A fully integrated microbattery for an implantable microelectromechanical system
Introduction
The reduction in size and improvement in capability of microsystems is presently limited by the specific and gravimetric properties, and overall sizes, of on-board power supplies [1]. This is most readily seen in autonomous devices used in environmental [2] biological [1], [3] and medical [4], [5], [6] applications (Table 1), which rely mainly on batteries for power. Indeed, power supplies often comprise up to ten times the mass of the other elements of the system, combined.
The Wireless Integrated Microsystems Engineering Research Center’s Intraocular Sensor (WIMS-ERC IOS) was studied here as a model system for an integrated, autonomous implantable device. This device is based on the Phoenix Processor [7], [8], an ultra low power consumption platform (∼30 pW) used in several WIMS microsystems. Its small scale (∼0.4 mm3 in volume, with a footprint of ∼2 mm2, Fig. 1) is required, to allow implantation in the eye to monitor intraocular pressure during treatment of glaucoma, for up to 2 years. At present (Table 2), there is no commercial power supply available which fits within the 2 mm2 device area, and simultaneously meets the lifetime and implantability requirements of the device.
Despite their excellent volumetric energy (Table 2), existing thin-film batteries require surface areas of O(cm2) to power typical MEMS devices, for more than 1 day. With specific capacities of 100–300 μAh cm−2, limited by the maximum thickness of thin-film electrodes construction (<5 μm), these batteries have been unable to meet the required lifetime of MEMS sensors and actuators. Moreover, typical thin-film processing conditions involve high temperatures (500–900 °C) and masking and etchant materials that are incompatible with chip materials and packages. To date, none has been implemented or integrated as power supply in a MEMS of the scale described here; instead, novel devices of similar scale have been demonstrated using macroscopic, unintegrated power sources (Table 1).
Possibly the most significant development in autonomous MEMS in the coming decades, for new applications, will be the achievement of fully integrated and optimized power supplies, realized cost-effectively, that are also capable to achieve energy densities (∼27 mWh cm−2 [9]) required to operate MEMS. Adopting manufacturing techniques that can be performed outside the clean room [10], which are also compatible with CMOS fabrication techniques, have the potential to reduce processing steps. Thus, in the present study, we had four objectives:
- (1)
Select and designing an optimized power supply for the WIMS-IOS;
- (2)
develop a fabrication technique allowing small scale, low-cost, and integrable fabrication for CMOS systems, and experimentally demonstrate a microscopic power source;
- (3)
map capacity and lifetime of several fabricated microbatteries;
- (4)
determine the effects of miniaturization on capacity, lifetime and device architecture.
Our methodology builds on our prior efforts in the area, including optimization of power supplies [11], [12], manufacture of novel microbatteries [13], [10] and electrode optimization [14], [15].
Section snippets
Testbed
The WIMS-ERC intraocular sensor has a bimodal duty cycle (Fig. 2) comprising ∼10 min periods of “sleep,” punctuated by 30–50 ms (milliseconds) periods of “active” sensing (Fig. 2). A 1-month duty cycle was assumed; a constant voltage step of 1.5 V at a constant current draw of 100 nA during 1 h, repeated 720 times was used. Voltage regulation in the chip was necessitated by operation and control, at different voltages, of several components; it was accomplished (Fig. 4) by use of a DC/DC converter
POWER output results
For POWER [11] calculations all 194 primary batteries included in the present database version were considered. A Zn/AgO battery type Renata 317 [18] was the best candidate, due to its high nominal capacity (10.5 mAh), and low mass (0.18 g) and a volume (43.5 mm3). The resulting projected lifetimes of all three approaches exceeded the targeted lifetime (≤2 years) by more than one order of magnitude. Among 61 secondary systems, a commercial Panasonic ML421S LiMn2O4 cell [19] and a research
Comparison with state-of-the-art (SOA)
Our fabrication process is compatible with MEMS materials and allows battery electrodes to be deposited directly on chips or chip packages. Fabrication methods for other thin-film batteries are not generally compatible with MEMS production, because of high temperature (>800 °C [25]) and use of etchants and solvents [25], [30]. Li thin-film batteries cost around $300/Wh [22] mainly related to the extensive use of the clean-room in the manufacturing process coupled with the numerous fabrication
Conclusions
Systems like the WIMS-IOS, requiring variable power profiles over time (e.g. pulses, spikes or steady plateaux) or comprising combinations of subcomponents, provide an opportunity for hybridization of power supplies, comprising more than one cell and/or electrochemistry. Modeling the duty cycle of the WIMS-IOS, an intrinsically low power system (42 pW cycle−1), we were able to identify and design a suitable power source [11], [12]. The present application is both an implantable device and a
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Mr. Scott Hanson for providing information about the power consumption of the intraocular sensor microchip. Dr. Sigrun Karlsdottir for training using the SEM microscope. Prof. Max Shtein for providing the Ångstrom Engineering PVD machine and Mr. Brendan O’Connor and Mr. Andrea Bianchini for providing assistance in preparing the samples. Sponsorship of this effort was primarily from the Engineering Research Centers program of the National Science Foundation under NSF Award Number
References (49)
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
(2000)- et al.
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
(2004) - et al.
Journal Of Power Sources
(2006) - et al.
Journal of Power Sources
(2005) - et al.
Journal of Power Sources
(2007) - et al.
Journal of Power Sources
(1999) - et al.
Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science
(1999) - et al.
Journal of Power Sources
(1995) - et al.
Journal of Power Sources
(2002) - et al.
Journal of Power Sources
(2003)
Journal of Power Sources
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
Journal of Power Sources
Applied Surface Science
Journal of Power Sources
Proceedings of the IEEE
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Chemical Reviews
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
Cited by (47)
3D printed solid-state composite electrodes and electrolytes for high-energy-density flexible microsupercapacitors
2022, Journal of Energy StorageCitation Excerpt :With the rapid development of flexible and portable electronics, extensive efforts have been devoted to developing miniaturized energy supply devices, including rechargeable microbatteries [1–5], microsupercapacitors (MSCs) [6–11], and micro-fuel cells [12–14].
Fabrication and characterization of a coplanar nickel-metal hydride microbattery equipped with a gel electrolyte
2019, Journal of Power SourcesCitation Excerpt :A 3D primary zinc-air microbattery with a micromachined metallic scaffold, having an energy density of around 3 mWh cm−2, was reported in Ref. [19]. Albano et al. fabricated an integrated primary zinc-silver oxide microbattery with a capacity of 140 μAh cm−2 for the use in implantable MEMS devices [20]. A 2D and a 3D zinc-silver microbattery fabricated with inkjet printing and a respective energy content of 2.3 and 3.9 mWh cm−2 was reported in Refs. [21,22].
Decohesion and rupture mechanisms of a multilayered microbattery studied by 4-point bending
2016, Journal of Power SourcesCitation Excerpt :Thus, the possibility for using slightly flexible substrates is already taken into account [4,5] and specific structures are proposed which should result in stretchable energy storage systems [10]. In this connection, it must be recalled that the mechanical strains and stresses sustained by a battery do not result from external loads only [9,13,14], but also from volume variations that accompany the battery charging or discharging [9,12,13]. In standard operating conditions, the local strains in the battery thereby may exceed 1%, which is usually surpassing the effects of the external solicitations during regular use or manufacturing (packaging, …) [9,17].
Characterization of thin-film electrolytes for all solid-state batteries
2016, Journal of Alloys and Compounds