Kinetics of precipitation of U4O9 from hyperstoichiometric UO2+x

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.054Get rights and content

Abstract

For safe and reliable operation of fission reactors in space, the phase diagrams and reaction kinetics of systems used as nuclear fuels, such as U–O, U–N, U–C, are required. Diffraction allows identification of phases and their weight fractions as a function of temperature in situ, with a time resolution of the order of minutes. In this paper, we will provide results from a neutron diffraction experiment studying the U–O system. Using the neutron diffractometer HIPPO, the decomposition of UO2+x into UO2 and U4O9 as a function of temperature was investigated in situ. From the diffraction data, the participating phases could be identified as UO2+x, UO2 and U4O8.94 and no stoichiometric U4O9 was found. Results of the experiment were used to improve existing thermodynamic models. The presented techniques (i.e., neutron diffraction and thermodynamic modeling) are also applicable to the other systems mentioned above.

Introduction

Uranium-based fuels have been used for space reactor applications for many years. In particular, uranium dioxide (UO2) has played an important role as fuel for the TOPAZ space reactors. Therefore, a sound understanding of the U–O system is required for the design, operation and disposal of reactor fuels for space applications.

Oxidation of UO2 (due to a reaction with air or steam, for example) may result in the formation of higher oxides, such as U4O9, U3O7 and U3O8[1] depending on the temperature and oxygen partial pressure. The change in density, crystal structure and chemical behaviour accompanying the introduction of these higher phases may have adverse effects on the mechanical and chemical performance of the fuel. Therefore, it is important to understand the stability of the various phases present.

Many investigators have studied the U–O system, most recently summarized by Guéneau et al. [2], Chevalier et al. [3] and Lewis et al. [4] as UO2 has traditionally been a popular fuel for both military and commercial water-cooled power reactors. Therefore, the U–O phase diagram is fairly well established. There still exists, however, some uncertainty around the non-stoichiometry of U4O9. Recent attempts to model the U–O system [3] approximate U4O9 as stoichiometric. Many investigators, however, have shown that U4O9 is a narrowly non-stoichiometric phase (U4O9−y). Experiments have shown that three phases exist: α-U4O9−y (below ∼80 °C), β-U4O9−y (between ∼80 °C and ∼550 °C) and γ-U4O9−y (above ∼550 °C) [5]. Fig. 1 shows a summary of the experimental data [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] on the location of the phase boundaries for U4O9−y as well as the proposed fields for the three phases of U4O9−y overlaid on the current thermodynamic treatment for this system [20]. In addition, the kinetics of precipitation of U4O9 from UO2+x are not well known, only that quenching of UO2+x is required to prevent the formation of U4O9[6], [19].

Section snippets

Description of experiment

To investigate the non-stoichiometry in U4O9 and the kinetics of precipitation of U4O9 from UO2+x, an in situ neutron diffraction experiment was performed using the high-pressure preferred orientation (HIPPO) neutron diffractometer [21], [22] at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico).

The reason neutron diffraction is used instead of X-ray diffraction (XRD) for the study of the U–O system is due to the much deeper penetrating depth into UO2 with

Data analysis

Rietveld refinement [23] of the diffraction patterns was performed using the General Structure Analysis System (GSAS) software [24]. Diffuse scattering parameters were included to account for the silica glass liner (container). The crystal structures used in the refinement were stoichiometric UO2 space group Fm3m from Hutchings [25] and UO2.234 space group I4¯3d from Kim et al. [26]. The observed patterns also matched the I4¯3d structure reported by Copper and Wills [27]. Many other crystal

Discussion of results

One result from this experiment of particular interest is the weight fraction of UO2 at the beginning of the experiment (Fig. 5) and its accompanying lattice parameter (Fig. 6). On the initial heat up of the sample, the UO2 phase weight fraction is much higher (∼100% instead of ∼30%) and its lattice constant is lower than would be expected from the phase diagram and published lattice parameter data for stoichiometric UO2 (this can also visually seen from the patterns in Fig. 3). These results

Conclusions

The excellent agreement of refined lattice parameters and weight fractions from the neutron diffraction experiment with published values has demonstrated that time-of-flight neutron diffraction can be a very useful tool for studies of the U–O system, even at high temperatures. The neutron diffraction experiment has demonstrated that, at approximately 300 °C, a powder sample of UO2+x will reach thermodynamic equilibrium in less than 1 h and U4O9−y can begin to precipitate at only 100 °C. In

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful discussions with S. White (RMC) and experimental support of D. Williams and O. Gourdon (LANL). The sample for this study was provided by J. Dunwoody (LANL). The work was funded in part by the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

This work has benefited from the use of the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. This facility is funded by the US Department of Energy under Contract

References (35)

  • R.J. McEachern et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1998)
  • C. Guéneau et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2002)
  • P.-Y. Chevalier et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2002)
  • B.J. Lewis et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2004)
  • B.E. Schaner

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1960)
  • L.E.J. Roberts et al.

    J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.

    (1961)
  • A. Nakamura et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1987)
  • A.M. Anthony et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1963)
  • W. Van Lierde et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1970)
  • T. Ishii et al.

    Solid State Commun.

    (1970)
  • H.-R. Wenk et al.

    Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A

    (2003)
  • D.G. Martin

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1988)
  • B.E. Schaner

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1960)
  • K. Naito

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1974)
  • S. Aronson et al.

    J. Phys. Chem.

    (1961)
  • M.J. Bannister et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1974)
  • Y. Saito

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (1974)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Flash sintering of stoichiometric and hyper-stoichiometric urania

      2018, Journal of Nuclear Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is not surprising as UO2 is a semiconductor with a band gap of ∼2eV [30] and its conductivity increases with temperature, therefore enabling a thermal runaway phenomenon that leads to the flash event. The similarities between UO2 and ZrO2, both are fluorite with a high melting point and can accommodate substantial oxygen non-stoichiometry depending on temperature and oxygen partial pressure as shown in the UO2 phase diagram adapted from Ref. [31] in Fig. 1, (which highlights the UO2+x-U4O9-y phase field) indicated that flash sintering would be a fabrication technique applicable to UO2. Additionally, the higher band gap of ZrO2, ∼6eV [32,33], versus ∼2eV for UO2, indicated that flash sintering in UO2 could be applied at lower temperatures and fields to produce dense pellets.

    • Oxidation of UC: An in situ high temperature environmental scanning electron microscopy study

      2017, Journal of Nuclear Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SAD ring pattern matches with a polycrystalline biphasic sample made of orthorhombic U3O8 and tetragonal U3O7 (PDF 00–031–1424 and 00–015–0004, respectively). Confirmation of the presence of a mixture of U3O7/U3O8 in the SAD analysis obtained for the sample oxidised at 723 K can also be deduced from the phase diagram reported by Higgs et al. [38]: for high oxygen/uranium ratio U3O8 is reported to be present in a mixture with U3O7 for temperatures below 780 K. On the other hand, above 780 K instead, U3O8 is expected to be present in a mixture with U4O9 [38,39]. The popcorn-like explosion observed in Fig. 4e also occurred for all the samples oxidised in the range of 773–848 K in a 10–100 Pa O2 atmosphere.

    • First-principles energetics of rare gases incorporation into uranium dioxide

      2016, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    • A statistical approach of the thermodynamic properties of UO<inf>2</inf> at high temperature

      2014, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text