Elsevier

Marine Policy

Volume 40, July 2013, Pages 194-204
Marine Policy

Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.034Get rights and content

Abstract

Adequate conservation and management of shark populations is becoming increasingly important on a global scale, especially because many species are exceptionally vulnerable to overfishing. Yet, reported catch statistics for sharks are incomplete, and mortality estimates have not been available for sharks as a group. Here, the global catch and mortality of sharks from reported and unreported landings, discards, and shark finning are being estimated at 1.44 million metric tons for the year 2000, and at only slightly less in 2010 (1.41 million tons). Based on an analysis of average shark weights, this translates into a total annual mortality estimate of about 100 million sharks in 2000, and about 97 million sharks in 2010, with a total range of possible values between 63 and 273 million sharks per year. Further, the exploitation rate for sharks as a group was calculated by dividing two independent mortality estimates by an estimate of total global biomass. As an alternative approach, exploitation rates for individual shark populations were compiled and averaged from stock assessments and other published sources. The resulting three independent estimates of the average exploitation rate ranged between 6.4% and 7.9% of sharks killed per year. This exceeds the average rebound rate for many shark populations, estimated from the life history information on 62 shark species (rebound rates averaged 4.9% per year), and explains the ongoing declines in most populations for which data exist. The consequences of these unsustainable catch and mortality rates for marine ecosystems could be substantial. Global total shark mortality, therefore, needs to be reduced drastically in order to rebuild depleted populations and restore marine ecosystems with functional top predators.

Highlights

► This manuscript provides an estimate of shark catches, discards and mortality worldwide. ► It is estimated that at least 1.4 million tons, or 100 million shark individuals are killed per year. ► Exploitation rates of sharks calculated from these data, or from stock assessments, are unsustainable. ► Management options for rebuilding shark populations are discussed.

Introduction

Sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras together comprise the chondrichthyan fishes (Class Chondrichthyes), a group of about 1000 species that has persisted for at least 400 million years, rendering them one of the oldest extant vertebrate groups on the planet. Recently, however, the global growth of fishing, coupled with Chondrichthyes' relatively slow growth and reproductive rates, have resulted in the progressive depletion of populations around the world. This trend has been particularly pronounced for sharks, largely due to their inherent vulnerability, and an increasing demand, particularly for their fins, in the Asian market [1], [2], [3], [4]. As such, many shark species are comparable to great whales, which also have late maturity, slow growth and low reproductive rates, and experienced escalating global fishing pressure until a global whaling moratorium came into effect in 1986 [5]. Similar to whales, quantifying the precise extent of sharks' decline, the risk of species extinction, and the consequences for marine ecosystems have been challenging and controversial, mostly due to data limitations [4], [6], [7], [8].

A key problem is the incomplete reporting of shark catches to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which tracks the status of fisheries worldwide. Caught sharks are often not landed and are instead discarded at sea [7], [9], with such discards not usually reported to national or international management agencies unless there are trained observers on board. Compounding this problem is the practice of shark finning, where the animal's fins are removed prior to the body being discarded at sea [9]. Due to the high value of the fins in Asian markets this practice is globally widespread. Some jurisdictions, such as Canada, the United States, Australia, and Europe have gradually introduced anti-finning legislation over the last 10 years, yet the practice continues in most other parts of the world [2]. Therefore it is very likely that reported catches represent only a fraction of total shark mortality. For example, Clarke et al. [9] used trade auction records from Hong Kong to estimate that the total mass of sharks caught for the fin trade. Estimates ranged between 1.21 and 2.29 Mt (million metric tons) yr−1 with a median estimate of 1.70 Mt yr−1 in the year 2000. This amounted to more than four times the reported shark catch from FAO at that time [9].

Notwithstanding these problems, the FAO, among other management bodies, has long recognized the conservation challenges associated with sharks and their relatives, and it launched an International Plan of Action for Sharks in 1999 (IPOA-Sharks, which also includes skates, rays, and chimaeras). This plan aims to enhance the conservation and management of sharks and their sustainable use, while improving data collection and the monitoring and management of shark fisheries [10]. The IPOA-Sharks further recommends that all states contributing to fishing mortality on sharks should participate in its management, and should have developed a National Shark Plan by 2001. However, progress remains disappointing so far, with limited adoption and implementation of IPOA goals at the national level [2], [11].

The objective of this paper is to provide an up-to-date assessment of the current status of shark populations including estimated global catches, current exploitation rates (herein defined as the total catch divided by the estimated biomass), and potential extinction risks at current levels of exploitation. Based on this review, possible management solutions for conserving and rebuilding shark populations are discussed. The authors intend to provide critical baseline information for the further development of national and international action plans that help ensure the conservation of sharks and their relatives.

Section snippets

Methods

Available information to estimate total shark fishing mortality, including reported landings, dead discards, and illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) landings were compiled for this paper. Caught sharks are either landed (reported or IUU) or discarded (alive or dead). Discarded sharks that are finned suffer 100% mortality, and those that are not finned suffer a lower post-release mortality [12]. These components (reported and IUU landings, dead discards) are estimated here from published

Results

Each year, global landings of sharks and other fisheries resource species are reported by fishing states to the FAO (Fig. 1). Since 1950, Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, skates and chimaeras) have comprised between 1% and 2% of the total landings (Fig. 1A, average proportion of 1.2%). Sharks made up about half of the total Chondrichthyes landings over that time frame (Fig. 1B). Both shark and total Chondrichthyes landings have risen sharply from 1950s to the late 1990s, and have since declined

Discussion

The primary goal of this paper was to estimate total catch and fishing-related mortality for sharks worldwide, and to derive an average exploitation rate from these estimates (Table 4). Due to the limited availability of data, particularly for shark discards, this work required a number of assumptions, as detailed above. Yet it allows placement of lower and upper limits on global shark mortality, here estimated to range from 63 to 273 million sharks, with a conservative estimate of ∼100 million

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded by grants from the National Science Foundation and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, with additional meeting support by the Pew Charitable Trusts. We gratefully acknowledge use of the FAO Fishstat database (http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en), the RAM Legacy Project Database (http://ramlegacy.marinebiodiversity.ca/ram-legacy-stock-assessment-database), and the Sea Around Us project website (www.seaaroundus.org) at

References (108)

  • P. Ward et al.

    The effects of circle hooks on bycatch and target catches in Australia's pelagic longline fishery

    Fish Res

    (2009)
  • D. Curran et al.

    Effects of circle hooks on pelagic catches in the Hawaii-based tuna longline fishery

    Fish Res

    (2011)
  • E.H. Carruthers et al.

    Estimating the odds of survival and identifying mitigation opportunities for common bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries

    Biol Conserv

    (2009)
  • D.W. Kerstetter et al.

    Effects of circle versus J-style hooks on target and non-target species in a pelagic longline fishery

    Fish Res

    (2006)
  • A.S. Afonso et al.

    Fishing gear modifications to reduce elasmobranch mortality in pelagic and bottom longline fisheries off Northeast Brazil

    Fish Res

    (2011)
  • J.C. Pacheco et al.

    Comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery

    Fish Res

    (2011)
  • J.G. Pajuelo et al.

    Bycatch and incidental catch of the black scabbardfish (Aphanopus spp.) fishery off the Canary Islands

    Fish Res

    (2010)
  • H.W. Huang et al.

    Bycatch and discards by Taiwanese large-scale tuna longline fleets in the Indian Ocean

    Fish Res

    (2010)
  • S. Mckinnell et al.

    Shark bycatch in the Japanese high seas squid driftnet fishery in the North Pacific Ocean

    Fish Res

    (1998)
  • F. Ferretti et al.

    Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean

    Ecol Lett

    (2010)
  • M. Lack et al.

    The future of sharks: a review of action and inaction

    (2011)
  • N. Dulvy et al.

    You can swim but you can't hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays

    Aquat Conserv

    (2008)
  • J.A. Musick et al.

    Management of sharks and their relatives (Elasmobranchii)

    Fisheries

    (2000)
  • M.R. Heithaus et al.

    Unraveling the ecological importance of elasmobranchs

  • J.D. Stevens et al.

    The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems

    ICES J Mar Sci

    (2000)
  • J.K. Carlson et al.

    Relative abundance and size of coastal sharks derived from commercial shark longline catch and effort data

    J Fish Biol

    (2012)
  • S.C. Clarke et al.

    Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets

    Ecol Lett

    (2006)
  • FAO. International plan of action for the conservation and management of sharks. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture...
  • M. Musyl et al.

    Postrelease survival, vertical and horizontal movements, and thermal habitats of five species of pelagic sharks in the central Pacific Ocean

    Fish Bull

    (2011)
  • FAO. FishStatJ—software for fishery statistical time series....
  • R. Watson et al.

    Mapping global fisheries: sharpening our focus

    Fish Fish

    (2004)
  • D.J. Agnew et al.

    Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing

    PLoS One

    (2009)
  • R.L. Lewison et al.

    Quantifying the effects of fisheries on threatened species: the impact of pelagic longlines on loggerhead and leatherback sea turtles

    Ecol Lett

    (2004)
  • R. Bonfil

    Overview of world elasmobranch fisheries

    FAO Fish Tech Pap

    (1994)
  • S. Jennings et al.

    Global-scale predictions of community and ecosystem properties from simple ecological theory

    Proc R Soc B

    (2008)
  • D. Ricard et al.

    Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database

    Fish Fish

    (2012)
  • S.E. Smith et al.

    Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks

    Mar Freshwater Res

    (1998)
  • Campana SE, Brading J, Joyce W. Estimation of pelagic shark bycatch and associated mortality in Canadian Atlantic...
  • SC Clarke et al.

    Population trends in Pacific oceanic sharks and the utility of regulations on shark finning

    Conserv Biol

    (2012)
  • S. Vannuccini

    Shark utilization, marketing and trade

    FAO Tech Fish Pap

    (1999)
  • M.R. Heithaus et al.

    The ecological importance of intact top predator populations: a synthesis of fifteen years of research in a seagrass ecosystem

    Mar Freshwater Res

    (2012)
  • J.K. Carlson
    (2007)
  • J.F. Kitchell et al.

    The role of sharks and longline fisheries in a pelagic ecosystem of the Central Pacific

    Ecosystems

    (2002)
  • J.A. Estes et al.

    Trophic downgrading of planet Earth

    Science

    (2011)
  • R.A. Myers et al.

    Extinction, survival, or recovery of large predatory fishes

    Philos Trans R Soc B

    (2005)
  • C.A. Ward-Paige et al.

    Recovery potential and conservation options for elasmobranchs

    J Fish Biol

    (2012)
  • J.F. Caddy et al.

    An overview of recent global experience with recovery plans for depleted marine resources and suggested guidelines for recovery planning

    Rev Fish Biol Fish

    (2004)
  • B. Worm et al.

    Rebuilding global fisheries

    Science

    (2009)
  • C. Mora et al.

    Management effectiveness of the world's marine fisheries

    PLoS Biol

    (2009)
  • A.J. Gallagher et al.

    Global shark currency: the distribution, frequency, and economic value of shark ecotourism

    Curr Issues Tourism

    (2011)
  • Cited by (470)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text