Assessment of land cover changes and spatial drivers behind loss of permanent meadows in the lowlands of Italian Alps

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.015Get rights and content

Abstract

The loss of permanent meadows in the lowlands of the European Alps due to land use/land cover changes is a major underestimated process, which affects the status of these habitats and their provision of ecosystem services. In the Italian Valtellina valley (80 km2) change detection analysis estimated meadows loss and spatial bivariate analysis and GIS-based logistic regression model analysed the spatial environmental drivers behind meadows loss in the period 1980–2000. A strong decrease in meadows (−18.5%) was found, in a context of agricultural land decrease and human settlements increase. This was the land cover type with highest loss and conversion rate during the study period. Meadows were converted to human settlements (urban, industrial and roads), other agriculture uses (cultivation, orchard, vineyard), bushland and uncultivated land. Meadows loss occurred mainly in soils with good land capability, low slope, exposed to south and in proximity of roads, urban settlements and bushland. Densities of urban, industrial and bushland and land capability were the only significant drivers for meadows loss, while distance to meadow edge, meadows density, distance to roads and soil degradation were the only significant drivers for meadows preservation. The conflict by land in locations densely occupied by other land cover types with good land capability is the major threat to meadows and avoidance of fragmentation may be a good strategy for its preservation. The meadows habitat needs a well-designed landscape and farming planning, which should account the economic value of the ecosystem services provided by this habitat.

Research highlights

▶ Meadows was the landcover class most affected between 1980 and 2000. ▶ Nearly one quarter of the meadows lands were definitively lost and mainly converted into human settlements, other agriculture uses, bushland and uncultivated land. ▶ Densities of urban, industrial and bushland and land capability were the significant drivers for meadows loss. ▶ Distance to meadow edge, density of meadow, distance to roads and soil degradation were the significant drivers for meadows preservation. ▶ The conflict by land in locations densely occupied by other land cover types with good land capability is the major threat to meadows and avoidance of fragmentation may be a good strategy for its preservation.

Introduction

Loss of grasslands due to alterations in land use/land cover (LUCC) affected the status of this ecosystems worldwide, resulting in loss of biodiversity (Niedrist et al., 2008), encroachment of shrubs and forest (Tasser et al., 2007), decrease of the forage production (Liu et al., 2006), altered water cycle (Mingliang et al., 2008), soil degradation (Snyman and du Preez, 2005), flood events (Flez and Lahousse, 2004) and desertification (Yong-Zhong et al., 2005). In the European Alps, loss of grasslands is a major multidimensional issue (e.g. environmental, economical and social impacts) documented since the 1950s, following the decline in agricultural activities (Gellrich et al., 2007, Hersperger and Bürgi, 2009), and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of European Union and World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations, which promoted intense farming practices and liberalization of markets (Kristensen et al., 2004). This loss in grasslands threats centuries of traditional land use and also its ecologically and economically relevant values (biodiversity, water conservation, forage production, dairy products, aesthetic tourism attractiveness) in a context of global environmental changes and increasing need for food supply (Ceballos et al., 2010).

Three major LUCC processes have been shown to reduce grasslands: (1) abandonment or extensive land use in the uplands with bush encroachment and marginalization with transformation of meadows into pastures in steep slopes (Fischer and Wipf, 2002), (2) intensification in the lowlands (agro-industry) and (3) human settlements expansion into agricultural land (Marini et al., 2007, Pimm and Raven, 2000, Sergio and Pedrini, 2008). Recent studies have shown that these processes affected plant and animal diversity (Bolli et al., 2007, Kampmann et al., 2008, Sergio and Pedrini, 2008), increased floods (Ranzi et al., 1999) and decreased soil respiration, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency (Tappeiner and Cernusca, 1998). It has also been shown that rates of land cover change vary according to landscape features (Falcucci et al., 2007, Schneeberger et al., 2007). In particular, conversions and loss in grasslands can be explained largely by topographic features (e.g. slope), soil related conditions (e.g. land capability) and local neighbourhood attributes related to proximity factors (e.g. distance to urban) (Gellrich et al., 2007, Hersperger and Bürgi, 2009, Rutherford et al., 2008).

However, while these studies documented alpine and sub-alpine regions, few studies addressed the loss in grasslands in the lowlands of mountain regions, which are the heart and last refugee for local farming systems after abandonment in uplands, and the locations most susceptible to changes due to anthropogenic pressure. In addition, in Italy, a country bounded by the Alps, these evaluations are rare and a quantification of grasslands loss is missing. This study assessed and modelled the conversion and loss of meadows in the lowlands of Valtellina, an Italian region in the Southern Alps, in order to better understand LUCC in lowlands and contribute to the creation of guidelines for the preservation and the sustainable management of this key habitat for the European Alps. In specific, for the period 1980–2000, it aims to analyse the following facets: (1) mapping of land cover for the study area (80 km2) to quantify changes and transitions in different land cover classes, focusing in meadows, (2) analysis of the spatial pattern of meadows loss according to spatial environmental features and (3) development of a GIS-based logistic regression model to identify significant drivers for meadows loss.

Section snippets

Study area

The study area (80 km2) is located in Italy, in the lowlands of middle Valtellina, Southern Alps (46.10′N, 9.50 E; Fig. 1). The elevation ranges from 250 to 750 m a.s.l. (above sea level) and slope rarely exceeds 5%. It is a U-shaped valley carved by glacial erosion during the Quaternary, with a west–east orientation, discharged by the river Adda and surrounded by high elevation mountains (>3000 m a.s.l.). Main soil types are Eutric fluvisols, Dystric and Eutric cambisols (FAO, 1988). Owing to the

Land cover change in the lowlands of Valtellina valley

The land cover analysis revealed a strong decrease in meadows within the study period 1980–2000. In 1980, the landscape was largely covered by agricultural land (65.8%), mainly meadows (36.4%) and vineyards (17.4%) (Table 2). Human settlements (urban, industrial and roads) covered 17.1% and bushland 10.7%. Twenty years later (2000), the overall composition of the landscape changed, it was less agricultural addressed (−10.5%), more human settled (+6.3%) and the presence of bushland increased

Landscape transformation and meadows conversion

This study found considerable land cover changes in the lowlands of Valtellina valley between 1980 and 2000 and confirmed the general trend for mountain regions in Europe, since the 1950s, of increasing human settlements and bushland and reduction in agricultural land. In particular, bushland expansion in lowlands, which was found in lowlands, is an unusual process since in the European Alps it has usually been registered at higher elevation, with a consequent reduction in agricultural

Conclusions

This study measured the underestimated land cover changes and spatial environmental variables behind the loss of permanent meadows within the period 1980–2000 in the lowlands of Italian Valtellina valley, European Alps. Nearly one quarter of the meadows lands were definitively lost and mainly converted into human settlements, other agriculture uses, bushland and uncultivated land. The spatial analysis denoted that local spatial environmental features are important for meadows loss and avoiding

Acknowledgments

We thank the cooperation of Fondazione Fojanini and the farmers during the field work. We acknowledge Dr. Giancarlo Graci for his support during GIS activities. We would like to thank the project CAPPA and MIUR for the financial support of this project.

References (56)

  • L. Marini et al.

    Effects of local factors on plant species richness and composition of Alpine meadows

    Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2007)
  • C. Piedallu et al.

    Efficient assessment of topographic solar radiation to improve plant distribution models

    Agr. Forest Meteorol.

    (2008)
  • R.G. Pontius et al.

    Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA

    Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2001)
  • T.K. Rudel et al.

    Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change

    Global Environ. Change

    (2005)
  • G.N. Rutherford et al.

    Assessing land-use statistics to model land cover change in a mountainous landscape in the European Alps

    Ecol. Model.

    (2008)
  • N. Schneeberger et al.

    Rates of landscape change at the northern fringe of the Swiss Alps: historical and recent tendencies

    Landscape Urban Plan.

    (2007)
  • A. Shalaby et al.

    Remote sensing and GIS for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use changes in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt

    Appl. Geogr.

    (2007)
  • H.A. Snyman et al.

    Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa—II. Influence on soil quality

    J. Arid Environ.

    (2005)
  • F. Stolle et al.

    Land use and vegetation fires in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia

    Forest Ecol. Manage.

    (2003)
  • D. Strijker

    Marginal lands in Europe—causes of decline

    Basic Appl. Ecol.

    (2005)
  • E. Tasser et al.

    Land-use changes and natural reforestation in the Eastern Central Alps

    Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2007)
  • S. Yong-Zhong et al.

    Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, northern China

    CATENA

    (2005)
  • T. Aavik et al.

    Plant diversity in a calcareous wooded meadow—the significance of management continuity

    J. Veg. Sci.

    (2008)
  • L.L.C. Astrade et al.

    Periurbanisation and natural hazards

    Rev. Geogr. Alp.

    (2007)
  • J.C. Bolli et al.

    The influence of changes in climate and land-use on regeneration dynamics of Norway spruce at the treeline in the Swiss Alps

    Silva Fenn.

    (2007)
  • G. Ceballos et al.

    Rapid decline of a grassland system and its ecological and conservation implications

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • W.A. Clark et al.

    Statistical Methods for Geographers

    (1986)
  • V.H. Dale et al.

    Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Rapid urbanization and its driving mechanism in the Pan-Third Pole region

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The preprocessing procedure included the coordinate system and spatial resolution (30 m) uniformities. To satisfy the requirements of model analysis, we sampled an equal number of dependent variables from the map whose values were 0 and 1 at the city scale (Monteiro et al., 2011). The independent variable values were also extracted from the same locations as the dependent variables.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text