Research paperAttitudes and aesthetic reactions toward green roofs in the Northeastern United States
Introduction
Understanding public reactions to green roofs and other relatively new building practices is important to the building design process. Along with a sober assessment of the benefits that green roofs provide, understanding public perspectives will aid in making the most appropriate design choices for a given project. While green roofs are only one of many sustainable building options, they may have a particularly profound visual impact. Understanding aesthetic reactions to green roofs, then, is essential to their use in building designs.
The green roof industry in the United States has grown steadily in recent years despite the general economic recession. During 2010 alone, there was a 28.5% increase in the construction of green roofs (Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, 2011). However, green roofs have yet to become a part of mainstream architecture and construction in the United States as they have in parts of Europe. While not the only limiting factor, green roofs need to be visible and understood in order to become widespread (Rogers, 2003). Green roofs have the potential to be highly visible but most are not. Intensive roofs, with deep media profiles and diverse plantings that often include shrubs and trees, have been integrated into some high profile buildings, such as the Rockefeller Center in NYC and Chicago's City Hall. Intensive roofs are, however, cost prohibitive to many organizations. Extensive roofs, with shallow media profiles and typically planted with succulents, are far more cost effective, but rarely accessible or visible from street level. Some authors further recognize semi-intensive roofs. These have media depths between that of intensive and extensive roofs or a mix of shallow and deeper areas. Semi-intensive roofs are less common though they may strike a balance between cost and planting options in some situations. Public aesthetic reactions to extensive and semi-intensive roofs are of particular interest as these roofs are more cost effective, widely replicable, and, if made visible, could have a high promotional value for the green roof industry.
Little research exists that is focused on public perceptions or aesthetic reactions specifically related to green roofs. Smith and Boyer (2007) point out the need for this type of research. Dunnett (2004) found that some survey respondents in the UK thought green roofs were visually too radical a departure for the residential landscape. In contrast, White and Gatersleben (2011) found that participants in an online, photograph-based survey preferred some types of vegetated residential buildings to non-vegetated ones. In the US, Kuper (2009) surveyed 100 students on the Temple University, Ambler campus in suburban Philadelphia and found they had little familiarity with green roofs and were mostly neutral about having a green roof in their neighborhood. A majority, however, did find green roofs attractive and believed that green roofs had environmental benefits.
For larger buildings, the research has focused on intensive roofs. In Singapore, Yuen and Wong (2005) addressed elements of public perceptions toward intensive green roofs on high-rise apartment buildings. They found that while awareness of the roof gardens was high (90%), and many people were willing to use them (84%), few actually did (17.7%). Of the same respondents, 40–65% had visited conventional, ground level parks. Access and visibility were cited as the main reasons for the higher visitation rates at parks compared to rooftop gardens. Most respondents (80%) said that they would like more roof gardens in their neighborhood. Their primary reasons for this included: leisure, beautification, access to greenery and nature, and better utilization of space. Loder (2011) conducted interviews with office workers in Chicago and Toronto and found that all participants preferred a green roof to tar or gravel roofs, but that participants were divided on whether they like the aesthetics of the mostly prairie-like green roofs. In addition, Loder (2011) found that visual access to green roofs had a positive influence on concentration but only physical access to the roof positively influenced the self-perception of health. Lee and Koshimitz (2006) found that the distance from a green roof influenced viewer perceptions.
Many gaps remain in our understanding of public attitudes and aesthetic reactions to green roofs. Public aesthetic reactions have been both positive and negative in different circumstances. When aesthetic reactions to various green roof designs or vegetation types were compared, this was accomplished through photographic surveys, with graphical representations of different types of vegetation superimposed on them, the validity of which has been both supported (Shafer & Richards, 1974) and questioned (Palmer, 2001). Attitudes toward green roofs have been neutral to positive with little indication of what might cause this discrepancy or how attitudes may differ among demographic groups. Both designers and clients would benefit from this information. This research addresses these gaps in our knowledge by assessing basic attitudes and aesthetic reactions to green roofs at gardens and universities in the Northeastern United States. Specifically our objectives were to: (1) determine visitors aesthetic reactions to publicly visible extensive and semi-intensive green roofs and whether these roofs are perceived as fitting in with the building and landscape; (2) determine whether some roof vegetation types are aesthetically preferred over others; (3) gauge visitors attitudes and values related to green roofs; (4) determine if a relationship exists between visitors aesthetic reactions and their attitudes or values; (5) determine whether attitudes, values, or aesthetic reactions to green roofs differ between demographic groups; (6) determine if public garden visitors differ from university visitors in their attitudes and/or aesthetic reactions to green roofs; and (7) determine whether people's attitudes or aesthetic reactions to green roofs change with increased knowledge or exposure to them.
Section snippets
Methods
We used in-person, written surveys to assess visitor attitudes, values, and aesthetic reactions to green roofs. While it was impossible to completely control the context within which the green roof was being viewed, an attempt was made to minimize this influence by limiting the variability around the green roof and the vantage point from which the survey was conducted. Sites were deemed acceptable if they (1) were located in the Northeast and Great Lakes regions of the US; (2) had extensive or
Survey participant demographics
At the seven green roof locations survey respondents totaled 221 and refusals totaled 147 resulting in a 60% participation rate. Participation rate varied between locations from 43% at Queens Botanic Garden, where a significant portion of the visitors did not speak English, to 97% at Chicago Botanic Garden. The total number of attempted surveys/hour-long period (participants + refusals) varied from 7 to 40.
The makeup of survey participants differed between the universities and gardens (Table 1).
Attitudes and values toward green roofs
General attitudes toward green roofs were positive and a high importance was placed on their benefits. This suggests that visitors to universities and public gardens are likely to support bringing green roofs to their institutions, particularly if given information about the benefits they provide. Many institutions are already well aware of the importance of marketing their sustainable practices, whether targeting costumers, students, members, donors, or other groups. The success of third-party
References (44)
Factors influencing landscape preferences: An empirical investigation
Landscape and Planning
(1984)- et al.
Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2002) - et al.
Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings
Landscape and Urban Planning
(1987) Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2001)- et al.
Exploring the dimensionality and social bases of the public's timber harvesting attitudes
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2006) Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape
Land Use Policy
(2009)- et al.
Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(1991) - et al.
Greenery on residential buildings: Does it affect preferences and perceptions of beauty?
Journal of Environmental Psychology
(2011) - et al.
Resident perceptions and expectations of rooftop gardens in Singapore
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2005) - et al.
Preference to home landscape: Wildness or neatness?
Landscape and Urban Planning
(2011)
The experience of landscape
Development of visual preference for natural environments
Environment and Behavior
Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable
Environment and Behavior
Forest stewardship education: Fostering positive attitudes in urban youth
Journal of Forestry
Rooftop futures’
Garden Design Journal
Planting green roofs and living walls
Urban park and forest participation and landscape preference: A review of the relevant literature
Journal of Arboriculture
Cultural background and landscape history as a factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest
Journal of Arboriculture
The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Landscape Ecology
Green roof industry grows 28.5 per cent in 2010!
Cited by (90)
Impacts of slope and length on the hydrological performance of green roof drainage mats
2024, Journal of Hydrology“It's a little soap opera of its own”: Fascinating green roofs offer complexity, movement, sensory engagement, and vast vistas
2024, Landscape and Urban PlanningGreen roofs and facades with integrated photovoltaic system for zero energy eco-friendly building – A review
2023, Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsUnderstanding the drivers of green roofs and green walls adoption in Global South cities: Analysis of Accra, Ghana
2023, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningAwareness and willingness to pay for green roofs in Mediterranean areas
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementDesigning with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability
2023, Frontiers of Architectural Research