Elsevier

Journal of Power Sources

Volume 246, 15 January 2014, Pages 696-702
Journal of Power Sources

Monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures for a high power Li-ion battery cathode

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.089Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows were solvothermally synthesized with ethylene glycol.

  • LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures were prepared by a facile method in high yield.

  • LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures show nice capacity retention and high rate capacity.

  • A facile method was proposed simply to prepared fully carbon-coated LiFePO4 cathode.

Abstract

In this paper, monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows have been successfully synthesized via solvothermal route with ethylene glycol (EG) as reaction medium. Subsequently, with the basis of the solvothermally synthesized monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows, monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures are facilely prepared in high yield. Based on the experimental results, the formation mechanism of the monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows has been discussed simply. The monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures exhibit nice capacity retention and high rate capacity due to the full carbon-coating and the well-crystallized nanosized particles.

Graphical abstract

Monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows are solvothermally synthesized with ethylene glycol as solvent and subsequently bring about monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures exhibiting high discharge capacity of 112 mAh g−1 at 30 C.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (157KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Over the past decade, tremendous efforts have been performed to find alternatives to the toxic and expensive cathodes currently employed in commercialized lithium-ion batteries, such as cobalt-oxide-based materials. As an alternative, the ordered olivine lithium iron phosphate, LiFePO4, has been intensively investigated since the pioneering work of Padhi et al. [1]. Moreover, LiFePO4 is regarded as the most promising cathode materials for power batteries used in electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), due to the moderate flat voltage plateau (3.4 V versus Li+/Li), high theoretical specific capacity (170 mAh g−1), intrinsic thermal safety, environmental compatibility, and abundance of iron resources in nature [2], [3]. However, the rate performance of the original LiFePO4 was significantly restricted by sluggish kinetics of electron and lithium-ion transport [4], [5], [6], [7]. Thus, enormous attempts have been carried out to improve the rate performance by enhance the conductivity, including surface coating or admixing with carbon and other electronically conductive materials [8], [9], [10], [11], reducing particle size and controlling morphology [10], [12], and doping with isovalent or supervalent cations [5], [6], [13], [14].

In recent years, some works on the modification of LiFePO4 particles represent significant progresses in the improvement of the rate performance. Wang et al. reported that a core–shell LiFePO4 nanocomposite prepared by an in situ polymerization restriction method could present a capacity of 90 mAh g−1 at rate of 60 C [10]. Wu et al. suggested that a nanocomposite with highly dispersed LiFePO4 nanoparticles in a nanoporous carbon matrix couple discharge at a rate up to 230 C [15]. Zhou et al. also illustrated that a nanocomposite, in which the LiFePO4 primary nanoparticles are wrapped homogeneously and loosely with a graphene 3D network, could deliver a capacity of 70 mAh g−1 at 60 C discharge rate [9]. All the above-mentioned reports demonstrated that full coating with carbon [10] is essential to attain high electrochemical performance. However, we know that the approaches based on the thermal decomposition of carbon-containing precursors, which have been widely used for the preparation of carbon-coated LiFePO4 particles [8], [9], [10], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], generally involve a high temperature treatment for forming carbon-coating. Due to the agglomeration of the LiFePO4 nanoparticles and the crystal further growth occurred during the high temperature treatment, only partial surface of the LiFePO4 particles is coated with the conductive carbon [10], [20]. Whereas the full carbon-coating facilitates the high power batteries, it is essential to pursue the preparation of the full carbon-coated LiFePO4 nanoparticles in high yield.

The popular strategy to synthesize LiFePO4 is the solid state reaction route performed at high temperature under inert atmosphere. Frequently, a few impurities, such as Li3Fe2(PO4)3, Fe2O3, and LiPO4, are involved in the final products [21], [22]. Moreover, due to the calcinations at high temperature it is also very difficult to obtain fine and homogeneous particles. In order to obtain LiFePO4 with fine particles for high rate performance and high capacity, it is essential to take advantage of solution synthetic route, such as precipitation [23], sol–gel [24], [25], polyol [26], [27], and hydrothermal reaction route [8], [11], [13], [28 ], [29], [30], [31]. Among these methods, hydrothermal reaction receives particular attention due to the mild operation temperature, well crystallization, simple process and low cost. Otherwise, hydrothermal reaction can be easily tailored to produce nanostructures by the modulation of reaction temperature, concentration of precursors, reaction medium solvent, and the addition of organic compounds [32], [33]. In a pioneering attempt, Whittingham et al. have successfully realized the synthesis of LiFePO4 via hydrothermal reaction route [28 ], [29]. Due to severe displacement of Fe in Li site, the products hydrothermally synthesized at 120 °C show low electrochemical activity. With the hydrothermal treatment temperature increasing above 180 °C, the displacement of Fe in Li site can be remarkably suppressed. However, probably due to the particle size enlargement or the presence of impurities brought about from the oxidation of Fe(II) salt the electrochemical activity improves slightly [29], [30]. Subsequent works have shown that the impurities can be avoided by introducing some organic reagents, such as ascorbic acid, polyacrylic acid, and citric acid, to prevent the oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III) [8], [13], [16], [31].

Recently, a novel hydrothermal system, in which the ethylene glycol (EG) was used with water or other organic reagents as the reaction medium, has been developed to prepare size- and morphology-controlled LiFePO4 nanostructures for improving the electrochemical properties [12], [34], [35], [36], [37]. Rangappa et al. [34] reported that LiFePO4 nanorods and hierarchical flower-like microstructures have been synthesized via solvothermal reaction route by employing EG with hexane or oleic acid as reaction medium solvent. Teng et al. [35] solvothermally synthesized the LiFePO4 nanodendrites by employing EG/water mixture solvent as reaction medium assisted with the surfactant of dodecyl benzene sulphonic acid sodium (SDBS). As anodized alumina oxide (AAO) is used as template in the hydrothermal reaction system, the preparation of LiFePO4 nanorod arrays is also realized via hydrothermal method with EG and water mixture solvent as reaction medium [36]. More recently, Goodenough et al. [12] develop a novel solvothermal approach, in which EG and ethylenediamine mixture solvent was used as reaction medium, combined with high temperature calcinations to synthesize LiFePO4 microspheres with an open three-dimensional (3D) porous microstructure in a large scale. These porous LiFePO4 microspheres show excellent rate capability and cycle stability. Obviously, the EG plays an important role in the morphology-controlled synthesis of LiFePO4 particle for improving the electrochemical properties mentioned above. During the synthesis processes, EG not only as a stabilizer suppresses the particle growth and the agglomeration but also as a reducer suppresses the oxidation of Fe(II) [12].

Herein we report a facile process for the preparation of the monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures in high yields, in which carbon-coating fully covers the highly crystalline monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows with a size of ca. 100 nm in diameter and ca. 100–200 nm in length. As shown in Scheme 1, our strategy includes two steps: one is the synthesis of the monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows via a simple solvothermal reaction route with ethylene glycol as reaction medium solvent under the effect of ascorbic acid as reducer, and the second is the full carbon-coating realized by dispersing the obtained monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows in ascorbic acid solution and following high temperature decomposition after drying. Due to the high perfect crystallization and the full carbon-coating, the monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures exhibit nice capacity retention and high rate capacity.

Section snippets

Experimental

The solvothermal reaction was carried out in a home-made Telflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. All the chemicals are of analytical grade and were used as purchased without further purification. FeSO4·7H2O, LiOH·H2O and H3PO4 (85 wt%) were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Factory (Shanghai, China), ethylene glycol (EG) from Tianjin Damao Chemical reagent Factory (Tianjin, China), ascorbic acid from Alfa Aesar (Shanghai, China), respectively.

Monodispersed LiFePO4 nanoparticles were

Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of the hydrothermally and ethylene glycol (EG) solvothermally synthesized samples. All the diffraction peaks caught from the both powders can be indexed to the orthorhombic lattice of LiFePO4 (JCPDS no. 81-1173), indicating that the both powders are of pure crystalline LiFePO4 crystals with olivine structure. The strong and sharp reflection peaks suggest that the as-prepared LiFePO4 products are well crystallized. Otherwise, compared in detail one can find that the

Conclusions

In summary, a facile two-step process has been developed for preparing monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures in high yield. The solvothermal synthesis of the monodispersed LiFePO4 nanopillows with EG as reaction medium solvent is the basis. After a mixture and a thermal decomposition of the carbon-containing precursor of ascorbic acid with the monodispersed LiFePO4 nanoparticles, the monodispersed LiFePO4@C core–shell nanostructures are obtained. EG as the solvothermal reaction

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, under Grant Nos. 61274004 and 51232006, the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation, China, under Grant No. LY12B07007, and Key Science and Technology Innovation Team of Zhejiang Province under grant number 2010R50013.

References (40)

  • J.F. Ni et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2010)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2012)
  • S. Franger et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2003)
  • S.J. Kwon et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2004)
  • S.F. Yang et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2001)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2008)
  • G. Meligrana et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2006)
  • D. Rangappa et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2010)
  • F. Teng et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2010)
  • F. Teng et al.

    Solid State Sci.

    (2010)
  • A.K. Padhi et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (1997)
  • J.M. Tarascon et al.

    Nature

    (2001)
  • B.L. Ellis et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2010)
  • P.S. Herle et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2004)
  • S.Y. Chung et al.

    Nat. Mater.

    (2002)
  • Y.S. Hu et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2007)
  • R. Amin et al.

    Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.

    (2007)
  • Y. Shi et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2012)
  • X.F. Zhou et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2011)
  • Y.G. Wang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Core-shell materials for advanced batteries

      2019, Chemical Engineering Journal
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text