Elsevier

The Leadership Quarterly

Volume 19, Issue 5, October 2008, Pages 582-594
The Leadership Quarterly

Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs' transformational leadership on firm innovation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.007Get rights and content

Abstract

This study seeks to advance understanding of how transformational leadership by top managers (CEOs) can affect their companies' innovativeness. We propose a model that includes both direct effects and indirect effects moderated by aspects of organizational culture, structure, and the external environment. The predicted effects are tested with data collected through multiple sources on 50 Taiwanese electronics and telecommunications companies. The results support the expectation that a positive relationship exists between CEO transformational leadership and organizational innovation. They also support most of the predicted moderating effects. The implications of these findings for practice and research are delineated.

Section snippets

Transformational leadership and organizational innovation

Bass et al. (2003) have characterized transformational leadership as encompassing five theoretically distinct components: charisma, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. They explain that both charisma and idealized influence have to do with serving as role models, with the former reflecting followers' attributions and the latter capturing leaders' behaviors. Leaders with idealized influence tend to place followers' needs over

Participants

We focused on a single industry so as to limit extraneous influences due to different industry types. Our sample was comprised of 50 Taiwanese companies from the electronics and telecommunications industry. This industry was selected because new product development and creative R&D efforts are critical for company survival due to the industry's rapid technological advances and highly competitive markets (Carey and Nahavandi, 1996, Balkin et al., 2000, Schilling and Hill, 1998).

To generate the

Results

We tested our hypotheses with the partial least squares (PLS) structural equations modeling technique (Wold, 1985), which is increasingly being adopted by leadership researchers (e.g., Bass et al., 2003, Howell et al., 2005, Shamir et al., 1998). This method does not make assumptions about (a) data distributions to estimate model parameters, (b) observation independence, or (c) variables metrics (Barclay, Higgins, & Thompson, 1995). As compared to more traditional techniques like regression,

Discussion and implications

This study has tested the direct and moderated effects of CEO transformational leadership on firm innovation. Our results supported a direct and positive effect of CEO transformational leadership on organizational innovation. The findings further revealed moderating effects by two attributes of the environment (uncertainty and competition) and four firm-level characteristics: climate of support for innovation, formalization, centralization, and empowerment, though in the last case, the effect

References (93)

  • SosikJ.J. et al.

    Self-concept based aspects of the charismatic leader: more than meets the eye

    The Leadership Quarterly

    (1998)
  • ZhuW. et al.

    CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: the mediating role of human-capital-enhancing human resource management

    The Leadership Quarterly

    (2005)
  • AdlerN.J.

    International dimensions of organizational behavior

    (2002)
  • AmabileT.M.

    How to kill creativity

    Harvard Business Review

    (1998)
  • AmabileT.M. et al.

    Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1999)
  • AmabileT.M. et al.

    Assessing the work environment for creativity

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • AndriopoulosC. et al.

    Enhancing organizational creativity: the process of perpetual challenging

    Management Science

    (2000)
  • AvolioB.J. et al.

    Reexamining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

    Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology

    (1999)
  • AvolioB.J. et al.

    Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    (2004)
  • BagozziR.P. et al.

    On the evaluation of structural equation models

    Academy of Marketing Science

    (1988)
  • BalkinD.B. et al.

    Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation?

    Academy of Management Journal

    (2000)
  • BarclayD. et al.

    The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration

    Technology Studies

    (1995)
  • BarronO.E. et al.

    High technology intangibles and analysts' forecasts

    Journal of Accounting Research

    (2002)
  • BarthM.E. et al.

    Analyst earnings forecast revisions and the pricing of accruals

    Review of Accounting Studies

    (2004)
  • BassB.M.

    Leadership and performance beyond expectations

    (1985)
  • BassB.M. et al.

    Full-range of leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

    (1997)
  • BassB.M. et al.

    Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2003)
  • BharadwajA. et al.

    Capturing the intangibles

    InformationWeek

    (1997)
  • BonoJ.E. et al.

    Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2004)
  • BrislinR.

    The wording and translation of research instruments

  • BrownS.L. et al.

    Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos

    (1998)
  • BurnsT. et al.

    The management of innovation

    (1961)
  • Business Week
  • CareyJ.M. et al.

    Using impression management to establish successful service-level agreements

  • CarminesE. et al.

    Reliability and validity assessment

    (1979)
  • ChinW.

    The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling

  • ChinW.W.

    Multi-group analysis with PLS

    (2000)
  • DaftR.L.

    Organization theory and design

    (2001)
  • DamanpourF.

    Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1991)
  • DoughertyD. et al.

    Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problem

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • DrazinR. et al.

    Community, population, and organization effects on innovation: a multilevel perspective

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1996)
  • FornellC. et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1981)
  • GardnerW.L. et al.

    The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective

    Academy of Management Review

    (1998)
  • GordonL. et al.

    Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: an empirical investigation

    Accounting, Organizations and Society

    (1984)
  • GrinyearP.H. et al.

    Dimensions of organizational structure: a critical replication

    Academy of Management Journal

    (1980)
  • HageJ.

    Future of organizations

    (1988)
  • Cited by (318)

    • The effect of top managers’ years of experience on innovation

      2023, International Journal of Innovation Studies
    • Enable to innovate: A review of the influence of empowering leadership on follower creativity and innovation

      2023, Handbook of Organizational Creativity: Leadership, Interventions, and Macro Level Issues, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +886 2 2938 7128

    2

    Tel.: +1 619 594 5331

    View full text