Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of porous SnO2 nanotubes and their lithium ion storage properties

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2012.02.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Porous SnO2 nanotubes have been synthesized by a rapid microwave-assisted hydrothermal process followed by annealing in air. The detailed morphological and structural studies indicate that the SnO2 tubes typically have diameters from 200 to 400 nm, lengths from 0.5 to 1.5 μm and wall thicknesses from 50 to 100 nm. The SnO2 nanotubes are self-assembled by interconnected nanocrystals with sizes ∼8 nm resulting in a specific surface area of ∼54 m2 g−1. The pristine SnO2 nanotubes are used to fabricate lithium half cells to evaluate their lithium ion storage properties. The porous SnO2 nanotubes are characteristic with high lithium ion storage capacity, that is found to be 1258, 951, 757, 603, 458, and 288 mAh g−1, at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4C, respectively. The enhanced electrochemical properties of the SnO2 nanotubes can be ascribed to their unique geometry and porous structures.

Graphical abstract

Porous SnO2 nanotubes are synthesized by a fast microwave-assisted hydrothermal process and exhibit high lithium ion storage properties due to their unique geometry and porous characteristics.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

► A microwave-assisted hydrothermal method was used to prepare porous SnO2 nanotubes. ► The porous SnO2 nanotubes have abundant mesopores on their tube walls. ► The porous SnO2 nanotubes possess high lithium ion storage properties. ► Our results may promote the development of high-performance anode materials.

Introduction

SnO2 is an important wide bandgap semiconductor with extensive applications in gas sensing [1], [2], [3], photocatalysis [4], water treatment [5], dye-/quantum dot-sensitized solar cells [6], [7], [8], [9] and hybrid solar cells [10]. SnO2 has also been considered as a promising anode material for lithium ion batteries (LIBs) due to its reported high specific capacity (>600 mAh g−1), low lithium ion (Li+) intercalation potential, non-toxicity, and low production cost [11]. However, the practical application of SnO2 as anode materials in LIBs has largely been hampered by its poor cycle performance and rate capability, which are caused by the huge volume change (>300%) [12] during charge and discharge, giving rise to pulverization of electrode materials and loss of electrical contact with current collector. As a result, much effort has been directed to improve the electrochemical performance of SnO2 materials. An available route is the conformal coating of a thin carbon layer on the SnO2 surfaces to stabilize the electrode structures during charge–discharge processes [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Other approaches include in-situ deposition or growth of SnO2 on carbon nanotubes [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] or grapheme [24], [25], [26] to enhance the electronic conductivity of the electrodes and alleviate their volumetric variation during electrochemical cycling. In addition to these strategies, it is well recognized that the electrochemical properties of materials strongly depend on their structural parameters, such as crystallinity, morphology, particle size, specific surface area and pore structure. For instance, porous spherical TiO2 [27] and LiMn2O4 [28] structures can exhibit much better cycle performance and rate-capability than their dense counterparts when used as LIB electrodes. Therefore, rational design and optimization of the pristine SnO2 microstructures play an important role in improving their electrochemical performance. In this regard, various SnO2 nanostructures, such as nanocrystals [29], [30], nanowire/nanorods [31], [32], [33], nanotubes [34], [35], [36], nanosheets [37], [38], porous and hollow structures [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], have been investigated as anode materials for LIBs. These nanostructures usually possess much higher specific surface areas than the bulk material, which can considerably elevate the reaction kinetics at surface and interface. Porous and hollow structures can also effectively accommodate the volume variation of SnO2 during electrochemical charge–discharge processes and improve the cycling performance.

Various synthetic routes have been developed to prepare SnO2 nanostructures, including chemical vapor deposition [8], sol–gel techniques [31], [39], micro-emulsion processes [4], template-assisted etching [36], [45], and hydrothermal/solvothermal methods [32], [40]. Among these methods, hydrothermal synthesis provides a facile route for the preparation of SnO2 nanostructures due to its easiness, mild reaction conditions, and low-cost. However, conventional hydrothermal methods usually take a long reaction period [41], [42]. Recently, microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis has increasingly attracted scientific attention due to its distinct heating means and significantly reduced reaction time [29], [46], [47], [48], [49]. In this work, we report the fast synthesis of SnO2 nanotubes with highly porous wall structures and evaluation of their electrochemical properties. The synthesized porous SnO2 nanotube structures are suitable for construction of anodes in LIBs because their ability to accomodate volume variation at charging and discharging cycles.

Section snippets

Synthesis of porous SnO2 nanotubes

The experimental procedure for the synthesis of porous SnO2 tubes can be described as follows. In a typical synthesis, 2.5 mmol of SnCl4 and 5 mmol of D−(+) glucose are sequentially dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water under vigorous stirring. The resulting solution is transferred into 35 mL quartz vial for microwave-assisted hydrothermal reaction (CEM Discover S-Glass). The setting temperature, pressure limit, and reaction time are preset to 150 °C, 180 psi, and 30 min, respectively. After the

Microstructure of synthesized SnO2 samples

Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns acquired from the precursors as well as the annealed product. All the diffraction peaks of the precursors, in Fig. 1(a), can be indexed to a single rutile phase of SnO2 (JCPDS Card No. 41-1445). The broad diffraction peaks indicate the nanocrystalline nature of the SnO2 precursors. The crystallinity of SnO2 is significantly improved after annealing as revealed in Fig. 1(b) where the average crystallite size, according to the Scherrer equation applied to the (1 1 0) peak,

Conclusions

SnO2 nanotubes with porous walls have been synthesized by a rapid microwave-assisted hydrothermal process followed by thermal treatment in air. The pristine SnO2 samples present large specific surface areas and average pore size (∼54 m2 g−1 and ∼4.5 nm, respectively). The porous SnO2 nanotubes exhibit high Li+ storage capacity and fairly high rate and cycling performance when evaluated as anode materials for LIBs. The improved electrochemical properties can be attributed to their unique morphology

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by GRF of Hong Kong under the project number CityU 110 209. The authors also thank Dr. T. L. Wong for HRTEM characterization and Dr. H. Cheng for help with electrochemical tests of commercial SnO2 particles.

References (52)

  • J.P. Ge et al.

    Sens. Actuators, B

    (2006)
  • L.J. Xi et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2008)
  • J.G. Ren et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • P.C. Lian et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2011)
  • H.E. Wang et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • L.J. Xi et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2012)
  • Y.L. Wang et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
  • Z.P. Li et al.

    Nanoscale

    (2011)
  • L. Shi et al.

    Langmuir

    (2010)
  • A. Kay et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2002)
  • J.Y. Liu et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2010)
  • S. Gubbala et al.

    Adv. Funct. Mater.

    (2008)
  • M.A. Hossain et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2010)
  • H.J. Snaith et al.

    Nano Lett.

    (2010)
  • Y. Idota et al.

    Science

    (1997)
  • J.Y. Huang et al.

    Science

    (2010)
  • X.M. Sun et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2006)
  • X.W. Lou et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2009)
  • J.S. Chen et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2009)
  • B.H. Zhang et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2010)
  • Y.S. Lin et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2010)
  • P. Wu et al.

    Nanoscale

    (2011)
  • G. Chen et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2008)
  • H.X. Zhang et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2009)
  • L.W. Ji et al.

    Chem. Eur. J.

    (2010)
  • P. Wu et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text