Genotoxicity assessment of an energetic propellant compound, 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

3-Nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) is an energetic explosive proposed for use in weapon systems, to reduce the sensitivity of warheads. In order to develop toxicity data for safety assessment, we investigated the genotoxicity of NTO, using a battery of genotoxicity tests, which included the Ames test, Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell chromosome aberration test, L5178Y TK+/− mouse lymphoma mutagenesis test and rat micronucleus test. NTO was not mutagenic in the Ames test or in Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA). NTO did not induce chromosomal aberrations in CHO cells, with or without metabolic activation. In the L5178Y TK+/− mouse lymphoma mutagenesis test, all of the NTO-treated cultures had mutant frequencies that were similar to the average frequencies of solvent control-treated cultures, indicating a negative result. Confirmatory tests for the three in vitro tests also produced negative results. The potential in vivo clastogenicity and aneugenicity of NTO was evaluated using the rat peripheral blood micronucleus test. NTO was administered by oral gavage to male and female Sprague–Dawley rats for 14 days at doses up to 2 g/kg/day. Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood demonstrated no significant induction of micronucleated reticulocytes relative to the vehicle control (PEG-200). These studies reveal that NTO was not genotoxic in either in vitro or in vivo tests and suggest a low risk of genetic hazards associated with exposure.

Introduction

The energetic explosive 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) was first prepared in 1905 by nitration of 1,2,4-triazole-5-one (TO) [1]. There was renewed interest in learning more about the chemistry of NTO in the late 1960s. The first report on the explosive nature of NTO was published by Lee and Coburn in 1985 [2]. In the past decade, the military services have been evaluating compounds for explosive formulations to replace highly sensitive explosives, such as 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT). NTO is reported to be less sensitive and more stable than RDX and TNT [3], [4], [5]. By definition, insensitive munitions are those “which reliably fulfill their performance, readiness and operational requirements on demand, and which minimize the probability of inadvertent initiation and severity of subsequent collateral damage to weapon platforms, logistic systems and personnel when subjected to unplanned stimuli” [6]. NTO is presently used in a number of formulations in weapon systems [7]. The US Army Research Development and Engineering Center (USARDEC) is evaluating explosive formulations containing NTO for use in additional weapon systems.

Development of occupational and environmental exposure standards is limited by the lack of toxicity data for NTO. The acute oral LD50 for NTO is reported to be >5 g/kg in rats and mice. In rabbit tests, NTO produced mild skin irritation but was not an eye irritant and did not induce dermal sensitization in guinea pigs [8]. A recently completed oral subchronic toxicity test in rats at doses of 0, 30, 100, 315 and 1000 mg/kg/day showed no compound-related effects on food consumption or body weight. Reduced testicular size was observed in the 315 and 1000 mg/kg/day groups and microscopic changes in testis were observed in all dose groups. The Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) was determined to be 30 mg/kg/day in rats, based on microscopic changes in the testis [9]. There are no published studies on the toxicokinetics and metabolism of NTO in animals. However, the fate of NTO was investigated in vitro using rat liver microsomes and bacterial systems. Rat liver microsome catalysis of NTO under nitrogen atmosphere produced primarily amine, 5-amino-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, but, in the presence of oxygen, produced a major product, 5-hydroxy-1,2,4-trizol-3-one urazole, and a minor product, an amine [10], [11]. Addition of NTO to aqueous medium releases protons and lowers pH. The metabolism of NTO by bacteria is pH-dependent in aqueous systems. The maximum microbial reduction occurred at pH 6 in the presence of sucrose, while a ring cleavage occurred at pH 8 [11]. NTO also showed pH-dependent toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. The growth inhibition value (IC 50) was 57 mg/mL after 7 days of exposure when buffered to a neutral pH [12].

There are no published genotoxicity data for NTO. Therefore, we evaluated both in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of NTO for health and environmental risk assessment, as part of our comprehensive toxicity and safety evaluation program of new energetic compounds.

Section snippets

Chemical

Test article: 3-Nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO, 99.6%) pure; CAS# 932-64-9, lot number BAE 07B 305001, was obtained from Ordnance Systems, Inc., Kingsport, TN (Fig. 1). For the Ames test, Aroclor 1254-induced rat hepatic S9 fraction was obtained from Molecular Toxicology, Inc. (Boone, NC); Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2 was obtained from Oxoid LTD, Hampshire, England; positive-control substances: 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF), sodium azide (NaAz), 9-aminoacridine (9-AA), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and

Bacterial reverse mutation tests

The results of the range-finding test for strain TA100 indicated that NTO was toxic at 500 μg/plate and above, without activation, and 5 mg/plate, with activation, in regard to relative cloning efficiency. The results of the range finding test for WP2uvrA indicated NTO was toxic at 1 mg/plate and above without activation. With activation, the revertants were significantly decreased only at 5 mg/plate.

Based on the results of the range finding test, NTO was tested at concentrations of 5, 10, 50, 100

Discussion

The U.S. Army is developing insensitive munitions for future weapon systems under the direction of a Department of Defense (DOD) – wide initiative to improve the safety of munitions [27]. NTO is an energetic explosive candidate to replace highly sensitive munitions containing RDX and TNT [4], [5]. Evaluation of chemical and physical properties of NTO showed it is less sensitive when compared to others munitions [28]. It also showed low mammalian toxicity when compared to RDX and TNT [29]. The

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the U.S. Army Environmental Quality Technology (EQT) Ordnance Environmental Program (OEP) of the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM), Environmental Acquisition and Logistics Sustainment Program. We would like to thank Erick Hangeland and Chandrark Patel for their continued interest and support of this effort.

References (39)

  • Z. Cammerer et al.

    In vivo micronucleus test with flow cytometry after acute and chronic exposures of rats to chemicals

    Mutat. Res.

    (2007)
  • K.A. Criswell et al.

    Validation of a flow cytometric acridine orange micronuclei methodology in rats

    Mutat. Res.

    (2003)
  • V.W. Manchot et al.

    Justus liebigs Annalen der Chemie

    (1905)
  • K.Y. Lee et al.

    3-Nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one, a less sensitive explosive (LA-10302-MS)

    (1985)
  • M.J. Stosz et al.

    Development of an insensitive explosive containing NTO

  • R.J. Spear et al.

    A Preliminary Assessment of NTO as an Insensitive High Explosive, MRL Technical Report, MRL-TR-89-18

    (1989)
  • M.W. Smith et al.

    NTO-based Explosive Formulations: A Technology Review. DSTO-TR-0796. Technical Report

    (1999)
  • M. Beyard
  • NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)

    Energetic Material Compendium, Version 4.0.1

    (2010)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Outdoor dissolution and photodegradation of insensitive munitions formulations IMX-101 and IMX-104: Photolytic transformation pathway and mechanism study

      2021, Chemosphere
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ecotoxicity studies have shown that DNAN is deleterious to organism health and it is acutely cytotoxic to bacteria and freshwater algae in the mg/L range, and to earthworm and ryegrass plant in the mg/kg range (Dodard et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2013). While NTO was reported to have relatively low toxicological risk to small mammals (Reddy et al., 2011) and aquatic organisms (Stanley et al., 2015; Madeira et al., 2018), its reduced metabolite product, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (ATO), shows both increased and decreased toxicity, depending on the target organism (Madeira et al., 2018). Detonated residues can also undergo attenuation by natural abiotic and biotic processes including adsorption, hydrolysis, photodegradation, and microbial degradation.

    • Alternative animal toxicity testing of chemical warfare agents

      2020, Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents
    • Algae toxicological assessment and valorization of energetic-laden wastewater streams using Scenedesmus obliquus

      2018, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Discharge limits are generally facility specific and are regulated by the facility's NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge System) permits. The biochemical, physiological and toxic effects of the ECs on algae growth are not well-understood, and only limited information is available in the current literature (Reddy et al., 2011; Dodard et al., 2013). In addition, it is widely documented that the sensitivity of microalgae to a particular compound depends on the algal species being exposed, and to date no data describing the aquatic toxicity of the EC investigated in this research, on the freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus (S. obliquus) have been found in the literature.

    • Adsorption and oxidation of 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazole-5-one (NTO) and its transformation product (3-amino-1,2,4-triazole-5-one, ATO) at ferrihydrite and birnessite surfaces

      2018, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, in microbially-active soils subjected to periodic or localized anoxia, NTO is biotransformed to 3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazol-5-one (ATO) (Krzmarzick et al., 2015; Le Campion et al., 1998, 1999). ATO likewise exhibits high aqueous solubility (Smith and Cliff, 1999; Spear et al., 1989) and toxicity (Le Campion et al., 1999; Mullins et al., 2016; Reddy et al., 2011). The abiotic transformation of these compounds as mediated by mineral surfaces has not been studied in detail.

    • Ecotoxicity of the insensitive munitions compound 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) and its reduced metabolite 3-amino-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (ATO)

      2018, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, NTO was not found to bioconcentrate in the test organisms. A battery of genotoxicity assays performed with NTO, including in vivo and in vitro test, suggested that there is a low risk of genetic hazards associated to the exposure to this compound [9]. NTO was ranked as practically nontoxic in aquatic toxicity tests conducted with Ceriodaphnia dubia and the unicellular green algae Selenastrum capricornutum [10].

    • Peri-pubertal administration of 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) affects reproductive organ development in male but not female Sprague Dawley rats

      2015, Reproductive Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This theory was supported in a battery of genotoxicity tests in which NTO was not mutagenic in the Ames Salmonella test (TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537), with and without metabolic activation (S9), or in Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA), did not induce chromosomal aberrations in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells (CHO-W-B1), and was negative in the L5178YTK+/− mouse lymphoma test [12]. NTO was also non-genotoxic in the in vivo rat peripheral blood micronucleus assay at doses up to 2000 mg/kg-day for 14 days [12]. Detection of explosive compounds and their degradation products in soil and groundwater near ammunition plants raises issues of potential effects on surrounding populations [6].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text