The antecedents, experience, and coping strategies of driver boredom in young adult males
Introduction
According to the World Health Organisation (2013), more than one million people die annually in road accidents worldwide, and another twenty to fifty million are injured. Young drivers aged 17 to 24 account for the most fatalities (Qld Gov, 2015). Among those, males are three times as likely to be killed in a car crash as females. One of the underlying factors is that young people and especially young males typically score high in sensation seeking behaviors (Zuckerman, Eysenck, & Eysenck, 1978). Perhaps lesser known is the following: (a) Young males are also more prone to feeling bored (Drory, 1982); (b) boredom proneness is a stable rather than transient personality trait (Harvey, Heslop, & Thorpe, 2011), and; (c) sensation seeking and boredom proneness are directly correlated (Zuckerman, 1994). A lack of stimulation while driving can lead particularly young drivers to feeling bored. This uncomfortable state may then trigger the seeking of sensations (e.g., speeding) or distractions (e.g., phone use), which in turn can lead to accidents (Fuller, 2005). However, driver boredom is not well understood, especially among this group of drivers most at risk.
The aim of this study is to investigate the phenomenon of driver boredom in young male adults. To address the research aim, we sought to answer the following research questions. They built upon the work by Martin, Sadlo, and Stew (2006) on boredom in general (all demographics and contexts).
- RQ1:
What are antecedents to driver boredom? (see Section 5.1).
- RQ2:
What is the subjective experience of driver boredom? (see Section 5.2).
- RQ3:
What are coping strategies to combat driver boredom? (see Section 5.3).
Our contribution is twofold. First, we propose an approach for investigating state boredom in the driving context without interrupting the experience. Second, we present empirical data from a study with 24 young male drivers and discussing them.
Section snippets
Defining boredom
One definition of boredom categorizes it as “the aversive experience of having an unfulfilled desire to be engaged in satisfying activity” (Fahlman et al., 2013). The feeling associated with this experience is perceived as negative and uncomfortable, resulting in the individual's desire to alleviate the adverse feeling. Boredom has been further broken down into components of arousal, stimulation, engagement, and attention. It is important to define and describe these terms in order to
Studying human factors in the driving context
Many human actors affect driver behavior and, as a result, road safety. Among them are anger (e.g., Gulian et al., 1990), stress (e.g., Rowden et al., 2011), frustration (e.g., El Chliaoutakis et al., 2002, Harris and Houston, 2010), fatigue (e.g., Philip et al., 2005), risk perception (e.g., Fuller, McHugh, & Pender, 2008), cognitive load (e.g., Palinko et al., 2010), sensation seeking (e.g., Dahlen et al., 2005), and impulsiveness (e.g., Stanford et al., 1996). The methods by which these
Theoretical framework
To investigate state boredom in the driving context, we chose a phenomenological inquiry approach. Phenomenology is the study of lived experience (Heidegger, 1988, Husserl, 1970). As summarized by Patton (2014), it explores how human beings make sense of experience and transform experience into consciousness. The value of phenomenology, as pointed out by Adams and van Manen (2008), lies in prioritizing how people subjectively experience the world. Unlike methodological frameworks centered
Results
In the following, we present the findings from our data analysis. Fig. 4 provides an overview of those findings as proposed by Miles et al. (2013: 92).
Discussion
Taking existing literature into account, we will discuss the data across four themes: antecedents, experience, coping strategies, and optimism bias.
Limitations
Although the study was carefully designed, we are aware of some limitations. Our investigation was primarily concerned with the experiences of individual drivers without any passengers. However, we invited two participants at a time and one of them sat on the passenger's side. We asked participants to imagine being by themselves without anyone next to them to talk to, but we do recognize that the experience might be a slightly different one. Our rationale behind this study setup was to foster a
Summary
We investigated the unique and safety-critical context of driver boredom in a qualitative study. We examined the data through a phenomenology lens and closely investigated the subjective experience of driver boredom, expanding on the work by Martin et al. (2006) on the boredom phenomenon in work and home contexts and on work by Heslop (2014) on individual difference predictors and behavioral effects of driver boredom.
As part of our findings, we presented antecedents associated with driver
Acknowledgements
This work was supported under the Australian Research Council's Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (ARC DECRA) funding scheme (project number DE140101542). We would like to acknowledge Verena Lindner and Diana Babiac who provided assistance with the study and Marcus Foth for providing valuable comments on the manuscript.
Fabius Steinberger is a doctoral researcher with the Urban Informatics Research Lab at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia. He investigates driver boredom and explores approaches to safely re-engage drivers in the driving task.
References (130)
Phenomenology: its use in nursing research
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(1994)- et al.
Young driver distraction: state of the evidence and directions for behavior change programs
J. Adolesc. Health
(2014) - et al.
Young driver crash rates by licensing age, driving experience, and license phase
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
(2015) - et al.
Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
(2005) - et al.
Do young novice drivers overestimate their driving skills more than experienced drivers? Different methods lead to different conclusions
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
(2011) Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers
Journal of Safety Research
(1999)- et al.
The assessment of anger and hostility: A critical review
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2004/1) - et al.
Perception of the risk of an accident by young and older drivers
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
(1986) - et al.
An evaluation of an adaptive automation system using a cognitive vigilance task
Biological Psychology
(2004) Towards a general theory of driver behaviour
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
(2005)
Task difficulty and risk in the determination of driver behaviour
Driver boredom: its individual difference predictors and behavioural effects
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Age differences in male drivers' perception of accident risk: the role of perceived driving ability
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
Risky decision making in adults with ADHD
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
Causes of boredom: the person, the situation, or both?
Personality and Individual Differences
What to do when feeling bored?: Students' strategies for coping with boredom
Learning and Individual Differences
Culture and state boredom: a comparison between European Canadians and Chinese
Personality and Individual Differences
Phenomenology
The phenomenological perspective
The experience of motivation: the theory of psychological reversals
Potential benefits and costs of concurrent task engagement to maintain vigilance a driving simulator investigation
A phenomenological investigation of being bored with life
Psychological Reports
On the function of boredom
Behavioral Science
Qualitative Interviews: When enough is enough
Research by Design
‘eventually you just get used to it’: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of 10-16 year-old girls' experiences of the transition into temporary accommodation after exposure to domestic violence perpetrated by men against their mothers
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
The use of psychophysiology to assess driver status
Ergonomics
Job demands and worker health: main effects and occupational differences
The challenges of partially automated driving
Guarding against boredom: security specialists in the US air force
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
Young drivers ignore dangerous phone warning
Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications
Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
Monitoring, managing, and motivating driver safety and well-being
Qualitative inquiry and research method: choosing among five approaches
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Flow: the classic work on how to achieve happiness
Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Optimal experience in work and leisure
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Boredom in the workplace a new look at an old problem
An interpretative phenomenological analysis of stress and coping in first year undergraduates
British Educational Research Journal
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing
Individual differences in boredom proneness and task effectiveness at work
Activation and behavior
Special considerations in distracted driving with teens
Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine
The unengaged mind: defining boredom in terms of attention
Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
Aggressive behavior while driving as predictor of self-reported car crashes
Journal of Safety Research
Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale
Assessment
Cited by (33)
Measurement invariance of the driving inattention scale (ARDES) across 7 countries
2024, Accident Analysis and PreventionA randomized controlled pilot trial of brief online mindfulness training in young drivers
2023, Accident Analysis and PreventionA novel conceptual framework investigating the relationship between roadside advertising and road safety: The driver behaviour and roadside advertising conceptual framework
2022, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourCitation Excerpt :This may be due to pre-existing driver performance levels such as boredom or fatigue [C]. For example, when a young driver decides to alleviate their boredom, they may search for stimulation from the road environment by engaging in non-driving related activities (such as viewing a billboard) (Steinberger et al., 2016). In these cases, attention may be diverted from the driving task [J] after pre-empting and then being exposed to the sign, but the driver self-mitigates the event [K], and the driver recovers [L].
The role of route familiarity in traffic participants’ behaviour and transport psychology research: A systematic review
2021, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives“They would call me, and I would need to know because it is like life and death”: A qualitative examination of the acceptability of smartphone applications designed to reduce mobile phone use while driving
2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourCitation Excerpt :This related to the desire to use specific phone functions that were not allowed when the application was turned on. This was primarily due to easing boredom when stuck in traffic or at a red light (Fofanova & Vollrath, 2012; Steinberger, Moeller, & Schroeter, 2016). Other reasons included using the phone out of habit while driving and worrying about missing important calls or messages.
Fabius Steinberger is a doctoral researcher with the Urban Informatics Research Lab at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia. He investigates driver boredom and explores approaches to safely re-engage drivers in the driving task.
April Moeller is a doctoral researcher with the Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation Group and the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Munich, Germany. She was a visitor at the Urban Informatics Research Lab at QUT. Her background is in neuro-cognitive psychology.
Ronald Schroeter is a senior research fellow with the Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety – Queensland (CARRS-Q) at QUT. His main research interest lies in translating human-centered design concepts to road safety.
- 1
Present address: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Munich, Leopoldstrasse 13, 80802 Munich, Germany