Performance and testing of glass-ceramic sealant used to join anode-supported-electrolyte to Crofer22APU in planar solid oxide fuel cells
Introduction
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are highly efficient energy conversion devices which produce electricity by the electrochemical reaction between a fuel and an oxidant. Among the different SOFCs, the planar type, which is expected to be cost effective and mechanically robust, offers an attractive potential for increased power densities compared to other concepts. A fuel cell device consists of an anode electrode (exposed to fuel), an electrolyte, and a cathode electrode (exposed to oxidant) [1], [2].
The repeating unit of a planar solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is formed by anode–electrolyte–cathode and interconnects. The interconnect links the anode of one cell to the cathode of the neighbouring cell [3]. In most SOFC stack designs, the interconnect is sealed to the ceramic cell components [4]. A promising interconnect material is chromia-forming ferritic stainless steel. However, the seal between the stainless steel metal interconnect and the ceramic SOFC components presents a challenge [5], [6].
The sealants for planar SOFCs must meet some important requirements: they have to be hermetic in order to prevent mixing of the fuel and oxidant and should have a thermal expansion coefficient close to those of the interconnect and the electrolyte. Moreover, the sealant must be mechanically and thermochemically stable in both oxidizing and wet-reducing environments at 800 °C and must not undergo any reaction with the other cell components. The problem becomes even more challenging as there is also a requirement for thermal cycle stability for planar stacks in which dissimilar SOFC components are sealed together. The sealants have to survive for several hundreds of thermal cycles during SOFC operations. Any cracks that form in the sealants or at the interfacial regions can cause leakage that leads to lower cell performance and efficiency. A number of different approaches are currently being studied for sealing SOFCs including [7]: brazing [8], [9], [10], compressive seals, as well as glasses, glass-ceramic seals and glass-composite seals [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].
Glass-ceramics can be prepared by controlled sintering and crystallization of glasses and have superior mechanical properties and higher viscosity at the SOFC operating temperature than glasses. Furthermore, they can have thermal expansion coefficients very different from the parent glass, due to the different crystalline phases that form and their relative proportion. Glass-ceramics show better resistance to the severe service environment (both oxidizing and reducing) than brazing alloys, and by carefully choosing the glass composition, they can meet most of the requirements that need to be exhibited by the ideal sealant material.
In order to develop a suitable glass-ceramic sealant, it is therefore necessary to understand the crystallization kinetics, the sealing properties and the chemical interactions with other components of the cell. Barium aluminosilicate sealants have shown high reactivity with the metallic interconnect at 800–900 °C forming a porous and weak interface composed of barium chromate (BaCrO4) and monocelsian (BaAl2Si2O8), while borate glasses are not sufficiently stable in a humidified fuel gas environment [20], [21].
Moreover, glass-ceramic seals have good hermeticity and are thermally and environmentally stable. However, the inherent brittleness of glasses may cause cracks to develop in seals during thermal cycling or thermal shock. This can cause leakage that would lead to lower cell performance and efficiency.
Owing to these problems that have been observed for barium aluminosilicate sealants, the authors have developed an alternative sealant based on a sodium–calcium–aluminosilicate glass-ceramic [22] consisting of gehlenite (Ca2Al2SiO7) and a sodium aluminosilicate (NaAlSiO4) phase. In the study that is presented here, the testing and performance of the sodium–calcium–aluminosilicate glass-ceramic sealant that was used to join the Anode-supported-electrolyte to Crofer22APU in planar SOFCs are reported. The investigation involved static treatments in humidified hydrogen and thermal cycling in air for 500 h; this can be considered as a preliminary screening on the glass-ceramic sealant performance, taking in account that the target operational life of the cell should be thousand of h (e.g., 10 kh).
Section snippets
Experimental
The heat resistant metal alloy used for this study was Crofer22APU (Cr 20–24, C 0.03, Mn 0.30–0.80, Si 0.50, Fe balance, wt.%) manufactured by Tyssen Krupp, Germany and supplied by HT Ceramix, Switzerland). The Crofer22APU was preoxidised as described in Ref. [22]. The anode-supported-electrolyte (ASE) (electrolyte: cubic zirconia, 8 mol% YSZ; anode: NiO–YSZ) was supplied by HT Ceramix (Switzerland). The Crofer22APU, and ASE samples to be joined were cut to obtain a final joined sample measuring
Crofer22APU/glass-ceramic sealant/ASE joined samples after multiple thermal cycles (RT-800 °C)
Fig. 1b shows a cross-section of a Crofer22/glass-ceramic sealant/ASE joined sample after three thermal cycles each of 120 h at 800 °C with slow cooling intervals to room temperature of 20 h, according to Fig. 1a. It can be observed that the adhesion between the glass-ceramic and Crofer22 and YSZ is still sound and that no cracks are detected in the glass-ceramic sealant. Fig. 2a and b show micrographs of the glass-ceramic/ASE and Crofer22/glass-ceramic interface, respectively. In Fig. 2a it can
Conclusions
The new glass-ceramic is a promising seal for SOFC based on Crofer22APU and ASE. The conclusions of this study are the following:
- (1)
Thermal cyclic exposure of the Crofer22APU/glass-ceramic sealant and ASE/glass-ceramic sealant interfaces to air at 800 °C led to no interfacial reactions. The joints exhibited no morphological and no microstructural changes.
- (2)
Continuous exposure of the Crofer22APU/glass-ceramic sealant and ASE/glass-ceramic sealant interfaces to humidified hydrogen for 500 h at 800 °C
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by EU Network of Excellence project Knowledge-based Multicomponent Materials for Durable and Safe Performance (KMM-NoE, NMP3-CT-2004-502243) and MULTISS: “Design and in-house development of SOFC stacks for dealing with multiple fuels” (Regione Piemonte project, Italy).The authors are grateful to the colleagues of the Department of Energetics (Politecnico di Torino, Italy), partners of MULTISS (Regional project), that partially supported this activity.
References (28)
- et al.
J. Power Sources
(2005) - et al.
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
(2007) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2007) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2007) - et al.
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(2006) - et al.
J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.
(2008) - et al.
J. Power Sources
(2008) - et al.
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
(2008) - et al.
J. Rare Earths
(2007) - et al.
Fuel Cells Bull.
(2006)