The role of macroscopic hardening and individual length-scales on crack tip stress elevation from phenomenological strain gradient plasticity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2008.08.007Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper quantifies the effect of strain gradient plasticity (SGP) on crack tip stress elevation for a broad range of applied loading conditions and constitutive model parameters, including both macroscopic hardening parameters and individual material length-scales controlling gradient effects. Finite element simulations incorporating the Fleck–Hutchinson SGP theory are presented for an asymptotically sharp stationary crack. Results identify fundamental scaling relationships describing (i) the physical length-scales over which strain gradients are prominent, and (ii) the degree of stress elevation over conventional Hutchinson–Rice–Rosengren (HRR) fields. Results illustrate that the three length-scale theory predicts much larger SGP effects than the single length-scale theory. Critically, the first length-scale parameter dominates SGP stress elevation: this suggests that SGP effects in fracture can be predicted using the length-scales extracted from nanoindentation, which exhibits similar behavior. Transitional loading/material parameters are identified that establish regimes of SGP relevance: this provides the foundation for the rational application of SGP when developing new micromechanical models of crack tip damage mechanisms and associated subcritical crack propagation behavior in structural alloys.

Introduction

The observation of brittle fracture in the presence of significant plastic deformation (Elssner et al., 1994) has sparked significant interest in the role of gradient-enhanced plasticity in modulating crack tip stresses (Chen et al., 1999; Jiang et al., 2001; Hwang et al., 2003; Qu et al., 2004). The central concept in this approach is that increased dislocation density associated with large gradients in plastic strain near the crack tip promotes strain hardening and leads to crack tip stresses that are much larger than those predicted using conventional plasticity. Previous simulations incorporating strain gradient plasticity (SGP) descriptions and a cohesive law for process zone fracture have shown that this stress elevation may be sufficient to drive atomic decohesion and rationalize the relationship between intrinsic and steady-state toughness (Wei and Hutchinson, 1997; Wei et al., 2004).

The fact that gradient-enhanced hardening can significantly elevate stresses has important implications for a number of fracture problems including interface debonding in thin films (Dauskardt et al., 1998), layered structure embrittlement (Broedling et al., 2008), microvoid damage (Srinivasan et al., 2008), fatigue (Brinckmann and Siegmund, 2008) and environmentally assisted fracture by both crack tip film rupture (Ford, 1990) and embrittlement by atomic hydrogen (H) (Gangloff, 2007). Crack tip hydrogen damage is of particular and growing interest (Woodtli and Kieselbach, 2000; Serebrinsky et al., 2004) because of the increasing focus on structural material integrity in hydrogen-based energy systems. Crack tip stresses play a central role in hydrogen-assisted cracking, both with regards to H localization and interface decohesion. Given the exponential dependence on H concentration with hydrostatic stresses at the crack tip, even moderate increases in stress over previous estimates dramatically increase the levels of crack tip hydrogen in the fracture process zone. Indeed, it was observed decades ago that hydrogen concentrations based on stresses from conventional plasticity are too low to rationalize the reduction in toughness due to hydrogen. This motivated alternative dislocation-based approaches to predict stresses larger than conventional plasticity (Kameda, 1986; Gerberich et al., 1991, Gerberich et al., 1993). Similar considerations are relevant to environment-enhanced fatigue crack propagation driven by highly localized and gradated cyclic plasticity, stress and H (Gangloff, 2002; Sunder, 2005, Sunder, 2007; Stoychev and Kujawski, 2008).

Clearly, any improvement over conventional predictions of crack tip stresses requires consideration of local material microstructure such as grain orientations, second phase particles, and of course, dislocations that arise in conjunction with steep gradients in plastic strains. Here, the focus is on the latter. The notion of exactly how enhanced dislocation hardening should be included in a constitutive description has spurred significant debate in the mechanics community. This debate will likely continue for some time because: (i) relatively few experimental methods for quantifying length-scale effects have emerged (e.g. nanoindentation (Nix and Gao, 1998), and more recently, bulge testing of thin films (Nicola et al., 2006)), (ii) competing approaches predict similar behavior and invariably require material-dependent parameters that must be determined from limited experimental results, and (iii) most rigorous “first-principles” modeling approaches are either limited in scope (e.g. two-dimensional simulations of edge dislocation interactions in face-centered cubic materials, Deshpande et al., 2005) or too computationally expensive to serve as the basis for prognosis of structural performance (Larsen et al., 2005).

With these considerations in mind, we adopt a phenomenological continuum strain gradient description to quantify dislocation-related changes in crack tip behavior (Fleck and Hutchinson, 2001). We utilize the reformulated Fleck/Hutchinson theory that, first and foremost, has been demonstrated to capture the effects of strain gradient-enhanced hardening in terms of established macroscopic yielding parameters and a limited number of parameters that dictate length-scale effects. Secondly, it is computationally efficient, which enables the present broad parameter study and increases the possibility of implementation with emerging prognosis tools (Larsen et al., 2005). Furthermore, the predictions from this approach are directly relevant to micromechanical models of the threshold and kinetics of important cracking processes (Gangloff, 2007).

The focus here is on identifying the relationships between macroscopic plasticity properties, applied loads and gradient effects, with two principle goals. First, we wish to identify the relationship between physical inputs and the length-scale over which gradient effects prominently enhance crack tip stresses. This facilitates the rational application of strain gradient theories, by clearly identifying regimes where length-scale effects are important over physical lengths that are appropriately modeled using continuum theories. Put in another way, we identify and graphically map combinations of material properties and loads that undoubtedly require explicit reference to material microstructure. Secondly, we seek to quantify gradient-induced changes in crack tip variables for scenarios where non-local continuum plasticity predictions are appropriate. The focus is on the magnitude of stress elevation and the physical length over which it occurs: both play important roles in evaluating the relative importance of competing crack advance mechanisms. The central question is simply: “at what level of applied stress intensity does one expect stresses significantly different from the HRR field ((Hutchinson, 1968; Rice and Rosengren, 1968), i.e. conventional plasticity), over a physical size scale where SGP is believable and for experimentally informed macroscopic hardening parameters, length-scale parameters, and applied stress intensity?” The answer to this question depends on not only given microstructure-dependent material length scales, li, but also the specific implementation of SGP: i.e., the details of how length-scale parameters and strain gradients are combined and inserted into the hardening law.

While previous simulations addressed some of these issues (Jiang et al., 2001; Wei and Hutchinson, 1997), they did not cover a broad range of material properties and applied loads. Moreover, they did not quantify the role of individual length-scale parameters, or establish connections between multiple-parameter theories and related single-parameter theories (such as those outlined for SGP (Fleck and Hutchinson, 2001) and in a different context by Aifantis (1984)). The comparison of single and multiple-parameter theories is of significant practical interest, considering that nanoindentation—the de facto choice for experimental calibration of SGP theories—is typically used to extract a single parameter. A meaningful length-scale can only be extracted when the same SGP theory is applied to interpret both depth-dependent hardness and a given application (e.g. fracture). The present study, which spans an unprecedented range of variables, enables one to infer the relevance of SGP to a specific material, loading scenario and crack growth damage mechanism based on published properties.

Section snippets

Strain gradient plasticity formulations

Comprehensive details regarding the Fleck/Hutchinson reformulated SGP theory are available elsewhere (Fleck and Hutchinson, 2001; Niordson and Hutchinson, 2003). As such, we focus on summarizing the key elements of SGP theory, with emphasis on understanding the role of individual length scales. To begin, flow stress is described in terms of an effective plastic strain, σ=f(Ep), where f is an increasing function determined from a macroscopic uniaxial stress–strain test, and Ep is the total

Finite element implementation and benchmarking

Details of the present finite element implementation of the Fleck/Hutchinson isotropic SGP incremental theory are provided in Appendix A. The approach is essentially identical to that outlined by Niordson and Hutchinson (2003), although a different element type is used. Eight-noded quadrilateral brick elements are used to model plane-strain deformation: the elements have nodal degrees of freedom that include both displacements and the conventional effective plastic strain measure (εp). As noted

Crack tip modeling and post-processing

Finite element models of the crack tip are shown in Fig. 2a; in each geometry, the crack face runs along the bottom of the model and terminates at the mid-point. Symmetry boundary conditions are imposed for nodes lying on the x-axis from the tip of the crack to the outer edge. The distances to the outer edge of each mesh were chosen to be 10 times the radius of the plastic zone size, as calculated using a classical plasticity estimate (look ahead to Eq. (5)). The displacements along the outer

Crack tip scaling parameters and basic character of the results

Stresses are normalized by the initial yield stress, σY, while the distance from the crack tip is normalized by this analytical estimate of the radius of plastic zone, rp:rp=13π(KIσY)2.

Radial distances normalized by rp reflect position relative to the edge of the plastic zone, which scales with the applied load. The normalized applied stress intensity factor is KI/σYli, where li is taken as l1 for the multiple-parameter theory and l* for single-parameter theory. Thus, rp/li represents a second

Conclusions

This broad parameter study identified important scaling relationships and critical transition parameters that define combinations of stress intensity, macroscopic hardening, and material length-scales that lead to significant SGP effects that should be included in crack tip damage modeling. Key findings for the sharp, mode I crack problem are:

  • For the single length-scale theory, SGP effects occur over distances where the HRR fields predict σH>4σY; that is, significant stress elevation is only

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research through Grant no. F49620-03-155.

References (41)

Cited by (68)

  • A mechanism-based gradient damage model for metallic fracture

    2021, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Strain gradient plasticity models have been developed to account for the role of plastic strain gradients and the associated dislocation hardening mechanisms at the continuum level [36–38]. The analysis of stationary crack tip fields using strain gradient plasticity models reveals much higher stresses than those predicted with conventional plasticity, with this stress elevation being sustained over tens of microns ahead of the crack [39,40]. Thus, it is necessary to incorporate strain gradient plasticity formulations into fracture modelling to appropriately characterise the small scale phenomena associated with crack tip deformation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text