, stress-dependent and hysteretic in nature and it is coupled to a nonlinear change in the magnetization of the material. Therefore MSMA are not only interesting materials for actuator and sensor design [4], [5], [6], but also candidates for advanced magnetic material applications, for example, in solenoid transducers [7], or as voltage generators [8].
Although magnetic field-induced phase transformations are possible under certain conditions [9], [10], the MFIS in MSMA are most often a result of the reorientation of martensite variants under the influence of the magnetic field, and this is how it will be treated in this work. The volume fraction of those variants whose magnetic easy axes are favorably oriented with respect to the external magnetic field grows at the expense of less favorable ones. Additionally the magnetic field-driven alignment of the magnetization with the applied field is accommodated by the mechanisms of magnetic domain wall motion and rotation of the magnetization away from preferred directions.
The key properties of MSMA, when considered as actuator materials, are the actuation stress and the actuation strain, in this case the MFIS and the resulting actuation work output. The maximum actuation stress is denoted the blocking stress, the stress level above which the variant reorientation is completely suppressed. Among the known MSMA, NiMnGa alloys are the most widely explored due to their low detwinning stress, and sufficiently high magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Maximum MFIS of 6% for five-layered tetragonal martensite and 10% for the seven-layered orthorhombic martensite have been reported [11], [14], [15], [18]. However, the maximum MFIS usually is observed at compressive stress levels below 2 MPa. One of the main research goals therefore is to produce MSMA in which large MFIS can be induced at high stress levels, for the purpose of maximizing the work output.
The main experiment in the characterization of the MSMA actuation properties in this work, is the measurement of MFIS as a function of the applied magnetic field under different stress levels. The composition of the material under study was selected to maximize the work output. This material selection strategy has led to the choice of a alloy with a composition of , in which a MFIS of 5.9%, with a blocking stress of 6 MPa, were obtained near , corresponding to an increase of the work output of more than 50%. The selection criteria are described in detail below. Analysis of the obtained MFIS data is used to explain the reason for an increase in the work output observed in the selected composition. The material response is also investigated with respect to the nature of the MFIS behavior beyond the first magnetic cycle. This aspect is motivated by the fact that most studies in the literature have focused only on the first cycle response of MSMA. Multiple cycle behavior, however, is important in the context of actuation. The mechanisms leading to the observed difference of the material response in the first and subsequent cycles are described.
In addition to the experimental work concerned with improving the actuation performance of MSMA, the other essential factor in the successful development of MSMA actuators is the constitutive modeling of the observed material response. It is demonstrated in the second part of this paper how the constitutive model, whose governing equations are presented in Section 3.1, is directly applied to predict the material response observed in the MFIS experiments conducted in this work.
Section snippets
Magneto-mechanical characterization of single crystals
The successful increase of the work output by composition selection in this study is based on the following idea. Necessary factors to increase the blocking stress and the achievable MFIS, and thus the actuation performance of the MSMA, are a high magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy and low detwinning stresses. In principal, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy can be increased by raising the saturation magnetization and Curie temperature () [19], [20]. However, it was reported that the
Phenomenological modeling of the magnetic field-induced strain in MSMA
Several models capturing the MFIS associated with the martensitic variant reorientation have been proposed in the literature, for example, by Glavatska et al. [27], Hirsinger and Lexcellent [28], James and Wuttig [29], James and Hane [30], Likhachev and Ullakko [31], Müllner et al. [5], and O’Handley [32]. For a more detailed review of the literature the reader is referred to Kiefer and Lagoudas [33], [44] and Kiang and Tong [34]. Most of the listed models are based on the minimization of a
Summary and conclusions
A newly developed magneto-thermo-mechanical testing system was used to characterize the actuation performance of MSMA single crystals with the composition of . The maximum first cycle MFIS of 5.9%, under 1 MPa, and second cycle MFIS of 4.8%, under 2 MPa, were obtained near at . A blocking stress of approximately 6 MPa was obtained. The maximum actuation work output values of 129 and were determined for the first and second cycles, respectively, both under 3 MPa,
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Army Research Office, Contract No. DAAD 19-02-1-0261, the National Science Foundation—Division of Materials Research, Contract No. 0244126, and the US Civilian Research & Development Foundation, Grant No. RE1-2525-TO-03.
References (45)
- et al.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
(1999) - et al.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
(2003) Sensors and Actuators A
(2003)- et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2003) - et al.
Acta Mater.
(2004) - et al.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
(2001) - et al.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
(2004) - et al.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
(2004) - et al.
Acta Mater.
(2001) - et al.
Acta Mater.
(2006)
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
Acta Mater.
Phys. Lett. A
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
Int. J. Plasticity
Appl. Phys. Lett.
J. Phys. IV France
J. Appl. Phys.
Appl. Phys. Lett.
Cited by (83)
Engineering thermal hysteresis of ferromagnetic shape memory alloy sensory particles
2022, Scripta MaterialiaSoft X-ray absorption spectroscopy and magnetic circular dichroism under pulsed high magnetic field of Ni-Co-Mn-In metamagnetic shape memory alloy
2022, Journal of Alloys and CompoundsCitation Excerpt :A huge magnetic strain in the martensite phase was observed in the single crystal of Ni2MnGa [2,3]. Consequently, a large number of studies have been conducted owing to the favorable efficiency of the material in actuators and sensors leading to numerous applications [4–6]. The unique behavior of the martensitic phase transformation was first reported in off-stoichiometric Heusler Ni-Mn-Z (Z = In, Sn, and Sb) alloys by Sutou et al. [7].
Fabrication and characterization of aluminum - magnetic shape memory alloy composites
2021, Materials Science and Engineering: ACitation Excerpt :A more robust alternative would be to embed a sensory material into the structure that is able to passively monitor and detect damage in the structure by interacting with an intrinsic aspect of the structural damage, such as stress concentrations at crack tips [5–9]. Shape memory alloys (SMAs) [10–12], and more specifically magnetic SMAs [13–37], are excellent candidate materials for this purpose due to their unique property relations between stress, strain, and magnetization [38–41]. In particular, a sub-class of magnetic SMAs, called metamagnetic SMAs (MMSMAs) exhibit simultaneous martensitic phase transformation and magnetic phase transition and feature massive change in magnetization levels upon martensitic transformation [13,28].
Phenomenology of shape memory alloys
2021, Shape Memory Alloy Engineering: For Aerospace, Structural, and Biomedical ApplicationsAn energy-relaxation-based framework for the modeling of magnetic shape memory alloys—Simulation of three-dimensional effects under homogeneous loading conditions
2021, International Journal of Solids and Structures