Translating network models to parallel hardware in NEURON

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.09.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The increasing complexity of network models poses a growing computational burden. At the same time, computational neuroscientists are finding it easier to access parallel hardware, such as multiprocessor personal computers, workstation clusters, and massively parallel supercomputers. The practical question is how to move a working network model from a single processor to parallel hardware. Here we show how to make this transition for models implemented with NEURON, in such a way that the final result will run and produce numerically identical results on either serial or parallel hardware. This allows users to develop and debug models on readily available local resources, then run their code without modification on a parallel supercomputer.

Section snippets

Uncited references

Bush et al. (1999), Carnevale and Hines (2006), Davison et al. (2003), Hines and Carnevale (2004), Kirkpatrick (2003), MCellRan4 (2007), Migliore et al. (2006), Santhakumar et al. (2005) and Sutter (2005).

References (9)

  • M.L. Hines et al.

    Discrete event simulation in the NEURON environment

    Neurocomputing

    (2004)
  • P.C. Bush et al.

    Increased pyramidal excitability and NMDA conductance can explain posttraumatic epileptogenesis without disinhibition: a model

    J Neurophysiol

    (1999)
  • N.T. Carnevale et al.

    The NEURON book

    (2006)
  • A.P. Davison et al.

    Dendrodendritic inhibition and simulated odor responses in a detailed olfactory bulb network model

    J Neurophysiol

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (46)

  • Stoney vs. Histed: Quantifying the spatial effects of intracortical microstimulation

    2022, Brain Stimulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    The values of Ve were coupled to each neuronal compartment using the e_extracellular mechanism [36]. The simulation was parallelized by distributing the total number of neurons (36,000) across 400 processors in a round-robin fashion (90 neurons/processor) [47]. The following statistical tests were undertaken to infer effects of ICMS intensity on axonal and somatic activation distances.

  • The open EEGLAB portal Interface: High-Performance computing with EEGLAB

    2021, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    In doing so, NSG aims to lower or eliminate the administrative and technical barriers that currently make it difficult for investigators to use these resources. The NSG (nsgportal.org) gateway offers free computer time to neuroscientists on the XSEDE computer network, providing a ready means to use HPC resources for popular neuroscience tools, pipelines, data processing, and software including NEURON (Hines and Carnevale, 2008), GENESIS (Bower and Beeman, 2012), MOOSE (Ray et al., 2008), NEST (Gewaltig and Diesmann, 2007), Brian (Goodman and Brette, 2009) and PyNN (Davison et al., 2009), as well as software for analyzing and visualizing structural and functional brain imaging data, such as Freesurfer (Fischl, 2012) and MRtrix (Tournier et al., 2012). NSG leverages access to resources including the supercomputers Comet at the University of California San Diego and Stampede2 at University of Texas Austin, and the Jetstream cloud resource at the University of Indiana.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text