Dissolution behaviour of source materials for synthesis of geopolymer binders: A kinetic approach
Introduction
Geopolymers are low calcium binding materials that can convert aluminosilicate wastes such as fly ash, slag and metakaolin into strong cementitious binders. These alkali-activated binders are acid-, heat- and fire- resistant (Van Jaarsveld et al., 1997, Duxson et al., 2007a, Duxson et al., 2007b, Provis and van Deventer, 2009), and they can be utilised as a green alternative to Portland cement due to the carbon dioxide savings achievable in their production process (Phair, 2006, Duxson et al., 2007a, Duxson et al., 2007b). In the geopolymerisation reaction, an aluminosilicate source is usually activated by alkali silicate solutions to produce the tetrahedral geopolymeric network (Provis and van Deventer, 2007, Provis and van Deventer, 2009). The release rate of silicate and aluminate species from source materials is critical in controlling the synthesis process of geopolymers and the development of binding gel. A high initial dissolution rate of silicate is known to accelerate the conversion of aluminosilicate materials to geopolymers (Fernández-Jiménez et al., 2006, De Silva et al., 2007), while the availability of aluminium in the source materials, and its release rate, are known to control geopolymer gel properties (Fernández-Jiménez et al., 2006, De Silva et al., 2007).
During geopolymer formation, dissolution, hydrolysis and condensation reactions take place. Depending on the concentration of Si in the system, condensation reactions can occur between aluminate and silicate species, or between silicate species themselves. While the dissolution of various compounds from aluminosilicates causes a gradual increase in Al and Si concentration in solution, this will stabilise when the Al and Si concentrations reach equilibrium with respect to the solid/gel phases present (Antonic et al., 1993). Dissolution behaviour of aluminosilicate compounds is controlled by the relationship between the forward and backward reactions leading to equilibrium. Forward reactions are related to the action of solvent in breaking the surface bonds (SiOAl), and formation of soluble species, and, therefore, are dependent on pH. Backward reactions are related to the reaction between soluble species in solution, on or with the surface of dissolving solid, and hence the concentration and speciation of aluminium and silicon in solution are critical in determining the rate of the backward reaction (Antonic et al., 1993).
Many researchers have published investigations on the dissolution of aluminosilicate compounds, and possible leaching of elements from various sources (Wang et al., 1999, Praharaj et al., 2002, Popovic et al., 2005, Jankowski et al., 2006, Gitari et al., 2009, Izquierdo and Querol, 2012, Crundwell, 2014, Granizon et al., 2014, Müllauer et al., 2015, Simonova et al., 2015). However, most of the studies are conducted in equilibrium conditions where both forward and backward reactions are controlling the release of elements. Authors have previously examined the role of aluminate and silicate release rates in controlling geopolymer nano-structure and gel growth behaviour (Hajimohammadi et al., 2010, Hajimohammadi et al., 2011). In the early stages of the reaction, rapid release of alumina is shown to hinder the dissolution of silica particles, and more crystalline zeolite products and a more continuous gel microstructure is observed with slower alumina release rate (Hajimohammadi et al., 2010). In slowly released silicate systems, gel nucleation is observed to take place very close to the solid silica source particles, while nucleation happens in bulk regions in systems that initially contain dissolved silica. These differences in nucleation lead to a more chemically heterogeneous binder in slow silicate released systems (Hajimohammadi et al., 2011). Thus, understanding the initial dissolution rates of source material in far-from-equilibrium conditions is essential to understanding and controlling the behaviour of final geopolymeric binders.
In this paper, the dissolution rate of some geopolymer precursor materials is examined using a kinetic approach. The liquid to solid ratios were designed to be sufficiently high to minimise precipitation of hydration products. The dissolution behaviour of some geopolymer source materials is characterised, and the effects of pH and particle size distribution on dissolution behaviour are presented. These results have implications for the selection of geopolymer precursor materials and the mix design of geopolymer binders, and explain some of the behaviour of geopolymers in the literature.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Fly ash (FA) can be used as a secondary raw material in many products such as concrete, and the main reason for the wide use of this material is its commercial availability throughout most of the world. Its utilisation in solid products provides an effective means of disposal of what is otherwise often a hazardous waste (Tsiridis et al., 2006). Fly ash is a popular material for synthesis of geopolymers due to its easy availability and the high workability of the binders formed (Palomo et al.,
Particle size distribution
Fig. 1 presents the particle size distributions of the raw materials studied after different milling times. The RHA, which initially has very fine particles (d50 = 8 μm), shows fewer changes in its size distribution after 5 min of milling among all samples. However, results show that milling gives a narrower size distribution and more submicron particle formation in this sample. The average particle size is reduced to 4 μm after 5 min milling. Milling of RHA is known to be beneficial for its
Conclusions and perspectives
It is known that the time of release of Al and Si species in solution plays a critical role in the nanostructural evolution of geopolymers and therefore in their final properties. Understanding the initial dissolution behaviour of source materials under different conditions can aid substantially the selection of geopolymer precursors and the custom design of geopolymer binders for specific applications. The effects of solution alkalinity and particle size distribution on dissolution rate have
Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part by the Centre for Sustainable Resource Processing through the Geopolymer Alliance, and in part by the Australian Research Council (DP0880320) (including partial support through the Particulate Fluids Processing Centre). Prof John L. Provis of the University of Sheffield is thanked for his valuable contributions to this work.
References (48)
- et al.
The effect of grinding on the physical properties of fly ashes and a portland cement clinker
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1997) - et al.
Particle size effect on the strength of rice husk ash blended gap-graded Portland cement concrete
Cem. Concr. Compos.
(2005) - et al.
Resistance to chloride penetration of blended portland cement mortar containing palm oil fuel ash, rice husk ash and fly ash
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2008) The mechanism of dissolution of minerals in acidic and alkaline solutions: part II application of a newtheory to silicates, aluminosilicates and quartz
Hydrometallurgy
(2014)- et al.
The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2007) - et al.
The role played by the reactive alumina content in the alkaline activation of fly ashes
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
(2006) - et al.
The effect of silica availability on the mechanism of geopolymerisation
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2011) - et al.
Leaching behaviour of elements from coal combustion fly ash: an overview
Int. J. Coal Geol.
(2012) - et al.
Mobility of trace elements from selected Australian fly ashes and its potential impact on aquatic ecosystems
Fuel
(2006) - et al.
Mechanical activation of granulated blast furnace slag and its effect on the properties and structure of portland slag cement
Cem. Concr. Compos.
(2008)
Leaching behaviour of major and trace elements from concrete: effect of fly ash and GGBS
Cem. Concr. Compos.
Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future
Cem. Concr. Res.
Leachability of elements from sub-bituminous coal fly ash from India
Environ. Int.
Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling
Chem. Eng. Sci.
Talc from Puebla de Lillo, Spain. II. Effect of dry grinding on particle size and shape
Appl. Clay Sci.
Silicate complexes of aluminum(III) in aqueous systems
Coord. Chem. Rev.
Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products
J. Hazard. Mater.
The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: part I. Theory and applications
Miner. Eng.
Comparative leaching experiments for trace elements in raw coal, laboratory ash, fly ash, and bottom ash
Int. J. Coal Geol.
Dissolution of amorphous aluminosilicate zeolite precursors in alkaline solutions, part 1 kinetics of the dissolution
J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.
Waste Materials Used in Concrete Manufacturing Westwood
Geopolymers - inorganic polymeric new materials
J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.
Kinetics of geopolymerization: role of Al2O3 and SiO2
Cem. Concr. Res.
Designing precursors for geopolymer cements
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
Cited by (99)
Leaching kinetics and reactivity regulation of red mud in an NaOH solution
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsEffect of surface activity of recycled fine aggregates from clay bricks on the hydration, microstructure and chloride transport of concrete
2024, Construction and Building MaterialsPozzolanic Metakaolin Reactions: Stoichiometric and Kinetic Modeling
2024, Materials and DesignThe effect of temperature on dissolution activity of fly ash and metakaolin in alkaline conditions
2024, Cement and Concrete Composites