Review
Feature Review
Inorganic nanoparticle-based contrast agents for molecular imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2010.09.004Get rights and content

Inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) including semiconductor quantum dots (QDs), iron oxide NPs and gold NPs have been developed as contrast agents for diagnostics by molecular imaging. Compared with traditional contrast agents, NPs offer several advantages: their optical and magnetic properties can be tailored by engineering the composition, structure, size and shape; their surfaces can be modified with ligands to target specific biomarkers of disease; the contrast enhancement provided can be equivalent to millions of molecular counterparts; and they can be integrated with a combination of different functions for multimodal imaging. Here, we review recent advances in the development of contrast agents based on inorganic NPs for molecular imaging, and also touch on contrast enhancement, surface modification, tissue targeting, clearance and toxicity. As research efforts intensify, contrast agents based on inorganic NPs that are highly sensitive, target-specific and safe to use are expected to enter clinical applications in the near future.

Section snippets

NPs as molecular imaging agents

Molecular imaging is a new frontier of biomedical research for visualizing, characterizing and monitoring biological processes in cells, tissues and organisms using sensitive instrumentation and contrast mechanisms [1]. Molecular imaging interrogates biological processes to report on and reveal the molecular abnormalities that form the basis of diseases. As a result, molecular imaging provides a powerful tool for the diagnosis of diseases including cancer, cardiovascular syndrome and

Molecular imaging modalities

Inorganic NPs are an actively explored technology for the development of contrast agents for molecular imaging. Figure 1 and Table 1 list the types of inorganic NPs being developed as imaging agents, and Figure 1 also shows some typical examples of inorganic NP-based molecular imaging 6, 9, 13, 14, 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33. Before discussing the performance of these contrast agents, it will be helpful to provide a brief introduction to the imaging modalities whose

Major inorganic NPs for molecular imaging

Among the inorganic NPs displayed in Figure 1a, iron oxide NPs have been used clinically as contrast agents for MR imaging, whereas the other two have been mainly evaluated in the preclinical setting. In addition, recent advances in synthesis have produced many novel NPs with potential applications in molecular imaging, and Table 1 shows a partial list of these inorganic NPs. These and additional examples can also be found in the Molecular Imaging and Contrast Agent Database (//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Surface modification of inorganic NPs

The surfaces of inorganic NPs often need to be modified to: i) allow transfer from a nonhydrolytic solvent into an aqueous medium; ii) increase the circulation time in the blood stream by adding a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) coating, or PEGylation; iii) enhance the targeting efficiency via the conjugation of binding ligands; and iv) increase functionality via the addition of other components including drugs. Three important issues must be taken into consideration when modifying the surfaces of

Delivery and targeting of inorganic NPs

NPs provide a range of advantages over molecular contrast agents traditionally used for molecular imaging. For example, the differences in vasculatures between normal and cancerous tissues enhance the accumulation of NPs in solid tumors (Figure 3a). Endothelial cells in normal tissues are well aligned and closely packed, whereas those in solid tumors are relatively leaky 81, 82, 83. Because of their large sizes, inorganic NPs circulating in the bloodstream cannot easily enter normal tissues yet

Biodistribution, clearance and the toxicity of inorganic NPs

In reality, it is impossible to have all injected NPs accumulated at the site of disease. As such, the biodistribution of inorganic NPs has to be considered and optimized from the beginning. Typically, inorganic NPs administered intravenously are mostly taken up by the liver and spleen, with the amount of accumulated particles depending on the particle size, shape and surface chemistry. There are several reports on the biodistribution of QDs, iron oxide NPs and gold colloids 57, 104, 105, 106,

Multimodal imaging with inorganic NPs

To diagnose malignancy accurately and at an early stage, it is often necessary to use a combination of different imaging modalities simultaneously. As such, there has been a strong interest in developing new imaging techniques based on optical and spectroscopic mechanisms. Notable examples include OCT, PAT, SERS and multiphoton microscopy. To keep pace with these emerging techniques, inorganic NPs need to be engineered with a variety of properties, and in some cases, they also need to enhance

Concluding remarks

Many types of inorganic NPs have been proposed and evaluated as potential contrast agents for molecular imaging, but most are still being tested in vitro or in vivo with small animals. Although a few (e.g. iron oxide NPs for MR imaging) have been approved for clinical use, most are still in development and will need to solve the potential toxicity issue. It is expected that some of the inorganic NPs (e.g. gold colloids) will overcome these hurdles and eventually move into the clinical phase. In

Acknowledgements

Our research in this field has been supported in part by an National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's Pioneer Award (DP1 OD000798), an NIH research grant (1R01 CA138527) from the NCI and startup funds from Washington University in St. Louis.

References (126)

  • C.W. Jung et al.

    Physical and chemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agents: ferumoxides, ferumoxtran, ferumoxsil

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1995)
  • C.A. Haynes et al.

    Globular proteins at solid/liquid interfaces

    Colloid Sur. B

    (1994)
  • J.J. Gray

    The interaction of proteins with solid surfaces

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2004)
  • C. Corot

    Recent advances in iron oxide nanocrystal technology for medical imaging

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2006)
  • Y. Zhang

    Surface modification of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and their intracellular uptake

    Biomaterials

    (2002)
  • H. Hashizume

    Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (2000)
  • R. Weissleder et al.

    Molecular imaging

    Radiology

    (2001)
  • S. Achilefu

    Introduction to concept and strategies for molecular imaging

    Chem. Rev.

    (2010)
  • K. Licha

    Contrast agents for optical imaging

    Topics Curr. Chem.

    (2002)
  • Y.M. Erdi

    The use of PET for radiotherapy

    Curr. Medical Imaging Rev.

    (2007)
  • S.E. Skrabalak

    Gold nanocages: Synthesis, properties, and applications

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2008)
  • C.J. Murphy

    Gold nanoparticles in biology: Beyond toxicity to cellular imaging

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2008)
  • D.L. Thorek

    Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging

    Ann. Biomed. Eng.

    (2006)
  • E.V. Shashkov

    Quantum dots as multimodal photoacoustic and photothermal contrast agents

    Nano Lett.

    (2008)
  • R.A. Farrer

    Highly efficient multiphoton-absorption-induced luminescence from gold nanoparticles

    Nano Lett.

    (2005)
  • E. Dulkeith

    Plasmon emission in photoexcited gold nanoparticles

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2004)
  • R. Popovtzer

    Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer

    Nano Lett.

    (2008)
  • J.F. Hainfeld

    Gold nanoparticles: a new X-ray contrast agent

    British J. Radiol.

    (2006)
  • X. Qian

    In vivo tumor targeting and spectroscopic detection with surface-enhanced raman nanoparticle tags

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2008)
  • P.C. Li

    In vivo photoacoustic molecular imaging with simultaneous multiple selective targeting using antibody-conjugated gold nanorods

    Opt. Express

    (2008)
  • G.A.F. van Tilborg

    Annexin A5-functionalized bimodal lipid-based contrast agents for the detection of apoptosis

    Bioconjug. Chem.

    (2006)
  • E. Karathanasis

    Imaging nanoprobe for prediction of outcome of nanoparticle chemotherapy by using mammography

    Radiology

    (2009)
  • X. Gao

    In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2004)
  • P.M. Allen

    InAs(ZnCdS) quantum dots optimized for biological imaging in the near-Infrared

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2009)
  • J. Gao

    Ultrasmall near-infrared non-cadmium quantum dots for in vivo tumor imaging

    Small

    (2010)
  • Y.-M. Huh

    In vivo magnetic resonance detection of cancer by using multifunctional magnetic nanocrystals

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2005)
  • X. Yang

    Nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging

    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology

    (2009)
  • C. Kim

    In vivo molecular photoacoustic tomography of melanomas targeted by bio-conjugated gold nanocages

    ACS Nano

    (2010)
  • C.L. Zavaleta

    Multiplexed imaging of surface enhanced raman scattering nanotags in living mice using noninvasive raman spectroscopy

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2009)
  • L. Tong

    Bright three-photon luminescence from gold/silver alloyed nanostructures for bioimaging with negligible photothermal toxicity

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2010)
  • J. Park

    Two-photon-induced photoluminescence imaging of tumors using near-infrared excited gold nanoshells

    Opt. Exp.

    (2008)
  • G.V. Maltzahn

    Computationally guided photothermal tumor therapy using long-circulating gold nanorod antennas

    Cancer Res.

    (2009)
  • M. Nyk

    High contrast in vitro and in vivo photoluminescence bioimaging using near infrared to near infrared up-conversion in Tm3+ and Yb3+ doped fluoride nanophosphors

    Nano Lett.

    (2008)
  • R.H. Hashemi

    MRI: The basics

    (2010)
  • R.A. Robb

    X-ray computed tomography: from basic principles to applications

    Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng.

    (1982)
  • M.E. Phelps

    PET: Physics, instrumentation, and scanners

    (2006)
  • M. Rodriguez-Porcel

    Imaging of VEGF receptor in a rat myocardial infarction model using PET

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2008)
  • T. Olafsen

    Optimizing radiolabeled engineered anti-p185HER2 antibody fragments for in vivo imaging

    Cancer Res.

    (2005)
  • W.P. Li

    Receptor-binding, biodistribution, and metabolism studies of 64Cu-DOTA-cetuximab, a PET-imaging agent for epidermal growth-factor receptor-positive tumors

    Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharmaceuticals

    (2008)
  • G. Niu

    Monitoring therapeutic response of human ovarian cancer to 17-DMAG by noninvasive PET imaging with 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab

    Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging

    (2009)
  • Cited by (214)

    • Semiconducting polymer dots for fluorescence biosensing and imaging

      2024, Semiconducting Polymer Materials for Biosensing Applications
    • Inorganic imaging nanoprobes for breast cancer diagnosis

      2023, Radiation Medicine and Protection
    • Silica-based nanocarriers

      2023, Bionanocatalysis: From Design to Applications
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text