Elsevier

Minerals Engineering

Volume 24, Issue 7, June 2011, Pages 651-660
Minerals Engineering

Selective sulphidation of a nickeliferous lateritic ore

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2010.10.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The processing of nickeliferous laterites to produce nickel metal is both complex and energy intensive. Since most laterites are found in less developed regions, the capital costs for the infrastructure can exceed those for the process itself. The low temperature sulphidation of lateritic ores to produce an intermediate nickel concentrate, for further processing, offers a number of potential advantages, such as lower energy consumption and a relatively simple flowsheet. In this research, the sulphidation of a nickeliferous lateritic ore was investigated between the temperatures of 450–1000 °C and sulphur additions of between 25 and 900 kg of sulphur per tonne of ore. The experiments showed that the nickel oxide can be selectively sulphidized to a nickel–iron sulphide. It was found that both the grade and the sulphidation degree largely depended upon the temperature and the sulphur additions, with temperatures above 550 °C exhibiting the highest recoveries and grades. A DTA/TGA with mass spectrometer was used to further elucidate the nature of the phase transformations that occur upon heating of the ore in the presence of sulphur.

Research highlights

► Selective nickel sulphidation from an iron-rich limonitic ore suggests that a nickel extraction of up to 90% is possible, while at the same time minimizing iron recoveries to below about 10 wt.%. ► At low sulphur additions (<300;kg S/tonne ore) a pyrrhotite phase is favored at all temperatures studied. At higher sulphur additions, below 550 °C, a pyrite-rich phase is favoured whereas at higher temperatures a pyrrhotite phase is also formed. ► Nickel extraction and selectivity increased with increasing temperature. A sharp increase coincided with the temperature at which the reduction of hematite to magnetite occurred. ► Overall the thermodynamic description of the Ni–Fe–S–O system adequately predicts the sulphidation and reduction reactions.

Introduction

Nickel consumption is expected to rise steadily in the future due to the increased stainless steel demand, particularly in China. This continuing rise in nickel demand will no longer be met through the treatment of nickel sulphide deposits, which currently account for over 60% of nickel production. Instead, future nickel production will have to increasingly rely on nickel laterites, an oxidic ore which is estimated to account for over 70% of known nickel resources (Dalvi et al., 2004).

Nickeliferous lateritic ores are located in tropical and sub-tropical regions and are formed through the weathering of olivine-rich rocks known as peridotites (Boldt, 1967). Whereas the host rock may contain between 0.2 and 0.3 wt.% nickel, the limonitic zone of an ore body may contain between 0.5 and 1.7 wt.% nickel and between 40 and 60 wt.% iron (Dalvi et al., 2004). Limonitic ores are treated using either one of two industrial processes. In High Pressure Acid Leaching (HPAL), the ore is leached with sulphuric acid in an autoclave followed by purification and either electrowinning or hydrogen reduction of the solution to produce a high purity nickel product. In another industrial process, known as the Caron process, the nickel in the ore is reduced at temperatures between 500 and 800 °C followed by an ammoniacal leach which extracts the nickel and cobalt into solution prior to further hydrometallurgical refining (Dalvi et al., 2004).

Both of these extraction processes require substantial capital expenditures in both infrastructure and equipment. To further complicate the issue, nickel laterite deposits are often located in remote areas where access to power and transportation may be difficult. Due to the high capital costs and complex operations there is a significant interest in alternative nickel extraction methods, which are less energy intensive, and can produce an intermediate product on-site, which is suitable for refining. One major avenue for research has been the selective reduction of nickel from lateritic ores, followed by physical upgrading via either magnetic separation or flotation.

The current research investigates the selective sulphidation of nickel from a limonitic ore at temperatures below the melting point of the oxides. The objective is to form nickel–iron sulphide particles which are large enough for physical separation from the gangue material.

Section snippets

Background and theory

There is a paucity of information available within the public domain on the sulphidation of nickel oxides and to the authors’ knowledge there are no published studies involving the selective sulphidation of nickel oxide from within a lateritic ore in the solid state. A recent review discusses the research related to the phase transformations that occur upon heating limonitic ores, as well as the behaviors of these ores in a reducing environment (Harris et al., 2009). These studies can be

Ore characterization

The ore used for all of the experiments was a limonitic ore from the Ivory Coast which was provided by Xstrata. The elemental analysis of the ore as determined by XRF is shown in Table 1. The limonitic ore is very high in iron and the nickel to iron ratio is almost 50:1. The composition was converted to an approximate mineralogical composition as shown in Table 2 and this agrees well with the X-Ray spectrum as shown in Fig. 3, which indicates that the predominant mineral is goethite.

The ore was

Furnace experiments

Samples with varying amounts of sulphur were reacted at 500 °C in order understand the role of sulphur additions on both the nickel and the iron recoveries. Fig. 5a shows the results as determined by the bromine–methanol leach. The nickel extraction is much higher than the corresponding iron extraction at all sulphur additions, and reaches a constant value of about 80% extraction, whereas the iron extraction continues to increase with the sulphur addition. It can be seen that the slope of the

Mechanisms

Sulphidation experiments over a range of temperatures reveal that selective sulphidation of the nickel oxide is possible and that the selectivity is a function of both the sulphur addition and the temperature. Higher temperatures and lower sulphur additions result in higher selectivity. The reason for this selectivity is most likely due to the buffering role of the iron oxide during the reaction. Once iron oxide begins to form a sulphide, the local partial pressure of SO2 increases to a point

Conclusions

  • Selective nickel sulphidation from an iron-rich limonitic ore suggests that a nickel extraction of up to 90% is possible, while at the same time maintaining the iron recoveries to below about 10 wt.%.

  • At low sulphur additions (<300 kg S/tonne ore) a pyrrhotite phase is favored at all temperatures studied. At higher sulphur additions, below 550 °C, a pyrite-rich phase is favoured whereas at higher temperatures a pyrrhotite phase is also formed.

  • Nickel extraction and selectivity increased with

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Xstrata for funding this research.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (52)

  • Thermodynamic analysis and application for preparing FePO<inf>4</inf> from nitric acid pressure leach laterite residue by selective leaching in phosphoric acid and induced precipitation

    2022, Hydrometallurgy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Currently, limonitic laterite ores attract more attention as one of the major sources to produce cobalt and nickel (Harris et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2013a, 2013b; Pan et al., 2013).

  • Extraction, phase transformation and kinetics of valuable metals from nickel-chromium mixed metal oxidized ore

    2021, Minerals Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several hydrometallurgical routes have been developed, such as reduction roasting followed by ammonia leaching, high pressure acid leaching (HPAL), and atmospheric acid leaching (AAL) (including heap leaching) (Li et al., 2012; Meng et al., 2015; Meshram et al., 2019; Quast et al., 2017). Reduction roasting followed by ammonia leaching is not suitable for treating nickel oxidized ores with high grade copper and cobalt owning to the drawbacks of low cobalt recovery, the operating conditions sensitivity and high energy consumption (Ma et al., 2013; Harris et al., 2011; Meshram et al., 2019; Fan et al., 2011, 2012). HPAL is an effective and selective process with high recoveries for nickel and cobalt and a low iron dissolving ratio due to the iron precipitating as hematite (Buyukakinci and Topkaya, 2009; Guo et al., 2011; Li et al., 2018b; McDonald and Whittington, 2008; Meshram et al., 2019).

  • A new approach to recover platinum-group metals from spent catalytic converters via iron matte

    2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling
    Citation Excerpt :

    When planning the experimental series, it was thought that the increase in the amount of sulfur in the smelting process would increase the probability that the PGMs would be present in the iron-sulfur matte. This idea agrees with the finding of Harris et al. (2011), who observed higher metal recoveries when using sulfur as the converting agent. For this purpose, nine experiments were carried out to understand the effect of the S/Fe ratio on PGM recovery.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text