Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling property in MBR: CO2 plasma treatment
Introduction
Increasingly the shortage of water is a serious problem all over the world because of the population growth and the expansion of industry activities. Therefore, there is a growing impetus for wastewater recycle and reuse. Interests in the membrane-bioreactor (MBR) technology for wastewater treatment have continually increased [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. The advantages offered by MBR over conventional treatment technologies are well known and the main of them are given below [11]: (1) complete removal of solid; (2) effluent disinfections; (3) separation of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge retention time (SRT); (4) higher loading rate capability and longer SRT; (5) lower/zero sludge production; (6) rapid start-up; (7) more compact size; (8) lower energy consumption. Negative aspects, however, include membrane fouling and concentration polarization (which are to some extent exacerbated by membrane fouling) [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. When membrane fouling occurs, a thick gel layer (which can be both biological or abiotic in composition) is formed onto the membrane surface and into the membrane pores, which causes the permeate flux to decline quickly. There have been many investigations concerning the mechanisms of membrane fouling [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] and the processes to restrict fouling and to enhance flux [21], [22]. A series of methods, such as pretreatment of feed solution [23], using air sparging [24], unsteady flow [22], limiting the flux and flushing by big bubbles [21], adding activated carbon [25], suitable design of membrane modules [8], back washing and cleaning [26], have been described in the literatures.
In general, membrane fouling occurs more seriously on hydrophobic membranes than hydrophilic ones because of hydrophobic interaction between solutes, microbial cells, and membrane materials. Membrane fouling can also be attributed to the adsorption of organic species, the precipitation of less soluble inorganic species, and the adhesion of microbial cells at the membrane surface. It is widely accepted that membrane fouling is less troublesome for the hydrophilic membranes than for the hydrophobic ones [12]. As a result, much attention has been made to reduce membrane fouling by modifying hydrophobic materials to relative hydrophilic [27], [28], [29], [30]. In our previous work [31], [32], [33], [34], it was found that grafting hydrophilic polymers on the membrane surface can enhance the resistant property of protein adsorption for polypropylene microporous membranes. This result indicates that the static antifouling property of polypropylene microporous membrane can be improved by surface modification. However, to our knowledge, few results [35], [36] have been reported to describe the effect of surface modification on the dynamic antifouling property of a polymeric membrane in MBR for wastewater treatment. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of CO2-plasma treatment on the membrane fouling during the filtration of activated sludge in a submerged aerobic MBR.
Section snippets
Materials
Polypropylene hollow fiber microporous membrane (PPHFMM) and polypropylene flat microporous membrane (PPFMM) with a porosity of 45–50% and an average pore diameter of 0.10 μm were prepared with a melt-extruded/cold-stretched method in our laboratory [31]. The inner and outer diameters of PPHFMM are 240 and 290 μm, respectively. The area of each membrane module is about 91 cm2. All other chemicals were AR grade and used without further purification.
Surface modification of PPHFMM by CO2-plasma
Before plasma treatment, the PPHFMM was washed
CO2-plasma treatment and characterization of PPHFMMs
PPHFMMs were treated by CO2-plasma for a given time in the plasma chamber. To analysis the chemical composition of the membrane surface, XPS was measured and the typical survey scans are shown in Fig. 2. In comparison with the virgin PPHFMM (Fig. 2(a)), it can be clearly seen from Fig. 2(b) and (c) that after CO2 plasma treatment, a peak at 532.7 eV corresponding to O 1s appeared. This O 1s peak can be designated to carbonyl and carboxyl groups generated by CO2 plasma treatment. Fig. 2 also
Conclusion
Effect of CO2 plasma treatment time on membrane fouling was investigated using a submerged MBR for PPHFMMs. XPS analysis confirmed the introduction of oxygen containing polar groups onto the membrane surfaces by the CO2 plasma treatment. Contact angle data showed that the hydrophilicity of the CO2 plasma treated membranes increased obviously. Before the membrane was used in the MBR and then cleaned with water and NaOH solution, it seems that the pore size and porosity of the membranes after
Acknowledgements
Financial supports from the High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2002AA601230) and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2003CB15705) are gratefully acknowledged.
References (38)
- et al.
Anaerobic treatment of wastewater with high organic content using a stirred tank reactor coupled with a membrane filtration unit
Water Res.
(2003) - et al.
Comparison of the filtration characteristics of organic and inorganic membranes in a membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor
Water Res.
(2002) - et al.
Modeling of submerged membrane bioreactor process for wastewater treatment
Desalination
(2002) - et al.
Influence of macromolecule adsorption during filtration of a membrane bioreactor mixed liquor suspension
J. Membr. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Study on hydraulic characteristics in a submerged membrane bioreactor process
Process Biochem.
(2000) - et al.
Design and operation consideration for wastewater treatment using a flat submerged membrane bioreactor
Process Biochem.
(2002) - et al.
Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations
Sep. Purif. Technol.
(2000) - et al.
The behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the cross-flow membrane bioreactor system
J. Membr. Sci.
(2002) - et al.
Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge
Process Biochem.
(2001) - et al.
Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling
Bioresour. Technol.
(2000)