Review
Mobile recommender systems in tourism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.04.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Recommender Systems (RSs) have been extensively utilized as a means of reducing the information overload and offering travel recommendations to tourists. The emerging mobile RSs are tailored to mobile device users and promise to substantially enrich tourist experiences, recommending rich multimedia content, context-aware services, views/ratings of peer users, etc. New developments in mobile computing, wireless networking, web technologies and social networking leverage massive opportunities to provide highly accurate and effective tourist recommendations that respect personal preferences and capture usage, personal, social and environmental contextual parameters. This article follows a systematic approach in reviewing the state-of-the-art in the field, proposing a classification of mobile tourism RSs and providing insights on their offered services. It also highlights challenges and promising research directions with respect to mobile RSs employed in tourism.

Introduction

The explosive growth of online environments has made the issue of information search and selection increasingly cumbersome; users are overwhelmed by options which they may not have the time or knowledge to assess. Recommender Systems (RSs) have proven to be a valuable tool for online users to cope with the information overload. RSs use details of registered user profiles and habits of the whole user community to compare available information items against reference characteristics in order to present item recommendations (Adomavicius and Tuzhilin, 2005, Ricci et al., 2011). Typically, a RS compares a user profile to some reference attributes and seeks to predict the ‘rating’ or ‘preference’ that a user would give to an item she has not yet considered.

RSs originally found success on e-commerce web sites to present information on items and products that are likely to be of interest to the user (e.g. films, books, news, web pages, etc.). Lately, they have been increasingly employed in the field of electronic tourism (e-tourism), providing services like trip and activities advisory, lists of points of interest (POIs) that match user preferences, recommendations of tourist packages, etc. (Kabassi, 2010, Werthner and Ricci, 2004). Existing RSs in e-tourism typically emulate services offered by tourist agents where prospective tourists refer to seeking advice for tourist destinations under certain time and budget constraints (Berka and Plönig,, Ricci, 2002). The user typically states her needs, interests and constraints based upon selected parameters. The system then correlates user choices with cataloged destinations annotated using the same vector of parameters.

A relatively recent development in e-tourism lies in the use of mobile devices as a primary platform for information access, giving rise to the field of mobile tourism. The unique characteristics of mobile tourism bring forward new challenges and opportunities for the evolution of innovative personalized services which have no place in the field of e-tourism. For instance, the knowledge of the exact user location develops appropriate ground for the provision of location-based services. Furthermore, user mobility allows exploiting the knowledge of user's mobility history and taking advantage of a user's social environment lying in geographical proximity.

The most prominent outcome of recent research efforts in mobile tourism has been the substantial number of mobile electronic guide systems, which have been on the spotlight over the past few years (Kenteris et al., 2011). Most of those systems go far beyond from being mobile electronic versions of printed tourist guides, as they incorporate personalization features and take full advantage of the sensing capabilities of modern mobile devices to infer user, social and environmental context in order to provide advanced context-aware services (Höpken et al., 2010).

The first systems that coupled mobile guides functionality with RS technologies appeared soon after (we use the term ‘mobile tourism RSs’ to refer to those systems). Mobile RSs can increase the usability of mobile tourism applications providing personalized and more focused content, hence limiting the negative effects of information overload (Ricci, 2011). In addition to offering personalized recommendations through employing sophisticated user modeling methodologies, mobile tourism RSs may also take advantage of usage and application context in providing improved, context-aware recommendations for attractions or tourist services (Adomavicius and v, 2011, Gavalas and Kenteris, 2011, O’Grady et al., 2007).

This article follows a systematic approach in reviewing the state-of-the-art in the field of mobile tourism RSs. It offers a detailed insight on typical recommendation tasks and the corresponding support functions commonly offered by existing mobile tourism RS prototypes, categorized in attractions recommendations, tourist services recommendations, collaboratively-generated recommendations, routes/tours and multiple-days itinerary planning. The main contribution of the article lies in the proposed classification of mobile tourism RSs, undertaken on the basis of three different aspects (their chosen architecture, the degree of user involvement in the delivery of recommendations and the criteria taken into account for deriving recommendations). Last, we highlight challenges and promising research directions with respect to mobile RSs employed in tourism.

The remainder of the article is structured as follows: Section 2 provides the required background on the recommendation techniques supported by contemporary RSs. Section 3 summarizes the main features of popular web-based e-tourism RSs. Section 4 provides a detailed view of services offered by mobile RSs in tourism, while Section 5 presents three classification viewpoints for existing mobile tourism RS prototypes. Section 6 provides insights on open issues and research opportunities in the field, while Section 7 summarizes the main issues tackled in the paper.

Section snippets

Types of recommender systems

Recommender systems are essentially information filtering systems aiming at predicting the ‘rating’ (i.e., the preference) that a user would give to an information item (e.g. music file, book or any other product) or social element (e.g. people or groups) she has not yet considered. RSs recommend those items predicted to better match user preferences, thereby reducing the user's cognitive and information overload. Recommendation are made either implicitly (e.g. through ordering a list of

Recommender systems in tourism

Existing recommendation systems in e-tourism acquire the user needs and wants, either explicitly (by asking) or implicitly (by mining the user online activity), and suggest destinations to visit, points of interest, events/activities or complete tourist packages. The main objective of travel RSs is to ease the information search process for the traveler and to convince (persuade) her of the appropriateness of the proposed services.

In recent years, a number of travel RSs has emerged and some of

Services offered by mobile recommender systems in tourism

With the rapid development of mobile computing technologies, various kinds of mobile applications have become very popular (Gavalas and Economou, 2011). As a revolutionary technology, mobile computing enables the access to information anytime, anywhere, even in environments with scarce physical network connections. Among others, the effective use of mobile technology in the field of mobile tourism has been actively studied. Along this line, mobile RSs (i.e. RSs tailored to the needs of mobile

Classification of mobile recommender systems in tourism

The landscape of mobile RSs employed in tourism is extremely diverse in terms of their architectural, technological and functional aspects. Certainly, a concrete classification of those systems is essential to understand their characteristics and contrast their respective advantages and restrictions. We argue that a taxonomy scheme solely relying on a single classification criterion carries the risk of being fragmentary and deficient while hiding the complexity, diversity and

Research challenges and future prospects

It should have become clear by now that mobile RSs represent a highly evolving domain of research with dozens of prototypes reported in the recent scientific literature. Although mobile RSs have been applied in various application fields (e.g. mobile shopping, advertising and content provisioning), tourism is undoubtedly the most crowded field among them (Ricci, 2011). Interestingly, several early mobile tourism RSs focused in treating the limitations of mobile devices (limited processing power

Summary

RSs represent a fascinating and fast evolving field of software systems that have find particular success in web environments. New developments in mobile computing, wireless networking, web technologies and social networking create vital space for the development of innovative mobile RSs which capture personal, social and environmental contextual parameters to deliver highly accurate and effective situation-aware recommendations. As a result, mobile RSs have been a subject of intense research

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the EU FP7/2007–2013 (DG CONNECT.H5-Smart Cities and Sustainability), under Grant agreement no. 288094 (project eCOMPASS).

References (98)

  • P. Vansteenwegen et al.

    The city trip planner: an expert system for tourists

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2011)
  • W.-S. Yang et al.

    A location-aware recommender system for mobile shopping environments

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2008)
  • W-S. Yang et al.

    iTravel: a recommender system in mobile peer-to-peer environment

    Journal of Systems and Software

    (2013)
  • S.T. Yuan et al.

    A recommendation mechanism for contextualized mobile advertising

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2003)
  • G.D. Abowd et al.

    Cyber-guide: a mobile context-aware tour guide

    Wireless Networks

    (1997)
  • Amendola I, Cena F, Console L, Crevola A, Gena C, Goy A, et al. UbiquiTO: a multi-device adaptive guide. In:...
  • G. Adomavicius et al.

    Incorporating contextual information in recommender systems using a multidimensional approach

    ACM Transactions on Information Systems

    (2005)
  • G. Adomavicius et al.

    Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

    (2005)
  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A. Context-aware recommender systems. In: Recommender systems handbook. Springer Science; 2011;...
  • Averjanova O, Ricci F; Nguyen QN. Map-based interaction with a conversational mobile recommender system. In:...
  • L. Baltrunas et al.

    Context relevance assessment and exploitation in mobile recommender systems

    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

    (2012)
  • Barkhuus L, Dey AK. Location-based services for mobile telephony: a study of user's privacy concerns. In: Proceedings...
  • Barranco M, Noguera JM, Castro J, Martínez L, Casillas J, Martínez-López F, et al. A context-aware mobile recommender...
  • Bader R, Woerndl W, Karitnig A; Leitner G. Designing an explanation interface for proactive recommendations in...
  • Baus J, Cheverst K, Kray C. A survey of map-based mobile guides. In: Map-based mobile services. Springer; 2005;...
  • Bedi P, Agarwal SK. A situation-aware proactive recommender system. In: Proceedings of the 12th international...
  • Bellotti V, et al. Activity-based serendipitous recommendations with the Magitti mobile leisure guide. In: Proceedings...
  • Berka Τ, Plönig Μ. Designing recommender systems for tourism. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on...
  • Biuk-Aghai RP, Fong S, Si YW. Design of a recommender system for mobile tourism multimedia selection. In: Proceedings...
  • Biuk-Aghai RP. MacauMap: next generation mobile traveling assistant. In: Proceedings of map Asia'04;...
  • Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In:...
  • Brown B, Chalmers M, Bell M, MacColl I, Hall M, Rudman P. Sharing the square: collaborative leisure in the city...
  • R. Burke

    Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments

    User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

    (2002)
  • A. Campbell et al.

    From smart to cognitive phones

    IEEE Pervasive Computing

    (2012)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems

    User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction

    (2009)
  • Cheverst K, Davies N, Mitchell K, Friday A, Efstratiou C. Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some...
  • Di Bitonto P, Di Tria F, Laterza M, Roselli T, Rossano V, Tangorra F. Automated generation of itineraries in...
  • DieToRecs. 〈http://www.modul.ac.at/dietorecs〉; 2012 [accessed...
  • Dunlop M, Morrison A, Mc Callum S, Ptaskinski P, Risbey C, Stewart F. Focussed palmtop information access through...
  • Felfernig A, Burke R. Constraint-based recommender systems: technologies and research issues. In: Proceedings of the...
  • J. Fink et al.

    User modeling for personalized city tours

    Artificial Intelligence Review

    (2002)
  • Fuchs M, Zanker M. Multi-criteria ratings for recommender systems: an empirical analysis in the tourism domain. In:...
  • Foursquare. 〈http://foursquare.com/〉; 2012 [accessed...
  • D. Gavalas et al.

    Development platforms for mobile applications: status and trends

    IEEE Software

    (2011)
  • D. Gavalas et al.

    A pervasive web-based recommendation system for mobile tourist guides

    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing

    (2011)
  • D. Gavalas et al.

    Evaluation of a web recommender system in electronic and mobile tourism

    International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology

    (2012)
  • D. Gavalas et al.

    A web application for recommending personalized mobile tourist routes

    IET Software

    (2012)
  • Heracles. 〈http://www.isi.edu/integration/Heracles/〉; 2012 [accessed...
  • J.L. Herlocker et al.

    Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems

    ACM Transactions Information Systems

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text