On the spinodal nature of the phase segregation and formation of stable nanostructure in the Ti–Si–N system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.017Get rights and content

Abstract

The free energy of the mixed Ti–Si–N system is calculated according to a semi-empirical thermodynamic formula based on the sub-lattice model for different activities of nitrogen. The results show that the phase segregation in the ternary Ti–Si–N systems is of chemically spinodal nature at a nitrogen pressure and deposition temperature typically used for the deposition of the superhard nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 nanocomposites, i.e. pN2103 mbar and Tdep 550–600 °C, respectively. Only at much lower nitrogen pressure and much higher temperature, can the chemically spinodal decomposition be restrained. A simple estimate of the interfacial strain energy for a semi-coherent interface, as expected for this system, shows that this contribution is unlikely to hinder the system being also coherently spinodal. It is further shown that kinetic constraints, such as Tdep  300 °C and low pN2, although within the range where the stoichiometric nitrides should be fully spinodally segregated, will kinetically hinder the system to reach the thermodynamically driven equilibrium.

Introduction

The generic design concept for the preparation of superhard nanocomposites with a high thermal stability and oxidation resistance is based on a strong, thermodynamically driven phase segregation in a binary (or ternary) system, that results in the formation of a nanostructure with “compositional modulation” with a sharp and strong interface [1], [2]. In their original paper [1], Veprek and Reiprich omitted using the term “spinodal” because of lack of unambiguous evidence, and because in some publications, where the hardening of mixed transition metal nitrides and carbides upon annealing was attributed to spinodal decomposition, such evidence was absent. The term “spinodal” was not even mentioned in the references quoted in those papers [3], [4], [5]. Meanwhile, experimental results were obtained that support the spinodal nature of the segregation of the TiN and Si3N4 phases during the deposition of the nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 nanocomposites, consisting of 3–4 nm small TiN nanocrystals “glued” together by about one monolayer of X-ray amorphous silicon nitride (see Section 4.1 in [6]). This segregation occurs provided the nitrogen pressure and deposition temperature are high enough, as explained in earlier papers [1], [2]:

  • -

    When deposited under the conditions of a sufficiently high nitrogen pressure (0.3–1 mbar) that provides the thermodynamic driving force and sufficiently high temperature (≥550 °C) that assures the diffusion rate-controlled phase segregation to be completed during the deposition [1], the crystallite size is fairly uniform [7].

  • -

    The morphology, as observed by transmission electron microscopy for nanocomposites deposited by plasma-induced chemical vapor deposition (P-CVD) under conditions that favor the formation of fully segregated, thermally very stable nanostructure, is typical of spinodally segregated systems with a high de-mixing enthalpy [6].

  • -

    In systems that display a larger misfit between the phases, such as nc-TiN/a-BN, the “optimum” crystallite size, where the TiN nanocrystals are covered with about one monolayer of BN and hardness reaches a maximum, is larger than in the case of nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 where this misfit is smaller [6].

  • -

    Coatings that were not deposited under the optimum conditions, so that the phase segregation was not completed during the deposition, show an increase in hardness upon annealing to ≥700 °C. This is accompanied by the “adjustment” of the crystallite size to the “optimum” value of about 3–4 nm that can be larger or smaller than the original crystallite size in the as deposited coatings [8].

Although these findings cannot be considered as final, unambiguous evidence, for the spinodal nature of the phase segregation during the formation of the nanostructure in the nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 nanocomposites (see, e.g. [9], [10], [11] and references therein), they provide strong support for this concept. Strong evidence of the spinodal nature can be provided by thermodynamic calculations of the Gibbs free energy of the mixed phases as a function of their relative fraction which yields the “chemical spinodal” curve (i.e. the second derivative of the Gibbs free energy of the mixed system is negative) for the TiN/Si3N4 system consisting of immiscible, stoichiometric nitrides (see Section 3).

Because the spinodal nature of the phase segregation upon the deposition of the superhard nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 and similar nanocomposites was questioned by some workers recently [12], we shall briefly summarize in the next section the thermodynamic conditions needed for spinodal phase segregation to occur. After presenting the calculations that yield the evidence for chemical spinodal in this system under the conditions outlined in [1], [2], [13], [14], we shall discuss possible effects of the strain energy in this system in order to show that it is unlikely to hinder the TiN–Si3N4 system to decompose spinodally. Section 4 will deal with a brief discussion of kinetic conditions that are needed in this system to reach that equilibrium. Two conditions will be identified and briefly discussed: (a) a sufficiently high temperature that is needed to allow the diffusion-controlled phase segregation to be completed during the deposition and (b) a sufficiently high nitrogen pressure that is needed to provide the necessary flux of chemisorbed nitrogen to form stoichiometric nitrides at a given deposition rate. The paper will end with conclusions and outlook for the possibilities of the design of superhard nanocomposites with a high thermal stability [1], [2] in other, advanced systems.

Section snippets

On the nature of spinodal decomposition

In his studies of the stability of phases, Gibbs distinguished between phase transformations that are “large in degree but small in extent” and those which are “small in degree and large in extent”. Nowadays, the former ones are called “nucleation and growth”, whereas the spinodal phase segregation is typical of the latter.

The term “spinodal” was introduced by van der Waals in order to describe that part of the binodal line D–E–F–G–H in his isotherm between the inflection points E and G (see

The basis of thermodynamic model

In a standard substitutional solution A1−xBx, all lattice sites are considered equivalent. Thus, the solution is formed from a pure substance A by substituting a part of the atoms A with B. The Gibbs free energy Gm of the mixed phase is then given by a standard formula [42]:Gm=xiGi0+RTxilnxi+ij>ixixjIijThe first term describes the contribution of the pure substances, the second one is the mixing entropy and the third one is the contribution due to the interaction between the components.

Discussion

Based on the sub-lattice model, the method used here for the calculation of the Gibbs free energy of the mixed “(TiSi)N” state, together with the simple interaction parameter, is of limited accuracy. Nevertheless, the results presented in Fig. 2, Fig. 3 show clearly that the phase segregation in the nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 system is of spinodal nature, because, even for a semi-coherent interface with energy of <0.5 kJ/m2 and crystallite size of 3–5 nm (as observed by experiment), the destabilizing

Conclusions and outlook

  • -

    Thermodynamic calculations of the Gibbs free energy of a mixed system of stoichiometric TiN and Si3N4 show that under the deposition temperature and nitrogen pressure used by Veprek et al. for the deposition of superhard nc-TiN/a-Si3N4 nanocomposites with a high thermal stability, the phase segregation is of a spinodal nature.

  • -

    The requirement of a sufficiently high nitrogen pressure is dictated mainly by the kinetics of the chemisorption of nitrogen atoms on the surface of the growing film.

  • -

    More

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor B.X. Liu for encouragement, valuable discussion and support of this work, and to Professor Magnus Oden, Professor Catherine Stampfl and Dr. Shiqiang Hao for providing us with their results prior to publication. Partial financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, by The Ministry of Science and Technology of China (through a Grant No. G20000627-07), by the Tsinghua University and by the European Commission within the 6th Framework

References (66)

  • S. Veprek et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1995)
  • O. Knotek et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1989)
  • R.A. Andrievski et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1991)
  • S. Veprek et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2005)
  • S. Veprek et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2004)
  • S. Veprek et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2006)
  • J. Prochazka et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2004)
  • B. Ditchek et al.

    Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.

    (1979)
  • J.W. Cahn

    Acta Metall.

    (1963)
  • A.R. Yavari

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1994)
  • R.F. Zhang et al.

    J. Phys.: Condens. Matter

    (2004)
  • Y. Tanaka et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2001)
  • F. Vaz et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1999)
  • F. Vaz et al.

    Mater. Sci. Forum

    (2002)
  • I. Barin

    Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances

    (1993)
  • A. Niederhofer et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2001)
  • S. Veprek

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A

    (1999)
  • S. Veprek et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (2002)
  • R.A. Andrievski, private communication,...
  • S. Christiansen et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1998)
  • J. Zarzycki

    Glasses and the Vitreous State

    (1991)
  • K. Binder
  • R. Wagner et al.
  • Anonymous referees of papers [1], [2], [13],...
  • J. van der Waals, Over de Continuiteit van den Gas- en Vloeistoftoestand, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leiden, 1873...
  • P.W. Atkins

    Physical Chemistry

    (1990)
  • F.E. Luborsky

    Amorphous Metallic Alloys

    (1983)
  • C.-P.P. Chou et al.

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (1975)
  • V. Mitlin

    Macromol. Symp.

    (2002)
  • Y.S. Lipatov et al.

    Polym. Int.

    (2002)
  • G. Ertl

    R. Soc. Chem., Faraday Discuss.

    (2002)
  • R. Schuster et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2003)
  • V. Daniel et al.

    Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) Ser. A

    (1943)
    V. Daniel et al.

    Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) Ser. A

    (1944)
  • Cited by (96)

    • On the miscibility gap in tungsten-based alloys

      2023, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text