Graphene oxide: A substrate for optimizing preparations of frozen-hydrated samples
Introduction
Films made of evaporated carbon are routinely used as substrates for the mounting and subsequent imaging of biological samples by electron microscopy. When imaged at higher magnifications such amorphous carbon substrates display a granular texture, attenuating and even obscuring the signal of unstained particles. Hence, to circumvent this limitation frozen-hydrated samples are often imaged within unsupported regions of vitreous ice prepared across perforated carbon films. However, a problem sometimes encountered with such preparations is the tendency of biological macromolecules to adsorb strongly to the surrounding carbon leading to a depletion of particles within the spanning vitreous ice. This in particular, is an issue with preparations that require washing to remove unwanted low molecular weight constituents, as most of the sample is also subsequently removed.
Graphene is a single-layer crystalline lattice of sp2 bound carbon atoms (Geim and Novoselov, 2007) possessing several advantages over amorphous carbon. The ideal (i.e. uncontaminated and defect free) graphene structure is expected to be essentially featureless down to a resolution of 2.13 Å. If sampled at higher resolution, the regular crystallinity of graphene gives rise to a periodic signal that can be subtracted if necessary (Meyer et al., 2008). The single-layer thickness (0.34 nm, Eda et al., 2008) of graphene also minimizes electron scattering within the substrate and hence any background noise. The conductivity of pristine graphene, converted to bulk units assuming a thickness of 3.4 Å, is more than six orders of magnitude higher than the conductivity of amorphous carbon (Chen et al., 2008, Robertson, 1986, Ziegler, 2006). Therefore, graphene may reduce charging effects and improve the imaging stability of insulating materials like amorphous ice. Graphene reacts to deformation elastically (Lee et al., 2008, Zakharchenko et al., 2009) and has a high mechanical strength (Wang et al., 2009), allowing it to withstand sonication as well as other harsh (chemical) treatments (Reina et al., 2009).
Although hydrophobic, graphene can be functionalized using chemical processes (Wang et al., 2009, Schniepp et al., 2006), thereby producing hydrophilic substrates to which molecules readily attach. Graphene oxide is one such derivative produced by the exfoliation of graphite oxide, a heavily oxygenated and hydrophilic form of graphite (Paredes et al., 2008, Wei et al., 2008). Fig. 1 shows an area of 1–2 layer thin graphene oxide substrate. Although oxidization attenuates the material properties of pristine graphene (see Section 4), substrates are stable and demonstrate significantly reduced background contrast. Clearly defined hexagonal diffraction patterns (Fig. 1, insets A and B) occurring at the material periodicities (2.13 and 1.23 Å, respectively, Meyer et al., 2007) correspond to disordered stacking of individual graphene oxide layers.
When preparing difficult and fragile samples, sometimes also requiring multiple washes prior to vitrification, the use of additional amorphous carbon substrate is routine. In this manuscript we compare graphene oxide to amorphous carbon and describe its use as a supporting substrate for unstained, frozen-hydrated samples.
Section snippets
Graphene oxide
Graphite oxide is produced according to the Hummers method (Hummers and Offeman, 1958) in which graphite mixed with concentrated sulfuric acid is exposed to strong oxidizing agents such as sodium nitrate, potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide during a controlled reaction. In this experiment highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) with a 150 μm grain size (Sigma, Munich, Germany) was used. However, we have also successfully oxidized natural graphite with grain sizes of 500–1800 μm (NGS
Background signal comparison
Fig. 2 compares calculated power spectra from separate single-layer (see inset) graphene oxide (Fig. 2, green, ∼300 °C baked) and thin amorphous carbon (Fig. 2, black, ∼3–4 nm thick) samples, imaged at 145 k× magnification and ∼200 nm defocus. According to a widely accepted model (Lerf et al., 1998), graphene oxide consists of defect-free crystalline areas (Fig. 3A) interspersed with clustered oxidized regions (Fig. 3B) to which the sample molecules attach. These functional groups form
Discussion
The advantages of very thin crystalline sheets prepared of materials such as graphite or layered silicates for the electron microscopy of small single particles has been recognized long ago (Hahn and Baumeister, 1974, Dobelle and Beer, 1968). They are highly transparent and essentially featureless at resolutions below the intrinsic material periodicity, and if necessary the periodic signal can be subtracted (Meyer et al., 2008). Nevertheless, practical applications as specimen supports have
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the European Union within the 7th Framework Programme of “PROSPECTS” and by the DFG Cluster of Excellence: Munich-Centre for Advanced Photonics (MAP). We thank Ravi Shankar Sundaraman and Marko Burghardt (MPI for solid state research, Stuttgart, Germany) for the initial graphite oxide preparations and instructions on preparation. Protein preparations of 26S and 20S proteasome were kindly provided by Oana Mihalache and Susanne Witt (MPI of Biochemistry, Martinsried,
References (30)
- et al.
High resolution negative staining of ferritin molecules on vermiculite single crystal supports
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
(1974) - et al.
Automated cryoelectron microscopy of single particles applied to the 26S proteasome
FEBS Lett.
(2007) - et al.
Synthesis of enhanced hydrophilic and hydrophobic graphene oxide nanosheets by a solvothermal method
Carbon
(2009) - et al.
Synthesis and characterisation of hydrophilic and organophilic graphene nanosheets
Carbon
(2009) - et al.
Synthesis and characterization of a graphene-C-60 hybrid material
Carbon
(2009) - et al.
Expression of functional Thermoplasma acidophilum proteasomes in Escherichia coli
FEBS Lett.
(1992) - et al.
Visualizing protein assemblies by means of preparative mass spectrometry and microscopy
J. Struct. Biol.
(2009) - et al.
Charged-impurity scattering in graphene
Nat. Phys.
(2008) - et al.
Conduction mechanisms in amorphous carbon prepared by ion-beam sputtering
J. Phys. Cond. Matter
(1995) - et al.
Chemically cleaved graphite support films for electron microscopy
J. Cell Biol.
(1968)
Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material
Nat. Nanotech.
The rise of graphene
Nat. Mater.
Electronic transport properties of individual chemically reduced graphene oxide sheets
Nano Lett.
Preparation of graphitic oxide
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Tunable electrical conductivity of individual graphene oxide sheets reduced at ‘‘low” temperatures
Nano Lett.
Cited by (126)
A 3D-printed flow-cell for on-grid purification of electron microscopy samples directly from lysate
2023, Journal of Structural BiologyBetter Cryo-EM Specimen Preparation: How to Deal with the Air–Water Interface?
2023, Journal of Molecular BiologyStructure of the Saccharolobus solfataricus type III-D CRISPR effector
2023, Current Research in Structural BiologyAdvances in sample preparation and data processing for single-particle cryo-electron microscopy
2022, Advances in Protein Molecular and Structural Biology Methods