Microstructure evolution during dynamic recrystallization of hot deformed superalloy 718

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Microstructure evolution during dynamic recrystallization (DRX) of superalloy 718 was studied by optical microscope and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique. Compression tests were performed at different strains at temperatures from 950 °C to 1120 °C with a strain rate of 10−1 s−1. Microstructure observations show that the recrystallized grain size as well as the fraction of new grains increases with the increasing temperature. A power exponent relationship is obtained between the dynamically recrystallized grain size and the peak stress. It is found that different nucleation mechanisms for DRX are operated in hot deformed superalloy 718, which is closely related to deformation temperatures. DRX nucleation and development are discussed in consideration of subgrain rotation or twinning taking place near the original grain boundaries. Particular attention is also paid to the role of continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) at both higher and lower temperatures.

Introduction

Superalloy 718 is a nickel-base alloy strengthened predominately by ordered gamma double prime (γ″-Ni3Nb) precipitates. Because of its good mechanical properties at elevated temperatures up to 650 °C, superalloy 718 has been widely used in gas turbine and related high temperature applications. Better control of the thermomechanical processing is of great importance for superalloy 718 to obtain a superior performance. It has been reported that dynamic recrystallization (DRX) is the responsible mechanism for hot restoration during high temperature deformation of superalloy 718 [1], [2], [3]. The microstructural characterization and recrystallization behavior in hot deformed superalloy 718 have been extensively studied using hot torsion or hot compression experiments [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Mathematical models to predict the recrystallized grain size and recrystallization fraction as well as the processing maps were well developed in the past several decades. However, informations on the micromechanisms of DRX during the hot deformation in superalloy 718 were still limited [10].

As we know, a fundamental understanding of DRX is essential for modeling the microstructure evolution and analyzing its effect on flow behavior. The key to the comprehension of DRX lies on the physical knowledge of the nucleation mechanisms which are closely related to the microstructure evolution during deformation. Researches on single-phase polycrystalline materials have demonstrated the existence of different nucleation mechamisms of DRX, which was suggested to be strongly dependent on deformation variables. Meanwhile, different nucleation mechamisms of DRX may be happened simultaneously in a certain deformed material. Therefore, systematical investigation on the microstructure evolution under different deformation conditions, especially the nucleation mechanism of DRX for superalloy 718, is quite needed. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) technique is a powerful method to obtain the detailed information on the orientations of grains and subgrains. Many researchers have studied the deformation microstructures and the nucleation mechanisms of DRX for different alloys by EBSD [11], [12], [13], [14], and it was also in application to the orientation analysis of superalloy 718 in the last few years [10], [15], [16]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the evolution of DRX microstructure in hot deformed superalloy 718. Misorientation measurements were systematically carried out to examine the nucleation as well as the progress of DRX. Particular attention was paid to the role of continuous subgrain rotation and the twin boundaries evolution with regard to the nucleation of DRX during hot deformation of superalloy 718.

Section snippets

Experimental procedure

The chemical compositions (wt.%) of superalloy 718 used in this investigation are as follows: Cr, 18.09; Fe, 17.69; Nb + Ta, 5.43; Mo, 3.07; Ti, 0.97; Al, 0.46; Co, 0.18; Si, 0.078; Mn, 0.065; Cu, 0.065; C, 0.040; S < 0.001; P < 0.007; Ni, balance. A 12.5 mm thick sheet was cut from an as-received wrought billet (252 mm in diameter and 152 mm in thickness) in the direction of cross section. Cylindrical specimens, with a diameter of 8 mm and a height of 12 mm, were machined from the center part of the

Flow characteristic and microstructures

True stress–true strain curves of superalloy 718 obtained at strain rate of 10−1 s−1 and at various temperatures from 950 °C to 1120 °C are shown in Fig. 2. The flow stress curves exhibit the similar features, i.e. a single peak at a critical strain followed by a strain softening stage and then sometimes a steady stage at high strain zone. The characteristics of the flow stress curves are the typical ones observed in many alloys, which implies the happening of DRX phenomenon during hot deformation

Flow softening and new grain evolution

The flow stress curves of superalloy 718 under hot deformation conditions, as shown in Fig. 2, are similar to that of superalloy 718 reported by other investigators [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. The increase of deformation temperature brings about an increase in mobility of grain boundaries and dislocations, which leads to the increase in the fraction of DRX grains (Fig. 3). A power exponent relationship between σp and DR is obtained for superalloy 718, which was reported to derive from the

Conclusions

Superalloy 718 was hot deformed to different strains at temperatures from 950 °C to 1120 °C with a true strain rate of 10−1 s−1. The relationship between the stable dynamically recrystallized grain size and the peak stress can be expressed by a power law function with an exponent value of −0.75. Microstructure analysis substantiate that the nucleation of DRX in superalloy 718 can hardly be considered to only one mechanism. At higher temperature (T = 1100 °C), new grains were formed by bulging of

References (31)

  • L.X. Zhou et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1995)
  • S.C. Medeiros et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2000)
  • Y.-S. Na et al.

    J. Mater. Proc. Technol.

    (2003)
  • A.M. Wusatowska-Sarnek et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2002)
  • P.J. Hurley et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • D. Ponge et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (1998)
  • M. Qian et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2007)
  • Q. Li

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2007)
  • T. Sakai

    J. Mater. Proc. Technol.

    (1995)
  • S.I. Kim et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2001)
  • B. Bay et al.

    Acta Metall.

    (1992)
  • D. Jorge-Badiola et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2005)
  • A. Belyakov et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • H.J. Mcqueen

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2004)
  • O. Sitdikov et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2002)
  • Cited by (206)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text