ViewpointMarine legislation – The ultimate ‘horrendogram’: International law, European directives & national implementation
Introduction
All seas face a number of environmental problems and are subject to competing spatial claims and conflicts between the many uses and users and this is especially so in seas adjoining developed, industrialised and agricultural regions such as Europe (van Tatenhove, 2013). Efforts to resolve these problems have led to extensive current administrative, legislative and management measures which all come under the term Risk Assessment and Risk Management (Cormier et al., 2013). These are then driven by a governance framework, embracing policies, politics, administration and legislation which cascade in a vertical sequence (Elliott, 2014). That vertical sequence requires integration from the international level down to national policies but, as will be shown here, this has resulted in a patchwork of European policies, national policies, private initiatives and regulations on different levels that often conflict with each other.
In Europe, the European Union (EU) is a pre-eminent player in the field of sustainable regional development and in recent decades, it has adopted more than 200 directives, regulations and many other forms of legislation and amendments in the area of environmental policy that have direct repercussions for regional development (Beunen et al., 2009). This policy framework is aimed at the sustainable use of marine resources, but also the protection of the marine biodiversity – indeed the main idea of marine management is to protect and enhance the natural structure, processes and functioning while at the same time delivering the ecosystem services from which society can take benefits (Elliott, 2011, Elliott, 2013).
There is now a complex management framework (Elliott, 2014) in which local, national, regional and international initiatives have to be harmonised. In the case of Europe, at both the EU and Member State levels, progress towards managing and protecting the marine environment has been hindered and is very often insufficient (EC, 2006). In Europe, measures to protect the marine environment by tackling the impact of human activities are not new. In the 1970s, many of the regional seas became the subject of international conventions including the OSPAR Convention for the North Eastern Atlantic, the Helsinki Convention (HELCOM) for the Baltic Sea, the Barcelona Convention and associated Protocols for the Mediterranean Sea and the Bucharest Convention for the Black Sea. Although now having much wider environmental remits, these Regional Sea Conventions (RSCs) were primarily created to address pollution from land-based and vessel-based sources. Historically, other maritime activities were also dealt with by a number of separate sectoral policies (Commission of the European Communities, 2008, van Hoof et al., 2012), which only took into account the priorities of one policy area (i.e. transport, fisheries, pollution etc) without fully assessing the impact across the board and giving equal weight to all the relevant sectors. Such compartmentalisation has led to a piecemeal approach to protecting the marine environment.
To our knowledge, there has been no attempt to collate and produce a synthesis of European marine environmental policies and so this paper aims to demonstrate the volume and extent of current legislation to manage the marine environment. As such it provides an overview and discussion of the types of directives and policies currently regulating European marine waters, emphasising the role of sectoral directives and how these have evolved to more holistic directives and management. To reinforce the point, we produce a road-map of the complex nature of the different types of legislation from International law and European jurisdictions. Given that this then requires an enabling framework within each Member State, we present as a case-example the national implementation in England used to protect the marine environment. We take the view that although we focus on the European situation, the analysis is relevant to all maritime states and will give lessons for those states whose marine use and protection legislation is less well-developed than European and North American states.
The fundamental questions addressed here are:
- 1)
Is there sufficient marine legislation to adequately manage the marine environment, giving protection to the natural system whilst providing ecosystem services and societal benefits?
- 2)
Are all sectors adequately managed or do we require better management or better implementation of the current legislation?
- 3)
Is there an important piece of legislation missing?
- 4)
Are the levels integrated both vertically (from globally to nationally) and horizontally (in all aspects within one geographical area)?
Section snippets
Principles for environmental management
As marine governance relates to policies, politics, laws and administrations, these are for the wide adoption of eight internationally recognised principles. These are ecologically sustainable development; intergenerational equity; the precautionary principle; Conservation of Biological Diversity and ecological integrity; economic valuation of environmental factors; the polluter pays principle; waste minimisation, and public participation (e.g. EDOWA, 2011).
In turn, the prevailing marine
Sectoral policy
Until relatively recently, the EU approach to the protection of the marine environment has been piecemeal. Since the 1970s, marine based activities have been regulated through a number of sectoral policies, where the sector include fishing, aquaculture, navigation, infrastructure development, agriculture, etc. Each piece of legislation then addressing a particular problem usually in isolation from other issues (Mee et al., 2008), some of which still exist today such as the Common Transport
Vertical integration
As discussed above, all European Member States have to respond to a large suite of international, regional and national policies, laws and agreements controlling many sectors such as fisheries, energy and conservation. Consequently there are many organisations and administrative bodies responsible for these such that in all countries no single authority is responsible for addressing marine affairs (see Elliott et al., 2006, Boyes and Elliott, in press). This has resulted in a patchwork of EU
Discussion
Given the total population of the EU coastal Member States, EU environmental directives contain some of the most influential environmental legislation worldwide, and are ‘binding as to the result to be achieved’. However, these directives have been criticised for often being vague in their commitments, lack specific details, and may contain wider-ranging derogations to soften the potential impact of the new legislation (Bell and McGillivray, 2006, Salomon, 2006, van Hoof, 2010, Rätz et al., 2010
Concluding remarks
Firstly it is emphasised that in compiling and widely discussing the analysis here, it has been notable that observers have been surprised by the complexity and amount of current marine legislation, even though they were aware of the large number of marine activities which required controlling. Environmental protection requires adequate legislation but on condition that a fit-for-purpose and not disproportionate bureaucracy is provided.
Secondly, the historical view has shown a
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Bob Earll and the delegates of the Coastal Futures 2014 – Review and Future Trends (January 22nd-23rd) for providing their comments and critiques of the earlier drafts of this diagram produced for writing this paper. We hope your views have been taken on board. Despite this, the authors take full responsibility for the figures in this article and would welcome any further comments on their accuracy and completeness.
The research leading to these results has
References (54)
- et al.
Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2011) - et al.
Marine monitoring during an economic crisis: the cure is worse than the disease
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2013) - et al.
Marine management – towards an integrated implementation of the European marine strategy framework and the water framework directives
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2010) - et al.
Good Environmental Status of marine ecosystems: What is it and how do we know when we have attained it?
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2013) - et al.
MSP in practice
Est. Coast Shelf Sci.
(2013) Environmental justice implications of MSP
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2011)MSP in ecosystem-based sea use management
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2008)- et al.
European experience with MSP
J. Environ. Manage.
(2009) Marine science and management means tackling exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures – a numbered guide
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2011)The 10-tenets for integrated, successful and sustainable marine management
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2013)
Integrated marine science and management: wading through the morass
Mar. Pollut. Bull
Challenging paradigms in estuarine ecology and management
Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.
Integrated marine management and administration for an island state—the case for a new Marine Agency for the UK
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
Guiding ecological principles for MSP
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
Governance strengths and weaknesses to implement the marine strategy framework directive in European waters
Mar. Policy
The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future
Sci. Total Environ.
How good is good? human values and Europe’s proposed marine strategy directive
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
The economic value of water use: implications for implementing the water framework directive in Scotland
J. Environ. Manage.
The water framework directive: total environment or political compromise?
Sci. Total Environ.
Complementary roles of European and national institutions under the common fisheries policy and the marine strategy framework directive
Mar. Policy
The European Commission proposal for a marine strategy: lacking substance
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
How to turn the tide: developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of the regional seas
Ocean Coast. Manag.
Undermining the integrated maritime policy – viewpoint
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach
Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage.
Rapid policy network mapping: a new method for Understanding Governance Structures for Implementation of Marine Environmental Policy
PLoS ONE
The law of the sea convention and the integrated regulation of the oceans
Int. J. Mar. Coastal Law
Environmental Law
Cited by (156)
The contribution of the resilience approach to the governance of complex systems: A qualitative study in the Po delta area, Italy
2024, Ocean and Coastal ManagementCumulative effects of offshore renewables: From pragmatic policies to holistic marine spatial planning tools
2023, Environmental Impact Assessment Review