Elsevier

Journal of Retailing

Volume 85, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages 145-158
Journal of Retailing

Using Lexical Semantic Analysis to Derive Online Brand Positions: An Application to Retail Marketing Research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2009.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper provides an innovative approach to brand tracking in the context of online retail shopping by deriving meaning from the vast amount of information stored in online search engine databases. The method draws upon research in lexical text analysis and computational linguistics to gain insights into the structural schema of online brand positions. The paper proposes a simple-to-use method that managers can utilize to assess their brand's positioning relative to that of their competitors’ in the online environment.

Section snippets

Background and problem statement

If managers do a simple keyword search to assess what the online world says about their brands, they will usually get back thousands of hits from a search engine. They will then face the onerous task of sifting through the voluminous data generated by those hits. Currently, the usefulness of the hit information is limited by the fact that the listings contain no summary information about the content. Nor do the listings contain information on the “semantic” properties of hits containing textual

Lexical semantics—some initial ideas

Typing the name of a brand or a travel destination into a search engine will often provide thousands of hits, but the searcher does not gain information on whether these sites have positive, negative, or neutral things to say about the brand or destination (Turney 2002). To get a better insight into the meaning in the text, researchers in the fields of artificial intelligence and natural language processing are beginning to focus on evaluating the content of large text-based corpora.

One of the

Lexical semantics—the method

For the purpose of our analysis, we utilize two key properties of textual data: (1) consumers attach meanings to words and (2) meanings are inherent in the text, or more specifically in the adjectival expressions used by the author of the text. Understanding the valence or semantic orientation of a word (Hatzivassiloglou and McKeown 1997) can help describe its associated noun. That is, we can infer the evaluative nature of a sentence describing a noun by examining the association between the

Co-occurrence of brands and descriptors

In our applications, word probability p(x) will be calculated as the number of documents in an online database that have the word x mentioned in them, divided by the total number of documents relevant to that problem. Let's say we are interested in examining the associations between automobile brands (Toyota, Honda, BMW, etc.) and certain descriptor variables (reliable, efficient, expensive, etc.). In this scenario, one would calculate the PMI of “Toyota” and “reliable” as follows:PMI=log2p(

Study 1: Brand positioning analysis

Despite the central role of positioning in marketing, there is surprisingly limited empirical work on consumer-derived typologies that reflect brand positioning strategies (Blankson and Kalafatis 2004). Branding is particularly important in the retail industry given the industry's highly competitive nature (Ailawadi and Keller 2004) and the fact that many retail chains are introducing private brands to compete with national brands (Bellizzi et al. 1981). Brand positioning relates to how brands

Study 2: Online brand personality assessment

It is now common to refer to brands as having their own personalities (Aaker, 1997, Fournier, 1998). Aaker (1997) defined brand personality as “the set of human characteristics associated with a brand” (p. 347). Through her empirical work, she identified five distinct dimensions of brand personality: sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, and ruggedness. She further broke down these five dimensions into 15 “facets” that were themselves composed of 42 “traits.” In Study 2, we attempt

Study 3: Attribute-level brand comparisons

In study 3, we compare two brands on a given attribute. Specifically, we compare brand pairs on “reliability” for several home appliances. Brand pairs were chosen based on the results reported in Consumer Reports’ 2004 Buying Guide. Consumer Reports’ results were based on a national survey of tens of thousands of responses it received for its annual questionnaire about products bought in the previous five years or so (Consumer Reports 2004). Thus, the Consumer Reports listing of brand

Discussion

This paper demonstrates that massive search engine databases like Google can be successfully mined to provide information of interest to online retailers. The three studies reported here are based on lexical semantic analysis which yields valuable insights into online brand representations that are of considerable value for making strategic marketing decisions.

Our approach offers a promising potential for analytical examination of a freely available database. Because the web provides an

Conclusions and limitations

The untamed jungle of the textual content on the web, coupled with the ease and frequency with which people can add content and the automated web crawlers that are commonplace today, provides a rich and detailed source of content for consumer researchers looking to better understand consumers’ relationships with products and brands. We present a significant first step at making sense of this content for marketing analysis, while encouraging and inviting other scholars to generate a stream of

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Aleksey Cherfas for his significant assistance with the programming for this project. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the UMD Chancellor's Grant program and additional support from CRITO/Project POINT.

References (44)

  • Jennifer L. Aaker

    Dimensions of Brand Personality

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1997)
  • Ann Banfield

    Unspeakable Sentences

    (1982)
  • Tim Berners-Lee et al.

    The Semantic Web

    Scientific American

    (2001)
  • Joseph A. Bellizzi et al.

    Consumer Perceptions of National, Private, and Generic Brands

    Journal of Retailing

    (1981)
  • Charles Blankson et al.

    The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Consumer/Customer-Derived Generic Typology of Positioning Strategies

    Journal of Marketing Management

    (2004)
  • Rebecca F. Bruce et al.

    Recognizing Subjectivity: A Case Study of Manual Tagging

    Natural Language Engineering

    (1999)
  • Patrali Chatterjee

    Online Reviews: So Consumers Use Them?

    Advances in Consumer Research

    (2001)
  • Kenneth W. Church et al.

    Word Association Norms, Mutual Information and Lexicography

  • Consumer Reports

    Buying Guide 2004

    (2004)
  • J. Cox et al.

    Service Quality and E-Commerce: An Exploratory Analysis

    Managing Service Quality

    (2001)
  • Kushal Dave et al.

    Mining the Peanut Gallery: Opinion Extraction and Semantic Classification of Product Reviews

  • Christiane D. Fellbaum

    WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database

    (1998)
  • Cited by (44)

    • The role of machine learning analytics and metrics in retailing research

      2021, Journal of Retailing
      Citation Excerpt :

      The abundance of user-generated content (UGC), such as customer reviews on websites and tags on social media platforms, allows retailers to conduct market structure analysis, which is an efficient alternative to the traditional methods of focus groups and surveys. In a prescient article in the Journal of Retailing, Aggarwal, Vaidyanathan, and Venkatesh (2009) develop an early approach to understanding brand positioning using Google search data. Lee and Bradlow (2011) extract specific phrases from the text of online customer reviews and conduct cluster analysis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 218 726 6817.

    2

    Tel.: +1 949 824 6625.

    View full text