Review Article
Formation & dissociation of methane gas hydrates in sediments: A critical review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.03.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Formation and dissociation of methane gas hydrates in sediments has been critically reviewed.

  • Parameters associated with sediments and matrix characteristics have been identified and qualitatively analysed.

  • Importance of driving force on formation of methane gas hydrates is highlighted

  • Elaborate discussions on mechanisms governing methane hydrates formation in sediments is presented.

Abstract

Methane Gas Hydrates, MGHs, are perceived as a future source of energy for the sustenance of mankind owing to their abundance, usually found in continental margins and permafrost regions. However, identification of potential MGHs reserves, characterized by their high saturation in sediment pores, Sh, establishing their spatial distribution in hydrate bearing sediemnts, HBS, and their extraction, is extremely challenging. This calls for a proper understanding of the mechanisms and factors, associated with sediments and their matrix characteristics, viz., the pore-diameter, dp, particle diameter, d, specific surface area, SSA, initial water saturation, Sw, salinity of the pore-water, S, mineralogy, porosity, η, and density, ρ and thermodynamic conditions, affecting the formation and dissociation of MGHs in sediments. In this context, several laboratory investigations have been conducted to mimic the natural process of MGHs formation, with an intention to gain an insight into (i) mechanisms involved in formations, (ii) response of HBS during dissociation, and (iii) CH4 gas recovery rate under prevailing thermodynamic conditions. However, such studies have, usually, focused on the simulation of ‘specific reservoir conditions’ (viz., P-T, S, d) and hence acquiring a comprehensive picture about the (i) MGHs formation and dissociation process, and (ii) influence of above-mentioned parameters on these processes, becomes necessary. With this in view, a critical review of the literature pertaining to the synthesis of MGHs has been conducted and it has been demonstrated that in addition to thermodynamic conditions, d, dp, Sw, S, SSA and mineralogy of the sediments have a significant influence on the formation as well as dissociation process. In this context, the discussion, analysis and relationship proposed in this manuscript prima facie will aid in estimating Sh and understanding the mechanisms governing its dependency on sediments and their matrix characteristics.

Introduction

Present-day civilization is excessively dependent on conventional energy sources (viz., coal, oil, natural gas), while one of the world's largest source of energy lies untapped in the form of Methane Gas Hydrates, MGHs (Makogon, 2010; Boswell and Collett, 2011; Collet et al., 2014; Selvakkumaran and Limmeechokchai, 2015; Van der Hoeven, 2015; Chen et al., 2016). Hydrates of natural gas, consisting methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), is present beneath the sea-bed along the continental margins and in permafrost regions are known to hold twice the amount of carbon present in all accessible conventional resources combined (Makogon, 1982; Sloan, 1991; Kvenvolden 1993, 1999; Keith and Rogers, 2005; Soga et al., 2006; Copard et al., 2007). This carbon is primarily found in the form of CH4 entrapped in molecular cavities of water as polyhedral lattice, giving it an ‘ice-like structure’, whenever high pressure (P) and low temperature (T) conditions are encountered (Schoell, 1988; Sloan and Koh, 2007; Rajunath et al., 2010). Though, exploration of the naturally occurring MGHs started in the late 1900s, identification of their potential reserves remains a challenging task owing to the (i) inaccessibility of the site, (ii) sensitivity of MGHs towards change in P-T conditions, (iii) risk of geohazards viz., seabed subsidence, uncontrolled release of CH4 gas into the environment, drilling complexities and well-bore instability (Koh and Sloan, 2007; Koh et al., 2012). Besides, the research pertaining to the determination of the quantity of MGHs, Sh, in HBS has revealed that the parameters like stiffness and electrical resistivity of HBS could be utilised for identification of the potential MGHs reserves (Stoll and Bryan, 1979; Judge, 1982; Pearson et al. 1983, 1986; Klein and Santamarina, 2003; Shankar and Riedel, 2014).

Furthermore, extraction of methane from HBS is yet to be fully commercialized, due to the aforementioned geohazards, expected to happen during CH4 gas production (Koh and Sloan, 2007; Pant, 2010; Tan et al., 2016; Motghare and Musale, 2017). Based on the studies conducted by Nixon and Grozic (2007), Long et al. (2009), Yuan et al. (2011), Ning et al. (2012), Goto et al. (2016), it has been reported that dissociation of MGHs, during extraction process, reduces the geomechanical (read shear) strength of the HBS, which might trigger subsidence of the seabed that in turn would damage the installed paraphernalia and the environment (Gabitto and Tsouris, 2010; Moridis et al., 2011; Collet et al., 2014; Dangayach et al., 2015). Studies carried out to address these issues suggest that the Sh (ratio of volume of hydrates to that of the voids) and type of MGHs habitat formed (viz., pore-filling, load-bearing and cementing) play a major role in governing the shear strength, permeability and compressibility of the HBS (Masui et al., 2005; Priest et al., 2009; Waite et al., 2009; Clayton et al., 2010; Yun and Santamarina, 2011; Uchida et al., 2012; Bu et al., 2017). In addition to geomechanical instability, dissociation characteristics viz., rate (Rd) and P-T conditions for dissociation are function of sediments and their matrix characteristics (Uchida et al. 1999, 2002; Smith et al., 2002; Babu et al., 2013; Mekala et al., 2014; Chong et al., 2015; Saw et al., 2015). Hence, laboratory synthesis of MGHs, for attaining a certain Sh along with the habitat of MGHs and to understand the dissociation characteristics becomes a much desirable exercise that would be a pre-cursor for initiating exploration activities for extraction of CH4 gas from the HBS.

In this context, studies were conducted by Hammerschmidt (1934), Englezos et al. (1987a), Joseph et al. (2017) who have synthesized MGHs in bulk-water, under controlled thermodynamic conditions. The basic intention of such an exercise was to (i) enhance storage of natural gas in tanks by converting it into hydrates (Nogami and Watanabe, 2008) and (ii) prevent hydrates formation in the gas pipelines, (Gudmundsson et al., 1996). However, these applications are limited to the synthesis of MGHs in bulk-water and it has been realized that there is a marked difference in synthesizing MGHs in the bulk-water and in the sediments matrix, primarily due to ‘inter-molecular interaction’ between the sediments and the pore-fluids (pore-water and hydrate forming gases), as reported by earlier researchers (Everett, 1961; Handa and Stupin, 1992; Adamson and Gast, 1997; Liu and Flemings, 2011).

Recent studies on MGHs have revealed that their formation (represented by Sh and rate of formation, Rf) in sediments depends on the dp, d, SSA, Sw, S, mineralogy, along with thermodynamic conditions (Blackwell, 1998; Uchida et al., 2002; Katsuki et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2011; Zang et al., 2013) and their dissociation (represented by Rd) depends on η, d, S (Kono et al., 2002; Babu et al., 2013; Chong et al. 2015, 2016b). However, these studies are site-specific and hence to comprehend the effect of the aforementioned governing parameters on formation and dissociation processes, parametric study becomes of utmost important, if not critical.

In order to understand the effect of parameters associated with sediment and their matrix characteristics on formation and dissociation (Sh, Rf and Rd), existing literature has been critically synthesized and an attempt has been made to demonstrate the mechanisms governing variation of Sh, Rf and Rd. The analysis, relationship and concept proposed in this manuscript prima facie will aid in estimating Sh and understanding the mechanisms, governing its dependency on sediments and their matrix characteristics.

Section snippets

Formation of MGHs

Formation, as well as dissociation of naturally occurring MGHs, is governed by heat & mass transfer through the sediments and the thermodynamic parameter, P-T conditions (Gabitto and Tsouris, 2010; Moridis et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2018). Heat and mass transfer in naturally occurring MGHs depends on the sediments and their matrix characteristics and thermodynamic conditions are a function of depth of the HBS and geothermal gradient (Misyura, 2016; Merey and Longinos, 2018). Furthermore,

Concluding remarks

Based on a critical synthesis of the existing literature, it has been realized that in order to simulate natural MGHs habitats in laboratory, aside pressure-temperature (thermodynamic) conditions, sediments and their matrix characteristics, and pore-solution viz., mineralogy, pore diameter, sediment diameter/mean diameter and specific surface area, density, initial water saturation, salinity, mineralogy and volume of sample are important. Furthermore, the influence of pore-diameter and salinity

Acknowledgements

The first and second authors would like to acknowledge grant of fellowship received from Gas Hydrate Research & Technology Centre (GHRTC), Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) of India under PAN IIT-ONGC collaboration.

Reference (210)

  • S. Dangayach et al.

    Thermal instability of gas hydrate bearing sediments: some issues

    Mar. Petrol. Geol.

    (2015)
  • J. Du et al.

    Effects of ionic surfactants on methane hydrate formation kinetics in a static system

    Adv. Powder Technol.

    (2014)
  • Z. Duan et al.

    The influence of temperature, pressure, salinity and capillary force on the formation of methane hydrate

    Geoscience Frontiers

    (2011)
  • P. Englezos et al.

    Kinetics of formation of methane and ethane gas hydrates

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1987)
  • P. Englezos et al.

    Kinetics of gas hydrate formation from mixtures of methane and ethane

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1987)
  • Y. Gao et al.

    Production characteristics of two class water-excess methane hydrate deposits during depressurization

    Fuel

    (2018)
  • P. Gayet et al.

    Experimental determination of methane hydrate dissociation curve up to 55 MPa by using a small amount of surfactant as hydrate promoter

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (2005)
  • H.C. Hamaker

    The London—van der Waals attraction between spherical particles

    Physica

    (1937)
  • K.U. Heeschen et al.

    The promoting effect of natural sand on methane hydrate formation: grain sizes and mineral composition

    Fuel

    (2016)
  • Y.J. Huang et al.

    Effect of fluid saturation on gas recovery from class-3 hydrate accumulations using depressurization: a case study of the Yuan-an ridge site in southwestern offshore taiwan

    Energy Procedia

    (2016)
  • M. Hyodo et al.

    Basic research on the mechanical behaviour of methane hydrate-sediment mixture

    J. Japan. Geotech. Soc.: Soils Found.

    (2005)
  • M. Jager et al.

    The effect of pressure on methane hydration in pure water and sodium chloride solutions

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (2001)
  • J. Jang et al.

    Hydrate bearing clayey sediments: formation and gas production concepts

    Mar. Petrol. Geol.

    (2016)
  • J. Joseph et al.

    Investigation on excess gas method for synthesis of methane gas hydrates

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2017)
  • D. Kashchiev et al.

    Driving force for crystallization of gas hydrates

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2002)
  • D. Kashchiev et al.

    Nucleation of gas hydrates

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2002)
  • T.J. Kneafsey et al.

    Methane hydrate formation and dissociation in a partially saturated core-scale sand sample

    J. Pet. Sci. Eng.

    (2007)
  • T.J. Kneafsey et al.

    X-Ray computed tomography examination and comparison of gas hydrate dissociation in NGHP-01 expedition (India) and Mount Elbert (Alaska) sediment cores: experimental observations and numerical modeling

    Mar. Petrol. Geol.

    (2014)
  • C.A. Koh et al.

    State of the art: natural gas hydrates as a natural resource

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2012)
  • H.O. Kono et al.

    Synthesis of methane gas hydrate in porous sediments and its dissociation by depressurizing

    Powder Technol.

    (2002)
  • A. Kumar et al.

    Experimental determination of permeability in the presence of hydrates and its effect on the dissociation characteristics of gas hydrates in porous media

    J. Pet. Sci. Eng.

    (2010)
  • A.W. Adamson et al.

    Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces

    (1997)
  • R. Anderson et al.

    Experimental measurement of methane and carbon dioxide clathrate hydrate equilibria in mesoporous silica

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2003)
  • P. Babu et al.

    Morphology of methane hydrate formation in porous media

    Energy Fuels

    (2013)
  • S.A. Bagherzadeh et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of gas hydrate formation in a bed of silica sand particles

    Energy Fuels

    (2011)
  • Y. Beaudoin et al.

    Gas hydrates: potential implications for future energy systems

    Frozen Heat: A Global Outlook on Methane Gas Hydrates

    (2014)
  • J.C. Benet et al.

    Measurement of the chemical potential of a liquid in porous media

    J. Porous Media

    (2012)
  • L.I. Berge et al.

    Measured acoustic wave velocities of R11 (CCl3F) hydrate samples with and without sand as a function of hydrate concentration

    J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth

    (1999)
  • B.B. Bernard et al.

    Light hydrocarbons in recent Texas continental shelf and slope sediments

    J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans

    (1978)
  • V.R. Blackwell

    Formation Processes of Clathrate Hydrates of Carbon Dioxide and Methane

    (1998)
  • R. Boswell et al.

    Current perspectives on gas hydrate resources

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2011)
  • J.M. Brooks et al.

    The nature of gas hydrates on the Nigerian continental slope

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2000)
  • J. Brugada et al.

    Discrete element modelling of geomechanical behaviour of methane hydrate soils with pore-filling hydrate distribution

    Granul. Matter

    (2010)
  • Q. Bu et al.

    Acoustic responses of gas hydrates formation in vertical gas migration system

  • S.B. Cha et al.

    A third-surface effect on hydrate formation

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1988)
  • R. Chapman et al.

    Thermogenic gas hydrates in the northern Cascadia margin

    Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union

    (2004)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Study of methane hydrate as a future energy resource: low emission extraction and power generation

    IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.

    (2016)
  • J.H. Choi et al.

    Laboratory formation of non cementing hydrates in sandy sediments

    Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.

    (2014)
  • Z.R. Chong et al.

    Size effect of porous media on methane hydrate formation and dissociation in an excess gas environment

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2016)
  • C.R. Clayton et al.

    The effects of hydrate cement on the stiffness of some sands

    Geotechnique

    (2010)
  • Cited by (91)

    • Thermodynamic properties and phase equilibria characteristics of natural gas hydrates

      2024, Advances in Natural Gas: Formation, Processing, and Applications: Natural Gas Hydrates: Volume 3
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text