Letter to the EditorNormalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations
References (19)
Lifting the crown—citation z-score
Journal of informetrics
(2007)- et al.
Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship vs. ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) methods and their effect on citation measures
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
(2009) - Bornmann, L. (2010). Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and...
- CWTS. (2008). AMC-specifieke CWTS-analyse 1997–2006. Leiden: CWTS [access via AMC intranet; unpublished,...
Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?
Scientometrics
(1979)- et al.
A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes
Scientometrics
(2003) - et al.
Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance
Scientometrics
(2009) Relations among science indicators. I. The static model
Scientometrics
(1990)- Leydesdorff, L., & Opthof, T. (in preparation). Normalization, CWTS indicators, and the Leiden Rankings: Differences in...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (84)
Biblioranking fundamental physics
2019, Journal of InformetricsCreativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?
2018, Journal of InformetricsCitation Excerpt :Cross-field comparisons of citation counts are profoundly influenced by the differences in citation behaviors of scientific fields (Schubert & Braun, 1986). For example, mathematics has a much lower citation density than the biomedical sciences (Leydesdorff & Opthof, 2010). Therefore, citation counts are inadequate scientific measures for evaluative cross-field comparisons, unless we remove the field effects (Waltman, 2016).
The β-ranking and the β-measure for directed networks: Axiomatic characterizations
2018, Social NetworksLinking scientific disciplines: Hydrology and social sciences
2017, Journal of HydrologyRanking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach
2016, Journal of Informetrics
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.