Further insight into mechanisms of solid-state interactions in UMo/Al system
Introduction
The UMo dispersion fuel is being developed to convert the Materials Testing Reactors cores currently working with UAlx and U3Si2, with a more dense fuel capable to meet the requirements of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, with low or no modification in initial design. This treaty promotes peaceful nuclear issues and gives a value of 20% as the maximum permissible limit of 235U enrichment (low enriched uranium (LEU)) [1]. U–Mo alloys are considered as one of the most promising uranium alloys for a high uranium density dispersion fuel due to the good irradiation performance of the cubic γ-uranium phase. Understanding the interaction between UMo and its Al matrix is a key stage for the research and development of a UMo-based LEU fuel, behaving in a satisfactory manner under irradiation [2], [3], [4].
In spite of the great interest in this system, there are very few relevant studies on the mechanisms of interdiffusion in the U–Mo–Al system. The main reasons for this lack of investigation are as follows: (i) At temperatures lower than 565 °C, the cubic metastable γ-UMo phase undergoes the metastable transformation γ-UMo → α-U + γ-UMo(Mo enriched) or the eutectoid decomposition γ-UMo → α-U + U2Mo(γ′) (see Fig. 1 [5], [6]) thus limiting the annealing time of interaction in γ phase in UMo/Al diffusion couples. (ii) The investigated T range (440–600 °C) is close to the Al melting point and may lead to a plastic deformation of Al during diffusion couple experiments. (iii) Thermodynamics of the U–Mo–Al ternary system is not well known.
Many studies on binary U/Al diffusion couples were performed in the sixties [7], [8], [9]. In this system, UAl3 is the only phase formed at the diffusion temperature [10] and Al is the mobile species [7]. To the author’s knowledge, only three relevant studies on UMo/Al diffusion couple experiments [11], [12], [13] have been carried out:
- –
Mirandou et al. [11] studied the interaction between homogenised γ-U–7 wt%Mo (noted U7Mo) and Al at 580 °C under a high-purity Ar atmosphere. Annealing times, of less than 4 h, are chosen to prevent the decomposition of γ-UMo phase. They reported that the interaction zone (thickness e = 175 μm after 4 h of annealing) is composed of three layers: from UMo to Al, a first layer L1 (containing 3.4 at.%Mo and 19.6 at.%U), a second layer L2 (containing 2.6 at.%Mo and 15.1 at.%U) and a very thin layer L3 (e ≈ 1 μm), close to Al, the composition of which was not determined. The compounds constituting both layers L1 and L2 were identified as (U,Mo)Al3, (U,Mo)Al4 and UMo2Al20 but no details concerning the constitution of each layer are given. When U7Mo alloy is used as-cast (not homogeneous in composition), the decomposition of the γ-UMo phase occurred and the total thickness of the reaction layer increased considerably (e ≈ 700 μm after 4 h of annealing). The interaction layer, which is neither regular nor layered, is made of an undetermined mixture of (U,Mo)Al3 and U6Mo4Al43 phases. Although the presence of (U,Mo)Al3 and (U,Mo)Al4 phases is often assumed in UMo/Al couples, the solubility of Mo in UAl3 and UAl4 phases has never been demonstrated. This means that if UAl3 and UAl4 are stoichiometric compounds then layers L1 and L2 can be composed by more than one phase.
Thus, the question is to know whether the layers L1 and L2 are single-phase or not.
- –
In a recent study, Park et al. [12] reported U7Mo/Al diffusion couple experiments performed in vacuum at 580 and 600 °C. The reaction layers are regular and the total thickness at 580 °C (145 μm after 5 h of annealing) is lower than that obtained by Mirandou et al. [11]. The ratio Al/(U + Mo) through the reaction layer, increases from γ-UMo to Al, but no details on the nature of the phases contained in this layer are given.
- –
Ryu et al. [13] performed U10Mo/Al diffusion couple experiments at 550 °C for 5 and 40 h in vacuum. The authors reported nearly the same conclusions concerning the three-layered morphology previously described. However, the total thickness of the interaction zone after 5 h of annealing (e ≈ 540 μm) is much higher than that obtained by Mirandou et al. (e ≈ 175 μm) [11] and Park et al. (145 μm) [12] at higher temperature (580 °C).
Most probably, a change in UMo alloy composition from 7 to 10 wt%Mo cannot lead to such a dramatic increase in the growth rate of the interaction layer.
Ryu et al. [13] also studied the thermal ageing of dispersed UMo fuel plates (U10Mo/Al) between 500 and 550 °C. For T = 525 °C and 550 °C, the reaction layer is divided into two layers, an internal layer (close to UMo) similar to (U,Mo)Al3 and an external layer labelled (U,Mo)Al4,4. By assuming solid-state diffusion control of the growth kinetics they calculated a global activation energy of about 300 kJ mol−1. This activation energy is substantially higher than that of the interdiffusion process in the U/Al binary system (60–80 kJ mol−1 [7]). Despite the fact that the overall composition of the interaction zone is almost comparable to that obtained in diffusion couple experiments, the growth kinetics of the interaction layer for dispersed UMo fuel plates is substantially decreased compared to diffusion couple case (e ≈ 15 μm compared to 540 μm after 5 h at 550 °C). This is well confirmed by a recent study performed by Park et al. [12] on the thermal ageing of dispersed U7Mo fuel plates at 550 and 580 °C for ageing times up to 50 h.
In all these studies neither the fine structure of the interaction zone (spatial distribution), nor the dynamics of the system and the diffusion path are described.
The aim of this paper is to study the role of Mo in solid-state interaction between UMo alloys and Al and to describe the fine structure of the interaction zone and the diffusion path through this system.
Section snippets
UMo and aluminum alloys
Arc melted ingots of UMo alloys containing 5, 7 and 10 wt%Mo, noted respectively U5Mo, U7Mo and U10Mo, were supplied by AREVA-CERCA fuel manufacturer (France). The ingots are arc-melted from pure elements U (99.9%) and Mo (99.9%). The oxygen content, measured only in the U7Mo ingot, by infrared spectrometry, is 245 ppm (±10%). As all ingots were produced by the same method, in the same arc furnace and for the same time, the O content is assumed to be approximately the same whatever the Mo content
Diffusion annealing data
Fig. 2 shows a SEM micrograph of a typical U7Mo/Al couple annealed at 600 °C for 4 h. The reaction product formed at the interface appeared to be regular and uniform in thickness. All specimens exhibited a non-planar interface and cracks were observed at the UMo end of the couple as well as through the reaction product. Table 2 summarises the experimental results concerning total thickness (e) of the reaction product for diffusion couples as well as for fuel plate thermal ageing. This table also
Diffusion couples
Values of total thickness (e) of the interaction zone determined from our experiments and literature data (see Table 2) for U7Mo/Al and U10Mo/Al couples at 550 and 580 °C are plotted against the square root of time in Fig. 9. The growth kinetics of the interaction zone for U7Mo/Al and U10Mo/Al couples at 550 °C obtained in this paper is very similar to that reported by Ryu et al. [13]. This clearly suggests that the increase in Mo content in UMo alloy from 7 to 10 wt% does not have any significant
Conclusions
The reactive diffusion between metastable γ-UMo alloys (containing 5, 7 and 10 wt%Mo) and Al, at T between 440 to 600 °C and for ageing times up to 10 h, are studied using the diffusion couple technique and nuclear fuel plate annealings. The reaction product formed at the interface consists of UAl3, UAl4, UMo2Al20 and U6Mo4Al43 phases, and is stratified in three main zones, two of which present a periodic layered morphology. The formation of such a particular morphology in the UMo/Al system is
References (39)
- et al.
Nucl. Eng. Des.
(1997) - et al.
J. Nucl. Mater.
(2004) - et al.
J. Nucl. Energy
(1956) - et al.
J. Nucl. Mater.
(2003) - et al.
J. Nucl. Mater.
(2003) - et al.
Intermetallics
(2004) J. Alloys Compd.
(2006)- et al.
J. Less Common Met.
(1989) - et al.
Scr. Metall. Mater.
(1995) - et al.
Acta Mater.
(1998)
Scr. Mater.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Acta Metall. Mater.
J. Nucl. Mater.
Cited by (72)
Irradiation behavior of ground and atomized U-7Mo dispersion fuels irradiated to low burnup
2024, Nuclear Engineering and DesignThermodynamic assessments of the U–Nb–Mo and U–Nb–Cr ternary systems
2021, Calphad: Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and ThermochemistryMicrostructure investigations of temperature effect on Al-UMo diffusion couples irradiated by swift Xe ions
2021, Journal of Nuclear MaterialsFirst-principles study of surface properties of crystalline and amorphous uranium aluminides
2020, Applied Surface ScienceMolecular dynamics simulations of displacement cascade and threshold energy in ordered alloy Al<inf>3</inf>U
2019, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsMechanical properties of irradiated U–Mo alloy fuel
2019, Journal of Nuclear Materials