Elsevier

Materials & Design

Volume 106, 15 September 2016, Pages 482-494
Materials & Design

Role of geometry on properties of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V structures fabricated using laser based directed energy deposition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.045Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Geometry of the deposited structure impacted the resulting tensile strengths and elongation.

  • Orientation within the structure impacted tensile strengths and elongation.

  • Tensile strength decreased with increasing height above the substrate.

  • Resulting mechanical properties correlated with the average prior beta grain intercepts.

Abstract

A series of Ti-6Al-4V wall structures were additively manufactured (AM) using directed energy deposition (DED) with similar processing parameters and build paths to investigate the role of geometry on the resulting as-deposited microstructure and mechanical properties. While the aggregated tensile strengths (1049 ± 37 MPa), yield strengths (936 ± 43 MPa), and elongations (18 ± 4%) were relatively consistent, a more in-depth statistical analysis revealed statistically significant relationships between the resulting mechanical properties and the orientation with respect to the build direction. Tensile samples with the long dimension parallel to the substrate exhibited a higher average tensile strength than samples with the long dimension perpendicular to the substrate. In addition, the tensile strengths from thick multi pass wall structures were significantly higher than thin single pass wall structures. Finally, the tensile strengths decreased with increasing height above the substrate within the wall structures. Most of the observed differences in mechanical behavior can be attributed to differences observed in the average prior β grain sizes and shapes that impact the amounts of boundary strengthening within the structures. In addition, qualitative differences within the microstructure were observed at different locations within individual builds and correlated with changes in tensile strength.

Introduction

Additive manufacturing (AM) encompasses a range of processes in which discrete components are fabricated in a layer by layer manner [1], [2]. In metallic material systems, AM can produce fully dense parts with highly complex geometric features from a range of different alloys and material combinations [3], [4], [5]. There has been a longstanding and continuing effort involving the AM fabrication of titanium alloy components using both directed energy deposition (DED) and powder bed fusion (PBF) AM processes [6], [7], [8]. In order for AM fabricated components to be put into service, particularly for critical applications, certification protocols need to be developed [9], [10]. A major component of this certification process involves the development of accurate material property databases.

The processing conditions during AM can vary significantly as different component geometries and sizes are produced, creating complex process-structure-property relationships unique to AM processes. The eventual certification of AM components will require a material property database with low levels of uncertainty for mechanical properties of interest, such as yield and tensile strength, elongation, and Young's modulus. Given the interest in AM fabricated Ti-6Al-4V components, there is a rather large amount of mechanical property data available in the literature. A wide range of powder bed fusion (PBF) and directed energy deposition (DED) processes have been investigated to include PBF using electron beam melting (EBM) [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], PBF with selective laser melting (SLM) [3], [14], [15], [17], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], DED using laser with a powder feedstock [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], DED laser with a wire feedstock [37], [38], [39], [40], and DED using a gas tungsten arc (GTA) energy source with a wire feedstock [37], [38], [41], [42], [43], [44]. The static mechanical properties for Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated using these different AM techniques as a function of the reported tensile strength and elongation values are plotted in Fig. 1(a).

As shown in Fig. 1(a), there is wide variability in the reported mechanical behavior of AM Ti-6Al-4V components with average tensile strengths ranging from 775 MPa to 1270 MPa and average elongations from 1% to 25%. This wide variability in mechanical behavior manifests itself not only between different AM processing techniques but also within the same processing techniques. For example, the laser based PBF process typically exhibited the highest tensile strengths, that averaged from 930 to 1310 MPa, and elongations that averaged 1 to 11%, while the electron beam based PBF process exhibited a wider range of properties compared to the other processes, with tensile strengths averaging from 775 to 1200 MPa and elongations averaging from 2 to 25%. While these previous studies have covered a wide range of processes, minimal information on the processing conditions has been included, and they have focused primarily on the characterization of mechanical properties from test specimens formed directly or machined from simple blocks or wall structures. Even though the processing conditions should be nominally the same, significant variability in the mechanical properties is still observed.

This considerable variability in the mechanical properties reported in the literature even extends to single processing techniques. For example, Fig. 1(b) plots the reported tensile strengths as a function of elongation from previous investigations for a range of DED processes. Although all of these results are obtained from nominally the same DED process, there is a wide variability in the reported processing conditions including the energy source, the feedstock type, and the processing parameters. DED fabricated components with a powder feedstock exhibited higher tensile strengths that averaged from 1025 to 1170 MPa [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35] than components fabricated with a wire feedstock for both GTA and laser based processes that averaged from 870 to 1055 MPa [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44]. The processing parameters are dependent on feedstock type, and typically a powder feedstock uses lower power levels than wire feedstock to fabricate similar components. In addition, ductility also varies considerably from the DED investigations, with elongations ranging from 3 to 20%. This variability could be the result of unseen or unreported porosity from either gas entrapment or from lack-of-fusion between deposition layers which can have a detrimental impact on ductility within AM components [20], [45], [46].

Since little information is presented on the processing parameters for previous AM investigations, there is a limited understanding of the mechanisms driving this wide variability in tensile properties across different studies. Although differences would be expected for different feedstocks and processing parameters, there is wide range of values in the reported mechanical properties even within individual investigations when the processing conditions are nominally similar. This variability could be the result of differing thermal histories experienced within the component during AM fabrication leading to location dependent differences. During processing, each location within the AM component undergoes a complex thermal history which includes melting, solidification, and thermal cycling [47]. The overall lack of the consideration of processing history for mechanical properties reported in the literature, whether in terms of processing parameters or geometry, has led, at least in part, to high levels of uncertainty in the mechanical properties needed for the design of AM components.

The eventual certification of large, complex Ti-6Al-4V AM components will require a more complete understanding of the governing process-structure-property relationships. The fabrication of even simple wall structures can be complicated by changes in the build path, leading to changes in mechanical properties at different locations and orientations which cannot be easily predicted. Although previous work has identified some of these relationships [31], [37], [39], [41], [42], [43], they were not fully investigated to determine their impact on the resulting mechanical behavior. One area, in particular, which has not been widely investigated is the role of part geometry and how changes in geometry impact the resulting mechanical properties within a component.

In order to begin building a material property database for specific geometries, several wall structures with different wall thicknesses, heights, and shapes were fabricated using a laser based DED process with consistent processing parameters and build paths. The processing conditions used in this investigation incorporated high laser powers and deposition rates, allowing for fabrication of large components in a reasonable amount of time. The relatively large size of these wall structures allowed the impact of geometry on the microstructures and mechanical properties to be investigated. Static mechanical properties and the corresponding microstructural features were analyzed for two orientations in relation to the build direction and at a range of locations throughout each wall structure. A statistical analysis was performed to determine the impact of the various geometrical features on the mechanical properties. Regardless of the different wall designs and wall thicknesses, the resulting mechanical properties obtained across all geometries were relatively consistent and well above the lower limits for cast and wrought Ti-6Al-4V components. However, this investigation showed that orientation, location, and geometry displayed statistically significant dependencies on the resulting mechanical properties. Investigating wall structures fabricated under similar processing conditions but encompassing different geometries will help increase the knowledge base leading to eventual certification of AM components for critical applications.

Section snippets

Deposition process and processing conditions

A series of Ti-6Al-4V wall structures were fabricated using a laser based DED process in an atmospherically controlled chamber purged with ultra-high purity argon gas to minimize atmospheric contamination during the deposition process. Oxygen content was monitored in the chamber using a General Electric CGA 351 zirconium oxide oxygen detector, and oxygen was maintained at levels below 100 ppm. An IPG Photonics® YLR-12000 laser system, which operates at a near-infrared wavelength between 1070 and

Overview of tensile behavior

Static mechanical testing of samples extracted from selected locations at both longitudinal and transverse orientations within several wall structures was performed to investigate the impact of geometry on the resulting mechanical behavior. Table 2 lists the average tensile properties for the longitudinal and transverse oriented tensile samples extracted from each wall structure along with the corresponding standard deviations. The highlighted box within both Fig. 1(a) and 1(b) bounds the

Conclusions

The impact of orientation, geometry, and location on the resulting microstructural and mechanical properties for laser based DED Ti-6Al-4V wall structures have been analyzed. Although the processing conditions were nominally maintained during AM processing, variations in both the microstructure and mechanical properties were observed in the as-deposited condition with respect to orientation, part geometry, and location.

  • Tensile samples oriented with the long dimension parallel to the substrate

Acknowledgements

The material is based upon work supported by the Office of Naval Research through the Naval Sea Systems Command under Contract No. N00024-02-D-6604, Delivery order No. 0611. Special thanks to Dr. William Frazier, Dr. Madan Kittur, Ms. Malinda Pagett, and Mr. Anthony Zaita for their helpful discussions and recommendations. We also acknowledge Mr. Jay Tressler and Mr. Griffin Jones for fabrication of the wall structures, Mr. Ed Good for use of his metallurgical laboratory, and Dr. Abdalla Nassar

References (70)

  • W. Xu et al.

    Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti-6Al-4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition

    Acta Mater.

    (2015)
  • B.E. Carroll et al.

    Anisotropic tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing

    Acta Mater.

    (2015)
  • C.L. Qiu et al.

    Fabrication of large Ti-6Al-4V structures by direct laser deposition

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2015)
  • A.J. Sterling et al.

    Fatigue behavior and failure mechanisms of direct laser deposited Ti-6Al-4 V

    Mat Sci Eng a-Struct.

    (2016)
  • B. Baufeld et al.

    Wire based additive layer manufacturing: comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated by laser-beam deposition and shaped metal deposition

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2011)
  • E. Brandl et al.

    Additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V using welding wire: comparison of laser and are beam deposition and evaluation with respect to aerospace material specifications

    Phys. Procedia

    (2010)
  • E. Brandl et al.

    Mechanical properties of additive manufactured titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) blocks deposited by a solid-state laser and wire

    Mater. Des.

    (2011)
  • B. Baufeld et al.

    Additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V components by shaped metal deposition: microstructure and mechanical properties

    Mater. Des.

    (2010)
  • P.A. Kobryn et al.

    The effect of laser power and traverse speed on microstructure, porosity, and build height in laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V

    Scr. Mater.

    (2000)
  • M.N. Ahsan et al.

    A comparative study of laser direct metal deposition characteristics using gas and plasma-atomized Ti-6Al-4V powders

    Mat Sci Eng a-Struct.

    (2011)
  • P.C. Collins et al.

    Development of methods for the quantification of microstructural features in alpha plus beta-processed alpha/beta titanium alloys

    Mat Sci Eng a-Struct.

    (2009)
  • J. Tiley et al.

    Quantification of microstructural features in alpha/beta titanium alloys

    Mat Sci Eng a-Struct.

    (2004)
  • A.I. Kahveci et al.

    Hardness versus strength correlation for oxygen-strengthened Ti-6Al-4V alloy

    Scripta Metallurgica Et Materialia

    (1991)
  • G. Lütjering

    Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (alpha + beta) titanium alloys

    Mat Sci Eng a-Struct.

    (1998)
  • C. de Formanoir et al.

    Electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V: microstructure, texture and mechanical behavior of the as-built and heat-treated material

    Mat Sci Eng a-Struct.

    (2016)
  • J.G. Conley et al.

    Rapid prototyping and solid free form fabrication

    J Manuf Sci E-T Asme.

    (1997)
  • I. Gibson et al.

    Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing. London

    (2010)
  • B. Dutta et al.

    Fasm. Additive manufacturing by direct metal deposition

    Adv. Mater. Process.

    (2011)
  • W.E. Frazier

    Metal additive manufacturing: a review

    J. Mater. Eng. Perform.

    (2014)
  • D.D. Gu et al.

    Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms

    Int. Mater. Rev.

    (2012)
  • B. Dutta et al.

    Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys

    Adv. Mater. Process.

    (2014)
  • Measurement science roadmap for metal-based additive manufacturing

  • M. Seifi et al.

    Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing

    Jom-Us.

    (2016)
  • P. Edwards et al.

    Electron beam additive manufacturing of titanium components: properties and performance

    J Manuf Sci E-T Asme.

    (2013)
  • H.K. Rafi et al.

    Microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting

    J. Mater. Eng. Perform.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (126)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text