Performance of oat hulls activated carbon for COD and color removal from landfill leachate
Introduction
Although municipal solid waste can be safely disposed in sanitary landfills, the operation of these facilities is challenged by emissions of greenhouse gases and leachate [1,2]. Landfill leachate is reported by the literature as a high-strength wastewater containing easily and hardly biodegradable organic matter, ammonia in high concentrations, dissolved solids, and heavy metals [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]].
Depending on the level of purification required for leachate prior to its released into the environment, it can be treated by stand-alone or combined methods, such as: air stripping [6,7], advanced oxidation processes [3,8], biological processes [4,5], and adsorption [9,10]. Significant removals of heavy metals and organic matter have been attributed to the use of commercial activated carbon for leachate treatment [[9], [10], [11]]. Nonetheless, as part of the efforts to divert organic wastes from landfills, these materials have been tested as precursors for activated carbon production and applied for wastewater treatment [12].
Oat is one the most popular cereals consumed worldwide, and its global production in 2017 was approximately 25.9 million tons, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations [13]. While oat is processed for human consumption, massive amounts of hulls are produced. The latter is a lignin-cellulosic waste that corresponds to about 25% of the oat grain weight. Oat hulls can be reused as animal feed, biomass for fuel production, or ultimately disposed in landfills [14,15]. Alternatively, oat hulls can be recovered as activated carbon, being successfully applied for dye [14] and arsenic [16] removals from aqueous solutions.
While limited information is available for oat hulls activated carbon applied for water purification, the literature lacks their application for landfill leachate. Therefore, this study aimed to contribute to the literature by using oat hulls as precursors for activated carbon and testing these adsorbents to remove COD and color from landfill leachate.
Section snippets
Oat hulls activated carbon
Oat hulls were collected from a milling industry located in Emerson-MB, Canada. Following methods described in previous studies reporting on waste-derived adsorbents [14,[16], [17], [18]], oat hulls activated carbon samples were prepared by means of chemical activation with phosphoric acid (impregnation ratios 60 and 100 %), followed by pyrolysis for 1 h, under a N2 atmosphere. The temperatures tested for pyrolysis were 350 and 500 °C [14,[16], [17], [18]].
Landfill leachate
Synthetic leachate was prepared
Physico-chemical and spectroscopic properties of oat hulls activated carbon
The yields obtained for oat hulls activated carbon were about 38 %, whereas burn-off was around 60 %, and ash content 30 % (Table 2). As reported by Hildago-Oporto et al. [31], oat hulls are lignocellulosic materials composed by nitrogen (0.6 %), carbon (43 %), hydrogen (6 %), and oxygen (50.4 %). During pyrolysis, hydrogen and oxygen atoms are removed from lignocellulosic materials, and the formed porous adsorbent is mainly composed by carbon atoms. Therefore, the maximum yield for activated
Conclusion
The adsorbents produced at different impregnation ratios and pyrolysis temperatures presented average pore diameters varying from 2.5–8.3 nm, indicating that mesoporous activated carbon samples were successfully produced. The BET surface area was dependent on both the tested impregnation ratios and pyrolysis temperatures. Adsorption was favored by running the batch tests at 20 °C, using a 20-g L−1 adsorbent dose, and adjusting the pH of leachate to 4. Due to their high BET surface areas, oat
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowships (UMGF) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC RGPIN-2014-05510) for financial support, and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. We also would like to thank the Nano-Systems Fabrication Laboratory (NSFL) director, Dr. Cyrus Shafai, and the manager Dwayne Chrusch, for their invaluable cooperation to this research.
References (42)
- et al.
Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity
J. Hazard. Mater.
(2008) - et al.
Recent advances in nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using biological treatments – a review
J. Environ. Manage.
(2019) - et al.
Treatment train for mature landfill leachates: optimization studies
Sci. Total Environ.
(2019) - et al.
Leachate/domestic wastewater aerobic co-treatment: a pilot-scale study using multivariate analysis
J. Environ. Manage.
(2016) - et al.
Study on the effect of landfill leachate on nutrients removal from municipal wastewater
J. Environ. Sci.
(2016) - et al.
Cost estimation of COD and color removal from landfill leachate using combined coffee-waste based activated carbon with advanced oxidation processes
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
(2017) - et al.
Treatment of stabilized landfill leachate by the combined process of coagulation/flocculation and powder activated carbon adsorption
Desalination
(2010) - et al.
Targeted removal of organic foulants in landfill leachate in forward osmosis system integrated with biochar/activated carbon treatment
Water Res.
(2019) - et al.
Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review
Sustainable Mater. Technol.
(2016) - et al.
Removal of malachite green, a hazardous dye from aqueous solutions using avena sativa (oat) hull as a potential adsorbent
J. Mol. Liq.
(2016)