Physicochemical compatibility of SrCeO3 with potential SOFC cathodes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2007.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The chemical and physical compatibility of SrCeO3 is investigated with respect to LaMO3 (M=Mn, Fe, Co) and La2−xSrxNiO4 (x=0, 0.8), via the reaction of fine-grained powder compacts and solid-state diffusion couples. Compositions were chosen so as to give predictive insight into possible candidate materials for all-oxide electrochemical devices. Results show the primary reaction in these systems to be the dissolution of SrO from SrCeO3 into the LaMO3/La2−xSrxNiO4, and corresponding formation of La-doped CeO2. Reaction kinetics are observed to be relatively fast, with element profiles suggesting the diffusion of Sr2+ in ceria to be surprisingly rapid. It is demonstrated that perovskite starting materials represent poor candidates for use with SrCeO3, reacting completely to form Ruddlesden-Popper/K2NiF4 type oxides. Reaction with La2NiO4 is less pronounced, and formation of secondary phases suppressed for the composition La1.2Sr0.8NiO4. It is thus concluded that Ruddlesden-Popper type oxides represent good candidate materials for use with a SrCeO3-based electrolytes when doped with appropriate levels of Sr.

Graphical abstract

Assessment of the SrCeO3 proton conductor shows this material to have poor chemical compatibility with LaMO3 perovskite systems, but predicts coexistence with Ruddlesden-Popper type oxides.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Proton conducting oxides have attracted considerable recent attention owing to their potential for use in a wide range of electrochemical devices, particularly the technologies which underpin the hydrogen economy; hydrogen separators, steam electrolysers and fuel cells [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. For these applications protonic systems are particularly attractive as they avoid the problems associated with the fuel–product mixing that occurs in oxide ion conducting systems.

Current state of the art in ceramic proton conductors are the barium and strontium cerate families [7], [8]. These exhibit a distorted perovskite structure [9], and high levels of proton conductivity are achievable via the replacement of Ce4+ with an acceptor dopant such as Y3+, Nd3+ Yb3+ or Gd3+ [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. The commercial application of these materials has been hindered however, by the instability of both Sr and Ba families with respect to their alkaline earth carbonates [15], [16], [17], and by the technical difficulty of creating fully dense ceramics with good mechanical properties [18]. A further challenge exists in the pairing of these materials with appropriate electrodes. Typically a porous electrode of a noble metal has been used [5], [10]. However, these are expensive and so there is some interest in the development of less costly solutions. Ideally a less expensive oxide ceramic would be used which exhibits combined fast protonic–electronic conductivity, but to date there are no oxides which fulfil these requirements. Possible alternatives exist in the use of a Ni-electrolyte cermet [19] under reducing conditions (i.e. fuel cell anode) and a mixed oxide ion/electronic conductor for oxidising conditions (i.e. fuel cell cathode) [10], [13], [20]. The use of a mixed electronic/oxide ion conductor greatly broadens the choice of potential electrodes, with the additional benefit that a good understanding of the synthesis, processing and chemistry already exists for many of the candidate materials.

With this in mind, we have investigated the chemical compatibility of the fast protonic conductor SrCeO3 with a number of well-known mixed oxide-ion/electronic conducting oxides. The systems chosen (LaCoO3, LaMnO3, LaFeO3 and La2−xSrxNiO4) are representative of current materials and provide a solid basis for prediction of other likely candidates.

Section snippets

Experimental

Powders of SrCeO3, LaMnO3, LaFeO3, LaCoO3 and La2−xSrxNiO4 (x=0, 0.8) were synthesised via spray pyrolysis of appropriate solutions of metal nitrates. A complexing agent, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), was used to assist dissolution and homogeneous reaction during pyrolysis. The as-prepared powders were then calcined in air to remove residual nitrates/organics, and ball milled in isopropanol for 6–8 h using 5 mm zirconia media. For the La2−xSrxNiO4 compositions a calcination temperature

Solid-state reaction—microfine powders

Following initial firing for 36 h at 1150 °C powder compacts of SrCeO3 with LaMO3 (M=Mn and Co) showed strong reaction, with complete reaction of SrCeO3 to form product phases identified as the K2NiF4 type materials (La,Sr)2MO4 and a CeO2-type phase. Small quantities of the starting perovskite were also present. The SrCeO3/La2NiO4 system showed similar, but more limited, reaction of SrCeO3, and a concurrent reduction in the La2NiO4 unit cell volume. In each case, broad diffraction peaks for the

Discussion

The thermochemical properties of the alkaline earth cerates have been thoroughly addressed by several studies due to their generally poor stability under typical fuel cell operating conditions. In addition to being unstable in CO2-containing and humid atmospheres, they are also known to be poorly stable with respect to their binary oxides. This is reflected in the Goldschmidt tolerance (t) factors, as enthalpies of formation become less exothermic with decreasing t-values [35]. SrCeO3 is

Conclusions

The solid-state reaction of SrCeO3 with LaMO3 and La2NiO4 type oxides has been evaluated in both mixed powder and diffusion couple geometries. The results, which are anticipated to have relevance across the wider range of alkaline earth cerate and lanthanide-transition metal perovskites, clearly demonstrate that SrCeO3 is non-coexistent with the perovskite phases LaMO3 (M=Mn, Fe, Co). The reaction products in these systems, coupled with the chemical compatibility of the La2−xSrxNiO4 solid

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to Øystein Anderson and Trine Øyås for powder preparation. Funding for this work was provided by the NANOMAT programme; Grant No. 158517413-“Functional Oxides for Energy Technology”.

References (50)

  • T. Norby

    Solid State Ionics

    (1999)
  • H. Iwahara et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2004)
  • K. Sundmacher et al.

    Catal Today

    (2005)
  • H. Matsumoto et al.

    J. Alloy Compds.

    (2006)
  • T. Schober

    Solid State Ionics

    (2003)
  • H. Iwahara

    Solid State Ionics

    (1981)
  • N. Bonanos et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (1995)
  • H. Iwahara

    Solid State Ionics

    (1995)
  • H. Iwahara

    Solid State Ionics

    (1996)
  • X.-T. Su et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2006)
  • N. Maffei et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2004)
  • N. Sammes et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2004)
  • A.N. Shirsat et al.

    Solid State Chem.

    (2004)
  • G.C. Mather et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2003)
  • J.Y. Lee et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1993)
  • S.V. Chavan et al.

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • T. Matsuura et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Solids.

    (1988)
  • R.A. Mohan Ram et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1987)
  • A.N. Grundy et al.

    CALPHAD

    (2004)
  • E.H.P. Cordfunke et al.

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (1998)
  • V.V. Kharton et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2004)
  • J.A. Kilner et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2002)
  • V.V. Vashook et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2000)
  • S.J. Skinner et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2000)
  • M. Al Daroukh et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text