Elsevier

Materials & Design (1980-2015)

Volume 36, April 2012, Pages 714-727
Materials & Design (1980-2015)

Technical Report
Effect of phase transformation and intermetallic compounds on the microstructure and tensile strength properties of diffusion-bonded joints between Ti–6Al–4V and AISI 304L

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.12.024Get rights and content

Abstract

The occurrence of a phase transformation and the effect of intermetallic compounds on the microstructure and tensile strength properties of diffusion-bonded (DB) joints between Ti–6Al–4V and AISI 304L were studied in the temperature range of 875–950 °C with an interval of 25 °C, a bonding time of 60 min and pressures of 4 MPa and 8 MPa. A maximum tensile strength of 242.6 MPa, was observed for diffusion-bonded joints that were processed at a temperature of 900 °C, bonded for 60 min at a pressure of 4 MPa and annealed for 2 h at 750 °C. Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to examine the grain growth and the fine details of the interface structure. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) revealed the existence of intermetallic compounds and corroborated the phase transformation.

Highlights

► Samples processed at 900 °C exhibited a maximum tensile strength of 242.6 MPa. ► Annealed samples exhibited more strength than the samples with no heat treatment. ► At higher temperatures, the reaction zone width increased for the annealed samples. ► A maximum hardness value of 781 VHN was noted for the samples processed at 950 °C. ► XRD report revealed Fe2Ti, Mn2Ti, Ti2Si2, Fe2V3, All4CrNi15, and Fe3Al2Si4.

Introduction

Titanium alloys (Ti-alloys) are light and strong and they possess good corrosion resistance properties that favour their usage in aerospace and corrosion resistance applications [1]. Among titanium alloys, Ti–6A–4V is the most widely used alloy for aerospace applications because of its low density, high strength, and high temperature properties. The cost of Ti-alloy is very high compared to that of stainless steels. The cost and material consumption could be reduced by bonding Ti–6Al–4V with AISI 304L, with or without an interlayer, to achieve the desired properties. Fusion welding is not suitable for joining advanced materials because it leads to the formation of hard and brittle phases at the welded region. Because of the limitations of fusion welding, diffusion bonding (DB) is more widely used to join dissimilar materials of two different species. The DB process is capable of joining all kinds of materials whose chemical and metallurgical properties are suitable for engineering applications.

Several authors have reported the feasibility of DB of dissimilar materials, with and without the use of interlayer materials, to improve their physical and metallurgical properties. Vigraman et al. [2], [3] performed DB of dissimilar ferrous materials duplex stainless steel SAE 2205 with medium-carbon steel AISI 1035 and austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L to low-carbon steel with an interlayer material AISI 304L steel. The combined techniques of superplastic forming and DB of similar titanium alloys were investigated in the literature for the manufacture of advanced aircraft engine blades and heavy parts in an inert gas environment [4], [5]. Xun and Tan [6] reported the application of combined superplastic forming and diffusion bonding to manufacture hollow engine blades. The low temperature superplastic properties were studied, and the production of hollow panel diffusion-bonded structures was reported in Ref. [7]. The effect of alloying elements on the microstructure of dual phase Ti-alloy subjected to superplastic deformation was published in Ref. [8]. Different diffusion bonding techniques were developed to bond pure titanium and Ti-alloys with several other metal combinations. The formation of diffusion-bonded joints between pure ‘Ti’ and pure ‘Al’ was reported by Wei et al. [9]. Titanium aluminide samples were diffusion-bonded with alternate layers of pure ‘Al’ and ‘Ti’ in another published work [10]. In a separate study [11], the use of a composite barrier layer for DB of TiAl to steel was reported. Konga et al. [12] conducted hot-pack roll bonding of Ti–6Al–4V with TiAl and obtained high bond strength for the diffusion-bonded joints. Kundu et al. [13], [14] described the joint properties and microstructures of pure titanium diffusion bonded to austenitic stainless steel with a nickel interlayer. Torun and Celikyurek [15] performed the diffusion bonding of pure titanium with nickel under vacuum conditions and reported good bond formation; in addition, the highly polished DB samples were borided.

Yan et al. [16] performed vacuum hot-roll bonding of Ti-alloy and stainless steel using a nickel interlayer and obtained good tensile strength. The DB of Ti-alloy to stainless steel with an aluminium alloy interlayer was performed below the melting point of the aluminium alloy and reported by He et al. [17]. The interface microstructure and mechanical properties of DB joints between titanium and stainless steel with a niobium interlayer were studied by Kundu et al. [18]. The effect of the impulse pressure on the bonded samples between Ti-alloy and stainless steel was studied and presented by Yuan et al. [19]. Hot isostatic DB of Ti–6Al–4V and stainless steel (304 grade) was successfully performed and the joint strength was presented in the literature [20].

In the current work, direct DB of Ti–6Al–4V to AISI 304L was conducted by maintaining a vacuum at high temperatures and maintaining the surface finish requirements. The phase transformations that occurred at various temperatures and their effect on the tensile strength were studied. High pressures were applied prior to DB to plastically deform the surface asperities of the contact surfaces, finishing the surface and breaking the thin oxide layer formed after mechanical and chemical cleaning. The experimental evidence indicated the presence of intermetallic compounds at the interface and a phase transformation in the solid state. The diffusion-bonded joints exhibited brittleness and deleterious effects on strength of the joints when they were subjected to cyclic heating and cooling. However, the study was conducted to understand the phase transformations taking place at the joint region. This material combination could be used for corrosion resistance applications, but these joints should not be exposed to higher temperatures for longer duration.

Section snippets

Materials

The chemical compositions of the Ti–6Al–4V and AISI 304L base metals are presented in Table 1. Rolled Ti–6Al–4V and austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L were purchased in the form of plates with thicknesses of 16 and 12 mm, respectively. The specimens were cut into 40 × 40 × 16 mm pieces for the Ti–6Al–4V and 40 × 40 × 12 mm for the AISI 304L. The mechanical strength of the base metals is provided in Table 2. The standard metallographic polishing technique with silicon carbide emery paper (up to 1200 grit)

Optical microscopy

Fig. 2a and b shows the as-received base metal microstructures of AISI 304L and Ti–6Al–4V, respectively. The grain sizes of the bonded materials (16 μm for AISI 304L and 10 μm for Ti–6Al–4V, both processed at 950 °C) are larger than those of the as-received materials (AISI 304L 7 μm and Ti–6Al–4V 8 μm) because of grain growth during the bonding process at higher temperatures and during the subsequent annealing. The insert micrograph in Fig. 2a shows twin bands of annealed austenite grains (γ-phase)

Conclusions

Under the investigated conditions, DB samples processed at a temperature of 900 °C and a holding pressure of 4 MPa for 60 min, followed by annealing, exhibited a maximum tensile strength of 242.6 MPa. The DB samples possessed tensile strengths that were 41.6% and 25.3% of the base metals, AISI 304L and Ti–6Al–4V, respectively. A maximum hardness value of 781 VHN was obtained for the DB samples processed at 950 °C and annealed for 2 h. The increase in hardness is due to the formation of hard and

Acknowledgements

The authors kindly acknowledge the financial support provided by (Grant No. 8023/BOR/RID/RPS-134/2007-2008) All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), New Delhi, India. We express our wholehearted gratitude to the management of our institution.

References (50)

  • S. Kundu et al.

    Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of diffusion bonded titanium-stainless steel joints using a nickel interlayer

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2006)
  • O. Torun et al.

    Boriding of diffusion-bonded joints of pure nickel to commercially pure titanium

    Mater Design

    (2009)
  • P. He et al.

    Hot pressing diffusion bonding of a titanium alloy to a stainless steel with an aluminium alloy interlayer

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2008)
  • X.J. Yuan et al.

    Impulse pressuring diffusion bonding of titanium alloy to stainless steel

    Mater Charact

    (2008)
  • M.J. Tan et al.

    High temperature deformation in Ti–5Al–2.5Sn alloy

    J Mater Proc Technol

    (2007)
  • G.C. Wang et al.

    Maximum m superplasticity deformation for Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy

    J Mater Proc Technol

    (2007)
  • J.S. Kim et al.

    Microstructural analysis on boundary sliding and its accommodation mode during superplastic deformation of Ti–6Al–4V alloy

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (1999)
  • S. Kundu et al.

    Diffusion bonding between commercially pure titanium and micro-duplex stainless steel

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2008)
  • K.L. Yang et al.

    Phase transformation in the β phase of super α2 Ti3Al base alloys during static annealing and superplastic deformation at 700–1000 °C

    Acta Mater

    (2003)
  • C.H. Park et al.

    Enhanced superplasticity utilizing dynamic globularization of Ti–6Al–4V alloy

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2008)
  • S. Kundu et al.

    Diffusion bonding of commercially pure titanium to 304 stainless steel using copper interlayer

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2005)
  • G.A. Salishchev et al.

    Formation of a submicrocrystalline structure in TiAl and Ti3Al intermetallics by hot working

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2000)
  • M. Ghosh et al.

    The effect of intermetallics on the strength properties of diffusion bonds formed between Ti–5.5Al–2.4V and 304 stainless steel

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2003)
  • B. Qin et al.

    Phase transformation diffusion bonding of titanium alloy with stainless steel

    Mater Charact

    (2006)
  • U.K. Mudali et al.

    Corrosion and microstructural aspects of dissimilar joints of titanium and type 304L stainless steel

    J Nucl Mater

    (2003)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Vacuum diffusion bonding of α‑titanium alloy to stainless steel for aerospace applications: Interfacial microstructure and mechanical characteristics

      2022, Materials Characterization
      Citation Excerpt :

      The EDS analysis shows that the layer 1 (relatively dark contrast) formed adjacent to SS321 side enriched with Cr compared to the base SS321 alloy. The enrichment of Cr can be attributed to uphill diffusion of Cr, where Cr diffuses down as per activity gradient rather than concentration gradient, which is consistent with the observations reported elsewhere for DB of steel with Ti [14,16,17]. The enriched Cr in the layer 1 along with presence of Fe, Ni and Ti is sufficient to stabilize σ phase after cooling [14,16–18] as indicated in Fe-Cr-Ni phase diagram [33].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text