Linear wireless sensor networks: Classification and applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2011.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) constitute a rapidly growing technology, taking advantage of advances in electronic miniaturization that consume less energy for both processing and communication. The cost of these devices is also constantly decreasing, making it possible to use a large number of sensor devices in a wide array of commercial, environmental, military, and health care fields. Many of these applications involve placing the sensors in a linear form, making a special class of these networks which we define as a Linear Sensor Network (LSN). In this paper, the concept of LSNs is expanded, along with a set of applications for which this type of network is appropriate. In addition, motivation for designing specialized protocol is provided that explores linearity of the network to increase the communication efficiency, reliability, fault tolerance, energy savings and network lifetime. Furthermore, classification of LSNs from both topological and hierarchical points of views, is presented and various characteristics, research challenges and underlying opportunities are discussed. Simulation experiments are also presented to compare the performance and reliability of LSNs.

Introduction

The advent of technology in computing and electronics evolving innovation of tiny wireless sensors has opened an unprecedented opportunity for a wide array of real-time applications. In recent years, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been emerging as a new suitable tool for a spectrum of new applications. These tiny sensor nodes are low cost, low power, easily deployable, and are self-organizing. They are usually capable of doing limited local processing. However, information collected from a large number of such nodes at a central location known as base stations (BSs) or sink nodes, before reaching a network control center (NCC) enables detailed representation of a given physical environment. Thus, a WSN can be described as a collection of sensor nodes which collaborate to arrive at some specific decision. Unlike traditional networks, a WSN depend on dense deployment and adequate co-ordination of data transfer to a BS. These unique characteristics make it very useful. WSNs were initially introduced for defense applications such as target detection, surveillance of enemy activities in a battlefield environment and counterterrorism. However, their advantages over traditional networks have resulted in many other potential civilian applications that range from infrastructure security to industrial control. Some examples are environment and habitat monitoring, health applications, home automation, traffic control, etc. Another possible example is protecting and monitoring a large pipeline system.

Research in the field of WSNs is relatively active and involves a number of interrelated issues, including efficient routing protocols (Akkaya and Younis, 2005, Akkaya and Younis, 2003, Akyildiz et al., 2002, Chong and Kumar, 2003, He et al., 2003, Schurgers and Srivastava, 2001, Soharabi and Pottie, 2000), QoS support (Jawhar and Wu, 2005), security (Fernandez et al., 2005), and middleware (Hadim et al., 2006). Most of these are investigated under the assumption that the network used for sensors does not have any infrastructure support. Fortunately, WSN needed for a monitoring linear infrastructures ought to be a structured network in which all sensor nodes are to be placed in a line. This characteristic can be utilized for enhancing the communication sequencing and reliability of the network.

We define LSNs as a new category of WSNs where the nodes are placed in a strictly linear or semi-linear form. A WSN is considered linear if one of the following conditions are true: (1) if all the nodes are aligned on a straight line, strictly forming a line, or thin LSN; (2) if all of the nodes exist between two parallel lines that extend for a relatively long distance as compared to their transmitting range and the distance separating them constitute a semi-linear or thick LSN. We introduced a general concept of LSNs along with some specialized routing protocols and addressing scheme in Jawhar et al., 2007, Jawhar et al., 2009.

The alignment of sensor nodes in a linear form can be used in many applications such as monitoring and surveillance of international boundaries for illegal crossing, or smuggling activities, monitoring of roads, or long pipelines carrying oil, gas and water resources, river environmental monitoring, etc. (Jawhar et al., 2007). This architecture utilizes a linear structure to address communication sequencing, reliability, and security problems. The objective of the design is to reduce the installation and maintenance costs, increase the network reliability and fault tolerance, enhance the battery life for sensors, and reduce end-to-end communication delay for better quality of service (QoS) support of sensitive data.

The contributions of this paper can be summarized as follows:

  • Identify and define LSNs, which constitute special class of WSNs.

  • Present sample applications of LSNs.

  • Outline the reasons and motivation behind the need for new architectures and protocols for LSNs.

  • Distinguish different possible control classes that indicate different types of LSNs from a topological and hierarchical points of views.

  • Present a case study which illustrates a design with associated protocols that increase the efficiency and robustness of routing.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides an overview of related work in this field. Section 3 introduces some important applications for wireless LSNs. Section 4 discusses the reasons why new architectures and protocols are desirable for LSNs. Section 5 provides a topological and hierarchical classification of LSNs. Sections 6 offers a basic algorithm for routing messages in LSNs and Section 7 presents simulation experiments, which evaluate its performance under various network conditions. The last section concludes the paper and provides future directions for further research.

Section snippets

Related work

Akkaya and Younis (2005) provide a survey of routing protocols in WSNs. They identify three types of such protocols: data centric, hierarchical, and location-based. The data centric protocols include flooding, gossiping, directed diffusion, energy-aware, rumor, and gradient-based. The hierarchical protocols include LEACH (low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy), PEGASIS (power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems), and APTEEN (adaptive threshold sensitive energy efficient sensor

Applications of linear wireless sensor networks

This section presents a list of potential applications for LSNs.

Why new architectures and protocols are needed?

There are many reasons why a new framework is needed for different types of LSNs.

Topological and hierarchical classification of LSNs

From the topological point of view, LSNs can be divided into several categories according to the linearity of different levels of the node hierarchy: thin, thick and very thick. This section presents these categories and discusses the characteristics and limitation of each one of them. In addition, from the hierarchical point of view, LSNs can be classified into several categories: one-level, two-level, and three-level LSNs. This classification depends on the way sensors and the communication

A basic algorithm for routing of messages in LSNs

As presented earlier, the main routing process of data messages is done at the DRN-to-DRN level. It is important to note that the classical routing protocols for wireless networks such as DSR and AODV are not used due to the fact that they are designed for multi-dimensional topologies and do not take advantage of the linear structure that is assumed. For example, DSR and AODV both use flooding from the source in order to discover paths to the destination. This is not necessary in our LSN once

Simulation

As a case study, we compared the performance of one thin and two thick three-level LSNs with varying node densities per distance unit. We define DDRN as the distance between two consecutive DRNs in the thin LSN, which is the unit of length in the simulation. The distance DDRN varies depending on the communication protocol used for DRN-to-DRN communication. For the IEEE 802.15.14 (Zigbee) protocol, which is used by most sensor networks, the commonly used transmission range is 10 m. The segment

Conclusions and future research

In this paper, LSNs, which constitute a new and specific category of WSNs, are presented. The paper discussed some of the applications that exhibit this kind of linear alignment and motivated the need for more research in this important area. Such research involves the design and testing of different networking and communication protocols which take advantage of the linearity of the network in order to increase the communication efficiency, energy savings, reliability and fault tolerance. In

References (39)

  • D.P. Agrawal et al.

    Introduction to wireless and mobile systems

    (2011)
  • Akkaya K, Younis M. An energy-aware QoS routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE...
  • K. Akkaya et al.

    A survey of routing protocols in wireless sensor networks

    Ad Hoc Network Journal

    (2005)
  • I. Akyildiz et al.

    A survey on wireless mesh networks

    IEEE Communications

    (2005)
  • I.F. Akyildiz et al.

    Wireless sensor networks: a survey

    Computer Networks

    (2002)
  • T. Banerjee et al.

    Using polynomial regression for data representation in wireless sensor networks

    International Journal of Communication and Systems

    (2007)
  • A. Carrillo et al.

    New distributed optical sensor for detection and localization of liquid leaks Pat I. Experimental studies

    Sensors and Actuators A

    (2002)
  • C. Chong et al.

    Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges

    The Proceedings of the IEEE

    (2003)
  • C. Cordeiro et al.

    Ad hoc and sensor networks: theory and applications

    (2011)
  • A. D'Costa et al.

    Distributed classification of gaussian space-time sources in wireless sensor networks

    IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications

    (2004)
  • H. Deng et al.

    Routing security in ad hoc networks

    IEEE Communications Magazine

    (2002)
  • S. Diggavi et al.

    Even one-dimensional mobility increases adhoc wireless capacity

    IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

    (2005)
  • Factory Physics 〈http://www.math.uah.edu/stat/poisson/exponential.pdf〉;...
  • E. Fernandez et al.

    Security of wireless and portable device networks: an overview

  • George SE, Chen IR. Movement-based checkpointing and logging for failure recovery of database applications in mobile...
  • A. Ghasemi et al.

    Exact probability of connectivity one-dimensional ad hoc wireless networks

    IEEE Communications Letters

    (2006)
  • D. Gross et al.

    Queueing models for spares provisioning

    Naval Research Logistics Quarterly

    (1977)
  • S. Hadim et al.

    Trends in middleware for mobile ad hoc networks

    The Journal of Communications

    (2006)
  • M. Hartong et al.

    Security and the US rail infrastructure

    International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

    (2008)
  • Cited by (153)

    • TDMA-based scheduling for multi-hop wireless sensor networks with 3-egress gateway linear topology

      2021, Internet of Things (Netherlands)
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, since targeting a dedicated network consisting of low-cost relay nodes, gateways, and a central server, we adopt a centrally-managed TDMA-based packet transmission scheduling with redundant transmissions assuming that the link layer does not provide any ARQ and transmission power adaptation mechanisms. In linear topologies, the number of neighboring nodes is limited, and the distance of neighboring nodes is long [1]. Therefore, the number of potential interference patterns and possible routing options are also limited, which may allow us to pursue optimality easier compared with general dense topologies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A primary version of some parts of this paper were presented in the Eighth Wireless Telecommunication Symposium (WTS'09), published by the IEEE Communication Society. This work was partially supported by UAEU Research Grant 03-03-9-11/08.

    View full text